To close examine the relationship of Taekwondo instructors "qualities and trainees" satisfaction, this paper sampled 30 training halls to the population of Taekwondo trainees in Seoul, Kyunggi Province as of 2001, and collected questionnaires from total 400 of partially selected male 12, female 8 fr...
To close examine the relationship of Taekwondo instructors "qualities and trainees" satisfaction, this paper sampled 30 training halls to the population of Taekwondo trainees in Seoul, Kyunggi Province as of 2001, and collected questionnaires from total 400 of partially selected male 12, female 8 from each training hall. As research subjects, it avoided low grade students, and made the 4th, 5th and 6th graders students its subjects. As a survey instrument for examining the relationship of Taekwondo instructors "qualities and trainees" satisfaction, Yang, Hyun-seok(1999)"s and Lee, Shik(1999)"s adapted and supplemented questionnaire on the satisfaction of the hall setting was used, and its reliability is .62~.84, so its is judged to be reliable. As data analysis, only effective sample was encoded, ANOVA, Scheffe, standard multiple regression were executed using window programs, SPSS/PC+ Version 10.0 and following conclusion was obtained. First, to explore the difference of coach"s quality by gender, ANOVA at significance level of p<.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 4〉. As a result of verifying the difference of instructor"s quality by gender, F value of learning development capability was 7.653, and Sig T=.006, which was statistically significant at p<.05, and F value of instructor"s knowledge extent was 7.51, and Sig T=.006, which was statistically significant at p<.05. And facility management was Sig T=0.649, which was not significant Thus it was clarified that learning development capability and instructor"s knowledge level by gender were factors having a significant effect. Second, to explore the difference of coach"s quality by school background, ANOVA at significance level of p<.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 5〉. As a result of verifying the difference of instructor"s quality by school background, F value of learning development capability was 11.832, and Sig T = .000, which was statistically significant at p<.05, and F value of instructor"s knowledge extent was 7.51, and Sig T = .006, which was statistically significant at p<.05. And facility management was Sig T=0.726, which was not significant. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning development capability and instructor"s knowledge level by school background. Third, to explore the difference of instructor"s quality by training period, ANOVA at significance level of p<.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 6〉. As a result of verifying the difference of instructor"s quality by training period, F value of learning development capability was 5.918, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p<.05, and F value of instructor"s knowledge extent was F=5.918, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p<.05. And facility management was F=6.582, Sig T=0.000, which was statistically significant. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning development capability and instructor"s knowledge level by training period. Fourth, to explore satisfaction factors by gender, ANOVA at significance level of p<.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 7〉. As a result of verifying the difference of satisfaction factors by gender, F value of satisfaction factors by gender was F=27.945, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p<.05, and instruction satisfaction was Sig T=.086, which was statistically insignificant at p<.05, facility satisfaction was Sig T=.130, which was not significant at p<.05. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning satisfaction factors by gender. Fifth, to satisfaction factors by school background, ANOVA at significance level of p<.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 8〉. As a result of verifying the difference ..
To close examine the relationship of Taekwondo instructors "qualities and trainees" satisfaction, this paper sampled 30 training halls to the population of Taekwondo trainees in Seoul, Kyunggi Province as of 2001, and collected questionnaires from total 400 of partially selected male 12, female 8 from each training hall. As research subjects, it avoided low grade students, and made the 4th, 5th and 6th graders students its subjects. As a survey instrument for examining the relationship of Taekwondo instructors "qualities and trainees" satisfaction, Yang, Hyun-seok(1999)"s and Lee, Shik(1999)"s adapted and supplemented questionnaire on the satisfaction of the hall setting was used, and its reliability is .62~.84, so its is judged to be reliable. As data analysis, only effective sample was encoded, ANOVA, Scheffe, standard multiple regression were executed using window programs, SPSS/PC+ Version 10.0 and following conclusion was obtained. First, to explore the difference of coach"s quality by gender, ANOVA at significance level of p<.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 4〉. As a result of verifying the difference of instructor"s quality by gender, F value of learning development capability was 7.653, and Sig T=.006, which was statistically significant at p<.05, and F value of instructor"s knowledge extent was 7.51, and Sig T=.006, which was statistically significant at p<.05. And facility management was Sig T=0.649, which was not significant Thus it was clarified that learning development capability and instructor"s knowledge level by gender were factors having a significant effect. Second, to explore the difference of coach"s quality by school background, ANOVA at significance level of p<.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 5〉. As a result of verifying the difference of instructor"s quality by school background, F value of learning development capability was 11.832, and Sig T = .000, which was statistically significant at p<.05, and F value of instructor"s knowledge extent was 7.51, and Sig T = .006, which was statistically significant at p<.05. And facility management was Sig T=0.726, which was not significant. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning development capability and instructor"s knowledge level by school background. Third, to explore the difference of instructor"s quality by training period, ANOVA at significance level of p<.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 6〉. As a result of verifying the difference of instructor"s quality by training period, F value of learning development capability was 5.918, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p<.05, and F value of instructor"s knowledge extent was F=5.918, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p<.05. And facility management was F=6.582, Sig T=0.000, which was statistically significant. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning development capability and instructor"s knowledge level by training period. Fourth, to explore satisfaction factors by gender, ANOVA at significance level of p<.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 7〉. As a result of verifying the difference of satisfaction factors by gender, F value of satisfaction factors by gender was F=27.945, and Sig T=.000, which was statistically significant at p<.05, and instruction satisfaction was Sig T=.086, which was statistically insignificant at p<.05, facility satisfaction was Sig T=.130, which was not significant at p<.05. Thus it was clarified that they are factors having a significant effect on learning satisfaction factors by gender. Fifth, to satisfaction factors by school background, ANOVA at significance level of p<.05 was indicated as shown at 〈Table 8〉. As a result of verifying the difference ..
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.