참고문헌 (50)

1. Alkhadim M Gidado K Painting N : Perceived crowd safety in large space buildings: The confirmatory factor analysis of perceived risk variables. J. Eng. Proj. Prod. Manag. 2018 ; 8 ( 1 ): 22 – 39 . 10.32738/JEPPM.201801.0004 

   상세보기

2. Almutairi MM Yamin M Halikias G : A framework for crowd management during COVID-19 with artificial intelligence. Sustainability. 2022 ; 14 ( 1 ): 303 . 10.3390/su14010303 

   상세보기

3. Barr D Drury J Butler T : Beyond ‘stampedes’: Towards a new psychology of crowd crush disasters. Br. J. Social Psychol. 2023 . 10.1111/bjso.12666 

   상세보기

4. Campbell JM Klugar M Ding S : Diagnostic test accuracy methods for systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 2015 ; 13 ( 3 ): 154 – 162 . 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000061 26355602 

   상세보기

5. Carter H Drury J Amlot R : Social identity and intergroup relationships in the management of crowds during mass emergencies and disasters: Recommendations for emergency planners and responders. Policing. 2018 ; 14 ( 4 ): 931 – 944 . 10.1093/police/pay013 

   상세보기

6. Chen C Lu T Jiao W : An extended model for crowd evacuation considering crowding and stampede effects under the internal crushing. Physica A. 2023 ; 625 : 129002 . 10.1016/j.physa.2023.129002 

   상세보기

7. Choi W-S Hyun S-Y Oh H-J : Perceived disaster preparedness and willingness to respond among emergency nurses in South Korea: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022 ; 19 ( 18 ): 11812 . 10.3390/ijerph191811812 36142081 

   상세보기

8. Choularton R : Contingency Planning and Humanitarian Action: A Review of Practice. London, United Kingdom : Humanitarian Practice Network ; 2007 . Reference Source 

9. Clapp R : Why do we call it 9/11? The Christian Century. 2010 (November 2) . (accessed June 12, 2023). Reference Source 

10. Delve HL Limpaecher A What is consensus coding and split coding in qualitative research? 2023 (April 6) . (accessed June 22, 2023). Reference Source 

11. Eriksson K McConnell A : Contingency planning for crisis management: Recipe for success or political fantasy? Polic. Soc. 2011 ; 30 ( 2 ): 89 – 99 . 10.1016/j.polsoc.2011.03.004 

    상세보기

12. Eriksson O : Modeling Information Transfer in High-density Crowds. Uppsala, Sweden : Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University ; 2018 . Reference Source 

13. Fachelli S Lopez-Roldan P : Comparative perspectives on social indicators. Soc. Indic. Res. 2021 ; 154 : 755 – 765 . 10.1007/s11205-020-02585-4 

    상세보기

14. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) : Special Events Contingency Planning for Public Safety Agencies. Emmitsburg, Maryland : Emergency Management Institute ; 2013 . Reference Source 

15. FEMA : Fundamentals of Emergency Management. Emergency Management Institute : Emmitsburg, Maryland ; 2021 . Reference Source 

16. Ha KM (Rabdan Academy) : PRISMA checklist. DANS. 2023 . 10.17026/dans-zy4-8dzj 

    

17. HACCP Mentor : Understanding the difference between an emergency plan and a contingency plan. HACCP Mentor ; 2018 (December 5) . (accessed March 5, 2023). Reference Source 

18. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) : Contingency Planning Guide. Geneva, Switzerland : IFRC ; 2012 . Reference Source 

19. Johnston E : Past tragedies similar to Seoul’s deadly crowd crush. Jpn. Times. 2022 (October 31) . (accessed April 25, 2023). Reference Source 

20. Kanaujiya A Tiwari V : Crowd management and strategies for security and surveillance during the large mass gathering events: The Prayagraj Kumbh Mela 2019 experience. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 2022 ; 45 ( 3 ): 263 – 273 . 10.1007/s40009-022-01114-w 35431383 

    상세보기

21. Karthika PS Kedar V Verma A : A walk accessibility-based approach to assess crowd management in mass religious gatherings. J. Transp. Geogr. 2022 ; 104 : 103443 . 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103443 

    상세보기

22. Kim K-S : The governor of Gyeonggi province wants to use the term ‘10.29 disaster’ as the first elected politician (in Korean). The Hankyoreh. 2022 (November 10) . (accessed May 17, 2023). Reference Source 

23. Kim S-M Nguyen DTH Park J-Y : The effect of amplitude, event, and duration of electrical stimulation on the evacuation velocity of rodents: An evacuation experiment. J. Korean Soc. Manuf. Process Eng. 2021 ; 20 ( 3 ): 8 – 15 . 10.14775/ksmpe.2021.20.03.008 

    원문보기 상세보기

24. Koenti IJ : Disaster management using a contingency approach in the special region of Yogyakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022 ; 1030 : 012017 . 10.1088/1755-1315/1030/1/012017 

    상세보기

25. Lee J-H : 이태원 참사, 역대 국내 ‘압사 사고’ 중 인명피해 최대 〔Itaewon tragedy: The biggest human loss in the Korean history of crowd crush〕. 한겨례 〔The Hankyoreh〕. 2022a (October 31) . (accessed March 9, 2023). Reference Source 

26. Lee MYH : Seoul crowd crush shows gaps in Korean safety rules, experts say. Wash. Post. 2022b (Octrober 30) . (accessed May 6, 2023). Reference Source 

27. Lee MY Hee K Meg MA : Crucial lapses led to tragically delayed rescue in a Seoul alley. Wash. Post. 2022 (November 16) . (accessed May 11, 2023). Reference Source 

28. Loh M : South Korean officials said that didn’t have a plan for handling crowds at events with no organizers, like the Halloween crowd crush which killed 155 people. Insider. 2022 (November 1) . (accessed April 29, 2023). Reference Source 

29. Luft J : The Johari window. Human Relations Training News. 1961 ; 5 ( 1 ): 6 – 7 . Reference Source 

30. Mair J Whitford M : An exploration of events research: Event topics, themes and emerging trends. Int J. Event Festiv. Manag. 2013 ; 4 ( 1 ): 6 – 30 . 10.1108/17582951311307485 

    상세보기

31. Martella C Li J Conarado C : On current crowd management practices and the need for increased situation awareness, prediction, and intervention. Saf. Sci. 2017 ; 91 : 381 – 393 . 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.09.006 

    상세보기

32. Mao J : A study on emergency management policy triggered by the crowd crush in Itaewon, South Korea. J. Educ. Humanit. Social Sci. 2023 ; 15 : 97 – 103 . 10.54097/ehss.v15i.9109 

    상세보기

33. McKing Consulting Corporation : A Framework for Improving Cross-Sector Coordination for Emergency Preparedness and Response: Action Steps for Public Health, Law Enforcement, the Judiciary, and Corrections. Washington, D.C. : Bureau of Justice Assistance ; 2008 . https://bja.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh186/files/Publications/Framework.pdf 

34. Ministry of the Interior and Safety (MOIS) : Official website of MOIS. MOIS ; 2023 . (accessed April 4, 2023). Reference Source 

35. Morton TA Power S’e A : Coming together after standing apart: What predicts felt safety in the post-coronavirus crowd? Soc. Sci. Med. 2022 ; 293 : 114649 . 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114649 34906827 

    상세보기

36. Page MJ Moher D Mckenzie JE : Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists. Res. Synth. Methods. 2022 ; 13 ( 2 ): 156 – 163 . 10.1002/jrsm.1535 34693644 

    상세보기

37. Park G-Y : Citizens volunteer to perform CPR during Itaewon accident. The Korea Herald. 2022 (October 31) . (accessed April 4, 2023). 10.54195/ef13656 Reference Source 

    

38. Pearl TH : Crowd crush: How the law leaves American crowds unprotected. Kentucky Law Journal. 2015 ; 104 ( 1 ): article 4 . 10.2139/ssrn.2569373 Reference Source 

    

39. Persson E Granberg M : Implementation through collaborative crisis management and contingency planning: The case of dam failure in Sweden. J. Risk Res. 2021 ; 24 ( 10 ): 1335 – 1348 . 10.1080/13669877.2020.1863845 

    상세보기

40. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) : PRISMA official website. 2023 . (accessed June 12, 2023). Reference Source 

41. Qualtrics : Your ultimate guide to qualitative research (with methods and examples). Qualtrics ; 2022 (January 1) . (accessed March 27, 2023). Reference Source 

42. Raineri A : The causes and prevention of serious crowd injuries and fatalities at outdoor music festivals. CQUniversity Conference Contribution. 2004 (October) . Reference Source 

43. Richards G Censon D Gracan D : Event management literature: Exploring the missing body of knowledge. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events. 2022 ; 1 – 22 . 10.1080/19407963.2022.2128810 

    

44. Russo F Rindone C : Urban exposure: Training activities and risk reduction. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2014 ; 191 : 991 – 1001 . 10.2495/SC140842 

    

45. Sheehy K Vackova P Manen V : Inclusive disaster risk reduction education for Indonesian children. Int. J. Incl. Educ. 2022 ; 1 – 17 . 10.1080/13603116.2022.2115156 

    

46. Sidiropoulos G Kiourt C Moussiades L : Crowd simulation for crisis management: The outcomes of the last decade. Mach. Learn. Appl. 2020 ; 2 : 100009 . 10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100009 

    상세보기

47. The Gurdian : At least 12 people dead after crowd crush at football stadium in El Salvador. The Gurdian. 2023 (May 21). (accessed November 15, 2023). https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/may/21/el-salvador-crowd-crush-cuscatlan-stadium 

48. United Nations (UN) : Disaster Preparedness for Effective Response: Guidance and Indicator Package for Implementing Priority Five of the Hyogo Framework. Geneva, Switzerland : UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction ; 2008 . Reference Source 

49. Wang S : Survey of crowd crush disasters and countermeasures. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2023 ; 38 ( S1 ): s78 . 10.1017/S1049023X2300225X 

    상세보기

50. Yamin M : Managing crowds with technology: Cases of Hajj and Kumbh Mela. Int. J. Inf. Technol. 2019 ; 11 ( 2 ): 229 – 237 . 10.1007/s41870-018-0266-1 32289103 

    상세보기