초록

AI-Helper

비정규직 차별시정제도가 시행된 지 약 4년이 되어 간다. 이 시간 동안 적지 않은 사건들이 노동위원회를 통해 다루어졌고, 일부 사건들은 법원에 계류되어 있다. 본고에서는 이 사건들 가운데 특히 의미가 있다고 생각되는 몇 가지의 사건을 분류하여 다음과 같은 순서로 정리하였다 : ① 기간제 근로계약의 반복ㆍ갱신과 차별시정신청인 적격, ② 국가, 공공기관 등의 차별시정피신청인 적격성과 차별시정의 주체성, ③ 업무의 동종성 및 유사성과 비교대상근로자의 선정, ④ 복수의 비교대상근로자 존재와 선정방식, ⑤ 차별시정신청의 대상으로서 임금 그 밖의 근로조건 ‘등’, ⑥ 임금과 계속되는 차별, ⑦ 단체협약은 합리적 차별의 근거가 될 수 있는가? 지금까지의 차별시정례들 가운데 이 각각에 해당되는 논점들이 어떻게 다루어졌고, 여기에서 어떤 의미 혹은 문제점을 찾아볼 수 있는지를 알아보고자 한다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

It has passed almost 4 years since the Discrimination Correction System for Irregular Workers was put in force. During that time, a lot of cases have been examined by LRC, and some of them are pending in the courts. In this paper, several cases correcting discrimination against irregular workers are...

It has passed almost 4 years since the Discrimination Correction System for Irregular Workers was put in force. During that time, a lot of cases have been examined by LRC, and some of them are pending in the courts. In this paper, several cases correcting discrimination against irregular workers are organized in the order of : ① the repetition and renewal of fixed- term labor contract and the eligibility of the petitioner; ② the eligibility of public institutions as the accused, ③ the sameness or similarity of work and selection of the group of regular workers who can be compared with the petitioner who is an irregular worker, ④ the problem with selection when there are plural groups of regular workers which can be compared with a irregular worker, ⑤ the problem with the meaning of wages and ‘other’ working conditions as the object of correction of discrimination, ⑥ wage as a continuing discrimination, ⑦ the problem whether a collective agreement can be a resonable cause of discrimination. By studying the cases correcting discrimination until now, this paper tries to cover how that points(①-⑦) were solved and what the meaningful or doubtful points are.

주제어