[해외논문]Comparison of sodium ion levels between an arterial blood gas analyzer and an autoanalyzer in preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective study원문보기
Kim, Hyunho
(Department of Pediatrics, Chonbuk National University Hospital, 20, Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, 54907 South Korea)
,
Kim, Jin Kyu
(Department of Pediatrics, Chonbuk National University Hospital, 20, Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, 54907 South Korea)
,
Cho, Soo Chul
(Department of Pediatrics, Chonbuk National University Hospital, 20, Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, 54907 South Korea)
BackgroundThe difference in sodium ion levels determined with direct and indirect methods often exceeds the permissible limit clinically. Additionally, no previous study has assessed the difference in the sodium ion levels between direct and indirect methods in premature infants. Therefore, the pres...
BackgroundThe difference in sodium ion levels determined with direct and indirect methods often exceeds the permissible limit clinically. Additionally, no previous study has assessed the difference in the sodium ion levels between direct and indirect methods in premature infants. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare sodium ion levels obtained using an arterial blood gas analyzer (ABGA; direct method) and an autoanalyzer (indirect method) to determine whether they are equivalent in premature infants.MethodsThe present retrospective study included 450 preterm infants (weight, <2500 g) who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of our hospital between March 2012 and April 2014. We compared sodium ion levels in 1041 samples analyzed using an ABGA (Stat Profile® CCX Series, Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA) and an autoanalyzer (ADVIA® 2400 Clinical Chemistry System, Siemens, Tarrytown, NY). The data were evaluated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient analysis, Bland-Altman plot, Deming regression analysis, and multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsThe mean sodium ion levels were 134.6 ± 3.5 mmol/L using the ABGA and 138.8 ± 4.7 mmol/L using the autoanalyzer (P < 0.001). Among the 1041 samples, 957 (91.9 %) showed lower sodium ion levels with the ABGA than with the autoanalyzer and 74 (7.1 %) showed lower sodium ion levels with the autoanalyzer than with the ABGA. The incidence of hyponatremia identified using the ABGA was 51.9 % (541/1041), while the incidence of hyponatremia identified using the autoanalyzer was only 14.0 % (146/1041). The Deming regression analysis of the sodium ion levels between the ABGA and the autoanalyzer yielded the following formula: autoanalyzer Na (mmol/L) = 20.7 + (0.9 × ABGA Na [mmol/L]). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, low plasma protein level (4 mmol/L between the two methods (odds ratio = 2.870, P < 0.001).ConclusionThe sodium ion levels determined using the ABGA and the autoanalyzer might not be equivalent in premature infants admitted to the NICU. Therefore, clinicians should be careful when diagnosing sodium ion imbalance in premature infants and providing treatment.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-016-0636-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
BackgroundThe difference in sodium ion levels determined with direct and indirect methods often exceeds the permissible limit clinically. Additionally, no previous study has assessed the difference in the sodium ion levels between direct and indirect methods in premature infants. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare sodium ion levels obtained using an arterial blood gas analyzer (ABGA; direct method) and an autoanalyzer (indirect method) to determine whether they are equivalent in premature infants.MethodsThe present retrospective study included 450 preterm infants (weight, <2500 g) who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of our hospital between March 2012 and April 2014. We compared sodium ion levels in 1041 samples analyzed using an ABGA (Stat Profile® CCX Series, Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA) and an autoanalyzer (ADVIA® 2400 Clinical Chemistry System, Siemens, Tarrytown, NY). The data were evaluated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient analysis, Bland-Altman plot, Deming regression analysis, and multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsThe mean sodium ion levels were 134.6 ± 3.5 mmol/L using the ABGA and 138.8 ± 4.7 mmol/L using the autoanalyzer (P < 0.001). Among the 1041 samples, 957 (91.9 %) showed lower sodium ion levels with the ABGA than with the autoanalyzer and 74 (7.1 %) showed lower sodium ion levels with the autoanalyzer than with the ABGA. The incidence of hyponatremia identified using the ABGA was 51.9 % (541/1041), while the incidence of hyponatremia identified using the autoanalyzer was only 14.0 % (146/1041). The Deming regression analysis of the sodium ion levels between the ABGA and the autoanalyzer yielded the following formula: autoanalyzer Na (mmol/L) = 20.7 + (0.9 × ABGA Na [mmol/L]). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, low plasma protein level (4 mmol/L between the two methods (odds ratio = 2.870, P < 0.001).ConclusionThe sodium ion levels determined using the ABGA and the autoanalyzer might not be equivalent in premature infants admitted to the NICU. Therefore, clinicians should be careful when diagnosing sodium ion imbalance in premature infants and providing treatment.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-016-0636-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
4. Carl A, Edward R, David E. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. 4th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier Inc.; 2006.
5. Lima-Oliveira G Lippi G Salvagno GL Montagnana M Picheth G Guidi GC Different manufacturers of syringes: a new source of variability in blood gas, acid–base balance and related laboratory test? Clin Biochem 2012 45 683 7 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.03.007 22440459
6. Story DA Morimatsu H Egi M Bellomo R The effect of albumin concentration on plasma sodium and chloride measurements in critically ill patients Anesth Analg 2007 104 893 7 10.1213/01.ane.0000258015.87381.61 17377102
7. Dimeski G Barnett RJ Effects of total plasma protein concentration on plasma sodium, potassium and chloride measurements by an indirect ion selective electrode measuring system Crit Care Resusc J Australas Acad Crit Care Med 2005 7 12 5
8. Sharma B Sarmah D A comparative evaluation of sodium and potassium measurements by flame photometer and by direct ISE methods Int J Health Sci Res IJHSR 2013 3 59 65
9. Yip PM Chan MK Zielinski N Adeli K Heparin interference in whole blood sodium measurements in a pediatric setting Clin Biochem 2006 39 391 5 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2005.12.006 16443209
12. Chow E Fox N Gama R Effect of low serum total protein on sodium and potassium measurement by ion-selective electrodes in critically ill patients Br J Biomed Sci 2008 65 128 31 10.1080/09674845.2008.11732815 18986099
13. Morimatsu H Rocktäschel J Bellomo R Uchino S Goldsmith D Gutteridge G Comparison of point-of-care versus central laboratory measurement of electrolyte concentrations on calculations of the anion gap and the strong ion difference Anesthesiology 2003 98 1077 84 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00009 12717128
14. Lang T Prinsloo P Broughton AF Lawson N Marenah CB Effect of low protein concentration on serum sodium measurement: pseudohypernatraemia and pseudonormonatraemia! Ann Clin Biochem 2002 39 66 7 10.1258/0004563021901586 11853193
15. The Department of Health and Human Service: the state of Victoria. https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/hospitals-and-health-services/patient-care/perinatal-reproductive/neonatalehandbook/pathology/normal-laboratory-values . Accessed 16 July, 2014.
16. Robert MK, Bonita FS, Joseph WS, Nina FS, Richard EB : Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 20th ed, Elsevier; 2015.
17. Karl B Günther B Alexander Roithmaier MD Martin G Alfred P Versmold MDHT Body composition, nutrition and fluid balance during the first two weeks of life in preterm neonates weighing less than 1500 grams J Pediatr 1991 118 615 20 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)83390-6 2007939
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.