Verheyden, G
(Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)
,
Nieuwboer, A
(Neurologic Rehabilitation Unit of the Kiliani-Klinik, Bad Windsheim, Germany)
,
Mertin, J
(Neurologic Rehabilitation Unit of the Klinik Kipfenberg, Germany)
,
Preger, R
(Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit of the University Hospital Pellenberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)
,
Kiekens, C
(Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)
,
De Weerdt, W
Objective: To examine the clinimetric characteristics of the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS). This newly developed scale evaluates motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. The TIS scores, on a range from 0 to 23, static and dynamic sitting balance as well as trunk co-ordination. It also aims to scor...
Objective: To examine the clinimetric characteristics of the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS). This newly developed scale evaluates motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. The TIS scores, on a range from 0 to 23, static and dynamic sitting balance as well as trunk co-ordination. It also aims to score the quality of trunk movement and to be a guide for treatment.Design: Two physiotherapists observed each patient simultaneously, but scored independently. Each patient was re-examined by one of the therapists.Subjects: Twenty-eight patients in a rehabilitation setting.Results: Kappa and weighted kappa values for item per item reliability ranged for all but two, from 0.62 to 1. All percentages of agreement exceeded 81%. Intraclass correlations (ICC) for the summed scores of the different subscales were between 0.85 and 0.99. Test–retest and interobserver reliability for the TIS total score (ICC) was 0.96 and 0.99, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement for the test–retest and interexaminer measurement error were -2.90, 3.68 and -1.84, 1.84, respectively. Cronbach alpha coefficients for internal consistency ranged from 0.65 to 0.89. Content validity was defined. Spearman rank correlations with the Barthel Index (r5=0.86) and the Trunk Control Test (r5=0.83) was used to examine construct and concurrent validity, respectively.Conclusions: Analysis of different clinimetric parameters support the use of the TIS in both clinical use and future stroke research. Guidelines for treatment and level of quality of trunk activity can be derived from the assessment.
Objective: To examine the clinimetric characteristics of the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS). This newly developed scale evaluates motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. The TIS scores, on a range from 0 to 23, static and dynamic sitting balance as well as trunk co-ordination. It also aims to score the quality of trunk movement and to be a guide for treatment.Design: Two physiotherapists observed each patient simultaneously, but scored independently. Each patient was re-examined by one of the therapists.Subjects: Twenty-eight patients in a rehabilitation setting.Results: Kappa and weighted kappa values for item per item reliability ranged for all but two, from 0.62 to 1. All percentages of agreement exceeded 81%. Intraclass correlations (ICC) for the summed scores of the different subscales were between 0.85 and 0.99. Test–retest and interobserver reliability for the TIS total score (ICC) was 0.96 and 0.99, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement for the test–retest and interexaminer measurement error were -2.90, 3.68 and -1.84, 1.84, respectively. Cronbach alpha coefficients for internal consistency ranged from 0.65 to 0.89. Content validity was defined. Spearman rank correlations with the Barthel Index (r5=0.86) and the Trunk Control Test (r5=0.83) was used to examine construct and concurrent validity, respectively.Conclusions: Analysis of different clinimetric parameters support the use of the TIS in both clinical use and future stroke research. Guidelines for treatment and level of quality of trunk activity can be derived from the assessment.
참고문헌 (32)
10.1093/ptj/74.6.534
Moreland, Julie D., Thomson, Mary Ann, Fuoco, Angela R..
Electromyographic biofeedback to improve lower extremity function after stroke: A meta-analysis.
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation,
vol.79,
no.2,
134-140.
van der Lee, Johanna H, Snels, Ingrid AK, Beckerman, Heleen, Lankhorst, Gustaaf J, Wagenaar, Robert C, Bouter, Lex M.
Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical rehabilitation,
vol.15,
no.1,
20-31.
Kwakkel, G, Wagenaar, R C, Kollen, B J, Lankhorst, G J.
Predicting disability in stroke--a critical review of the literature..
Age and ageing,
vol.25,
no.6,
479-489.
BOHANNON, RICHARD W..
Lateral trunk flexion strength : impairment, measurement reliability and implications following unilateral brain lesion.
International journal of rehabilitation research = Internationale Zeitschrift für Rehabilitationsforschung,
vol.15,
no.3,
249-251.
Nieuwboer, Alice, Feys, Hilde, Weerdt, Willy De, Nuyens, Godelieve, Corte, Els De.
Developing a Clinical Tool to Measure Sitting Balance after Stroke: A reliability study.
Physiotherapy,
vol.81,
no.8,
439-445.
Collin, C, Wade, D.
Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study..
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry,
vol.53,
no.7,
576-579.
Franchignoni, F. P., Tesio, L., Ricupero, C., Martino, M. T..
Trunk Control Test as an Early Predictor of Stroke Rehabilitation Outcome.
Stroke,
vol.28,
no.7,
1382-1385.
BOHANNON, RICHARD W..
Recovery and correlates of trunk muscle strength after stroke :.
International journal of rehabilitation research = Internationale Zeitschrift für Rehabilitationsforschung,
vol.18,
no.2,
162-167.
Benaim, Charles, Pérennou, Dominique Alain, Villy, Jacqueline, Rousseaux, Marc, Pelissier, Jacques Yvon.
Validation of a Standardized Assessment of Postural Control in Stroke Patients : The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS).
Stroke,
vol.30,
no.9,
1862-1868.
Tsuji, Tetsuya, Liu, Meigen, Sonoda, Shigeru, Domen, Kazuhisa, Chino, Naoichi.
The stroke impairment assessment set: Its internal consistency and predictive validity.
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation,
vol.81,
no.7,
863-868.
Hantson, L, De Weerdt, W, De Keyser, J, Diener, H C, Franke, C, Palm, R, Van Orshoven, M, Schoonderwalt, H, De Klippel, N, Herroelen, L.
The European Stroke Scale..
Stroke,
vol.25,
no.11,
2215-2219.
Kramer, Michael S, Feinstein, Alvan R.
Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance.
Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics,
vol.29,
no.1,
111-123.
Lee, Johanna H. van der, Beckerman, Heleen, Lankhorst, Gustaaf J., Bouter, Lex M..
THE RESPONSIVENESS OF THE ACTION RESEARCH ARM TEST AND THE FUGL-MEYER ASSESSMENT SCALE IN CHRONIC STROKE PATIENTS.
Journal of rehabilitation medicine,
vol.33,
no.3,
110-113.
Beckerman, H.; Roebroeck, M.E. etc. "Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness." Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, v.10 no.7 (2001), pp. 571-578, doi:10.1023/A:1013138911638.
Altman, D. G., Bland, J. M..
Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies.
The Statistician : journal of the Institute of Statisticians,
vol.32,
no.3,
307-317.
Martin Bland, J., Altman, D..
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT.
The Lancet,
vol.327,
no.8476,
307-310.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.