The purpose of this study was to present resonable and scientific basis to prove the new proposition of the sport culture by mathematical approach as a transcendental study for reexamining the sport culture. The procedures of this study were three steps: the first was to consider the meaning of reex...
The purpose of this study was to present resonable and scientific basis to prove the new proposition of the sport culture by mathematical approach as a transcendental study for reexamining the sport culture. The procedures of this study were three steps: the first was to consider the meaning of reexamining the sport culture, the second was to investigate the implication and meaning of the sport culture as the proof on the general proposition of "P→Q" on the relationships of the inverse and the contraposition by logical ratiocination of mathematics, and the third was to do the pure theoretical attempt to improve the research methods centering around the basis of the new sport culture and the mathematical implication. The following conclusions are supported by the finding of this study. First, the logical ratiocination of mathematics tried doing an attempt of methodology to prove that "the play and sports implicate the sport culture". If "xy=0"were true, "x=0 or y=0" must be true. If it proves, it should be considered as a relationship of "P→Q". From, this proposition, it"s possible to infer that "Q is P", however it is just to show "P is Q". For understanding and practicing the truth on this point of view, we must understand what "x=0 or y=0" means. The propositions of "P→Q", "Q→P", and "~P→~Q" has used frequently. However, the propositions of "~Q→~P" which is to prove "if Q were not true, P should not be true" has not used open. If the proposition of "P is Q" prove, the contraposition as for "if Q were not true, P should not true" should prove. Therefor, we can know "it should be Q" because of reversing the establishment of "if it exist in P". Second, on the above points of view, the true propositions, which the play and the sports imply the sport culture, tried doing the method of the reduction by the contraposition. For understanding, if the play group and the sport group equal the sport culture group, the play group should equal the sport culture group, or the sport group should equal the sport culture group", this study tried presenting the betterment of the research method and desirable method for the true proposition of "the sports culture" to prove "if the play group do not equal the sport culture group, or the sport group do not equal the sport culture group, then the play group and the sport group should not equal the sport culture group".
The purpose of this study was to present resonable and scientific basis to prove the new proposition of the sport culture by mathematical approach as a transcendental study for reexamining the sport culture. The procedures of this study were three steps: the first was to consider the meaning of reexamining the sport culture, the second was to investigate the implication and meaning of the sport culture as the proof on the general proposition of "P→Q" on the relationships of the inverse and the contraposition by logical ratiocination of mathematics, and the third was to do the pure theoretical attempt to improve the research methods centering around the basis of the new sport culture and the mathematical implication. The following conclusions are supported by the finding of this study. First, the logical ratiocination of mathematics tried doing an attempt of methodology to prove that "the play and sports implicate the sport culture". If "xy=0"were true, "x=0 or y=0" must be true. If it proves, it should be considered as a relationship of "P→Q". From, this proposition, it"s possible to infer that "Q is P", however it is just to show "P is Q". For understanding and practicing the truth on this point of view, we must understand what "x=0 or y=0" means. The propositions of "P→Q", "Q→P", and "~P→~Q" has used frequently. However, the propositions of "~Q→~P" which is to prove "if Q were not true, P should not be true" has not used open. If the proposition of "P is Q" prove, the contraposition as for "if Q were not true, P should not true" should prove. Therefor, we can know "it should be Q" because of reversing the establishment of "if it exist in P". Second, on the above points of view, the true propositions, which the play and the sports imply the sport culture, tried doing the method of the reduction by the contraposition. For understanding, if the play group and the sport group equal the sport culture group, the play group should equal the sport culture group, or the sport group should equal the sport culture group", this study tried presenting the betterment of the research method and desirable method for the true proposition of "the sports culture" to prove "if the play group do not equal the sport culture group, or the sport group do not equal the sport culture group, then the play group and the sport group should not equal the sport culture group".
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.