Cranioplasty of frontal skull defects are used for cosmetic reasons, helping correct disfigurement, but also play a critical role in protecting intracranial content from exposure and compression. Modern surgical management is based on principles of craniofacial surgery such as early one-stage repair...
Cranioplasty of frontal skull defects are used for cosmetic reasons, helping correct disfigurement, but also play a critical role in protecting intracranial content from exposure and compression. Modern surgical management is based on principles of craniofacial surgery such as early one-stage repair- if possible, exposure of all fracture fragments by well-sited cosmetic incisions, precise internal fixation and definitive soft tissue management. The choice of surgical approach depends on fracture severity, complexity, patient comorbidities, and surgeon preference and experience. In large skull defects, titanium mesh reconstruction offers good alternative to other biomaterials by eliminating the time consuming task of contour moulding. The aim of the study is to provide a comprehensive review of aesthetic and functional outcomes, involving titanium mesh implants associated with native bone reconstruction of frontal area posttraumatic defects. Also, the article is related to the authors own experience, in treating several patients with posttraumatic deformity of the frontal bone, assessing forehead contour aesthetics, pain, nerve function and late cerebral complications. A retrospective study was conducted using records from 14 adult patients, between 21-74 years of age, who underwent reconstruction of depressed frontal bone fractures, by receiving titanium mesh implants, between February 2013- October 2015. All patients had a minimum follow up of 5 months by clinical examination and periodic CT-scans. In order to evaluate the experimental results we follow different clinical parameters than late complications, like facial nerve function, cosmetic outcome, and pain. According our clinical results, titanium mesh is an effective method of forehead reconstruction, which provides predictably good long term results.
Cranioplasty of frontal skull defects are used for cosmetic reasons, helping correct disfigurement, but also play a critical role in protecting intracranial content from exposure and compression. Modern surgical management is based on principles of craniofacial surgery such as early one-stage repair- if possible, exposure of all fracture fragments by well-sited cosmetic incisions, precise internal fixation and definitive soft tissue management. The choice of surgical approach depends on fracture severity, complexity, patient comorbidities, and surgeon preference and experience. In large skull defects, titanium mesh reconstruction offers good alternative to other biomaterials by eliminating the time consuming task of contour moulding. The aim of the study is to provide a comprehensive review of aesthetic and functional outcomes, involving titanium mesh implants associated with native bone reconstruction of frontal area posttraumatic defects. Also, the article is related to the authors own experience, in treating several patients with posttraumatic deformity of the frontal bone, assessing forehead contour aesthetics, pain, nerve function and late cerebral complications. A retrospective study was conducted using records from 14 adult patients, between 21-74 years of age, who underwent reconstruction of depressed frontal bone fractures, by receiving titanium mesh implants, between February 2013- October 2015. All patients had a minimum follow up of 5 months by clinical examination and periodic CT-scans. In order to evaluate the experimental results we follow different clinical parameters than late complications, like facial nerve function, cosmetic outcome, and pain. According our clinical results, titanium mesh is an effective method of forehead reconstruction, which provides predictably good long term results.
참고문헌 (22)
10.1097/scs.0b013e31824dfcb1 D.W. Kim, E.S. Yoon, B.I. Lee, et al., Fracture depth and delayed contour deformity in frontal sinus anterior wall fracture, J Craniofacial Surg, 23 (4) (2012) 991–994.
10.1097/scs.0000000000002466 M.S. Sakat, K. Kilic, E. Altas, et al., Comminuted frontal sinus fracture reconstructed with titanium mesh, J Craniofacial Surg, 27 (2) (2016) e207–208.
10.1016/j.joms.2003.04.020 S. Manolidis, Frontal sinus injuries: associated injuries and surgical management of 93 patients, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 62 (7) (2004) 882-891.
10.1097/scs.0b013e3182902518 O. Egemen, O. Ozkaya, T. Aksan, et al., Endoscopic repair of isolated anterior table frontal sinus fractures without fixation, J Craniofacial Surg, 24 (4) (2013) 1357–1360.
10.1016/j.otot.2008.08.001 E. Bradley Strong, Frontal sinus fractures Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 19(2) (2008) 151-160.
10.1016/s0090-3019(97)00336-4 M Misra, M. Dujovny, G. Gonzales-Portillo, C. Abood, Cranial Titanium Osteosynthesis Systems, Surgical Neurology, 48(6) (1997) 632-635.
10.1016/j.otc.2013.07.005 W. Marshall Guy, Anthony E. Brissett, Contemporary Management of Traumatic Fractures of the Frontal Sinus, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 46(5) (2013) 733-748.
I. Antoniac, Handbook of Bioceramics and Biocomposites, Springer International Publishing, New York (2016) 1275-1307.
10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.695.185 M. Dumitru, D. Nica, A. Mohan, B. Feder, A.V. Ciurea, New concept in cranioplasty based on biomaterials performance in various clinical cases, Key Engineering Materials, 695 (2016) 185-188.
10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.695.196 A. Mohan, V. Saceleanu, D. Mohan, A. V. Ciurea, Value of Dural Patches in Obliteration of Cranio-Ethmoidal Traumatic CSF Fistulas, Key Engineering Materials, 695 (2016) 196-199.
10.1016/j.injury.2014.09.019 C. Shuo-Tsung, C. Cheng-Jen, S. Wei-Chin, C. Lin-Wan, C. I-Hsuan, L. Muh-Shi, 3-D titanium mesh reconstruction of defective skull after frontal craniectomy in traumatic brain injury, Injury, 46(1) (2015) 80-85.
10.1016/j.otc.2013.07.005 W. Marshall Guy, Anthony E. Brissett, Contemporary Management of Traumatic Fractures of the Frontal Sinus, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 46(5) (2013) 733-748.
10.1016/j.jcms.2007.04.002 J.R. Vignes, N.O. Jeelani, M. Dautheribes, F. San-Galli, D. Liguoro, Cranioplasty for repair of a large bone defect in a growing skull fracture in children, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 35(3) (2007) 185-188.
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.01.011 B.C. Brevi, A.S. Magri, L. Toma, E. Sesenna, Cranioplasty for repair of a large bone defect with autologous and homologous bone in children, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 45(4) (2010) e17-e20.
10.1016/s0967-5868(96)90009-0 M. A Stoodley, J.R. Abbott, D. A Simpson, Titanium cranioplasty using 3-D computer modelling of skull defects, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 3(2) (1996) 149-155.
10.1016/j.wneu.2011.02.013 J.J. Wind, C. Ohaegbulam, F.M. Iwamoto, P.M. Black, J.K. Park, Immediate Titanium Mesh Cranioplasty for Treatment of Postcraniotomy Infections, World Neurosurgery, 79(1) (2013) 207. e11-207. e13.
10.1016/0266-4356(91)90118-o M.F. Patel, J.D. Langdon, Titanium mesh (TiMesh) osteosynthesis: a fast and adaptable method of semi-rigid fixation, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 29(5) (1991) 316-324.
10.1148/radiology.147.1.6828719 N. Rosen, B.R. Brady, T.J. Buonanno, E.S. Kistler, J.P. Hinshaw, S. Waldo et al, Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, Radiology, 147 (1982) 139–148.
10.1016/j.jocn.2008.07.087 M.P. Martin, S. Olson, Post-operative complications with titanium mesh, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 16(8) (2009) 1080-1081.
E.T. Talvan, M.I. Fagetean, C. Mohor, M. V. Saceleanu, Management of frontal sinus trauma associated with orbital roof and nasal bone fracture – Case Report and review of the literature, Acta Medica Transilvanica, 21(1) (2016) 85-88.
10.1016/j.ijom.2007.08.452 A.A. Magliocco, Therapeutic means in frontal fractures, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 36(11) (2007) 1081-1082.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.