최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기Physical therapy, v.92 no.8, 2012년, pp.1036 - 1045
Cacchio, Angelo , Necozione, Stefano , MacDermid, Joy C. , Rompe, Jan Dirk , Maffulli, Nicola , di Orio, Ferdinando , Santilli, Valter , Paoloni, Marco
BackgroundThe Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire is a tool designed for self-assessment of forearm pain and disability in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET). However, an Italian version of this questionnaire has not been available.ObjectiveThe aims of this study ...
Am J Sports Med Regan 20 746 1992 10.1177/036354659202000618 Microscopic histopathology of chronic refractory lateral epicondylitis
Br Med Bull Longo 87 131 2008 10.1093/bmb/ldn023 Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow
J Hand Ther MacDermid 14 105 2001 10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80040-5 Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology: issues in instrument development and evaluation
Rheumatology (Oxford) Sathyamoorthy 43 1434 2004 10.1093/rheumatology/keh367 Development and validation of an elbow score [erratum in: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44:1081]
J Shoulder Elbow Surg King 8 351 1999 10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90159-3 A standardized method for assessment of elbow function
J Hand Ther MacDermid 18 407 2005 10.1197/j.jht.2005.07.002 Update: the patient-rated forearm evaluation questionnaire is now the patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation
J Hand Ther Overend 12 31 1999 10.1016/S0894-1130(99)80031-3 Reliability of a patient-rated forearm evaluation questionnaire for patients with lateral epicondylitis
Am J Ind Med Hudak 29 602 1996 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) [erratum in: Am J Ind Med. 1996;30:372]
J Occup Environ Med Pransky 39 1195 1997 10.1097/00043764-199712000-00014 Measuring functional outcomes in work-related upper extremity disorders: development and validation of the upper extremity function scale
J Clin Epidemiol Guillemin 46 1417 1993 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines
Scand J Rheumatol Guillemin 24 61 1995 10.3109/03009749509099285 Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Beaton 25 3186 2000 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014 Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Wuori 79 832 1998 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90366-5 Strength and pain measures associated with lateral epicondylitis bracing
J Hand Ther Rompe 20 3 2007 10.1197/j.jht.2006.10.003 Validation of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation questionnaire
J Bone Joint Surg Am Turchin 80 154 1998 10.2106/00004623-199802000-00002 Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability
J Hand Surg Br Padua 28 179 2003 10.1016/S0266-7681(02)00303-0 Italian version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and validation
Control Clin Trials Deyo 12 142S 1991 10.1016/S0197-2456(05)80019-4 Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: statistic and strategies for evaluation
Phys Ther Stratford 76 1109 1996 10.1093/ptj/76.10.1109 Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores
The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments Fleiss 1 1986 Reliability of measurement
Am J Occup Ther Ottenbacher 47 10 1992 10.5014/ajot.47.1.10 Reliability analysis in therapeutic research: practice and procedures
Practical Statistics for Nursing and Health Care Fowler 2002
Qual Life Res McHorney 4 293 1995 10.1007/BF01593882 Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?
Med Care Kazis 27 S178 1989 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015 Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status
Med Care Liang 28 632 1990 10.1097/00005650-199007000-00008 Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation
J Chronic Dis Guyatt 40 171 1987 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5 Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Cohen 2nd ed. 1988
Pain Farrar 88 287 2000 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00339-0 Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures
Curr Opin Rheumatol Beaton 14 109 2002 10.1097/00002281-200203000-00006 Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research
Phys Ther Riddle 78 1197 1998 10.1093/ptj/78.11.1197 Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 2
J Clin Epidemiol Crosby 56 395 2003 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00044-1 Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life
Phys Ther Stratford 74 528 1994 10.1093/ptj/74.6.528 Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain
BMJ Bland 314 572 1997 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572 Cronbach's alpha
BMC Musculoskelet Disord Nilsson 9 79 2008 10.1186/1471-2474-9-79 Cross-cultural adaptation and determination of the reliability and validity of PRTEE-S (Patientskattad Utvärdering av Tennisarmbåge), a questionnaire for patients with lateral epicondylalgia, in a Swedish population
J Hand Ther Newcomer 18 400 2005 10.1197/j.jht.2005.07.001 Sensitivity of the Patient-Rated Forearm Evaluation questionnaire in lateral epicondylitis
Hong Kong Med J Leung 10 172 2004 Reliability of Hong Kong Chinese version of the Patient-Rated Forearm Evaluation questionnaire for lateral epicondylitis
J Clin Epidemiol Guyatt 45 1341 1992 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90194-R Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Kopec 25 3110 2000 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00005 Measuring functional outcomes in persons with back pain: a review of back-specific questionnaires
J Clin Epidemiol Stucki 48 1369 1995 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00054-2 Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
J Clin Epidemiol Wiebe 56 52 2003 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00537-1 Comparative responsiveness of generic and specific quality-of-life instruments
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.