다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery, v.51 no.4, 2016년, pp.587 - 593
Santema, T.B. , Stubenrouch, F.E. , Koelemay, M.J.W. , Vahl, A.C. , Vermeulen, C.F.W. , Visser, M.J.T. , Ubbink, D.T.
AI-Helper
Objectives: Shared decision making (SDM) is a process in which patients and their doctors collaborate in choosing a suitable treatment option by incorporating patient values and preferences, as well as the best available evidence. Particularly in vascular surgery, several conditions seem suitable fo...
Surg Technol Int Ubbink 26 31 2015 Shared decision making in surgery
Med Decis Making Moumjid 27 5 539 2007 10.1177/0272989X07306779 Shared decision making in the medical encounter: are we all talking about the same thing?
Health Aff Fowler 30 4 699 2011 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0003 Informing and involving patients to improve the quality of medical decisions
BMJ Stiggelbout 344 e256 2012 10.1136/bmj.e256 Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare
Ann Surg Knops 257 5 860 2013 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182864fd6 Decision aids for patients facing a surgical treatment decision: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Patient Educ Couns Bekker 50 3 323 2003 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00056-9 Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome
N Engl J Med Oshima Lee 368 1 6 2013 10.1056/NEJMp1209500 Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs
Circulation Naik 117 11 1361 2008 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.724005 Improving hypertension control in diabetes mellitus: the effects of collaborative and proactive health communication
Am J Respir Crit Care Med Wilson 181 6 566 2010 10.1164/rccm.200906-0907OC Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma
JAMA World Medical A 310 20 2191 2013 10.1001/jama.2013.281053 World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects
Patient Educ Couns Kriston 80 1 94 2010 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034 The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample
Patient Educ Couns Scholl 88 2 284 2012 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.005 Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-physician version (SDM-Q-Doc)
Qual Saf Health Care Elwyn 12 2 93 2003 10.1136/qhc.12.2.93 Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement
Patient Educ Couns Goossensen 67 1-2 50 2007 10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.017 Measuring shared decision making processes in psychiatry: skills versus patient satisfaction
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat De Las Cuevas 9 1045 2013 10.2147/NDT.S49021 Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
Patient Educ Couns Weiss 70 1 79 2008 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.001 Measuring shared decision making in the consultation: a comparison of the OPTION and informed decision making instruments
Statistician Altman 32 3 307 1983 10.2307/2987937 Measurement in medicine - the analysis of method comparison studies
Social Sci Med Entwistle 66 2 362 2008 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.001 Involvement in treatment decision making: its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation
Patient Educ Couns Entwistle 63 3 268 2006 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.002 Patient involvement in treatment decision making: the case for a broader conceptual framework
JAMA Strull 252 21 2990 1984 10.1001/jama.1984.03350210038026 Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?
Ann Oncol Tariman 21 6 1145 2010 10.1093/annonc/mdp534 Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review
Patient Educ Couns Chewning 86 1 9 2012 10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004 Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Brom 14 25 2014 10.1186/1472-6947-14-25 Congruence between patients' preferred and perceived participation in medical decision making: a review of the literature
Fam Pract Coleman 17 5 422 2000 10.1093/fampra/17.5.422 Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations
Patient Educ Couns Henry 98 7 849 2015 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.006 Analysis of threats to research validity introduced by audio recording clinic visits: selection bias, Hawthorne effect, both, or neither?
Soc Sci Med Epstein 61 7 1516 2005 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.001 Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues
Br J Psychiatry Goss 193 5 416 2008 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.048728 Involving patients in decisions during psychiatric consultations
Health Expect Couet 18 4 542 2015 10.1111/hex.12054 Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument
BMJ Mulley 345 e6572 2012 10.1136/bmj.e6572 Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients' preferences matter
Acad Med Pellerin 86 8 1010 2011 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822220c5 Toward shared decision making: using the OPTION scale to analyze resident-patient consultations in family medicine
J Telemed Telecare Stacey 12 8 410 2006 10.1258/135763306779378663 Randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of an intervention to implement evidence based patient decision support in a nursing call centre
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Knops 48 3 276 2014 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.04.016 A decision aid regarding treatment options for patients with an asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomised clinical trial
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.