참고문헌 (35)

1. Aldrich GC Koppel K 2015 Pet food palatability evaluation: a review of standard assay techniques and interpretation of results with a primary focus on limitations . Animals (Basel) . 5 ( 1 ): 43 – 55 . 26479136 

2. Araujo JA Milgram NW 2004 A novel cognitive palatability assessment protocol for dogs . J Anim Sci . 82 ( 7 ): 2200 – 2206 . 15309970 

3. Araujo JA Studzinski CM Larson BT Milgram NW 2004 Comparison of the cognitive palatability assessment protocol and the two-pan test for use in assessing palatability of two similar foods in dogs . Am J Vet Res . 65 ( 11 ): 1490 – 1496 . 15566086 

   상세보기

4. Bradley RA Terry M.E 1952 Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons . Biometrika . 39 : 324 – 345 . 

   상세보기

5. Bradshaw JW 1991 Sensory and experiential factors in the design of foods for domestic dogs and cats . Proc Nutr Soc . 50 ( 1 ): 99 – 106 . 1881936 

   상세보기

6. Bradshaw JW 2006 The evolutionary basis for the feeding behavior of domestic dogs ( Canis familiaris ) and cats ( Felis catus ) . J Nutr . 136 ( 7 Suppl ): 1927S – 1931S . 16772461 

7. Butler JRA Toit JT 2002 Diet of free-ranging domestic dogs ( Canis familiaris ) in rural Zimbabwe: implications for wild scavengers on the periphery of wildlife reserves . Anim Conserv . 5 : 29 – 37 . 

   상세보기

8. Chao ET 1984 Hedonic scaling of sugars using concurrent operant schedules with dogs . Neurosci Biobehav Rev . 8 ( 2 ): 225 – 229 . 6462552 

   상세보기

9. Chen M Chen X Nsor-Atindana J Masamba KG Ma J Zhong F 2016 Optimization of key aroma compounds for dog food attractant . Anim Feed Sci Technol . 225 : 173 – 181 . 

10. David HA 1963 The method of paired comparisons . DTIC Document . http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA417190#page=15 

11. Di Lorenzo PM Youngentob SL 2003 Olfaction and taste . In: Handbook of psychology . Hoboken (NJ) : John Wiley & Sons, Inc . 

12. Dittrich R Hatzinger R 2009 Fitting loglinear Bradley-Terry models (LLBT) for paired comparisons using the R package prefmod . Psychol Test Assess Model 51 : 216 . 

13. Ferrell F 1984 Preference for sugars and nonnutritive sweeteners in young beagles . Neurosci Biobehav Rev . 8 ( 2 ): 199 – 203 . 6205334 

    상세보기

14. Feuerbacher EN Wynne CD 2012 Relative efficacy of human social interaction and food as reinforcers for domestic dogs and hand-reared wolves . J Exp Anal Behav . 98 ( 1 ): 105 – 129 . 22851794 

    상세보기

15. Green PL Rashotte ME 1984 Demonstration of basic concurrent-schedules effects with dogs: choice between different amounts of food . Neurosci Biobehav Rev . 8 ( 2 ): 217 – 224 . 6462551 

    상세보기

16. Griffin RW Scott GC Cante CJ 1984 Food preferences of dogs housed in testing-kennels and in consumers’ homes: some comparisons . Neurosci Biobehav Rev . 8 ( 2 ): 253 – 259 . 6462556 

    상세보기

17. Hall NJ Collada A Smith DW Wynne CDL 2016 Performance of domestic dogs on an olfactory discrimination of a homologous series of alcohols . Appl Anim Behav Sci . 178 : 1 – 6 . 

    상세보기

18. Hewson-Hughes AK Hewson-Hughes VL Colyer A Miller AT McGrane SJ Hall SR Butterwick RF Simpson SJ Raubenheimer D 2013 Geometric analysis of macronutrient selection in breeds of the domestic dog, Canis lupus familiaris . Behav Ecol . 24 ( 1 ): 293 – 304 . 23243377 

    상세보기

19. Horowitz A Hecht J Dedrick A 2013 Smelling more or less: Investigating the olfactory experience of the domestic dog . Learn Motiv . 44 : 207 – 217 . 

    상세보기

20. Houpt KA Davis PP Hintz HF 1982 Effect of peripheral anosmia in dogs trained as flavor validators . Am J Vet Res . 43 ( 5 ): 841 – 843 . 7091848 

    상세보기

21. Houpt K Hintz HF Shepherd P 1978 The role of olfaction in canine food preferences . Chem Senses . 3 : 281 – 290 . 

22. Houpt KA Smith SL 1981 Taste preferences and their relation to obesity in dogs and cats . Can Vet J . 22 ( 4 ): 77 – 85 . 7248879 

    상세보기

23. Kinney NE Antill RW 1996 Role of olfaction in the formation of preference for high-fat foods in mice . Physiol Behav . 59 ( 3 ): 475 – 478 . 8700949 

    상세보기

24. Oxley J Waggoner LP 2009 Chapter 3 - detection of explosives by dogs . In: Oxley MMC , editors. Aspects of explosives detection . Amsterdam : Elsevier pp. 27 – 40 . 

25. Rashotte ME Foster DF Austin T 1984 Two-pan and operant lever-press tests of dogs’ preference for various foods . Neurosci Biobehav Rev . 8 ( 2 ): 231 – 237 . 6462553 

    상세보기

26. Rashotte ME Smith JC 1984 Operant conditioning methodology in the assessment of food preferences: introductory comments . Neurosci Biobehav Rev . 8 ( 2 ): 211 – 215 . 6462550 

    상세보기

27. Scott MD Causey K 1973 Ecology of Feral Dogs in Alabama . J Wildl Manag . 37 : 253 – 265 . 

28. Smith JC Rashotte ME Austin T Griffin RW 1984 Fine-grained measures of dogs’ eating behavior in single-pan and two-pan tests . Neurosci Biobehav Rev . 8 ( 2 ): 243 – 251 . 6462555 

    상세보기

29. Smith SL Kronfeld DS Banta CA 1983 Applied canine and feline ethology owners’ perception of food flavor preferences of pet dogs in relation to measured preferences of laboratory dogs . Appl Anim Ethol . 10 : 75 – 87 . 

30. Thompson H Riemer S Ellis SLH Burman OHP 2016 Behaviour directed towards inaccessible food predicts consumption—A novel way of assessing food preference . Appl Anim Behav Sci . 178 : 111 – 117 . 

    상세보기

31. Tobie C Péron F Larose C 2015 Assessing food preferences in dogs and cats: a review of the current methods . Animals (Basel) . 5 ( 1 ): 126 – 137 . 26479142 

32. Tôrres CL Hickenbottom SJ Rogers QR 2003 Palatability affects the percentage of metabolizable energy as protein selected by adult beagles . J Nutr . 133 ( 11 ): 3516 – 3522 . 14608067 

    상세보기

33. Vicars SM Miguel CF Sobie JL 2014 Assessing preference and reinforcer effectiveness in dogs . Behav Process . 103 : 75 – 83 . 

34. Vondran JC 2013 A two pan feeding trial with companion dogs: considerations for future testing . Kansas State University . 

35. Xiao K Kondo Y Sakuma Y 2004 Sex-specific effects of gonadal steroids on conspecific odor preference in the rat . Horm Behav . 46 ( 3 ): 356 – 361 . 15325236 

    상세보기