$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[해외논문] Toward Linux kernel memory safety 원문보기

Software: practice & experience, v.48 no.12, 2018년, pp.2237 - 2256  

Reshetova, Elena (Intel OTC, Espoo, Finland) ,  Liljestrand, Hans (Aalto University, Espoo, Finland) ,  Paverd, Andrew (Aalto University, Espoo, Finland) ,  Asokan, N. (Aalto University, Espoo, Finland)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

SummaryThe security of billions of devices worldwide depends on the security and robustness of the mainline Linux kernel. However, the increasing number of kernel‐specific vulnerabilities, especially memory safety vulnerabilities, shows that the kernel is a popular and practically exploitable ...

Keyword

#Linux kernel   #Linux kernel development process   #memory safety  

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Smalley S , Vance C , Salamon W . Implementing SELinux as a Linux Security Module . 2006 . https://www.nsa.gov/resources/everyone/digital-media-center/publications/research-papers/assets/files/implementing-selinux-as-linux-security-module-report.pdf 

  2. Bauer M . Paranoid penguin: an introduction to Novell AppArmor . Linux J . 2006 ; 2006 ( 148 ): 13 . 

  3. Integrity Measurement Architecture (IMA) wiki pages. 2017 . http://sourceforge.net/p/linux-ima/wiki/Home/ 

  4. Implementing dm‐verity . 2017 . http://source.android.com/security/verifiedboot/dm-verity 

  5. National Vulnerability Database: Statistics for kernel vulnerabilities . 2017 . https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/search/statistics?adv_search=true&form_type=advanced∓results_type=statistics&query=kernel 

  6. Cook K . Status of the Kernel Self Protection Project . 2016 . www.outflux.net/slides/2016/lss/kspp.pdf 

  7. Kernel Self Protection Project wiki. 2017 . http://www.kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Kernel_Self_Protection_Project 

  8. Raheja S , Munjal G , Shagun . Analysis of Linux kernel vulnerabilities . Indian J Sci Technol . 2016 ; 9 ( 48 ). 

  9. Chen H , Mao Y , Wang X , Zhou D , Zeldovich N , Kaashoek MF . Linux kernel vulnerabilities: state‐of‐the‐art defenses and open problems . In: Proceedings of the Second Asia‐Pacific Workshop on Systems (APSys); 2011 ; Shanghai, China . 

  10. Collins GE . A method for overlapping and erasure of lists . Commun ACM . 1960 ; 3 ( 12 ): 655 ‐ 657 . 

  11. McKenney PE . Overview of Linux‐kernel reference counting . Technical Report n2167=07‐0027. Beaverton, OR : IBM Linux Technology Center ; 2007 . 

  12. Nagarakatte S , Zhao J , Martin MMK , Zdancewic S . Softbound: highly compatible and complete spatial memory safety for C . In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation; 2009 ; Dublin, Ireland . 

  13. Moreira J , Rigo S , Polychronakis M , Kemerlis V . DROP THE ROP: Fine‐grained Control‐flow Integrity for the Linux Kernel . 2017 . https://www.blackhat.com/docs/asia-17/materials/asia-17-Moreira-Drop-The-Rop-Fine-Grained-Control-Flow-Integrity-For-The-Linux-Kernel-wp.pdf 

  14. Song C , Lee B , Lu K , Harris W , Kim T , Lee W . Enforcing kernel security invariants with data flow integrity . Paper presented: 23rd Annual Network Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS); San Diego, CA . 2016 . 

  15. The Kernel Address Sanitizer (KASAN) . 2017 . www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/dev-tools/kasan.html 

  16. Nikolenko V . Exploiting COF Vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel . 2016 . ruxcon.org.au/assets/2016/slides/ruxcon2016-Vitaly.pdf 

  17. Ramakesavan R , Zimmerman D , Singaravelu P . Intel Memory Protection Extensions (Intel MPX) Enabling Guide . 2015 . http://caxapa.ru/thumbs/808589/4878c6471cb5ae28546a594bf25ba5c25c6f.pdf 

  18. Hastings R , Joyce B . Purify: fast detection of memory leaks and access errors . In: Proceedings of the Winter 1992 USENIX Conference; 1991 ; Berkeley, CA . 

  19. Patil H , Fischer CN . Efficient run‐time monitoring using shadow processing . In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Automated Debugging (AADEBUG); 1995 ; Saint Malo, France . 

  20. Patil H , Fischer C . Low‐cost, concurrent checking of pointer and array accesses in C programs . Softw Pract Exper . 1997 ; 27 ( 1 ): 87 ‐ 110 . 

  21. Jones RWM , Kelly PHJ . Backwards‐compatible bounds checking for arrays and pointers in C programs . In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Automated Debugging (AADEBUG); 1997 ; Linköping, Sweden . 

  22. Yong SH , Horwitz S . Protecting C programs from attacks via invalid pointer dereferences . ACM SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes . 2003 ; 28 ( 5 ): 307 ‐ 316 . 

  23. Xu W , DuVarney DC , Sekar R . An efficient and backwards‐compatible transformation to ensure memory safety of C programs . SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes . 2004 ; 29 ( 6 ): 117 ‐ 126 . 

  24. Nethercote N , Fitzhardinge J . Bounds‐checking entire programs without recompiling . In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Semantics Program Analysis and Computing Environments for Memory Management (SPACE); 2004 ; Venice, Italy . 

  25. Dhurjati D , Adve V . Backwards‐compatible array bounds checking for C with very low overhead . In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering; 2006 ; Shanghai, China . 

  26. Necula GC , McPeak S , Weimer W . CCured: type‐safe retrofitting of legacy code . ACM SIGPLAN Notices . 2002 ; 37 ( 1 ): 128 ‐ 139 . 

    상세보기

  27. Grossman D , Hicks M , Jim T , Morrisett G . Cyclone: a type‐safe dialect of C . C/C++ Users J . 2005 ; 23 ( 1 ): 112 ‐ 139 . 

  28. PaX address space layout randomization (ASLR) . 2003 . http://pax.grsecurity.net/docs/aslr.txt 

  29. Branco R . Grsecurity forum — Guest Blog by Rodrigo Branco: PAX_REFCOUNT Documentation . 2015 . https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=7Zt=4173 

  30. Nethercote N , Seward J . Valgrind: a framework for heavyweight dynamic binary instrumentation . In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation; 2007 ; San Diego, CA . 

  31. Serebryany K , Bruening D , Potapenko A , Vyukov D . AddressSanitizer: a fast address sanity checker . In: USENIX Annual Technical Conference; 2012 ; Boston, MA . 

  32. Solar Designer . Linux kernel patch to remove stack exec permission . 1997 . http://seclists.org/bugtraq/1997/Apr/31 

  33. Pax non‐executable pages design & implementation . 2003 . http://pax.grsecurity.net 

  34. Krahmer S . X86‐64 buffer overflow exploits and the borrowed code chunks exploitation technique . 2005 . https://trailofbits.github.io/ctf/exploits/references/no-nx.pdf 

  35. Cowan C , Pu C , Maier D , et al. StackGuard: automatic adaptive detection and prevention of buffer‐overflow attacks . In: Proceedings of the 7th USENIX Security Symposium; 1998 ; San Antonio, TX . 

  36. A stack smashing technique protection tool for Linux . 2011 . http://www.angelfire.com/sk/stackshield 

  37. Xu J , Kalbarczyk Z , Iyer RK . Transparent runtime randomization for security . Paper presented at: 22nd Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS); 2003 ; Florence, Italy . 

  38. Ratanaworabhan P , Livshits B , Zorn B . NOZZLE: a defense against heap‐spraying code injection attacks . Paper presented at: 18th USENIX Security Symposium; 2009 ; San Jose, CA . 

  39. Kwon A , Dhawan U , Smith J , Knight Jr TF , DeHon A . Low‐fat pointers: compact encoding and efficient gate‐level implementation of fat pointers for spatial safety and capability‐based security . In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer & Communications Security (CCS); 2013 ; Berlin, Germany . 

  40. Kuvaiskii D , Oleksenko O , Arnautov S , et al. SGXBOUNDS: memory safety for shielded execution . In: Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Computer Systems (EuroSys); 2017 ; Belgrade, Serbia . 

  41. Devietti J , Blundell C , Martin MMK , Zdancewic S . Hardbound: architectural support for spatial safety of the C programming language . ACM SIGARCH Comput Archit News . 2008 ; 36 ( 1 ): 103 ‐ 114 . 

  42. Coccinelle Project . 2017 . http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/ 

  43. Pike JP . Server CPU Predictions For 2017 . 2017 . https://www.forbes.com/sites/moorinsights/2017/01/10/server-cpu-predictions-for-2017/27adb50365a7 

  44. Akritidis P , Costa M , Castro M , Hand S . Baggy bounds checking: an efficient and backwards‐compatible defense against out‐of‐bounds errors . Paper presented at: 18th USENIX Security Symposium; 2009 ; San Jose, CA . 

  45. Netperf Project . 2017 . http://hewlettpackard.github.io/netperf 

  46. Grsecurity Project . 2017 . https://grsecurity.net 

  47. Submitting patches: the essential guide to getting your code into the kernel . 2017 . https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.12/process/submitting-patches.html 

  48. Cook K . codeblog: security things in Linux v4.13 . 2017 . https://outflux.net/blog/archives/2017/09/05/security-things-in-linux-v4-13/ 

활용도 분석정보

상세보기
다운로드
내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GREEN

저자가 공개 리포지터리에 출판본, post-print, 또는 pre-print를 셀프 아카이빙 하여 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로