$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Quantitative evaluation of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict higher Gleason score prostate cancer

Scandinavian journal of urology, v.52 no.3, 2018년, pp.180 - 185  

Kato, Seiji (Department of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan) ,  Kamijima, Shuichi ,  Inaoka, Tsutomu (Department of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan) ,  Kamiya, Naoto ,  Sasai, Daisuke (Department of Radiology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan) ,  Terada, Hitoshi ,  Hiruta, Nobuyuki (Department of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan) ,  Suzuki, Hiroyoshi

초록이 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Dy, Geolani W., Gore, John L., Forouzanfar, Mohammad H., Naghavi, Mohsen, Fitzmaurice, Christina. Global Burden of Urologic Cancers, 1990–2013. European urology, vol.71, no.3, 437-446.

  2. Lecouvet, F.E., El Mouedden, J., Collette, L., Coche, E., Danse, E., Jamar, F., Machiels, J.P., Vande Berg, B., Omoumi, P., Tombal, B.. Can Whole-body Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Diffusion-weighted Imaging Replace Tc 99m Bone Scanning and Computed Tomography for Single-step Detection of Metastases in Patients with High-risk Prostate Cancer?. European urology, vol.62, no.1, 68-75.

  3. Sartor, Oliver, Eisenberger, Mario, Kattan, Michael W., Tombal, Bertrand, Lecouvet, Frederic. Unmet Needs in the Prediction and Detection of Metastases in Prostate Cancer. The oncologist, vol.18, no.5, 549-557.

  4. Lecouvet, Frédéric E., Geukens, Daphné, Stainier, Annabelle, Jamar, François, Jamart, Jacques, d'Othée, Bertrand Janne, Therasse, Patrick, Berg, Bruno Vande, Tombal, Bertrand. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Axial Skeleton for Detecting Bone Metastases in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic and Cost-Effectiveness and Comparison With Current Detection Strategies. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, vol.25, no.22, 3281-3287.

  5. Weinreb, J.C., Barentsz, J.O., Choyke, P.L., Cornud, F., Haider, M.A., Macura, K.J., Margolis, D., Schnall, M.D., Shtern, F., Tempany, C.M., Thoeny, H.C., Verma, S.. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. European urology, vol.69, no.1, 16-40.

  6. Borkowetz, Angelika, Platzek, Ivan, Toma, Marieta, Renner, Theresa, Herout, Roman, Baunacke, Martin, Laniado, Michael, Baretton, Gustavo, Froehner, Michael, Zastrow, Stefan, Wirth, Manfred. Direct comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results with final histopathology in patients with proven prostate cancer in MRI/ultrasonography‐fusion biopsy. BJU international, vol.118, no.2, 213-220.

  7. Diagn Interv Radiol Kivrak AS 433 19 2013 

  8. Epstein, Jonathan I, Allsbrook Jr, William C, Amin, Mahul B, Egevad, Lars L. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. The American journal of surgical pathology, vol.29, no.9, 1228-1242.

  9. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Health Statistics 2016 

  10. Rosenkrantz, A.B., Verma, S., Choyke, P., Eberhardt, S.C., Eggener, S.E., Gaitonde, K., Haider, M.A., Margolis, D.J., Marks, L.S., Pinto, P., Sonn, G.A., Taneja, S.S.. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR. The Journal of urology : official journal of the American Urological Association, Inc, vol.196, no.6, 1613-1618.

  11. Hambrock, Thomas, Somford, Diederik M, Huisman, Henkjan J, van Oort, Inge M, Witjes, J Alfred, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A, Scheenen, Thomas, Barentsz, Jelle O. Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.. Radiology, vol.259, no.2, 453-461.

  12. Lebovici, Andrei, Sfrangeu, Silviu A, Feier, Diana, Caraiani, Cosmin, Lucan, Ciprian, Suciu, Mihai, Elec, Florin, Iacob, Gheorghita, Buruian, Mircea. Evaluation of the normal-to-diseased apparent diffusion coefficient ratio as an indicator of prostate cancer aggressiveness. BMC medical imaging, vol.14, no.1, 15-15.

  13. Utsumi, Takanobu, Oka, Ryo, Endo, Takumi, Yano, Masashi, Kamijima, Shuichi, Kamiya, Naoto, Fujimura, Masaaki, Sekita, Nobuyuki, Mikami, Kazuo, Hiruta, Nobuyuki, Suzuki, Hiroyoshi. External validation and comparison of two nomograms predicting the probability of Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology in two patient populations: a retrospective cohort study. Japanese journal of clinical oncology, vol.45, no.11, 1091-1095.

  14. Bittencourt, Leonardo Kayat, Barentsz, Jelle O., de Miranda, Luiz Carlos Duarte, Gasparetto, Emerson Leandro. Prostate MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T correlates better with prostatectomy Gleason grades than TRUS-guided biopsies in peripheral zone tumours. European radiology, vol.22, no.2, 468-475.

  15. PROMIS study group, Ahmed, H.U., El-Shater Bosaily, A., Brown, L.C., Gabe, R., Kaplan, R., Parmar, M.K., Collaco-Moraes, Y., Ward, K., Hindley, R.G., Freeman, A., Kirkham, A.P., Oldroyd, R., Parker, C., Emberton, M.. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. The Lancet, vol.389, no.10071, 815-822.

  16. Lai, Win Shun, Gordetsky, Jennifer B., Thomas, John V., Nix, Jeffrey W., Rais‐Bahrami, Soroush. Factors predicting prostate cancer upgrading on magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy in an active surveillance population. Cancer, vol.123, no.11, 1941-1948.

  17. for the PRIAS study group, Bokhorst, L.P., Valdagni, R., Rannikko, A., Kakehi, Y., Pickles, T., Bangma, C.H., Roobol, M.J.. A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment. European urology, vol.70, no.6, 954-960.

  18. Quon, Jeffrey S., Moosavi, Bardia, Khanna, Maneesh, Flood, Trevor A., Lim, Christopher S., Schieda, Nicola. False positive and false negative diagnoses of prostate cancer at multi-parametric prostate MRI in active surveillance. Insights into imaging, vol.6, no.4, 449-463.

  19. Hoeks, Caroline M A, Hambrock, Thomas, Yakar, Derya, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A, Feuth, Ton, Witjes, J Alfred, F?tterer, Jurgen J, Barentsz, Jelle O. Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging.. Radiology, vol.266, no.1, 207-217.

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로