$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Analysis of skeletal characteristics of flat feet using three-dimensional foot scanner and digital footprint 원문보기

Biomedical engineering online, v.21, 2022년, pp.56 -   

Yamashita, Tomoko (Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka City University, 3-3-138 Sugimoto, Sumiyoshi, Osaka, 558-8585 Japan) ,  Yamashita, Kazuhiko (Department of Clinical Engineering, Faculty of Human Care at Makuhari, Tohto University, Chiba, Japan) ,  Sato, Mitsuru (School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Showa University, Kanagawa, Japan) ,  Kawasumi, Masashi (School of Science and Technology for Future Life, Tokyo Denki University, Tokyo, Japan) ,  Ata, Shingo (Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka City University, 3-3-138 Sugimoto, Sumiyoshi, Osaka, 558-8585 Japan)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

BackgroundFlat feet increase the risk of knee osteoarthritis and contribute to frailty, which may lead to worse life prognoses. The influence of the foot skeletal structure on flat feet is not yet entirely understood. Footprints are often used to evaluate feet. However, footprint-based measurements ...

주제어

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 1. Hatfield GL Cochrane CK Takacs J Krowchuk NM Chang R Hinman RS Knee and ankle biomechanics with lateral wedges with and without a custom arch support in those with medial knee osteoarthritis and flat feet J Orthop Res 2016 34 1597 1605 10.1002/jor.23174 26800087 

  2. 2. Iijima H Ohi H Isho T Aoyama T Fukutani N Kaneda E Association of bilateral flat feet with knee pain and disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study J Orthop Res 2017 35 2490 2498 10.1002/jor.23565 28370219 

  3. 3. Harris EJ Vanore JV Thomas JL Kravitz SR Mendelson SA Mendicino RW Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric flatfoot J Foot Ankle Surg 2004 43 341 373 10.1053/j.jfas.2004.09.013 15605048 

  4. 4. Atik A Ozyurek S Flexible flatfoot North Clin Istanb 2014 1 57 64 10.14744/nci.2014.29292 28058304 

  5. 5. Chang CH Chen YC Yang WT Ho PC Hwang AW Chen CH Flatfoot diagnosis by a unique bimodal distribution of footprint index in children PLoS ONE 2014 9 e115808 10.1371/journal.pone.0115808 25551228 

  6. 6. Levinger P Murley GS Barton CJ Cotchett MP Mcsweeney SR Menz HB A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford foot model Gait Posture 2010 32 519 523 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.07.013 20696579 

  7. 7. Tweed JL Campbell JA Avil SJ Biomechanical risk factors in the development of medial tibial stress syndrome in distance runners J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2008 98 436 444 10.7547/0980436 19017851 

  8. 8. Ross MH Smith MD Vicenzino B Reported selection criteria for adult acquired flatfoot deformity and posterior tibial tendon dysfunction: are they one and the same? A systematic review PLoS ONE 2017 12 e0187201 10.1371/journal.pone.0187201 29194449 

  9. 9. Knapik JJ Brosch LC Venuto M Swedler DI Bullock SH Gaines LS Effect on injuries of assigning shoes based on foot shape in air force basic training Am J Prev Med 2010 38 Suppl S197 S211 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.013 20117594 

  10. 10. Lee YC Wang MJ Taiwanese adult foot shape classification using 3D scanning data Ergonomics 2015 58 513 523 10.1080/00140139.2014.974683,Pubmed:25361465 25361465 

  11. 11. Roth S Roth A Jotanovic Z Madarevic T Navicular index for differentiation of flatfoot from normal foot Int Orthop 2013 37 1107 1112 10.1007/s00264-013-1885-6 23580031 

  12. 12. Okuda H Juman S Ueda A Miki T Shima M Factors related to prevalence of hallux valgus in female university students: a cross-sectional study J Epidemiol 2014 24 200 208 10.2188/jea.je20130110 24705646 

  13. 13. Aenumulapalli A Kulkarni MM Gandotra AR Prevalence of flexible flat foot in adults: a cross-sectional study J Clin Diagn Res 2017 11 AC17 AC20 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26566.10059 28764143 

  14. 14. Elvan A Simsek IE Cakiroglu MA Angin S Association of quadriceps angle with plantar pressure distribution, navicular height and calcaneo-tibial angle Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2019 53 145 149 10.1016/j.aott.2018.12.008 30638781 

  15. 15. Toyooka S Shimazaki N Yasui Y Ando S Saho Y Nakagawa T Validity of a simple footprint assessment board for diagnosing the severity of flatfoot: a prospective cohort study BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021 22 285 10.1186/s12891-021-04154-3 33736625 

  16. 16. Banwell HA Paris ME Mackintosh S Williams CM Paediatric flexible flat foot: How are we measuring it and are we getting it right? A systematic review J Foot Ankle Res 2018 11 21 10.1186/s13047-018-0264-3 29854006 

  17. 17. Staheli LT Evaluation of planovalgus foot deformities with special reference to the natural history J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1987 77 2 6 10.7547/87507315-77-1-2 3820110 

  18. 18. Staheli LT Chew DE Corbett M The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987 69 426 428 10.2106/00004623-198769030-00014 3818704 

  19. 19. Pita-Fernández S González-Martín C Seoane-Pillado T López-Calviño B Pértega-Díaz S Gil-Guillén V Validity of footprint analysis to determine flatfoot using clinical diagnosis as the gold standard in a random sample aged 40 years and older J Epidemiol 2015 25 148 154 10.2188/jea.JE20140082,Pubmed:25382154 25382154 

  20. 20. Mall NA Hardaker WM Nunley JA Queen RM The reliability and reproducibility of foot type measurements using a mirrored foot photo box and digital photography compared to caliper measurements J Biomech 2007 40 1171 1176 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.04.021 16824532 

  21. 21. Lee YC Lin G Wang MJJ Comparing 3D foot scanning with conventional measurement methods J Foot Ankle Res 2014 7 44 10.1186/s13047-014-0044-7 25364389 

  22. 22. Papuga MO Burke JR The reliability of the associate platinum digital foot scanner in measuring previously developed footprint characteristics: a technical note J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2011 34 114 118 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.12.008 21334543 

  23. 23. Robinette KM Daanen HA Precision of the Caesar scan-extracted measurements Appl Ergon 2006 37 259 265 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.07.009 16202970 

  24. 24. Yamashita K, Yamashita T, Sato M, Kawasumi M, Takase Y. Development of a quantitative measurement system for three-dimensional analysis of foot morphology using a smartphone. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. 2019;2019:3171–4. 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857209. 

  25. 25. Yamashita T Yamashita K Sato M Kawasumi M Ata S Foot-surface-structure analysis using a smartphone-based 3D foot scanner Med Eng Phys 2021 95 90 96 10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.08.001 34479698 

  26. 26. Klein C Groll-Knapp E Kundi M Kinz W Increased hallux angle in children and its association with insufficient length of footwear: A community based cross-sectional study BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009 10 159 10.1186/1471-2474-10-159 20015410 

  27. 27. Chen KC Yeh CJ Kuo JF Hsieh CL Yang SF Wang CH Footprint analysis of flatfoot in preschool-aged children Eur J Pediatr 2011 170 611 617 10.1007/s00431-010-1330-4 20972687 

  28. 28. Chen KC Tung LC Tung CH Yeh CJ Yang JF Wang CH An investigation of the factors affecting flatfoot in children with delayed motor development Res Dev Disabil 2014 35 639 645 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.12.012 24444612 

  29. 29. Williams DS McClay IS Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity Phys Ther 2000 80 864 871 10.1093/ptj/80.9.864 10960934 

  30. 30. Mercier L Practical orthopedics 224 2008 6 Philadelphia Mosby 

  31. 31. Arunakul M Amendola A Gao Y Goetz JE Femino JE Phisitkul P Tripod index: a new radiographic parameter assessing foot alignment Foot Ankle Int 2013 34 1411 1420 10.1177/1071100713488761 23657663 

  32. 32. Dyal CM Feder J Deland JT Thompson FM Pes planus in patients with posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: asymptomatic versus symptomatic foot Foot Ankle Int 1997 18 85 88 10.1177/107110079701800208 9043880 

  33. 33. Forriol F Pascual J Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years of age Foot Ankle 1990 11 101 104 10.1177/107110079001100208 2265808 

  34. 34. Ozer MC Barut C Evaluation of the sole morphology of professional football players Int SportMed J 2012 13 8 17 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로