$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Flexible and static wrist units in upper limb prosthesis users: functionality scores, user satisfaction and compensatory movements 원문보기

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, v.13, 2016년, pp.26 -   

Deijs, M. (Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001 (CB41), 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands) ,  Bongers, R. M. (Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands) ,  Ringeling - van Leusen, N. D. M. (Revant Rehabilitation Center, Brabantlaan 1, 4817 JW Breda, The Netherlands) ,  van der Sluis, C. K. (Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001 (CB41), 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

BackgroundThe current study examines the relevance of prosthetic wrist movement to facilitate activities of daily living or to prevent overuse complaints. Prosthesis hands with wrist flexion/extension capabilities are commercially available, but research on the users’ experiences with flexible wrist...

주제어

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 1. Peerdeman B Boere D Witteveen H in 't Veld RH Hermens H Stramigioli S Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective J Rehabil Res Dev 2011 48 6 719 37 10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0161 21938658 

  2. 2. Biddiss E Beaton D Chau T Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics Disabil Rehabil 2007 2 6 346 57 

  3. 3. Atkins DJH Heard DCY Donovan WH Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities J Prosthet. Orthot 1996 8 1 2 11 10.1097/00008526-199600810-00003 

  4. 4. Kyberd PJ The influence of passive wrist joints on the functionality of prosthetic hands Prosthet Orthot Int 2012 36 1 33 8 10.1177/0309364611426905 22064262 

  5. 5. Bertels T Schmalz T Ludwigs E Objectifying the functional advantages of prosthetic wrist flexion J Prosthet. Orthot 2009 21 2 74 8 10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181a10f46 

  6. 6. MacPhee BJ Examining the prosthetic function and body behavior of prosthesis users performing activities of daily living 2007 

  7. 7. Carey SL Jason Highsmith M Maitland ME Dubey RV Compensatory movements of transradial prosthesis users during common tasks Clin. Biomech. 2008 23 9 1128 35 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.05.008 

  8. 8. Zinck AL Investigation of compensatory movements in prosthesis users and the design of a novel wrist 2008 

  9. 9. Carey SL Dubey RV Bauer GS Highsmith MJ Kinematic comparison of myoelectric and body powered prostheses while performing common activities Prosthet Orthot Int 2009 33 179 186 10.1080/03093640802613229 19367522 

  10. 10. Metzger AJ Dromerick AW Holley RJ Lum PS Characterization of compensatory trunk movements during prosthetic upper limb reaching tasks Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012 93 2029 2034 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.011 22449551 

  11. 11. Major MJ Stine RL Heckathorne CW Fatone S Grard SA Comparison of range-of-motion and variability in upper body movements between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks J Neuroeng Rehabil 2014 11 132 10.1186/1743-0003-11-132 25192744 

  12. 12. Ostlie K Franklin RJ Skjeldal OH Skrondal A Magnus P Musculoskeletal pain and overuse syndromes in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011 92 12 1967 73 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.026 22133243 

  13. 13. Davidson J A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities J Hand Ther 2002 15 1 62 70 10.1053/hanthe.2002.v15.01562 11866354 

  14. 14. Petersen B. Preliminary feedback from field trial users of the Motion Control Multi-flex wrist, Proceedings 2008 Myoelectric controls/Powered prosthetics symposium. Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada; 2008. 

  15. 15. Metcalf CD Woodward H Wright V Chappell PH Burridge JH Yule VT Changes in hand function with age and normative unimpaired scores when measured with the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure Br J Hand Ther 2008 13 3 79 83 

  16. 16. Light CM Chappell PH Kyberd PJ Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 83 6 776 83 10.1053/apmr.2002.32737 12048655 

  17. 17. Mathiowetz V Volland G Kashman N Weber K Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity Am J Occup Ther 1985 39 6 386 91 10.5014/ajot.39.6.386 3160243 

  18. 18. Burger H Franchignoni F Heinemann AW Kotnik S Giordano A Validation of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey upper extremity functional status module in people with unilateral upper limb amputation J Rehabil Med 2008 40 5 393 9 10.2340/16501977-0183 18461266 

  19. 19. Demers L Weiss-Lambrou R Ska B Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST) Assist Technol 1996 8 1 3 13 10.1080/10400435.1996.10132268 10159726 

  20. 20. Wessels RD De Witte LP Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of QUEST 2.0 with users of various types of assistive devices Disabil Rehabil 2003 25 6 267 72 10.1080/0963828021000031197 12623616 

  21. 21. Desmond DM MacLachlan M Factor structure of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) with individuals with acquired upper limb amputations Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2005 84 7 506 13 10.1097/01.phm.0000166885.16180.63 15973087 

  22. 22. De Vries WH Veeger HE Cutti AG Baten C van der Helm FC Functionally interpretable local coordinate systems for the upper extremity using inertial & magnetic measurement systems J Biomech 2010 43 10 1983 8 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.007 20382385 

  23. 23. Wu G van der Helm FC Veeger HE Makhsous M Van Roy P Anglin C ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand J Biomech 2005 38 5 981 92 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042 15844264 

  24. 24. Woltring HJ 3-D attitude representation of human joints: a standardization proposal J Biomech 1994 27 12 1399 414 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90191-0 7806549 

  25. 25. Vasluian E Bongers RM Reinders-Messelink HA Burgerhof JG Dijkstra PU van der Sluis CK Learning effects of repetitive administration of the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure in novice prosthetic users J Rehabil Med 2014 46 8 788 97 10.2340/16501977-1827 24850374 

  26. 26. Hermansson LM Fisher AG Bernspang B Eliasson AC Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: a new Rasch-built measure of prosthetic hand control J Rehabil Med 2005 37 3 166 71 16040474 

  27. 27. Hill W Kyberd PJ Norling Hermansson L Hubbard S Stavdahl O Swanson S Upper limb prosthetic outcome measures (ULPOM): a working group and their findings J Prosthet. Orthot 2009 21 4S 69 82 10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181ae970b 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로