최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기International journal of project management : the journal of the International Project Management Association, v.27 no.7, 2009년, pp.665 - 679
Sauser, Brian J. (Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 201 216 8589) , Reilly, Richard R. (fax: +1 201 216 5541.) , Shenhar, Aaron J. (Stevens Institute of Technology, School of System and Enterprises, Castle Point on Hudson, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA)
AbstractWhen important projects fail, the investigation is often focused on the engineering and technical reasons for the failure. That was the case in NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter (MCO) that was lost in space after completing its nine-month journey to Mars. Yet, in many cases the root cause of...
Peart 1971 Design of project management systems and records
Acad. Manag. Rev. Eisenhardt 14 4 532 1989 10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 Building theories from case study research
Manag. Sci. Pich 48 8 1008 2002 10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163 On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management
Admin. Sci. Quart. Henderson 35 1 9 1990 10.2307/2393549 Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms
Organ. Sci. Terwiesch 13 4 402 2002 10.1287/orsc.13.4.402.2948 Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering: alternative coordination strategies
Shenhar AJ. Real life project analysis - guidelines. Stevens Institute of Technology; 1999.
Project Manag. J. Bubshait 23 2 43 1992 Project characteristics that influence the implementation of project management techniques: a survey
Clark 1991 Product development performance
Griner CS, Keegan WB. Enhancing mission success - a framework for the future: a report by the NASA chief engineer and the NASA integrated action team. National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2000.
Int. J. Project Manag. Turner 11 2 93 1993 10.1016/0263-7863(93)90017-H Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with lll defined goals and/or methods of achieving them
The Standish group: the chaos report. West Yarmouth, MA: The Standish Group International, Inc.; 2001.
Evans M. Overdue and over budget, over and over again. The Economist; 2005.
Hammer 2003 Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution
Roush W. R deficit=D inflation. Technology Review, July 27; 2005.
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change Tishler 51 2 151 1996 10.1016/0040-1625(95)00197-2 Identifying critical success factors in defense development projects: a multivariate analysis
Zhang L, Lee KO, Zhang Z, Banerjee P. Critical success factors of enterprise resource planning systems implementation success in China. In: Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii international conference on systems sciences; 2003.
Int. J. Project Manag. Belassi 14 3 141 1996 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00064-X A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects
Morris 1987 The anatomy of major projects: a study of the reality of project management
Int. J. Project Manag. Munns 14 2 81 1996 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00057-7 The role of project management in achieving project success
Project Manag. J. Pinto 19 3 67 1988 Critical success factors across the project life cycle
Organ. Stud. Lindkvist 19 6 931 1998 10.1177/017084069801900602 Managing product development projects: on significance of fountains and deadlines
Int. J. Project Manag. Payne 17 1 55 1999 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00005-2 Company-wide project management: the planning and control of programs of projects of different type
Int. J. Project Manag. Floricel 19 445 2001 10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00047-3 Strategizing for anticipating risks and turbulence in large-scale engineering projects
Admin. Sci. Quart. Drazin 30 514 1985 10.2307/2392695 Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory
Lawrence 1967 Organization and environment: managing differentiation and integration
Res. Organ. Behav. Pennings 14 267 1992 Structural contingency theory: a reappraisal
Manag. Sci. Shenhar 47 3 394 2001 10.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772 One size does not fit all projects: exploring classical contingency domains
Woodward 1958 Management and technology
Burns 1961 The management of innovation
Shenhar 1265 2004 The Wiley guide to managing projects How projects differ, and what to do about it
Res. Policy Shenhar 25 607 1996 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00877-2 Toward a typological theory of project management
Thompson 1967 Organizations in action
Youker R. The difference between different types of projects (Revised). In: Proceedings of PMI 30th annual seminar and symposium. Philadelphia, PA; 2002 http://www.maxwideman.com/guests/index.htm.
Am. Sociol. Rev. Perrow 32 194 1967 10.2307/2091811 A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations
Galbraith 1977 Organization design
Archibald 2003 Managing high-technology programs and projects
Archibald RD, Voropaev VI. Commonalities and differences in project management around the world: a survey of project categories and life cycle models. In: Proceeding of the 17th IPMA world congress on project management. Moscow, Russia; 2003.
Int. J. Project Manag. Atkinson 17 6 337 1999 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6 Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria
Shenhar 2007 Reinventing project management: the diamond approach to successful growth and innovation
Crawford 2004 Project categorization systems
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. Williams 52 4 497 2005 10.1109/TEM.2005.856572 Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns
Sauser 2004 A case study of Mars Climate Orbiter
Blake 1978 Managing for responsive research and development
Steele 1975 Innovation in big business
Wheelwright 1992 Revolutionizing product development
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. Tatikonda 47 1 74 2000 10.1109/17.820727 Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: a deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation
Int. J. Project Manag. Soderlund 9 4 451 2005 Developing project competence. Empirical regularities in competitive project operations
PMI 2002 Government extension to a guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)
PMI 2003 Construction extension to a guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)
PMI 2003 United States Department of Defense Extension to: a guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)
Res. Policy Dvir 27 915 1998 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00085-7 In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors
Manag. Sci. Gatignon 48 9 1103 2002 10.1287/mnsc.48.9.1103.174 A structural approach to assessing innovation: construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. Shenhar 45 1 33 1998 10.1109/17.658659 From theory to practice. toward a typology of project management styles
Manag. Sci. Mihm 46 6 733 2003 10.1287/mnsc.49.6.733.16021 Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects
Gillham 2000 Case study research methods
Yin 1994 Case study research: design and methods
Denzin 1984 The research act
Stake 1995 The art of case research
Goldin 2000 When the best must do even better: remarks by Daniel S. Goldin at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Perrow 1999 Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies
Vaughn 1996 The challenger launch decision: risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA
CAIB 2003 Columbia accident investigation board report
Lewis 1984 The voyage of Columbia, the first spaceship
Project Manag. J. Webster 18 2 41 1987 The space shuttle challenger incident: showcase project
J. Cases Inform. Technol. Guthrie 7 3 57 2005 10.4018/jcit.2005070104 The Columbia disaster: culture, communication and change
Chaisson 1998 The Hubble wars
Acta Astronaut. Newman 48 5-12 517 2001 10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00071-6 Failure-space. A systems engineering look at 50 space system failures
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. Balachandra 44 276 1997 10.1109/17.618169 Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework
Syst. Res. Forum Sauser 1 1 27 2006 10.1142/S1793966606000102 A return to the moon: a system engineering management framework and the success of lunar prospector
Eng. Manag. J. Shenhar 17 4 8 2005 10.1080/10429247.2005.11431667 Toward a NASA-specific project management framework
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.