[논문]Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: An in vitro study

Bishara, S.E.; Trulove, T.S.

doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81604-X

Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: An in vitro study

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, v.98 no.3, 1990년, pp.263 - 273

Bishara, S.E. , Trulove, T.S.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

A series of tests of three different debonding techniques applied to three different types of ceramic brackets revealed the following: (1) The incidence of bracket failure during debonding was significantly greater with conventional debonding recommended by the manufacturer (10-35%), as compared with the incidence associated with either the ultrasonic or the electrothermal methods (0%). (2) Bond failure at the bracket-adhesive interface occurred with significantly greater frequency for the Starfire brackets when debonding was performed with the electrothermal instrument and with significantly less frequency when the debonding pliers were used. Combination bond failures, in which part of the adhesive stayed on the enamel and part stayed on the bracket, occurred with significantly greater frequency when Transcend and Starfire brackets were debonded with debonding wrenches than when other methods were used. Combination-bond failures occurred with significantly less frequency when the brackets were removed with ultrasonic tips or with the electrothermal instrument. (3) The debonding times for the ultrasonic method were significantly greater than the times for either the conventional or the electrothermal methods. There were no significant differences among the debonding times for the three bracket types. There were no significant differences in the debonding times between the electrothermal method (@?x = 3.0 seconds) and the conventional bracket-removal method (@?x = 1.0 seconds). (4) Enamel loss as a result of adhesive removal was not significantly different among the three adhesive-removal techniques tested. Post-treatment roughness of the enamel surface was greater for the high-speed adhesive-removal technique than for either the low-speed or ultrasonic adhesive-removal methods.

참고문헌 (11)

Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Douglas 95 96 1989 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90387-9 Enamel wear caused by ceramic brackets

상세보기
Bull Am Assoc Orthod Linquist 7 2 3 1989 President's letter of AAO members regarding ceramic brackets
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Gwinnett 93 346 1988 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90165-5 A comparison of shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets

상세보기
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Odegaard 94 201 1988 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90028-5 Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket

상세보기
J Clin Orthod Swartz 22 82 1988 Ceramic brackets
Krell KV, Courey JM, Bishara SE. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques: enamel loss and time requirements. Submitted for publication.
Am J Orthod Sheridan 89 21 1986 10.1016/0002-9416(86)90109-0 Electrothermal debracketing. Part I. An in vitro study

상세보기
Am J Orthod Fitzpatrick 72 671 1977 10.1016/0002-9416(77)90334-7 The effects of wear, acid etching, and bond removal on human enamel

상세보기
Am J Orthod Pus 77 269 1980 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90082-2 Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques

상세보기
1988 Transcend Instruction Manual, Unitek/3M Corporation: No. 11-447-2
Trulove 1989 An in vitro comparative study of debonding three ceramic brackets with three debonding techniques [MS Thesis]

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: An in vitro study

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

참고문헌 (11)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 URL 링크

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트