Jette, Diane U
(DU Jette, PT, DSc, is Professor and Department Chair, Physical Therapy Program, Simmons College, 300 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115 (USA))
,
Latham, Nancy K
(NK Latham, PT, PhD, is Assistant Research Professor, Sargent College, Boston University, Boston, Mass)
,
Smout, Randall J
(RJ Smout, MS, is Senior Analyst, Institute for Clinical Outcomes Research, Salt Lake City, Utah)
,
Gassaway, Julie
(J Gassaway, MS, RN, is Director of Project)
,
Slavin, Mary D
(MD Slavin, PT, PhD, is Director of Education and Dissemination, Center for Rehabilitation Effectiveness, Sargent College, Boston University)
,
Horn, Susan D
(SD Horn, PhD, is Senior Scientist, Institute for Clinical Outcomes Research)
AbstractBackground and Purpose. The purpose of this study was to describe physical therapy provided to patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Subjects and Methods. Data were collected from 972 patients with stroke receiving physical therapy services at 6 rehabilitation faciliti...
AbstractBackground and Purpose. The purpose of this study was to describe physical therapy provided to patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Subjects and Methods. Data were collected from 972 patients with stroke receiving physical therapy services at 6 rehabilitation facilities in the United States. Descriptive statistics were derived to describe physical therapy sessions, including proportion of therapy time spent in specific functional activities and proportion of those activities that included any of 59 interventions. Results. Mean length of stay was 18.7 days (SD=10.3), and patients received physical therapy, on average, 13.6 days (SD=7.8). Patients attended, on average, 1.5 (SD=0.3) physical therapy sessions per day, with each session lasting 38.1 minutes (SD=17.1). Gait and prefunctional activities were performed most frequently (31.3% and 19.7% of total treatment time, respectively). For gait activity, physical therapists used balance and postural awareness training in more than 50% of sessions and used strength training for more than 50% of sessions of prefunctional activities. Eighty-six percent of the patients received evaluation, and 84% of the patients and families received education. Discussion and Conclusion. Therapists selected an eclectic approach to intervention rather than specific intervention techniques. The approach to patients' care included interventions to remediate impairments and to compensate for functional limitations. Therapists also reported frequently using motor control and motor learning approaches to facilitate all activities. This approach to care is largely consistent with existing stroke care guidelines and advances in the scientific theories of motor control and motor learning.
AbstractBackground and Purpose. The purpose of this study was to describe physical therapy provided to patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Subjects and Methods. Data were collected from 972 patients with stroke receiving physical therapy services at 6 rehabilitation facilities in the United States. Descriptive statistics were derived to describe physical therapy sessions, including proportion of therapy time spent in specific functional activities and proportion of those activities that included any of 59 interventions. Results. Mean length of stay was 18.7 days (SD=10.3), and patients received physical therapy, on average, 13.6 days (SD=7.8). Patients attended, on average, 1.5 (SD=0.3) physical therapy sessions per day, with each session lasting 38.1 minutes (SD=17.1). Gait and prefunctional activities were performed most frequently (31.3% and 19.7% of total treatment time, respectively). For gait activity, physical therapists used balance and postural awareness training in more than 50% of sessions and used strength training for more than 50% of sessions of prefunctional activities. Eighty-six percent of the patients received evaluation, and 84% of the patients and families received education. Discussion and Conclusion. Therapists selected an eclectic approach to intervention rather than specific intervention techniques. The approach to patients' care included interventions to remediate impairments and to compensate for functional limitations. Therapists also reported frequently using motor control and motor learning approaches to facilitate all activities. This approach to care is largely consistent with existing stroke care guidelines and advances in the scientific theories of motor control and motor learning.
참고문헌 (33)
Stroke Muntner 33 1209 2002 10.1161/01.STR.0000015031.57955.D1 Trends in stroke prevalence between 1973 and 1991 in the US population 25 to 74 years of age
Disabil Rehabil deWeerdt 22 181 2000 10.1080/096382800296872 Time use of stroke patients in an intensive rehabilitation unit: a comparison between a Belgian and a Swiss setting
Clin Rehabil Alexander 15 207 2001 10.1191/026921501666047564 What is the association between the different components of stroke rehabilitation and health outcomes
Clin Rehabil Ballinger 13 301 1999 10.1191/026921599673198490 Unpacking the black box of therapy: a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Carr 10 201 1994 10.3109/09593989409036399 Physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: bases for Australian physiotherapists' choice of treatment
Motor Control Theory and Practical Application Shumway-Cook 1995
Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation Gordon 1 1987 Assumptions underlying physical therapy intervention: theoretical and historical approaches
Stroke Rehabilitation: Guidelines for Exercise and Training to Optimize Motor Skill Carr 2002
Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems: Proceedings of the II-STEP Conference Schmidt 49 1991 Motor learning principles for physical therapy
Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems: Proceedings of the II-STEP Conference Winstein 65 1991 Designing practice for motor learning: clinical implications
Stroke Duncan 33 167 2002 10.1161/hs0102.101014 Adherence to postacute rehabilitation guidelines is associated with functional recovery in stroke
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Schleenbaker 74 1301 1994 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90083-M Electromyographic biofeedback for neuromuscular reeducation in the hemiplegic stroke patient: a meta-analysis
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Moreland 79 134 1998 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90289-1 Electromyographic biofeedback to improve lower extremity function after stroke: a meta-analysis
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Glanz 77 549 1996 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90293-2 Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials
Clin Rehabil DeKroon 16 350 2002 10.1191/0269215502cr504oa Therapeutic electrical stimulation to improve motor control and functional abilities of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review
Cochrane Database Syst Rev Moseley 3 CD002840 2003 Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke
Am J Phys Med Rehabil Deutsch 81 133 1999 10.1097/00002060-200202000-00010 The uniform data system for medial rehabilitation report of patients discharged from comprehensive medical rehabilitation programs in 1999
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.