[논문]Foot Orthosis and Sensorized House Slipper by 3D Printing

Brognara, Lorenzo; Fantini, Massimiliano; Morellato, Kavin; Graziani, Gabriela; Baldini, Nicola; Cauli, Omar

doi:10.3390/ma15124064

Foot Orthosis and Sensorized House Slipper by 3D Printing 원문보기

Materials, v.15 no.12, 2022년, pp.4064 -

Brognara, Lorenzo (Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40123 Bologna, Italy) , Fantini, Massimiliano (lorenzo.brognara2@unibo.it) , Morellato, Kavin (Romagna Tech s.c.p.a., 47121 Forli, Italy) , Graziani, Gabriela (msm.fantini@gmail.com) , Baldini, Nicola (Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Terracini 28, 40131 Bologna, Italy) , Cauli, Omar (morellato.kavin@gmail.com)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Background: In clinical practice, specific customization is needed to address foot pathology, which must be disease and patient-specific. To date, the traditional methods for manufacturing custom functional Foot Orthoses (FO) are based on plaster casting and manual manufacturing, hence orthotic therapy depends entirely on the skills and expertise of individual practitioners. This makes the procedures difficult to standardize and replicate, as well as expensive, time-consuming and material-wasting, as well as difficult to standardize and replicate. 3D printing offers new perspectives in the development of patient-specific orthoses, as it permits addressing all the limitations of currently available technologies, but has been so far scarcely explored for the podiatric field, so many aspects remain unmet, especially for what regards customization, which requires the definition of a protocol that entails all stages from patient scanning to manufacturing. Methods: A feasibility study was carried out involving interdisciplinary cooperation between industrial engineers and podiatrists. To that end: (i) For patient-specific data acquisition, 3D scanning of the foot is compared to traditional casting. (ii) a modelling GD workflow is first created to design a process permitting easy creations of customized shapes, enabling the end user (the podiatrist) to interactively customize the orthoses. Then, (iii) a comparison is made between different printing materials, in order to reproduce the same mechanical behavior shown by standard orthoses. To do this, the mechanical properties of standard materials (Polycarbonate sheets), cut and hand-shaped, are compared with four groups of 3D printed samples: poly(ethylene glycol) (PETG), poly(acrylonitrile-butadiene.styrene) (ABS), polycarbonate (PC) and poly(lactic acid) (PLA) obtained by Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF). Results: Differences found between the foot plaster model obtained with the plaster slipper cast in a neutral position and the model of the real foot obtained with 3D scanning in the same position can be ascribed to the non-stationarity of the patient during the acquisition process, and were limited by a locking system with which no substantial differences in the almost entire sole of the foot scan were observed. Conclusions: Using the designed GD workflow, podiatrists with limited CAD skills can easily design and interactively customize foot orthoses to adapt them to the patients’ clinical needs. 3D printing enables the complex shape of the orthoses to be reproduced easily and quickly. Compared to Polycarbonate sheets (gold standard), all the printed materials were less deformable and reached lower yield stress for comparable deformation. No modifications in any of the materials as a result of printing process were observed.

주제어

참고문헌 (53)

1. Tang L. Wang L. Bao W. Zhu S. Li D. Liu C. Functional gradient structural design of customized diabetic insoles J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2019 94 279 287 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.03.003 30933836

상세보기
2. Bandyopadhyay A. Bryan H. Additive manufacturing of multi-material structures Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2018 129 1 16 10.1016/j.mser.2018.04.001

상세보기
3. Ngo T.D. Kashani A. Imbalzano G. Nguyen K.T. Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges Compos. Part B Eng. 2018 143 172 196 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012

상세보기
4. Mo S. Leung S.H. Chan Z.Y. Sze L.K. Mok K.M. Yung P.S. Reef F. Cheung R.T.H. The biomechanical difference between running with traditional and 3D printed orthoses J. Sports Sci. 2019 37 2191 2197 10.1080/02640414.2019.1626069 31156031

상세보기
5. Xu R. Wang Z. Ren Z. Ma T. Jia Z. Fang S. Jin H. Comparative Study of the Effects of Customized 3D printed insole and Prefabricated Insole on Plantar Pressure and Comfort in Patients with Symptomatic Flatfoot Med. Sci. Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2019 25 3510 10.12659/MSM.916975

상세보기
6. Wang X. Jiang M. Zhou Z. Gou J. Hui D. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective Compos. Part B Eng. 2017 110 442 458 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034

상세보기
7. Wohlers T. Tracking global growth in industrial-scale additive manufacturing 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 2014 1 2 3 10.1089/3dp.2013.0004

상세보기
8. Haghighi A. Li L. Study of the relationship between dimensional performance and manufacturing cost in fused deposition modeling Rapid Prototyp. J. 2018 24 395 408 10.1108/RPJ-11-2016-0177

상세보기
9. Bae E.J. Jeong I.D. Kim W.C. Kim J.H. A comparative study of additive and subtractive manufacturing for dental restorations J. Prosthet. Dent. 2017 118 187 193 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.004 28089336

상세보기
10. Chen R.K. Jin Y.A. Wensman J. Shih A. Additive manufacturing of custom orthoses and prostheses—A review Addit. Manuf. 2016 12 77 89 10.1016/j.addma.2016.04.002

상세보기
11. Yarwindran M. Sa’aban N.A. Ibrahim M. Periyasamy R. Thermoplastic elastomer infill pattern impact on mechanical properties 3D printed customized orthotic insole ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2016 11 6519 6524
12. da Silva Barros K. Zwolinski P. Mansur A.I. Where do the environmental impacts of Additive Manufacturing come from? Case study of the use of 3D-printing to print orthotic insoles Proceedings of the 12ème Congrès International de Génie Industriel Compiegne, France 5 May 2017
13. Walbran M. Turner K. McDaid A.J. Customized 3D printed ankle-foot orthosis with adaptable carbon fibre composite spring joint Cogent Eng. 2016 3 1227022 10.1080/23311916.2016.1227022

상세보기
14. Davia-Aracila M. Hinojo-Péreza J.J. Jimeno-Morenillab A. Morab H.M. 3D printing of functional anatomical insoles Comput. Ind. 2018 94 38 53 10.1016/j.compind.2017.12.001

상세보기
15. Roberts A. Wales J. Smith H. Sampson C.J. Jones P. James M. A randomised controlled trial of laser scanning and casting for the construction of ankle–foot orthoses Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 2016 40 253 261 10.1177/0309364614550263 25336052

상세보기
16. Jain M.L. Dhande S.G. Vyas N.S. Virtual modeling of an ankle foot orthosis for correc-tion of foot abnormality Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2011 27 257 260 10.1016/j.rcim.2010.06.008

상세보기
17. Mavroidis C. Ranky R.G. Sivak M.L. Patritti B.L. DiPisa J. Caddle A. Gilhooly K. Govoni L. Sivak S. Lancia M. Patient specific ankle-foot orthoses using rapid prototyping J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2011 8 1 10.1186/1743-0003-8-1 21226898

상세보기
18. Telfer S. Pallari J. Munguia J. Dalgarno K. McGeough M. Woodburn J. Embracing additive manufacture: Implications for foot and ankle orthosis design BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2012 13 84 10.1186/1471-2474-13-84 22642941

상세보기
19. Alam M. Choudhury I.A. Azuddin M. Development of Patient Specific Ankle Foot Orthosis through 3D Reconstruction Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environment Energy and Biotechnology Singapore 9–10 June 2014 84 88 10.7763/ipcbee
20. Palousek D. Rosicky J. Koutny D. Stoklásek P. Navrat T. Pilot study of the wrist orthosis design process Rapid Prototyp. J. 2014 20 27 32 10.1108/RPJ-03-2012-0027

상세보기
21. Dombroski C.E. Balsdon M.E. Froats A. The use of a low cost 3D scanning and printing tool in the manufacture of custom-made foot orthoses: A preliminary study BMC Res. Notes 2014 7 443 10.1186/1756-0500-7-443 25015013

상세보기
22. Song E. Yoon S.W. Son H. Yu S. Foot Measurement Using 3D Scanning Model Int. J. Fuzzy Log. Intell. Syst. 2018 18 167 174 10.5391/IJFIS.2018.18.3.167

상세보기
23. Salles A.S. Gy D.E. An evaluation of personalised insoles developed using additive manufacturing J. Sports Sci. 2013 31 442 450 10.1080/02640414.2012.736629 23083421

상세보기
24. Belvedere C. Siegler S. Fortunato A. Caravaggi P. Liverani E. Durante S. Ensini A. Konow T. Leardini A. New comprehensive procedure for custom-made total ankle replacements: Medical imaging, joint modeling, prosthesis design, and 3D printing J. Orthop. Res. 2019 37 760 768 10.1002/jor.24198 30537247

상세보기
25. Telfer S. Woodburn J. The use of 3D surface scanning for the measurement and assessment of the human foot J. Foot Ankle Res. 2010 3 19 28 10.1186/1757-1146-3-19 20815914

상세보기
26. Menz H.B. Auhl M. Ristevski R. Frescos N. Munteanu S.E. Evaluation of the accuracy of shoe fitting in older people using three-dimensional foot scanning J. Foot Ankle Res. 2014 7 3 13 10.1186/1757-1146-7-3 24456656

상세보기
27. The Pros and Cons of Computerized Foot Orthotic Technology—OPEDGE.COM n.d Available online: https://opedge.com/Articles/ViewArticle/2004-11_01 (accessed on 27 October 2019)
28. Stanković K. Booth B.G. Danckaers F. Burg F. Vermaelen P. Duerinck S. Sijbers J. Huysmans T. Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of healthy foot shape: A proof of concept study J. Foot Ankle Res. 2018 11 8 10.1186/s13047-018-0251-8 29541162

상세보기
29. Coudert T. Vacher P. Smits C. Van der Zande M. A method to obtain 3D foot shape deformation during the gait cycle Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on the 3D Analysis of Human Movement Valenciennes, France 28–30 June 2006
30. Jezersek M. Mozina J. High-speed measurement of foot shape based on multiple-laserplane triangulation Opt. Eng. 2009 48 113604 10.1117/1.3265522

상세보기
31. Kimura M. Mochimaru M. Kanade T. 3D measurement of feature cross-sections of foot while walking Mach. Vis. Appl. 2011 22 377 388 10.1007/s00138-009-0238-3

상세보기
32. Barisch-Fritz B. Schmeltzpfenning T. Plank C. Grau S. Foot deformation during walking: Differences between static and dynamic 3D foot morphology in developing feet Ergonomics 2014 57 921 933 10.1080/00140139.2014.899629 24684680

상세보기
33. Pallari J.H. Dalgarno K.W. Munguia J. Muraru L. Peeraer L. Telfer S. Woodburn J. Design and additive fabrication of foot and ankle-foot orthoses 21st Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium–An Additive Manufacturing Conference University of Texas Austin, TX, USA 2010
34. Chromy A. Zalud L. Robotic 3D scanner as an alternative to standard modalities of medical imaging SpringerPlus 2014 3 13 10.1186/2193-1801-3-13 25694857

상세보기
35. Payne C. Cost benefit comparison of plaster casts and optical scans of the foot for the manufacture of foot orthoses Australas. J. Podiatr. Med. 2007 41 29 31
36. Drury J.L. Mooney D.J. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: Scaffold design variables and applications Biomaterials 2003 24 4337 4351 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-5 12922147

상세보기
37. Tukuru N. Gowda S.K.P. Ahmed S.M. Badami S. Rapidprototype technique in medical field Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2008 1 341 344
38. Laughton C. McClay Davis I. Williams D.S. A comparison of four methods of obtaining a negative impression of the foot J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2002 92 261 268 10.7547/87507315-92-5-261 12015406

상세보기
39. Hin A.J.S. Krul A.J. Performance of Human Solutions Body Dimensions Software Report 2005-A9 TNO Human Factors Hague, The Netherlands 2005
40. Zein N.N. Hanouneh I.A. Bishop P.D. Samaan M. Eghtesad B. Quintini C. Miller C. Yerian L. Klatte R. Three-dimensional print of a liver for preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation Liver Transpl. 2013 19 1304 1310 10.1002/lt.23729 23959637

상세보기
41. Carroll M. Annabell M.E. Rome K. Reliability of capturing foot parameters using digital scanning and the neutral suspension casting technique J. Foot Ankle Res. 2011 4 9 10.1186/1757-1146-4-9 21375757

상세보기
42. Cignoni P. Callieri M. Corsini M. Dellepiane M. Ganovelli F. Ranzuglia G. MeshLab: An Open-Source Mesh Processing Tool Proceedings of the Sixth Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference Salerno, Italy 2–4 July 2008 129 136
43. Islam M.N. Boswell B. Pramanik A. An investigation of dimensional accuracy of parts produced by three-dimensional printing Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2013, IAENG London, UK 3–5 July 2013
44. Todorov G. Sofronov Y. Dimova K. Comparison Analysis Between Different Technologies for Manufacturing Patient-Specific Implants Machine and Industrial Design in Mechanical Engineering Rackov M. Mitrović R. Čavić M. KOD, Mechanisms and Machine Science Springer Cham, Switzerland 2021 Volume 109 10.1007/978-3-030-88465-9_27”
45. Saqib S. Urbanic J. An experimental study to determine geometric and dimensional accuracy impact factors for fused deposition modelled parts Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2012 293 298 10.1007/978-3-642-23860-4_48
46. Nancharaiah T.R. Raju D.R. Raju V.R. An experimental investigation on surface quality and dimensional accuracy of FDM components Int. J. Emerg. Technol. 2010 1 106 111
47. Ay M. Kubat T. Delilbasi C. Ekici B. Yuzbasioglu H.E. Hartomacioglu S. 3D Bio-Cad modeling of human mandible and fabrication by rapid-prototyping technology Usak Univ. J. Mater. Sci. 2013 2 135 145 10.12748/uujms.201324255
48. Huang C.Y. Luo L.J. Lee P.Y. Lai J.Y. Wang W.T. Lin S.C. Efficient segmentation algorithm for 3D bone models construction on medical images J. Med. Biol. Eng. 2010 31 375 386 10.5405/jmbe.734
49. Karatas O.H. Toy E. Three-dimensional imaging techniques: A literature review Eur. J. Dent. 2014 8 132 140 10.4103/1305-7456.126269 24966761

상세보기
50. Othman H.I. Role of computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing technology in prosthetic implant restorations Int. J. Dent. Clin. 2012 4 22 34
51. Dizon J.R. Espera A.H. Jr. Chen Q. Advincula R.C. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers Addit. Manuf. 2018 20 44 67 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002

상세보기
52. Yick K.L. Lo W.T. Ng S.P. Yip J. Kwan H.H. Kwong Y.Y. Cheng F.C. Analysis of Insole Geometry and Deformity by Using a Three-Dimensional Image Processing Technique: A Preliminary Study J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2019 109 98 107 10.7547/16-116 31135202

상세보기
53. Choo Y.J. Boudier-Revéret M. Chang M.C. 3D printing technology applied to orthosis manufacturing: Narrative review Ann. Palliat. Med. 2020 9 4262 4270 10.21037/apm-20-1185 33040564

상세보기

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

Foot Orthosis and Sensorized House Slipper by 3D Printing 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (53)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

연관된 기능

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트