참고문헌 (119)

1. Public Underst Sci C Almeida 27 952 2018 10.1177/0963662518766281 Almeida C, Massarani L (2018) Farmers prevailing perception profiles regarding GM crops: a classification proposal. Public Underst Sci 27:952-966 

   상세보기

2. Environ Commun D Arlt 13 440 2019 10.1080/17524032.2018.1430600 Arlt D, Rauchfleisch A, Schäfer MS (2019) Between fragmentation and dialogue. Twitter communities and political debate about the Swiss “nuclear withdrawal initiative”. Environ Commun 13:440-456 

   상세보기

3. Sustainability C Bain 6 9456 2014 10.3390/su6129456 Bain C, Dandachi T (2014) Governing GMOs: The (counter) movement for mandatory and voluntary non-GMO labels. Sustainability 6:9456-9476 

   상세보기

4. Science A-L Barabási 286 1979 509 1999 10.1126/science.286.5439.509 Barabási A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(1979):509-512 

   상세보기

5. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci WL Bennett 644 20 2012 10.1177/0002716212451428 Bennett WL (2012) The personalization of politics: political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 644:20-39 

   상세보기

6. Inf Commun Soc WL Bennett 15 739 2012 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 Bennett WL, Segerberg A (2012) The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Inf Commun Soc 15:739-768 

   상세보기

7. Public Underst Sci AW Betten 27 294 2018 10.1177/0963662517712207 Betten AW, Broerse JE, Kupper F (2018) Dynamics of problem setting and framing in citizen discussions on synthetic biology. Public Underst Sci 27:294-309 

   상세보기

8. Media Commun SS Bodrunova 7 119 2019 10.17645/mac.v7i3.1934 Bodrunova SS, Blekanov I, Smoliarova A, Litvinenko A (2019) Beyond left and right: real-world political polarization in Twitter discussions on inter-ethnic conflicts. Media Commun 7:119-132 

   상세보기

9. Eur J Commun B Cammaerts 27 117 2012 10.1177/0267323112441007 Cammaerts B (2012) Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. Eur J Commun 27:117-134 

   상세보기

10. 10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001 Chadwick A (2017) The hybrid media system: politics and power. Oxford University Press 

    

11. J Comput-Mediat Commun C Chan 22 266 2017 10.1111/jcc4.12192 Chan C, Fu K (2017) The relationship between cyberbalkanization and opinion polarization: time-series analysis on Facebook pages and opinion polls during the Hong Kong Occupy Movement and the associated debate on political reform. J Comput-Mediat Commun 22:266-283 

    상세보기

12. Soc Sci Comput Rev A Chen 40 1133 2022 10.1177/0894439321998066 Chen A, Zhang X (2022) Changing social representations and agenda interactions of gene editing after crises: A network agenda-setting study on Chinese social media. Soc Sci Comput Rev 40:1133-1152 

    상세보기

13. Fem Media Stud R Clark 16 788 2016 10.1080/14680777.2016.1138235 Clark R (2016) “Hope in a hashtag”: the discursive activism of #WhyIStayed. Fem Media Stud 16:788-804 

    

14. npj Sci Food K Cui 2 10 2018 10.1038/s41538-018-0018-4 Cui K, Shoemaker SP (2018) Public perception of genetically-modified (GM) food: A nationwide Chinese consumer study. npj Sci Food 2:10 

    상세보기

15. Sci Technol Human Values MF Dahlstrom 48 1 2022 Dahlstrom MF, Wang Z, Lindberg S, Opfer K, Cummings CL (2022) The media’s taste for gene-edited food: Comparing media portrayals within US and European regulatory environments. Sci Technol Human Values 48:1-22 

16. Public Underst Sci G Debucquet 29 524 2020 10.1177/0963662520929668 Debucquet G, Baron R, Cardinal M (2020) Lay and scientific categorizations of new breeding techniques: implications for food policy and genetically modified organism legislation. Public Underst Sci 29:524-543 

    상세보기

17. Soc Hist A Dirlik 27 16 2002 10.1080/03071020110094183 Dirlik A (2002) Modernity as history: post-revolutionary China, globalization and the question of modernity. Soc Hist 27:16-39 

    상세보기

18. J Big Data D Domalewska 8 2021 10.1186/s40537-021-00431-z Domalewska D (2021) An analysis of COVID-19 economic measures and attitudes: evidence from social media mining. J Big Data 8:42 

    상세보기

19. Public A Downs 28 38 1972 Downs A (1972) Up and down with ecology: the issue-attention cycle. Public 28:38-50 

20. Rev Policy Res DJ Elgin 32 226 2015 10.1111/ropr.12118 Elgin DJ (2015) Utilizing hyperlink network analysis to examine climate change supporters and opponents. Rev Policy Res 32:226-245 

    상세보기

21. 10.4324/9781315838250 Fairclough N (2013) Language and Power. Routledge 

    

22. Comput Hum Behav D Fischer-Preßler 100 138 2019 10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.012 Fischer-Preßler D, Schwemmer C, Fischbach K (2019) Collective sense-making in times of crisis: connecting terror management theory with Twitter user reactions to the Berlin terrorist attack. Comput Hum Behav 100:138-151 

    상세보기

23. J Commun R Fletcher 67 476 2017 10.1111/jcom.12315 Fletcher R, Nielsen RK (2017) Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. J Commun 67:476-498 

    상세보기

24. Politics Gov B Friedrich 7 165 2019 10.17645/pag.v7i4.2082 Friedrich B, Hackfort S, Boyer M, Gottschlich D (2019) Conflicts over GMOs and their contribution to food democracy. Politics Gov 7:165-177 

    상세보기

25. Sci Commun TK Fung 40 33 2018 10.1177/1075547017748947 Fung TK, Griffin RJ, Dunwoody S (2018) Testing links among uncertainty, affect, and attitude toward a health behavior. Sci Commun 40:33-62 

    상세보기

26. Mod Law Rev A Giddens 62 1 1999 10.1111/1468-2230.00188 Giddens A (1999) Risk and responsibility. Mod Law Rev 62:1-10 

    상세보기

27. Soc Netw S Gonzalez-Bailon 31 271 2009 10.1016/j.socnet.2009.07.003 Gonzalez-Bailon S (2009) Opening the black box of link formation: social factors underlying the structure of the web. Soc Netw 31:271-280 

    상세보기

28. J Agric Environ Ethics D Gregorowius 25 265 2009 10.1007/s10806-011-9330-6 Gregorowius D, Lindemann-Matthies P, Huppenbauer M (2009) Ethical discourse on the use of genetically modified crops: a review of academic publications in the fields of ecology and environmental ethics. J Agric Environ Ethics 25:265-293 

    상세보기

29. Soc Media Soc L Guenther 6 1 2020 Guenther L, Ruhrmann G, Bischoff J, Penzel T, Weber A (2020) Strategic framing and social media engagement: Analyzing memes posted by the German identitarian movement on Facebook. Soc Media Soc 6:1-13 

30. Conf Hum Factors Comput Syst Proc X Gui 214 1 2018 Gui X, Kou Y, Pine K, Ladaw E, Kim H, Suzuki-Gill E, Chen Y (2018) Multidimensional risk communication: public discourse on risks during an emerging epidemic. Conf Hum Factors Comput Syst Proc 214:1-14 

31. Mass Commun Soc L Guo 18 557 2015 10.1080/15205436.2015.1045300 Guo L, Vargo C (2015) The power of message networks: a big-data analysis of the network agenda setting model and issue ownership. Mass Commun Soc 18:557-576 

    상세보기

32. Commun Res L Guo 00 1 2023 Guo L, Zhang Y, Mays K, Akyürek AF, Wijaya D, Betke M (2023) Agenda setting, cross-cutting effects, and political expression on social media: the gun violence case. Commun Res 00:1-25 

33. Acad Manag Rev C Hardy 41 80 2016 10.5465/amr.2013.0106 Hardy C, Maguire S (2016) Organizing risk: discourse, power, and “riskification. Acad Manag Rev 41:80-108 

    상세보기

34. Food Chem Toxicol C Hartmann 116 100 2018 10.1016/j.fct.2018.04.006 Hartmann C, Hübner P, Siegrist M (2018) A risk perception gap? Comparing expert, producer and consumer prioritization of food hazard controls. Food Chem Toxicol 116:100-107 

    상세보기

35. Med Anthropol Q C Heller 15 25 2001 10.1525/maq.2001.15.1.25 Heller C (2001) From risk to globalization: discursive shifts in the French debate about GMOs. Med Anthropol Q 15:25-28 

    상세보기

36. 10.1177/14614448211063899 Huang S, Yang T (2022) No trade-offs between news and entertainment: evidence from online engagement data. New Media Soc:14614448211063899 

    

37. China: Int J VG Huang 16 143 2018 10.1353/chn.2018.0042 Huang VG (2018) Socialist legacies, discursive opportunities and the diffusion of Anti-GM crops discourse in post-socialist China. China: Int J 16:143-166 

    상세보기

38. 10.4324/9781003160212 Jia H (2022) Science in movements: knowledge control and social contestation in China’s Hydropower, GMO and Nuclear Controversies. Taylor & Francis 

    

39. Commun Rep M Jiang 29 87 2016 10.1080/08934215.2015.1098715 Jiang M, Leeman RW, Fu K (2016) Networked framing: Chinese microbloggers’ framing of the political discourse at the 2012 Democratic national convention. Commun Rep 29:87-99 

    

40. 10.1007/978-981-16-5379-7_11 Jin J, Cheng X, Li Z (2021) Segmentation disparities in scientific experts’ knowledge of and attitudes towards GMOs in China. In: Schiele B et al (eds) Science Cultures in a Diverse World: Knowing, Sharing, Caring. Springer, p 209-232 

    

41. 10.1177/09636625211070150 Jin Y, Schaub S, Tosun J, Wesseler J (2022) Does China have a public debate on genetically modified organisms? A discourse network analysis of public debate on Weibo. Public Underst Sci:09636625211070150 

    상세보기

42. Comput Hum Behav BK Johnson 104 2020 10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.031 Johnson BK, Neo RL, Heijnen MEM, Smits L, van Veen C (2020) Issues, involvement, and influence: effects of selective exposure and sharing on polarization and participation. Comput Hum Behav 104:106155 

    상세보기

43. Int J Press Polit A Jungherr 24 404 2019 10.1177/1940161219841543 Jungherr A, Posegga O, An J (2019) Discursive power in contemporary media systems: a comparative framework. Int J Press Polit 24:404-425 

    상세보기

44. Sci Technol Hum Values N Kato-Nitta 2021 1 2021 Kato-Nitta N, Tachikawa M, Inagaki Y, Maeda T (2021) Public perceptions of risks and benefits of gene-edited food crops: an international comparative study between the US, Japan, and Germany. Sci Technol Hum Values 2021:1-33 

45. N. Media Soc A Khalil 23 3038 2021 10.1177/1461444820943849 Khalil A, Storie LK (2021) Social media and connective action: the case of the Saudi women’s movement for the right to drive. N. Media Soc 23:3038-3061 

    상세보기

46. Eur Socio Rev B Klandermans 30 702 2014 10.1093/esr/jcu068 Klandermans B, van Stekelenburg J, Damen M-L, van Troost D, van Leeuwen A (2014) Mobilization without organization: the case of unaffiliated demonstrators. Eur Socio Rev 30:702-716 

    상세보기

47. Risk Anal J Kuzma 28 1081 2008 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01071.x Kuzma J, Romanchek J, Kokotovich A (2008) Upstream oversight assessment for agrifood nanotechnology: a case studies approach. Risk Anal 28:1081-1098 

    상세보기

48. Lancet H-M Lam 381 2044 2013 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60776-X Lam H-M, Remais J, Fung M-C, Xu L, Sun SS-M (2013) Food supply and food safety issues in China. Lancet 381:2044-2053 

    상세보기

49. Public Underst Sci J Lassen 27 923 2018 10.1177/0963662518766286 Lassen J (2018) Listened to, but not heard! The failure to represent the public in genetically modified food policies. Public Underst Sci 27:923-936 

    상세보기

50. Sci Commun S Lee 40 147 2018 10.1177/1075547017753189 Lee S, Kim S-H (2018) Scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science in South Korea: does knowledge lead to favorable attitudes? Sci Commun 40:147-172 

    상세보기

51. Soc Sci Comput Rev P Li 39 1030 2021 10.1177/0894439320956790 Li P, Cho H, Qin Y, Chen A (2021) #Metoo as a connective movement: examining the frames adopted in the anti-sexual harassment movement in China. Soc Sci Comput Rev 39:1030-1049 

    상세보기

52. Cult Sci Y Li 2 311 2019 10.1177/209660831900200406 Li Y, Luo C, Chen A (2019) The evolution of online discussions about GMOs in China over the past decade: changes, causes and characteristics. Cult Sci 2:311-325 

    상세보기

53. Public Underst Sci J Liang 28 991 2019 10.1177/0963662519876782 Liang J, Liu X, Zhang W (2019) Scientists vs laypeople: how genetically modified food is discussed on a Chinese Q&A website. Public Underst Sci 28:991-1004 

    상세보기

54. Inf Commun Soc J Lobera 24 1419 2021 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1749697 Lobera J, Portos M (2021) Decentralizing electoral campaigns? New-old parties, grassroots and digital activism. Inf Commun Soc 24:1419-1440 

    상세보기

55. J Respons Innov P Macnaghten 3 282 2016 10.1080/23299460.2016.1255700 Macnaghten P (2016) Responsible innovation and the reshaping of existing technological trajectories: The hard case of genetically modified crops. J Respons Innov 3:282-289 

    상세보기

56. 10.4324/9781003112525-22 Macnaghten P, Shah E, Ludwig D (2021) Making dialogue work: responsible innovation and gene editing. In: Ludwig D et al (eds) The politics of knowledge in inclusive development and innovation. Routledge, p 243-255 

    

57. Soc Sci Comput Rev D Maier 36 3 2018 10.1177/0894439317690337 Maier D, Waldherr A, Miltner P, Jähnichen P, Pfetsch B (2018) Exploring issues in a networked public sphere: combining hyperlink network analysis and topic modeling. Soc Sci Comput Rev 36:3-20 

    상세보기

58. J Comput-Mediat Commun S Majó-Vázquez 22 284 2017 10.1111/jcc4.12196 Majó-Vázquez S, Cardenal AS, González-Bailón S (2017) Digital news consumption and copyright intervention: evidence from Spain before and after the 2015 “link tax”. J Comput-Mediat Commun 22:284-301 

    상세보기

59. Polit Commun S Majó-Vázquez 36 227 2019 10.1080/10584609.2018.1546244 Majó-Vázquez S, Nielsen RK, González-Bailón S (2019) The backbone structure of audience networks: a new approach to comparing online news consumption across countries. Polit Commun 36:227-240 

    상세보기

60. Risk Anal Y Malakar 00 1 2023 Malakar Y, Lacey J (2023) On the interconnected nature of risk and responsibility in the research and development of new and emerging technologies. Risk Anal 00:1-14 

61. Hum Soc Sci Commun Y Malakar 9 17 2022 10.1057/s41599-021-01028-w Malakar Y, Lacey J, Bertsch PM (2022) Towards responsible science and technology: how nanotechnology research and development is shaping risk governance practices in Australia. Hum Soc Sci Commun 9:17 

    상세보기

62. 10.4324/9781315109930-9 Mann A (2017) Hashtag activism and the right to food in Australia. In: Schneider T et al (eds) Digital Food Activism. Routledge, p 168-184 

    

63. Mass Commun Soc ME McCombs 17 781 2014 10.1080/15205436.2014.964871 McCombs ME, Shaw DL, Weaver DH (2014) New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Commun Soc 17:781-802 

    상세보기

64. Int J Press Polit S Meraz 18 138 2013 10.1177/1940161212474472 Meraz S, Papacharissi Z (2013) Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. Int J Press Polit 18:138-166 

    상세보기

65. Soc Mov Stud R Motta 14 576 2015 Motta R (2015) Transnational discursive opportunities and social movement risk frames opposing GMOs. Soc Mov Stud 14:576-595 

66. J Commun S Mukerjee 68 26 2018 10.1093/joc/jqx007 Mukerjee S, Majó-Vázquez S, González-Bailón S (2018) Networks of audience overlap in the consumption of digital news. J Commun 68:26-50 

    상세보기

67. 10.1177/01622439221112460 Nawaz S, Satterfield T, Phurisamban R (2022) Does “Precision” matter? A Q study of public interpretations of gene editing in agriculture. Sci Technol Hum Values:01622439221112460 

    상세보기

68. Soc Netw Z Neal 39 84 2014 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.06.001 Neal Z (2014) The backbone of bipartite projections: inferring relationships from co-authorship, co-sponsorship, co-attendance and other co-behaviors. Soc Netw 39:84-97 

    상세보기

69. Inf Commun Soc M O’Neil 23 1854 2020 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1620823 O’Neil M, Ackland R (2020) Risk issue adoption in an online social movement field. Inf Commun Soc 23:1854-1873 

    상세보기

70. Public Underst Sci SS Ofori-Parku 27 197 2018 10.1177/0963662516685488 Ofori-Parku SS (2018) Tacit knowledge and risk perceptions: tullow Oil and lay publics in Ghana’s offshore oil region. Public Underst Sci 27:197-213 

    상세보기

71. J Inf Technol Politics M Osterbur 18 194 2021 10.1080/19331681.2020.1838396 Osterbur M, Kiel C (2021) Tweeting in echo chambers? Analyzing Twitter discourse between American Jewish interest groups. J Inf Technol Politics 18:194-213 

    상세보기

72. Sci Public Policy R Owen 39 751 2012 10.1093/scipol/scs093 Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J (2012) Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Sci Public Policy 39:751-760 

    

73. Inf Commun Soc Z Papacharissi 19 307 2016 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697 Papacharissi Z (2016) Affective publics and structures of storytelling: sentiment, events and mediality. Inf Commun Soc 19:307-324 

    상세보기

74. Inf Commun Soc P Pond 22 213 2019 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366539 Pond P, Lewis J (2019) Riots and Twitter: connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere. Inf Commun Soc 22:213-231 

    상세보기

75. Int Commun Gaz R Pöyhtäri 83 81 2021 10.1177/1748048519883520 Pöyhtäri R, Nelimarkka M, Nikunen K, Ojala M, Pantti M, Pääkkönen J (2021) Refugee debate and networked framing in the hybrid media environment. Int Commun Gaz 83:81-102 

    상세보기

76. Digit Geogr Soc C Price 2 2021 10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100017 Price C (2021) The online genetically modified food debate: digital food activism, science and alternative knowledges. Digit Geogr Soc 2:100017 

    상세보기

77. Environ Commun U Reber 15 173 2021 10.1080/17524032.2020.1812685 Reber U (2021) Global climate change or national climate changes? An analysis of the performance of online issue publics in integrating global issues. Environ Commun 15:173-188 

    상세보기

78. Ritzer G (1993) The McDonaldization of society: an investigation into the changing character of contemporary social life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press 

79. Elem Sci Anth P Roberts 8 47 2020 10.1525/elementa.446 Roberts P, Herkert J, Kuzma J (2020) Responsible innovation in biotechnology: stakeholder attitudes and implications for research policy. Elem Sci Anth 8:47 

    상세보기

80. Cult Sci Y Ruan 2 255 2019 10.1177/209660831900200403 Ruan Y, Yang J, Jin J (2019) One issue, different stories: the construction of GMO issues on Chinese, American and British mainstream media portals. Cult Sci 2:255-275 

    상세보기

81. Soc Netw J Saint-Charles 52 228 2018 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.09.001 Saint-Charles J, Mongeau P (2018) Social influence and discourse similarity networks in workgroups. Soc Netw 52:228-237 

    상세보기

82. 10.4324/9781003039242-16-15 Schäfer MS, Metag J (2021) Audiences of science communication between pluralisation, fragmentation and polarization. In: Bucchi M, Trench B. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. Routledge, p 291-304 

    

83. Soc Probl R Schurman 51 243 2004 10.1525/sp.2004.51.2.243 Schurman R (2004) Fighting “Frankenfoods”: Industry opportunity structures and the efficacy of the anti-biotech movement in Western Europe. Soc Probl 51:243-268 

    상세보기

84. J Agrar Chang I Scoones 8 315 2008 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00172.x Scoones I (2008) Mobilizing against GM crops in India, south Africa and brazil. J Agrar Chang 8:315-344 

    상세보기

85. Soc Media Soc F Shaw 2 205630511667288 2016 10.1177/2056305116672889 Shaw F (2016) “Bitch I said hi”: the Bye Felipe campaign and discursive activism in mobile dating apps. Soc Media Soc 2:2056305116672889 

    상세보기

86. 10.1080/23808985.2013.11679147 Shumate M, Pilny A, Atouba YC, Kim J (2013) A taxonomy of communication networks. In: Cohen E (ed) Communication yearbook 37. Routledge, p 121-150 

    상세보기

87. Am Socio Rev U Shwed 75 817 2010 10.1177/0003122410388488 Shwed U, Bearman PS (2010) The temporal structure of scientific consensus formation. Am Socio Rev 75:817-840 

    상세보기

88. Risk Anal P Slovic 19 689 1999 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00439.x Slovic P (1999) Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Anal 19:689-701 

    상세보기

89. J Hazard Mater P Slovic 86 17 2001 10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00248-5 Slovic P (2001) The risk game. J Hazard Mater 86:17-24 

    상세보기

90. Public Underst Sci M Smallman 27 655 2018 10.1177/0963662517706452 Smallman M (2018) Science to the rescue or contingent progress? Comparing 10 years of public, expert and policy discourses on new and emerging science and technology in the United Kingdom. Public Underst Sci 27:655-673 

    상세보기

91. Res Policy J Stilgoe 42 1568 2013 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42:1568-1580 

    상세보기

92. Soc Netw D Stoltenberg 59 120 2019 10.1016/j.socnet.2019.07.001 Stoltenberg D, Maier D, Waldherr A (2019) Community detection in civil society online networks: theoretical guide and empirical assessment. Soc Netw 59:120-133 

    상세보기

93. Soc Sci Comput Rev J Suk 39 276 2021 10.1177/0894439319864882 Suk J, Abhishek A, Zhang Y, Ahn SY, Correa T, Garlough C, Shah DV (2021) #MeToo, networked acknowledgment, and connective action: How “empowerment through empathy” launched a social movement. Soc Sci Comput Rev 39:276-294 

    상세보기

94. N. Media Soc H Taneja 19 1331 2017 10.1177/1461444816642172 Taneja H (2017) Mapping an audience-centric World Wide Web: a departure from hyperlink analysis. N. Media Soc 19:1331-1348 

    상세보기

95. Am J Infect Control L Tang 46 1375 2018 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.05.019 Tang L, Bie B, Zhi D (2018) Tweeting about measles during stages of an outbreak: a semantic network approach to the framing of an emerging infectious disease. Am J Infect Control 46:1375-1380 

    상세보기

96. Tolman EC (1932) Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York, NY: Univ of California Press 

97. Rev Policy Res J Tosun 34 310 2017 10.1111/ropr.12235 Tosun J, Schaub S (2017) Mobilization in the European public sphere: the struggle over genetically modified organisms. Rev Policy Res 34:310-330 

    상세보기

98. Int J Press Polit N Usher 23 324 2018 10.1177/1940161218781254 Usher N, Holcomb J, Littman J (2018) Twitter makes it worse: political journalists, gendered echo chambers, and the amplification of gender bias. Int J Press Polit 23:324-344 

    상세보기

99. Ann Int Commun Assoc P van Aelst 41 3 2017 van Aelst P, Strömbäck J, Aalberg T, Esser F, de Vreese C, Matthes J, Hopmann D, Salgado S, Hubé N, Stępińska A (2017) Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy? Ann Int Commun Assoc 41:3-27 

100. Sci Commun CW van Eck 42 454 2020 10.1177/1075547020942228 van Eck CW, Mulder BC, Dewulf A (2020) Online climate change polarization: Interactional framing analysis of climate change blog comments. Sci Commun 42:454-480 

     상세보기

101. J Commun CJ Vargo 64 296 2014 10.1111/jcom.12089 Vargo CJ, Guo L, McCombs M, Shaw DL (2014) Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election. J Commun 64:296-316 

     상세보기

102. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst S Velardi 45 366 2021 10.1080/21683565.2020.1818159 Velardi S, Selfa T (2021) Framing local: an analysis of framing strategies for genetically modified organism (GMO) labeling initiatives in the northeastern US. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 45:366-389 

     상세보기

103. Commun Methods Meas D Walter 13 248 2019 10.1080/19312458.2019.1639145 Walter D, Ophir Y (2019) News frame analysis: an inductive mixed-method computational approach. Commun Methods Meas 13:248-266 

     상세보기

104. Online Inf Rev R Wang 40 850 2016 10.1108/OIR-12-2015-0378 Wang R, Liu W, Gao S (2016) Hashtags and information virality in networked social movement: examining hashtag co-occurrence patterns. Online Inf Rev 40:850-866 

     상세보기

105. Telemat Inform R Wang 61 101600 2021 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101600 Wang R, Zhou A(2021) Hashtag activism and connective action: a case study of# HongKongPoliceBrutality. Telemat Inform 61:101600 

     상세보기

106. J Risk Res W Wang 24 1086 2021 10.1080/13669877.2020.1801808 Wang W, Guo L (2021) Benefits and risks of genetically modified mosquitoes: news and Twitter framing across issue-attention cycle. J Risk Res 24:1086-1100 

     상세보기

107. Internet Res X Wang 30 1547 2020 10.1108/INTR-11-2019-0491 Wang X, Song Y (2020) Viral misinformation and echo chambers: the diffusion of rumors about genetically modified organisms on social media. Internet Res 30:1547-1564 

     상세보기

108. Glob Environ Change HTP Williams 32 126 2015 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006 Williams HTP, McMurray JR, Kurz T, Lambert FH (2015) Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Glob Environ Change 32:126-138 

     상세보기

109. Public Relat Rev Y Xiong 45 10 2019 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.014 Xiong Y, Cho M, Boatwright B (2019) Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the# MeToo movement. Public Relat Rev 45:10-23 

     상세보기

110. J Asian Stud Y Yan 71 705 2012 10.1017/S0021911812000678 Yan Y (2012) Food safety and social risk in contemporary China. J Asian Stud 71:705-729 

     상세보기

111. Int J Commun Y Yang 10 20 2016 Yang Y (2016) How large-scale protests succeed in China: the story of issue opportunity structure, social media, and violence. Int J Commun 10:20 

112. N. Genet Soc Z Yang 41 116 2022 10.1080/14636778.2022.2063826 Yang Z (2022) The new stage of public engagement with science in the digital media environment: citizen science communicators in the discussion of GMOs on Zhihu. N. Genet Soc 41:116-135 

     상세보기

113. 10.1007/978-94-024-0917-8_5 Yu N, Xu Q (2016) Public discourse on genetically modified foods in the mobile sphere: Framing risks, opportunities, and responsibilities in mobile social media in China. In: Wei R (ed) Mobile Media, Political Participation, and Civic Activism in Asia. Springer, p 81-102 

     

114. Crit Stud Media Commun B Zelizer 10 219 1993 Zelizer B (1993) Journalists as interpretive communities. Crit Stud Media Commun 10:219-237 

115. Eur J Soc JY Zhang 18 327 2015 Zhang JY (2015) Cosmopolitan risk community and China’s climate governance. Eur J Soc 18:327-342 

116. J Risk Res JY Zhang 21 68 2018 10.1080/13669877.2017.1351473 Zhang JY (2018) Cosmopolitan risk community in a bowl: a case study of China’s good food movement. J Risk Res 21:68-82 

     상세보기

117. Public Underst Sci X Zhang 30 570 2021 10.1177/0963662520987754 Zhang X, Chen A, Zhang W (2021) Before and after the Chinese gene-edited human babies: Multiple discourses of gene editing on social media. Public Underst Sci 30:570-587 

     상세보기

118. Soc Sci Comput Rev X Zhang 40 42 2022 10.1177/0894439320905522 Zhang X, Ho JCF (2022) Exploring the fragmentation of the representation of data-driven journalism in the Twittersphere: a network analytics approach. Soc Sci Comput Rev 40:42-60 

     상세보기

119. PLoS One N Zhao 11 e0157947 2016 10.1371/journal.pone.0157947 Zhao N, Jiao D, Bai S, Zhu T (2016) Evaluating the validity of simplified Chinese version of LIWC in detecting psychological expressions in short texts on social network services. PLoS One 11:e0157947 

     상세보기