$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[해외논문] Reliability of three landmarking methods for dual inclinometry measurements of lumbar flexion and extension 원문보기

BMC musculoskeletal disorders, v.16, 2015년, pp.121 -   

MacDermid, Joy C (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario Canada) ,  Arumugam, Vanitha (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario Canada) ,  Vincent, Joshua I (Roth –) ,  Payne, Kimberly L (MacFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph’s Healthcare London, London, Ontario Canada) ,  So, Aubrey K (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario Canada)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

BackgroundTo examine the intra and inter-rater reliability of lumbar flexion and extension measurements attained using three landmarking methods for dual inclinometry.MethodsThis was a repeated measures reliability study. Convenience sampling was used to obtain forty volunteer subjects. Two assessor...

Keyword

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 1. Long DM BenDebba M Torgerson WS Boyd RJ Dawson EG Hardy RW Persistent back pain and sciatica in the United States: patient characteristics J Spinal Disord 1996 9 1 40 58 10.1097/00002517-199602000-00007 8727456 

  2. 2. Thomas E Silman AJ Papageorgiou AC Macfarlane GJ Croft PR Association between measures of spinal mobility and low back pain. An analysis of new attenders in primary care Spine 1998 23 3 343 7 10.1097/00007632-199802010-00011 9507623 

  3. 3. Nitschke JE Nattrass CL Disler PB Chou MJ Ooi KT Reliability of the American Medical Association guides’ model for measuring spinal range of motion. Its implication for whole-person impairment rating Spine 1999 24 3 262 8 10.1097/00007632-199902010-00013 10025021 

  4. 4. Rondinelli R Murphy J Esler A Marciano T Cholmakjian C Estimation of normal lumbar flexion with surface inclinometry. A comparison of three methods Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1992 71 4 219 24 10.1097/00002060-199208000-00004 1642821 

  5. 5. Dopf CA Mandel SS Geiger DF Mayer PJ Analysis of spine motion variability using a computerized goniometer compared to physical examination. A prospective clinical study Spine 1994 19 5 586 95 10.1097/00007632-199403000-00015 8184354 

  6. 6. MacDermid JCCK Gandhi R The reliability and validity of double inclinometer in measuring lumbar mobility Physiother Can 2000 53 1 1 s29 

  7. 7. Saur PM Ensink FB Frese K Seeger D Hildebrandt J Lumbar range of motion: reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility Spine 1996 21 11 1332 8 10.1097/00007632-199606010-00011 8725925 

  8. 8. Williams R Binkley J Bloch R Goldsmith CH Minuk T Reliability of the modified-modified Schober and double inclinometer methods for measuring lumbar flexion and extension Phys Ther 1993 73 1 33 44 8417457 

  9. 9. Gardocki RJ Watkins RG Williams LA Measurements of lumbopelvic lordosis using the pelvic radius technique as it correlates with sagittal spinal balance and sacral translation Spine J 2002 2 6 421 9 10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00426-6 14589266 

  10. 10. Fitzgerald GK Wynveen KJ Rheault W Rothschild B Objective assessment with establishment of normal values for lumbar spinal range of motion Phys Ther 1983 63 11 1776 81 6634943 

  11. 11. Kippers V Parker AW Toe-touch test. A measure of its validity Phys Ther 1987 67 11 1680 4 3671506 

  12. 12. Hart DL Rose SJ Reliability of a noninvasive method for measuring the lumbar curve* J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1986 8 4 180 4 10.2519/jospt.1986.8.4.180 18802227 

  13. 13. Beattie P Rothstein JM Lamb RL Reliability of the attraction method for measuring lumbar spine backward bending Phys Ther 1987 67 3 364 9 2950529 

  14. 14. Bryan JM Mosner E Shippee R Stull MA Investigation of the validity of postural evaluation skills in assessing lumbar lordosis using photographs of clothed subjects J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990 12 1 24 9 10.2519/jospt.1990.12.1.24 18796885 

  15. 15. Mayer TG Tencer AF Kristoferson S Mooney V Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984 9 6 588 95 10.1097/00007632-198409000-00009 6238424 

  16. 16. Littlewood C May S Measurement of range of movement in the lumbar spine—what methods are valid? A systematic review Physiotherapy 2007 93 3 201 11 10.1016/j.physio.2006.10.006 

  17. 17. Mayer TG Kondraske G Beals SB Gatchel RJ Spinal range of motion. Accuracy and sources of error with inclinometric measurement Spine 1997 22 17 1976 84 10.1097/00007632-199709010-00006 9306526 

  18. 18. Chen SP Samo DG Chen EH Crampton AR Conrad KM Egan L Reliability of three lumbar sagittal motion measurement methods: surface inclinometers J Occup Environ Med 1997 39 3 217 23 10.1097/00043764-199703000-00011 9093973 

  19. 19. Rainville J Sobel JB Hartigan C Comparison of total lumbosacral flexion and true lumbar flexion measured by a dual inclinometer technique Spine 1994 19 23 2698 701 10.1097/00007632-199412000-00019 7899966 

  20. 20. Cupon LN Jahn WT Current standards for measuring spinal range of motion for impairment J Chiropractic Med 2003 2 1 8 12 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60067-6 

  21. 21. Van A J.A.M der Korst V Assessment of the flexibility of the Lumbar Scand J Rheumatol 1973 2 2 87 91 10.3109/03009747309098823 4750605 

  22. 22. Miller SA Mayer T Cox R Gatchel RJ Reliability problems associated with the modified Schober technique for true lumbar flexion measurement Spine 1992 17 3 345 8 10.1097/00007632-199203000-00017 1533063 

  23. 23. Association AM Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment 4 th edition 1993 4 

  24. 24. Cocchiarela L American Medical Association, Anderson GBJ: Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 5th edition: Amer Medical Assn 2001 5 

  25. 25. Rondinelli RD Genovese E Brigham CR American Medical Association: Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 6th edition: 6th ed. Chicago, Ill.: American Medical Association 2008 6 

  26. 26. Gill K Krag MH Johnson GB Haugh LD Pope MH Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion Spine 1988 13 1 50 3 10.1097/00007632-198801000-00012 3381139 

  27. 27. Mayer RS Chen IH Lavender SA Trafimow JH Andersson GB Variance in the measurement of sagittal lumbar spine range of motion among examiners, subjects, and instruments Spine 1995 20 13 1489 93 10.1097/00007632-199507000-00008 8623068 

  28. 28. Billis EV Foster NE Wright CC Reproducibility and repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in locating spinal levels by palpation Man Ther 2003 8 4 223 32 10.1016/S1356-689X(03)00017-1 14559045 

  29. 29. Binkley J Stratford PW Gill C Interrater reliability of lumbar accessory motion mobility testing Phys Ther 1995 75 9 786 92 7659738 

  30. 30. Downey B Taylor N Niere K Can manipulative physiotherapists agree on which lumbar level to treat based on palpation? Physiotherapy 2003 89 2 74 81 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60578-0 

  31. 31. Harlick JC Milosavljevic S Milburn PD Palpation identification of spinous processes in the lumbar spine Man Ther 2007 12 1 56 62 10.1016/j.math.2006.02.008 16781182 

  32. 32. McKenzie AM Taylor NF Can Physiotherapists locate Lumbar spinal levels by palpation? Physiotherapy 1997 83 5 235 9 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66213-X 

  33. 33. Fleiss JL Design and analysis of clinical experiments: Wiley 2011 

  34. 34. Shrout PE Fleiss JL Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability Psychol Bull 1979 86 2 420 8 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 18839484 

  35. 35. Portney L Watkins M Foundation of Clinical Research: Applications to practice 2000 Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice-Hall 

  36. 36. Quack C Schenk P Laeubli T Spillmann S Hodler J Michel BA Do MRI findings correlate with mobility tests? An explorative analysis of the test validity with regard to structure Eur Spine J 2007 16 6 803 12 10.1007/s00586-006-0264-z 17143634 

  37. 37. Stokes IA Abery JM Influence of the hamstring muscles on lumbar spine curvature in sitting Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1980 5 6 525 8 10.1097/00007632-198011000-00007 7466461 

  38. 38. Woods K Bishop P Jones E Warm-up and stretching in the prevention of muscular injury Sports Med 2007 37 12 1089 99 10.2165/00007256-200737120-00006 18027995 

  39. 39. Perret C Poiraudeau S Fermanian J Colau MM Benhamou MA Revel M Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the fingertip-to-floor test Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001 82 11 1566 70 10.1053/apmr.2001.26064 11689977 

  40. 40. Sarah T A systematic review of methods to measure posture Physical Ther Rev 2003 8 1 45 50 10.1179/108331903225001390 

활용도 분석정보

상세보기
다운로드
내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로