[논문]Inter-rater reliability of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study

Fischer, Michael; Rü; egg, Stephan; Czaplinski, Adam; Strohmeier, Monika; Lehmann, Angelika; Tschan, Franziska; Hunziker, Patrick R; Marsch, Stephan C

doi:10.1186/cc8963

[해외논문] Inter-rater reliability of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study 원문보기

Critical care CC, v.14 no.2, 2010년, pp.R64 - R64

Fischer, Michael (Department of Medical Intensive Care, University Hospital, Spitalstrasse, Basel, 4031, Switzerland) , Rüegg, Stephan (Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Spitalstrasse, Basel, 4031, Switzerland) , Czaplinski, Adam (Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Spitalstrasse, Basel, 4031, Switzerland) , Strohmeier, Monika (Department of Medical Intensive Care, University Hospital, Spitalstrasse, Basel, 4031, Switzerland) , Lehmann, Angelika (Department of Medical Intensive Care, University Hospital, Spitalstrasse, Basel, 4031, Switzerland) , Tschan, Franziska (Department of Psychology, University of Neuchatel, Rue de la Maladiè) , Hunziker, Patrick R (re, Neuchatel, 2000, Switzerland) , Marsch, Stephan C (Department of Medical Intensive Care, University Hospital, Spitalstrasse, Basel, 4031, Switzerland)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

IntroductionThe Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is the most widely used scoring system for comatose patients in intensive care. Limitations of the GCS include the impossibility to assess the verbal score in intubated or aphasic patients, and an inconsistent inter-rater reliability. The FOUR (Full Outline of UnResponsiveness) score, a new coma scale not reliant on verbal response, was recently proposed. The aim of the present study was to compare the inter-rater reliability of the GCS and the FOUR score among unselected patients in general critical care. A further aim was to compare the inter-rater reliability of neurologists with that of intensive care unit (ICU) staff.MethodsIn this prospective observational study, scoring of GCS and FOUR score was performed by neurologists and ICU staff on 267 consecutive patients admitted to intensive care.ResultsIn a total of 437 pair wise ratings the exact inter-rater agreement for the GCS was 71%, and for the FOUR score 82% (P = 0.0016); the inter-rater agreement within a range of ± 1 score point for the GCS was 90%, and for the FOUR score 92% (P = ns.). The exact inter-rater agreement among neurologists was superior to that among ICU staff for the FOUR score (87% vs. 79%, P = 0.04) but not for the GCS (73% vs. 73%). Neurologists and ICU staff did not significantly differ in the inter-rater agreement within a range of ± 1 score point for both GCS (88% vs. 93%) and the FOUR score (91% vs. 88%).ConclusionsThe FOUR score performed better than the GCS for exact inter-rater agreement, but not for the clinically more relevant agreement within the range of ± 1 score point. Though neurologists outperformed ICU staff with regard to exact inter-rater agreement, the inter-rater agreement of ICU staff within the clinically more relevant range of ± 1 score point equalled that of the neurologists. The small advantage in inter-rater reliability of the FOUR score is most likely insufficient to replace the GCS, a score with a long tradition in intensive care.

참고문헌 (16)

Teasdale G Jennett B Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale Lancet 1974 2 81 84 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91639-0 4136544

상세보기
Gill M Martens K Lynch EL Salih A Green SM Interrater reliability of 3 simplified neurologic scales applied to adults presenting to the emergency department with altered levels of consciousness Ann Emerg Med 2007 49 403 407 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.031 17141146

상세보기
Balestreri M Czosnyka M Chatfield DA Steiner LA Schmidt EA Smielewski P Matta B Pickard JD Predictive value of Glasgow Coma Scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004 75 161 162 14707332

상세보기
Benzer A Mitterschiffthaler G Marosi M Luef G Puhringer F De La Renotiere K Lehner H Schmutzhard E Prediction of non-survival after trauma: Innsbruck Coma Scale Lancet 1991 338 977 978 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91840-Q 1681344

상세보기
Gill M Windemuth R Steele R Green SM A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale score to simplified alternative scores for the prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes Ann Emerg Med 2005 45 37 42 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.07.429 15635308

상세보기
Stanczak DE White JG III Gouview WD Moehle KA Daniel M Novack T Long CJ Assessment of level of consciousness following severe neurological insult. A comparison of the psychometric qualities of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Comprehensive Level of Consciousness Scale J Neurosurg 1984 60 955 960 10.3171/jns.1984.60.5.0955 6716164

상세보기
Starmark JE Stalhammar D Holmgren E Rosander B A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85) J Neurosurg 1988 69 699 706 10.3171/jns.1988.69.5.0699 3054013

상세보기
Wijdicks EF Bamlet WR Maramattom BV Manno EM McClelland RL Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score Ann Neurol 2005 58 585 593 10.1002/ana.20611 16178024

상세보기
Wolf CA Wijdicks EF Bamlet WR McClelland RL Further Validation of the FOUR score coma scale by intensive care nurses Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2007 82 435 438 10.4065/82.4.435 17418071

상세보기
Landis JR Koch GG The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 1977 33 159 174 10.2307/2529310 843571

상세보기
Eken C Kartal M Bacanli A Eray O Comparison of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score Coma Scale and the Glasgow Coma Scale in an emergency setting population Eur J Emerg Med 2009 16 29 36 19106717

상세보기
Bland JM Altman DG Cronbach's alpha BMJ 1997 314 572 9055718
Iyer VN Mandrekar JN Danielson RD Zubkov AY Elmer JL Wijdicks EF Validity of the FOUR score coma scale in the medical intensive care unit Mayo Clin Proc 2009 84 694 701 10.4065/84.8.694 19648386

상세보기
Ely EW Truman B Shintani A Thomason JW Wheeler AP Gordon S Francis J Speroff T Gautam S Margolin R Sessler CN Dittus RS Bernard GR Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) JAMA 2003 289 2983 2991 10.1001/jama.289.22.2983 12799407

상세보기
Kho ME McDonald E Stratford PW Cook DJ Interrater reliability of APACHE II scores for medical-surgical intensive care patients: a prospective blinded study Am J Crit Care 2007 16 378 383 17595370

상세보기
Murray GD Butcher I McHugh GS Lu J Mushkudiani NA Maas AI Marmarou A Steyerberg EW Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study J Neurotrauma 2007 24 329 337 10.1089/neu.2006.0035 17375997

상세보기

활용도 분석정보

상세보기

다운로드

내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

[해외논문] Inter-rater reliability of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

참고문헌 (16)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

활용도 분석정보

활용도 Top5 논문

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

[해외논문] Inter-rater reliability of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

참고문헌 (16)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

활용도 분석정보

활용도 Top5 논문 더보기

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

활용도 Top5 논문