$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Public Diplomacy and North Korea Policy: Diverging Effects of U.S. Messages in the United States and South Korea

Journal of East Asian studies, v.5 no.2, 2005년, pp.191 - 214  

Mo, Jongryn ,  Hahn, Kyu S.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The Bush administration has pursued a new, hard-line approach to the current nuclear standoff with North Korea. In efforts to build public support from the American public as well as from its allies in the region, the Bush administration has carefully framed, in distinctive ways, the nature of the c...

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Gordon Michael R. , “U.S. Readies Plan to Raise Pressure on North Koreans,” New York Times, December 29, 2002. 

  2. Asian Studies Program Conference Report 2003 Steinberg 

  3. Nelson, Thomas E., Kinder, Donald R.. Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion. The journal of politics, vol.58, no.4, 1055-1078.

  4. The UN Security Council passed Resolution 1441 on November 8, 2002. 

  5. House Karen Elliot , “The Lessons of North Korea: Appeasing a Tyrant Leads to Disaster,” Wall Street Journal, January 3, 2003. 

  6. We acknowledge, because we relied on a nonrepresentative sample, that we are not in a position to assess the generalizability of our findings. Arguably, however, our South Korean sample consists of participants who are most difficult to “persuade,” because young Koreans (including college students) hold relatively strong pro-North Korea (and anti-American) attitudes. Accordingly, it is worth noting that this is likely to create a downward bias in our estimates of framing effects, making it more difficult to find significant results. In any event, at least within the context of our experiment, by the logic of random assignment, we can attribute any postexposure group differences to the experimental treatment itself. 

  7. Kamakura, Wagner A., Mazzon, Jose Afonso. Value Segmentation: A Model for the Measurement of Values and Value Systems. The Journal of consumer research, vol.18, no.2, 208-218.

  8. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals 1996 Kinder 

  9. Talking Politics 1992 Gamson 

  10. Science “The Psychology of Preferences,” 24 136 1982 Kahneman 

  11. Reading Mixed Signals: Ambivalence in American Public Opinion About Government 1999 Cantril 

  12. Laney, James T., Shaplen, Jason T.. How to Deal with North Korea. Foreign affairs, vol.82, no.2, 16-.

  13. ABC News poll. 

  14. In none of these courses was North Korea a central topic. American subjects were drawn from two courses on political economy. These courses focused on various political science applications of game theory analysis. South Korean subjects were drawn from two introductory-level political science courses at a large university in Pusan, South Korea. Given the topical features of these courses, little discussion about the North Korea nuclear problem took place. Therefore, it is unlikely that any course discussion interfered with the findings featured in this study. 

  15. In presenting this argument, however, the Bush administration has not made much use of North Korea's previous failures to live up to its tough rhetoric. Admiral Joy, chief UN negotiator during the armistice negotiations in the Korean War, noting that North Koreans made concessions when they lacked power to resist, commented that “force was a decisive factor, the only logic the communists truly understand.” 

  16. Gottemoeller Rose , “A Deal That Worked,” New York Times, April 26, 2003. 

  17. We asked the following two questions: (1) “How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If the United States (South Korea) decides to negotiate with North Korea, the United States (South Korea) should make it clear that it is willing to impose sanctions and isolation on North Korea.” (2) “How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If the United States (South Korea) decides to negotiate with North Korea, the United States (South Korea) should make it clear that it is willing to use force against North Korea.” 

  18. Dorussen, Han, Mo, Jongryn. Ending Economic Sanctions : Audience Costs and Rent-Seeking as Commitment Strategies. The Journal of conflict resolution, vol.45, no.4, 395-426.

  19. The length of the five articles was kept nearly identical; it ranged from 300 to 327 words. 

  20. The questions were worded as follows: (1) “How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The current North Korean nuclear crisis posits a serious threat to the security in East Asia”; (2) “How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The current North Korean nuclear crisis calls for an immediate action.” 

  21. The question was worded as follows: “How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The U.S. and South Korea share common interests with respect to the current North Korean nuclear crisis.” 

  22. This difference was statistically significant at p < .01 in a paired t-test. 

  23. Beggs, S., Cardell, S., Hausman, J.. Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. Journal of econometrics, vol.17, no.1, 1-19.

  24. Frontier in Econometrics 1974 McFadden 

  25. For example, McFadden , “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” 

  26. We indeed found that the security message did make South Korean subjects feel more urgency. But this apparently led them to believe that even more dovish measures ought to be employed to resolve the conflict in a timely manner. 

  27. Jacoby , “Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending.” 

  28. 10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001 

  29. It ought to be noted that we replicated all our findings based on respondents' absolute policy support by taking an alternative analytical approach. We modeled respondents' absolute support for the five policy alternatives in a seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) model. Substantively, our results remained unaltered from those reported here. For brevity, we omit these results from this report. 

  30. Cha, Victor D.. Korea's Place in the Axis. Foreign affairs, vol.81, no.3, 79-.

  31. In support of this view, we found that, inferring from “feeling thermometer” ratings, the humanitarian message significantly lowered their favorable attitudes toward both North Korea and Kim Jong Il. 

  32. Halloran Richard , “Korean Surprise,” Baltimore Sun, April 3, 2003. 

  33. 10.7208/chicago/9780226293660.001.0001 

  34. In terms of policy goals, one major disagreement is whether future policies must focus primarily on eliminating weapons of mass destruction from the Korean peninsula or on avoiding military conflict in the Korean peninsula. Accordingly, we employed the following two measures to capture this core dimension in the current debate: How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements? (1) “It is important that North Korea give up nuclear weapons”; and (2) “Even if North Korea possesses nuclear weapons, it is important to avoid a military conflict with North Korea.” 

  35. Orne, Martin T.. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.. The American psychologist, vol.17, no.11, 776-783.

  36. Segye Ilbo, June 3, 2003. 

  37. For example, Steinberg , “Korean Attitudes Towards the United States.” Also see Moon Katharine , “Korean Nationalism, Anti-Americanism, and Democratic Consolidation,” in Kim Samuel S. , ed., Korea's Democratization (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003). 

  38. For example, Gamson , Talking Politics. 

관련 콘텐츠

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로