참고문헌 (81)

1. Ahlin, ＆Aring;sa; Johansson, Eva etc. "Individual Demand for Local Public Schooling: Evidence from Swedish Survey Data." International tax and public finance, v.8 no.4 (2001), pp. 331-351, doi:10.1023/A:1011206621433.

   

2. Alevy, J. E., List, J. A., Adamowicz, W. L.. How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Nonmarket Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature. Land economics, vol.87, no.3, 365-381.

   상세보기

3. Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D.. "Coherent Arbitrariness": Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences. The Quarterly journal of economics, vol.118, no.1, 73-106.

   상세보기

4. Federal Register Arrow K. 4601 58 10 1993 Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation 

5. 10.4337/9781781009727 

   

6. Bechtel, Michael M., Hainmueller, Jens, Hangartner, Dominik, Helbling, Marc. Reality Bites: The Limits of Framing Effects for Salient and Contested Policy Issues. Political Science Research and Methods : PSRM : the Journal of the the European Political Science Association, vol.3, no.3, 683-695.

   상세보기

7. Bergstrom, T.C., Roberts, J.A., Rubinfeld, D.L., Shapiro, P.. A test for efficiency in the supply of public education. Journal of public economics, vol.35, no.3, 289-307.

   상세보기

8. Bergstrom, Theodore C., Rubinfeld, Daniel L., Shapiro, Perry. Micro-Based Estimates of Demand Functions for Local School Expenditures. Econometrica : journal of the Econometric Society, vol.50, no.5, 1183-.

   상세보기

9. Bowen, Howard R.. The Interpretation of Voting in the Allocation of Economic Resources. The Quarterly journal of economics, vol.58, no.1, 27-48.

   상세보기

10. Brookshire, David S., Crocker, Thomas D.. The advantages of contingent valuation methods for benefit-cost analysis. Public choice, vol.36, no.2, 235-252.

    상세보기

11. Cai, Beilei, Cameron, Trudy Ann, Gerdes, Geoffrey R.. Distributional Preferences and the Incidence of Costs and Benefits in Climate Change Policy. Environmental & resource economics, vol.46, no.4, 429-458.

    상세보기

12. Carlsson, Fredrik. Design of Stated Preference Surveys: Is There More to Learn from Behavioral Economics?. Environmental & resource economics, vol.46, no.2, 167-177.

    상세보기

13. Carson, Richard T. Contingent Valuation: A Practical Alternative when Prices Aren't Available. The Journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association, vol.26, no.4, 27-42.

    상세보기

14. Carson, Richard T., Groves, Theodore. Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental & resource economics, vol.37, no.1, 181-210.

    상세보기

15. Carson, Richard T., Louviere, Jordan J.. A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches. Environmental & resource economics, vol.49, no.4, 539-559.

    상세보기

16. Champ, Patricia A., Flores, Nicholas E., Brown, Thomas C., Chivers, James. Contingent Valuation and Incentives. Land economics, vol.78, no.4, 591-604.

    상세보기

17. American Economic Review Cummings R.G. 260 85 1 1995 Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys - is the dichotomous choice approach incentive‐compatible 

    상세보기

18. Denzau, Arthur T., Weisz, Reuben N., Walcutt join(' ', James C.. A Quasi-Experimental Method for Studying Public Sector Demands. Southern economic journal, vol.44, no.2, 306-.

    상세보기

19. Desvousges, W., Mathews, K., Train, K.. Adequate responsiveness to scope in contingent valuation. Ecological economics : the journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics, vol.84, 121-128.

    상세보기

20. Diamond, Peter A, Hausman, Jerry A. Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?. The Journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association, vol.8, no.4, 45-64.

    상세보기

21. 10.1093/jleo/17.1.62 

    

22. Fischel, William A. Determinants of voting on environmental quality: A study of a New Hampshire pulp mill referendum. Journal of environmental economics and management, vol.6, no.2, 107-118.

    상세보기

23. Fischhoff, Baruch. Value elicitation: Is there anything in there?. The American psychologist, vol.46, no.8, 835-847.

    상세보기

24. Flores, N.E., Strong, A.. Cost credibility and the stated preference analysis of public goods. Resource and energy economics, vol.29, no.3, 195-205.

    상세보기

25. Getzner, Michael. The regional context of infrastructure policy and environmental valuation: the importance of stakeholders' opinions. Journal of environmental economics and policy, vol.1, no.3, 255-275.

    상세보기

26. Gibbard, Allan. Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result. Econometrica : journal of the Econometric Society, vol.41, no.4, 587-.

    상세보기

27. Gramlich, Edward M., Rubinfeld, Daniel L.. Micro Estimates of Public Spending Demand Functions and Tests of the Tiebout and Median-Voter Hypotheses. The Journal of political economy, vol.90, no.3, 536-560.

    상세보기

28. Green, Donald, Jacowitz, Karen E., Kahneman, Daniel, McFadden, Daniel. Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods. Resource and energy economics, vol.20, no.2, 85-116.

    상세보기

29. Haab, Timothy C., Interis, Matthew G., Petrolia, Daniel R., Whitehead, John C.. From Hopeless to Curious? Thoughts on Hausman's “Dubious to Hopeless” Critique of Contingent Valuation. Applied economic perspectives and policy : AEPP, vol.35, no.4, 593-612.

    상세보기

30. Hanemann, W. Michael. Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation. The Journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association, vol.8, no.4, 19-43.

    상세보기

31. Hanemann, W. Michael. Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses. American journal of agricultural economics, vol.66, no.3, 332-341.

    상세보기

32. Hardie, Ian, Strand, Ivar. Measurement of Economic Benefits for Potential Public Goods. American journal of agricultural economics, vol.61, no.2, 313-317.

    상세보기

33. Hausman, Jerry. Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless. The Journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association, vol.26, no.4, 43-56.

    상세보기

34. Hockley, G.C., Harbour, G.. Revealed preferences between public expenditures and taxation cuts: Public sector choice. Journal of public economics, vol.22, no.3, 387-399.

    상세보기

35. Jacowitz, Karen E., Kahneman, Daniel. Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks. Personality & social psychology bulletin, vol.21, no.11, 1161-1166.

    상세보기

36. Johnston, Robert J.. Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum. Journal of environmental economics and management, vol.52, no.1, 469-481.

    상세보기

37. Kahneman, Daniel. Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. The american economic review, vol.93, no.5, 1449-1475.

    상세보기

38. Kahneman, Daniel, Ritov, Ilana, Schkade, David. Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues. Journal of risk and uncertainty, vol.19, no.1, 203-235.

    상세보기

39. Kling, Catherine L, Phaneuf, Daniel J, Zhao, Jinhua. From Exxon to BP: Has Some Number Become Better than No Number?. The Journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association, vol.26, no.4, 3-26.

    상세보기

40. 10.1057/9780230591189_6 

    

41. Lankford, R.H.. Preferences of citizens for public expenditures on elementary and secondary education. Journal of econometrics, vol.27, no.1, 1-20.

    상세보기

42. Levinson, Arik. Valuing public goods using happiness data: The case of air quality. Journal of public economics, vol.96, no.9, 869-880.

    상세보기

43. List, John A., Gallet, Craig A.. What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?. Environmental & resource economics, vol.20, no.3, 241-254.

    상세보기

44. Lo, Alex Y., Spash, Clive L.. DELIBERATIVE MONETARY VALUATION: IN SEARCH OF A DEMOCRATIC AND VALUE PLURAL APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY. Journal of economic surveys, vol.27, no.4, 768-789.

    상세보기

45. Loomis, John. WHAT'S TO KNOW ABOUT HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN STATED PREFERENCE VALUATION STUDIES?. Journal of economic surveys, vol.25, no.2, 363-370.

    상세보기

46. Lupia, Arthur. Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. The American political science review, vol.88, no.1, 63-76.

    상세보기

47. Lupia, Arthur, Matsusaka, John G.. DIRECT DEMOCRACY: New Approaches to Old Questions. Annual review of political science, vol.7, 463-482.

    상세보기

48. Lupia A.andMcCubbins M.D.(1998)The democratic dilemma: can citizens learn what they need to know?New York:Cambridge University Press. 

49. Public Finance‐Finances Publiques Maital S. 85 34 1 1979 Measurement of net benefits from public goods: a new approach using survey data 

50. McFadden, Daniel. Contingent Valuation and Social Choice. American journal of agricultural economics, vol.76, no.4, 689-708.

    상세보기

51. McFadden, Daniel. Rationality for Economists?. Journal of risk and uncertainty, vol.19, no.1, 73-105.

    상세보기

52. McFadden, Daniel. Economic Choices. The american economic review, vol.91, no.3, 351-378.

    상세보기

53. 1989 Resources for the Future Washington D. C R.C. Mitchell R.T. Carson Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method 

54. Murphy, James J., Allen, P. Geoffrey, Stevens, Thomas H., Weatherhead, Darryl. A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation. Environmental & resource economics, vol.30, no.3, 313-325.

    상세보기

55. Noam, Eli M.. Demand functions and the valuation of public goods. Public choice, vol.38, no.3, 271-280.

    상세보기

56. Water Resources Research Pendse D. 919 12 1976 Measurement of environmental trade‐offs and public policy: a case study 

57. Pommerehne W.W.(1987) Präferenzen für öffentliche Güter. Ansätze zu ihrer Erfassung. J.C.B Mohr Tübingen. 

58. Preston, Ian, Ridge, Michael. Demand for Local Public Spending: Evidence from the British Social Attitudes Survey. The economic journal : the quarterly journal of the Royal Economic Society, vol.105, no.430, 644-.

    상세보기

59. Randall, Alan, Ives, Berry, Eastman, Clyde. Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements. Journal of environmental economics and management, vol.1, no.2, 132-149.

    상세보기

60. Rheinberger, Christoph M.. A Mixed Logit Approach to Study Preferences for Safety on Alpine Roads. Environmental & resource economics, vol.49, no.1, 121-146.

    상세보기

61. European Journal of Political Economy Rongen G. 11 235 1995 Efficiency in the provision of local public goods in Norway 

62. Rubinfeld, Daniel L.. Voting in a Local School Election: A Micro Analysis. The review of economics and statistics, vol.59, no.1, 30-.

    상세보기

63. Rubinfeld, D.L., Shapiro, P.. Micro-estimation of the demand for schooling - Evidence from Michigan and Massachusetts. Regional science and urban economics, vol.19, no.3, 381-398.

    상세보기

64. Rubinfield, Daniel L., Shapiro, Perry, Roberts, Judith. Tiebout Bias and the Demand for Local Public Schooling. The review of economics and statistics, vol.69, no.3, 426-.

    상세보기

65. Satterthwaite, Mark Allen. Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. Journal of economic theory, vol.10, no.2, 187-217.

    상세보기

66. Schläpfer, Felix. Access to party positions and preference formation: a field experiment. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft = Revue suisse de science politique = Swiss political science review, vol.17, no.1, 75-91.

    상세보기

67. Schläpfer, Felix, Hanley, Nick. Contingent Valuation and Collective Choice. Kyklos; internationale Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaften, vol.59, no.1, 115-135.

    상세보기

68. Schläpfer, Felix, Roschewitz, Anna, Hanley, Nick. Validation of stated preferences for public goods: a comparison of contingent valuation survey response and voting behaviour. Ecological economics : the journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics, vol.51, no.1, 1-16.

    상세보기

69. Schlapfer, F., Schmitt, M.. Anchors, endorsements, and preferences: A field experiment. Resource and energy economics, vol.29, no.3, 229-243.

    상세보기

70. Schläpfer, Felix, Schmitt, Marcel, Roschewitz, Anna. Competitive politics, simplified heuristics, and preferences for public goods. Ecological economics : the journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics, vol.65, no.3, 574-589.

    상세보기

71. Schokkaert, E.. Preferences and demand for local public spending. Journal of public economics, vol.34, no.2, 175-188.

    상세보기

72. Shabman, Leonard, Stephenson, Kurt. Searching for the Correct Benefit Estimate: Empirical Evidence for an Alternative Perspective. Land economics, vol.72, no.4, 433-449.

    상세보기

73. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources. Methodological Issues and Research Needs Shapiro P. 244 1996 

74. Smith, Vernon L. Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics. The american economic review, vol.93, no.3, 465-508.

    상세보기

75. Strauss, R.P., Hughes, G.D.. A new approach to the demand for public goods. Journal of public economics, vol.6, no.3, 191-204.

    상세보기

76. Sunstein, Cass R., Thaler, Richard H.. Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron. The University of Chicago law review, vol.70, no.4, 1159-.

    상세보기

77. Columbia Law Review Sunstein C.R. 167 114 2014 The real world of cost‐benefit analysis: thirty‐six questions (and almost as many answers) 

    상세보기

78. Tversky, A, Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, vol.211, no.4481, 453-458.

    상세보기

79. A report of the EPA Science Advisory Board USEPA 2009 

80. Vossler, Christian A, Kerkvliet, Joe. A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum. Journal of environmental economics and management, vol.45, no.3, 631-649.

    상세보기

81. Vossler, Christian A., Kerkvliet, Joe, Polasky, Stephen, Gainutdinova, Olesya. Externally validating contingent valuation: an open-space survey and referendum in Corvallis, Oregon. Journal of economic behavior & organization, vol.51, no.2, 261-277.

    상세보기