$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Improving social media measurement in surveys: Avoiding acquiescence bias in Facebook research

Computers in human behavior, v.57, 2016년, pp.82 - 92  

Kuru, O. ,  Pasek, J.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Social media measurement relies heavily on self-report survey research. Hence, known biases in how individuals answer survey questions can introduce systematic errors into the social media literature. In particular, many common social media measures are prone to acquiescence response bias, an error ...

주제어

참고문헌 (62)

  1. Journal of Marketing Bagozzi 48 1 11 1984 10.2307/1251307 A prospectus for theory construction in marketing 

  2. Journal of Marketing Research Baumgartner 38 2 143 2001 10.1509/jmkr.38.2.143.18840 Response styles in marketing research: a cross-national investigation 

  3. Psychological Bulletin Bentler 107 2 238 1990 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 Comparative fit indexes in structural models 

  4. Psychological Bulletin Bentler 88 3 588 1980 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures 

  5. Political Analysis Berinsky 20 3 351 2012 10.1093/pan/mpr057 Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's mechanical turk 

  6. Structural Equation Modeling Billiet 7 4 608 2000 10.1207/S15328007SEM0704_5 Modeling acquiescence in measurement models for two balanced sets of items 

  7. Journal of Information Technology & Politics Bode 9 4 352 2012 10.1080/19331681.2012.709045 Facebooking it to the polls: a study in online social networking and political behavior 

  8. Brown Vol. 4 1987 

  9. Perspectives on Psychological Science Buhrmester 6 1 3 2011 10.1177/1745691610393980 Amazon's mechanical turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? 

  10. American Sociological Review Carr 36 2 287 1971 10.2307/2094045 The srole items and acquiescence 

  11. Behaviormetrika Chan 30 1 99 2003 10.2333/bhmk.30.99 Analyzing ipsative data in psychological research 

  12. Sociometry Cloud 33 2 192 1970 10.2307/2786329 Using balanced scales to control acquiescence 

  13. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology Cheung 31 2 187 2000 10.1177/0022022100031002003 Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling 

  14. Costa 1992 Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO FFI): Professional manual 

  15. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology Couch 60 2 151 1960 10.1037/h0040372 Yeasayers and naysayers: agreeing response set as a personality variable 

  16. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication Ellison 12 4 1143 2007 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x The benefits of facebook “Friends:” social capital and college students' use of online social network sites 

  17. New Media & Society Ellison 13 6 873 2011 10.1177/1461444810385389 Connection strategies: social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices 

  18. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication Ellison 19 4 855 2014 10.1111/jcc4.12078 Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes 

  19. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking Elphinston 14 11 631 2011 10.1089/cyber.2010.0318 Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction 

  20. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology Fischer 35 3 263 2004 10.1177/0022022104264122 Standardization to account for cross-cultural response bias A classification of score adjustment procedures and review of research in JCCP 

  21. Fowler Vol. 38 1995 

  22. Journal of Marketing Research Greenleaf 29 2 176 1992 10.2307/3172568 Improving rating scale measures by detecting and correcting bias components in some response styles 

  23. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal Hu 6 1 1 1999 10.1080/10705519909540118 Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives 

  24. Journal of Social Psychology Jackson 49 1 65 1959 10.1080/00224545.1959.9921964 Cognitive energy level, acquiescence, and authoritarianism 

  25. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication Jarvenpaa 5 2 1999 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00337.x Consumer trust in an internet store: a cross-cultural validation 

  26. Computers in Human Behavior Junco 28 1 187 2012 10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026 Too much face and not enough books: the relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance 

  27. Computers in Human Behavior Junco 29 3 626 2013 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.007 Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use 

  28. Kline 2005 Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 

  29. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Knowles 77 2 379 1999 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.379 Why people say “yes”: a dual-process theory of acquiescence 

  30. Amcis 2009 Proceedings Krasnova 343 2009 “It Won't happen to me!”: self-disclosure in online social networks 

  31. Journal of Information Technology Krasnova 25 2 109 2010 10.1057/jit.2010.6 Online social networks: why we disclose 

  32. Applied Cognitive Psychology Krosnick 5 3 213 1991 10.1002/acp.2350050305 Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys 

  33. Annual Review of Psychology Krosnick 50 537 1999 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537 Survey research 

  34. Public Opinion Quarterly Krosnick 51 2 201 1987 10.1086/269029 An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement 

  35. Krosnick 2001 Designing good questionnaires: Insights from psychology 

  36. Kuru, O. & Pasek, J. (in press). Comparing social media use and political engagement: Toward a valid measurement strategy. In Richardson G. (Ed.) Social media and politics: A new way to participate in the political process. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. 

  37. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society Kwon 2013 10.1177/0270467613496767 Facebook use and social capital: to bond, to bridge, or to escape 

  38. Leech 1983 Principles of pragmatics 

  39. Computers in Human Behavior Lee 36 440 2014 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.007 How do people use Facebook features to manage social capital? 

  40. American Journal of Sociology Lenski 65 5 463 1960 10.1086/222750 Caste, class, and deference in the research interview 

  41. Journal of Retailing MacKenzie 88 4 542 2012 10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001 Common method bias in marketing: causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies 

  42. Information Systems Research McKnight 13 3 334 2002 10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology 

  43. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking Mehdizadeh 13 4 357 2010 10.1089/cyber.2009.0257 Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on facebook 

  44. Messick 161 1991 Psychology and methodology of response styles 

  45. Nunnally 1978 Psychometric theory 

  46. New Media & Society Park 2012 10.1177/1461444812465927 Does social networking service usage mediate the association between smartphone usage and social capital? 

  47. Pasek 27 2010 Optimizing survey questionnaire design in political science: Insights from psychology 

  48. Journal of Applied Psychology Podsakoff 88 5 879 2003 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies 

  49. Rosenberg 1965 Society and the adolescent self-image 

  50. Medical Care Ross 33 4 392 1995 10.1097/00005650-199504000-00006 A comparative study of seven measures of patient satisfaction 

  51. Saris Vol. 4 61 2010 Comparing questions with agree/disagree response options to questions with item-specific response options 

  52. Educational and Psychological Measurement Schriesheim 41 4 1101 1981 10.1177/001316448104100420 Controlling acquiescence response bias by item reversals: the effect on questionnaire validity 

  53. Schuman 1981 Questions and answers in attitude surveys 

  54. Simon 1957 Models of man; social and rational 

  55. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology Steinfield 29 6 434 2008 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002 Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: a longitudinal analysis 

  56. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking Vitak 14 3 107 2011 10.1089/cyber.2009.0226 It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election 

  57. Applied Psychological Measurement Weijters 34 2 105 2010 10.1177/0146621609338593 The individual consistency of acquiescence and extreme response style in self-report questionnaires 

  58. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology Welkenhuysen-Gybels 34 6 702 2003 10.1177/0022022103257070 Adjustment for acquiescence in the assessment of the construct equivalence of Likert-Type score items 

  59. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication Williams 11 2 593 2006 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029.x On and off the Net: scales for social capital in an online Era 

  60. Journal of Applied Psychology Williams 81 1 88 1996 10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.88 Measurement and nonmeasurement processes with negative affectivity and employee attitudes 

  61. Perspectives on Psychological Science Wilson 7 3 203 2012 10.1177/1745691612442904 A review of facebook research in the social sciences 

  62. Proceedings Ascilite Hobart Wise 1332 2011 Facebook in higher education promotes social but not academic engagement. Changing demands, changing directions 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로