$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Camera Calibration with Baseline Distance Constraints

The Photogrammetric record, v.25 no.130, 2010년, pp.140 - 158  

Lerma, José ((jllerma@cgf.upv.es)) ,  L. ((sannata@upvnet.upv.es)) ,  Navarro, Santiago ((micablo@upvnet.upv.es)) ,  Cabrelles, Miriam ((ansegil@upvnet.upv.es)Polytechnic University of Valencia, Spain) ,  Seguí, Ana E.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

AbstractThis paper presents a distance-constrained bundle adjustment approach which was used to calibrate a multi-sensor system. The multi-sensor system integrates three rigidly fixed cameras, two visible and one thermal infrared. The influence of the number of camera base constraints is empirically...

Abstract

ZusammenfassungDieser Beitrag stellt einen Bündelansatz zur Kalibrierung eines Multi-sensorsystems vor, der mit Zwangsbedingungen auf der Basis von Entfernungen arbeitet. Das Multisensorsystem integriert drei starr montierte Kameras, zwei davon für den sichtbaren Bereich des Spektrums, eine für den thermalen Infrarotbereich. Der Einfluss der Anzahl der Kamerabasisbedingungen wird empirisch im Prozess der Selbstkalibrierung der Bündelausgleichung analysiert. Eine erfolgreiche Kalibrierung des Systems erfordert einen vollen Satz von Distanzbedingungen zu den Kamerabasen in der Ausgleichung, um zulängliche Berechnungen der Kamerabasen und der relativen Drehungen zwischen den Kameras zu erhalten. Die Verbesserung der Genauigkeit der Kalibrierung ist hervorragend, wobei die maximale Verbesserung bei der gering auflösenden Thermalkamera erreicht werden konnte. Es wird empfohlen diesen Ansatz für fest montierte Multisensorsysteme zu verwenden.

Abstract

RésuméCet article présente une méthode de compensation par faisceaux avec une distance contrainte, utilisée pour étalonner un système multicapteurs. Le système multicapteurs est constitué de trois caméras fixées rigidement, deux dans le visible et une dans l’infrarouge thermique. L’influence du nombre de contraintes sur la distance de base est analysée empiriquement par un auto-étalonnage par compensation par faisceaux. Pour réussir l’étalonnage du système multicapteurs il est nécessaire d’incorporer la totalité des contraintes sur les distances de base, afin d’obtenir un calcul satisfaisant des distances de base entre les caméras et des rotations relatives entre caméras. L’amélioration de la précision de l’étalonnage est remarquable, le maximum étant obtenu pour la caméra thermique à basse résolution. La solution contrainte est recommandée pour les systèmes multicapteurs contenant des caméras fixées rigidement.

주제어

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Ahmad, A., Chandler, J. H.. Photogrammetric Capabilities of the Kodak DC40, DCS420 and DCS460 Digital Cameras. The Photogrammetric record, vol.16, no.94, 601-615.

  2. Boland J. 2000.Camera Calibration Panel Report. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.http://www.asprs.org/news/archive/final_report.html[Accessed: 25th June 2008]. 

  3. Brumana R. Fregonese L. Fassi F.andPascalis F. 2005.3D laser scanner points clouds and 2D multi‐spectral images: a data matching software for cultural heritage conservation. CIPA XX International Symposium Torino Italy. 5 pages. 

  4. Photogrammetric Engineering Case J. B. 766 27 5 1961 The utilization of constraints in analytical photogrammetry 

  5. Chandler, Jim H., Fryer, John G., Jack, Amanda. Metric capabilities of low-cost digital cameras for close range surface measurement. The Photogrammetric record, vol.20, no.109, 12-26.

  6. Clarke, T. A., Fryer, J. G.. The Development of Camera Calibration Methods and Models. The Photogrammetric record, vol.16, no.91, 51-66.

  7. Cornou S. Dhome M.andSayd P. 2003.Architectural reconstruction with multiple views and geometric constraints. The British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC) Norwich. The British Machine Vision Association and Society for Pattern Recognition. 10 pages. 

  8. Cronk, Simon, Fraser, Clive, Hanley, Harry. Automated metric calibration of colour digital cameras. The Photogrammetric record, vol.21, no.116, 355-372.

  9. Deng, Wen Yi, Dong, Ming Li, Lu, Nai Guang, Wang, Y.Q.. Photogrammetric Method with Distance Constraint for Profile of Inflatable Space Antenna. Key engineering materials, vol.381, 313-316.

  10. Three‐dimensional Computer Vision: A Geometric Viewpoint Faugeras O. 1993 

  11. Fischler, Martin A., Bolles, Robert C.. Random sample consensus : a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, vol.24, no.6, 381-395.

  12. Fraser, Clive S.. Digital camera self-calibration. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing : official publication of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS), vol.52, no.4, 149-159.

  13. Fraser, C. S., Edmundson, K. L.. The Metric Impact of Reduction Optics in Digital Cameras. The Photogrammetric record, vol.15, no.87, 437-446.

  14. Close Range Photogrammetry and Machine Vision Fryer J. G. 1996 

  15. Integration of multi‐source close‐range data Gianinetto M. 2005 

  16. Grenness, Malcolm J., Osborn, Jon E., Tyas, Martin J.. Mapping tooth surface loss with a fixed‐base stereo camera. The Photogrammetric record, vol.23, no.122, 194-207.

  17. 10.1007/978-3-662-04567-1 

  18. 10.1007/978-3-662-04567-1 

  19. 10.1017/CBO9780511811685 

  20. Hemayed E. E. 2003.A survey of camera self‐calibration.Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance: 351-357. 

  21. van den Heuvel, Frank A.. 3D reconstruction from a single image using geometric constraints. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing : official publication of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS), vol.53, no.6, 354-368.

  22. Geomatics Research Australasia King B. 67 63 1995 Bundle adjustment of constrained stereopairs-mathematical models 

  23. Photogrammetry. Advanced Methods and Applications Kraus K. 1997 

  24. Läbe T.andFörstner W. 2006.Automatic relative orientation of images.Proceedings of the 5th Turkish-German Joint Geodetic Days Berlin. 6 pages. 

  25. Fotogrametría Moderna: Analítica y Digital Lerma J. L. 2002 

  26. Lerma, José L., Cabrelles, Miriam. A review and analyses of plumb-line calibration. The Photogrammetric record, vol.22, no.118, 135-150.

  27. Mobile multicamera photogrammetric system for terrestrial applications Lerma J. L. 2009 

  28. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Lerma J. L. 456 36 5 2007 Visible and thermal IR documentation of a masonry brickwork building 

  29. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing Lichti D. D. 1111 63 9 1997 Constrained FEM self calibration 

  30. Close Range Photogrammetry: Principles, Methods and Applications Luhmann T. 2006 

  31. Manual of Photogrammetry McGlone J. C. 2004 

  32. Introduction to Modern Photogrammetry Mikhail E. M. 2001 

  33. Mills, Jon P., Schneider, Danilo, Barber, David M., Bryan, Paul G.. Geometric assessment of the kodak DCS Pro back. The Photogrammetric record, vol.18, no.103, 193-208.

  34. Nister, D.. An Efficient Solution to the Five-Point Relative Pose Problem. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol.26, no.6, 756-777.

  35. Qian, Gang, Chellappa, Rama. Bayesian self-calibration of a moving camera. Computer vision and image understanding : CVIU, vol.95, no.3, 287-316.

  36. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Remondino F. 266 36 5 2006 Digital camera calibration methods: considerations and comparisons 

  37. Rizzi A. Voltolini F. Remondino F. Girardi S.andGonzo L. 2007.Optical measurement techniques for the digital preservation documentation and analysis of cultural heritage.VIII Conference on Optical 3‐D Measurement Techniques Zurich Switzerland 2:16-24. 

  38. Calibration tests of industrial and scientific CCD cameras Shortis M. R. 1991 

  39. Stewénius, Henrik, Engels, Christopher, Nistér, David. Recent developments on direct relative orientation. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing : official publication of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS), vol.60, no.4, 284-294.

  40. Wackrow, Rene, Chandler, Jim H.. A convergent image configuration for DEM extraction that minimises the systematic effects caused by an inaccurate lens model. The Photogrammetric record, vol.23, no.121, 6-18.

  41. Wackrow, Rene, Chandler, Jim H., Bryan, Paul. Geometric consistency and stability of consumer-grade digital cameras for accurate spatial measurement. The Photogrammetric record, vol.22, no.118, 121-134.

  42. Elements of Photogrammetry with Applications in GIS Wolf P. R. 2000 

  43. Yeredor, A.. The extended least squares criterion: minimization algorithms and applications. IEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society, vol.49, no.1, 74-86.

관련 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로