다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
Obstetrics & gynecology science, v.65 no.3, 2022년, pp.273 - 278
Kim, Soo Rim (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International St. Mary’s Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea) , Suh, Dong Hoon (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea) , Kim, Woojeong (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea) , Jeon, Myung Jae (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea)
AI-Helper
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the current surgical techniques for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair in South Korea.MethodsA web-based questionnaire survey was sent to 780 members of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The items assessed in the questionnaire wer...
1 Olsen AL Smith VJ Bergstrom JO Colling JC Clark AL Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence Obstet Gynecol 1997 89 501 6 9083302
2 Weber AM Walters MD Piedmonte MR Ballard LA Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001 185 1299 304 11744900
3 Maher C Feiner B Baessler K Schmid C Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 4 CD004014. 23633316
4 Jha S Moran P The UK national prolapse survey: 5 years on Int Urogynecol J 2011 22 517 28 21340642
5 Maher C Feiner B Baessler K Christmann-Schmid C Haya N Marjoribanks J Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016 2 CD012079 26858090
6 Tawfeek S Barrington J How are anterior repairs carried out in the UK? J Obstet Gynaecol 2006 26 650 5 17071433
7 Shippey S Gutman RE Quiroz LH Handa VL Contemporary approaches to cystocele repair: a survey of AUGS members J Reprod Med 2008 53 832 6 19097515
8 Lensen EJ Stoutjesdijk JA Withagen MI Kluivers KB Vierhout ME Technique of anterior colporrhaphy: a Dutch evaluation Int Urogynecol J 2011 22 557 61 21350970
9 Lensen EJ Withagen MI Stoutjesdijk JA Kluivers KB Vierhout ME The use of synthetic mesh in vaginal prolapse surgery: a survey of Dutch urogynaecologists Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012 162 113 5 22397742
10 Kim SR Suh DH Jeon MJ Current use of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in clinical practice among Korean obstetrician-gynecologists BMC Womens Health 2021 21 207 34006265
11 Hendrix SL Clark A Nygaard I Aragaki A Barnabei V McTiernan A Pelvic organ prolapse in the women’s health initiative: gravity and gravidity Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002 186 1160 6 12066091
12 Weber AM Walters MD Piedmonte MR Ballard LA Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001 185 1299 304 11744900
13 Halpern-Elenskaia K Umek W Bodner-Adler B Hanzal E Anterior colporrhaphy: a standard operation? Systematic review of the technical aspects of a common procedure in randomized controlled trials Int Urogynecol J 2018 29 781 8 29214325
14 Greenberg JA Clark RM Advances in suture material for obstetric and gynecologic surgery Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009 2 146 58 19826572
15 Bergman I Söderberg MW Kjaeldgaard A Ek M Does the choice of suture material matter in anterior and posterior colporrhaphy? Int Urogynecol J 2016 27 1357 65 26935306
16 Madhuvrata P Glazener C Boachie C Allahdin S Bain C A randomised controlled trial evaluating the use of polyglactin (Vicryl) mesh, polydioxanone (PDS) or polyglactin (Vicryl) sutures for pelvic organ prolapse surgery: outcomes at 2 years J Obstet Gynaecol 2011 31 429 35 21627429
17 Valtersson E Husby KR Elmelund M Klarskov N Evaluation of suture material used in anterior colporrhaphy and the risk of recurrence Int Urogynecol J 2020 31 2011 8 32638062
18 Bergman I Söderberg MW Kjaeldgaard A Ek M Does the choice of suture material matter in anterior and posterior colporrhaphy? Int Urogynecol J 2016 27 1357 65 26935306
19 Mizon G Duckett J The effect of suture characteristics on short-term morbidity after vaginal prolapse surgery J Obstet Gynaecol 2015 35 625 7 25562704
20 Zebede S Smith AL Lefevre R Aguilar VC Davila GW Reattachment of the endopelvic fascia to the apex during anterior colporrhaphy: does the type of suture matter? Int Urogynecol J 2013 24 141 5 22777583
21 Luck AM Galvin SL Theofrastous JP Suture erosion and wound dehiscence with permanent versus absorbable suture in reconstructive posterior vaginal surgery Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 192 1626 9 15902168
22 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Reclassification of urogynecologic surgical mesh instrumentation [Internet] Silver Spring (MD) FDA c2016 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/96464/download
23 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Urogynecologic surgical mesh implants [Internet] Silver Spring (MD) FDA c2021 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/implants-and-prosthetics/urogynecologic-surgical-mesh-implants
24 DeLancey JO Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992 166 6 Pt 1 1717 24 1615980
25 Kim BH Lee SB Na ED Kim HC Correlation between obesity and pelvic organ prolapse in Korean women Obstet Gynecol Sci 2020 63 719 25 32693442
26 Rock JA Jones HW Te Linde’s operative gynecology 10th ed Philadelphia (PA) Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2011
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.