참고문헌 (45)

1. (2018, October 08). Agenda 21 & Chapter 36. Available online: http://www.un-documents.net/a21-36.htm. 

2. (2018, October 01). Teaching and Learning for Sustainable Future Program. Available online: http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/mods/theme_gs/mod0a.html. 

3. (2018, October 08). Education for Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002474/247444e.pdf. 

4. (2018, October 08). ICT in Education and Sustainable Futures. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability/special_issues/ICTESF. 

5. Augmented reality and mobile devices: A binominal methodological resource for inclusive education (SDG 4). An example in secondary education Sustainability 2018 10 1 

6. Deaconu The use of information and communications technology in vocational education and training-Premise of sustainability Sustainability 2018 10.3390/su10051466 10 1 

   상세보기

7. (2018, January 02). Amazon Prime Air’s First Customer Delivery. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v = vNySOrI2Ny8&t = 9s. 

8. Margaritoff, M. (2018, February 04). Drones in Agriculture: How UAVs Farming more Efficient. Available online: http://www.thedrive.com/tech/18456/drones-in-agriculture-how-uavs-make-farming-more-efficient. 

9. Branson-Potts, H.L.A. (2018, January 11). Fire Department Used Drones for the First Time During Skirball Fire. Available online: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-lafd-drone-skirball-fire-20171214-story.html. 

10. Walsh, K. (2018, January 12). 7 Fun Ways Teachers Can Use Drones for Teaching and Learning. Available online: http://www.emergingedtech.com/2017/10/7-fun-ways-teachers-can-used-drones-for-teaching-and-learning. 

11. Cenejac, J. (2018, January 11). 5 Ways to Use Drones in the Classroom: Cherishing Students’ Passion for Technology. Available online: http://elearningindustry.com/drones-in-the-classroom-5-ways-cherishing-students-passion-technology. 

12. Carnahan, C., Zieger, L., and Crowley, K. (2016). Drones in Education: Let Your Students’ Imagination Soar, International Society for Technology in Education. 

13. Smith Drones for the science classroom Sci. Teach. 2018 10.2505/4/tst18_085_02_16 85 16 

    상세보기

14. 10.1109/COMCOM.2017.8167087 Hoffert, F. (2017, January 17-18). Examining the possibility of using programming language with low-cost drones. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Applied Computer and Communication Technologies, Jakarta, Indonesia. 

    

15. Hussey, M. (2018, January 15). Drones in Woodland Elementary Classroom Soar, Flip and Teach. Available online: http://www.tampabay.com/news/education/k12/drones-in-woodland-elementary-classroom-soar-flip-and-teach/2260352. 

16. Wakefield, J. (2018, January 16). Robots and Drones Take over Classrooms. Available online: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-38758980. 

17. Schaeffer Drones in the classroom J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 2017 32 85 

18. Carnahan, C., and Crowley, K. (2018, January 5). Using Drones to Ensure Student Success. Proceedings of the 2017 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Austin, TX, USA. 

19. 10.1109/ICALT.2017.116 Palaigeorgiou, G., Malandrakis, G., and Tsolopani, C. (2017, January 3-7). Learning with Drones: Flying Windows for Classroom Virtual Field Trips. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Timisoara, Romania. 

    

20. Gerson The development and assessment of multimedia software for improving 3D spatial visualization skills Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 2001 10.1002/cae.1012 9 105 

    상세보기

21. Sorbi Developing 3D spatial visualization skills Eng. Des. Gr. J. 1999 63 21 

22. Sorbi Educational research in developing 3D spatial skills for engineering students Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2009 10.1080/09500690802595839 31 459 

    상세보기

23. Baki A comparative study of the effects of using dynamic geometry software and physical manipulative on the spatial visualization skills of preservice mathematics teachers Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2011 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01012.x 42 291 

    상세보기

24. Chou Utilizing 3D open source software to facilitate student learning of fundamental engineering knowledge: A quasi-experimental study Int. J. Eng. Educ. 2017 33 382 

    상세보기

25. Fombuena Unmanned aerial vehicles and spatial thinking: Boarding education with geotechnology and drones IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. 2017 10.1109/MGRS.2017.2710054 5 8 

    상세보기

26. Kazakoff The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood Early Child. Educ. J. 2013 10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5 41 245 

    상세보기

27. (2018, January 21). Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Kindergarten learning experience. Available online: https://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/0408kle.docx. 

28. Sarama Building blocks of early childhood mathematics Teach. Child. Math. 2003 10.5951/TCM.9.8.0480 9 480 

    상세보기

29. Zelazo Early development of executive function: A problem-solving framework Rev. Gen. Psychol. 1997 10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.198 1 198 

    상세보기

30. Fessakis Problem solving by 5-6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study Comput. Educ. 2013 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016 63 87 

    상세보기

31. Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using scratch in five schools Comput. Educ. 2016 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003 97 129 

    상세보기

32. Brennan, K., and Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Annual American Educational Research Association Meeting, American Educational Research Association. 

33. (2018, October 01). Teaching and Learning for Sustainable Future. Available online: http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/. 

34. (2018, October 01). ISTE Standards for Students. Available online: https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students. 

35. Amiel Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda Educ. Technol. Soc. 2008 11 29 

36. Creswell, J.W., and Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Method Research, Sage. 

37. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, Sage. [3rd ed.]. 

38. (2018, October 22). Picture-Sequencing Test; Hsin-Yi: Taipei, Taiwan,. Available online: http://store.kimy.com.tw/category/productdetail.aspx?no=H000000017280. 

39. Chou Skill development and knowledge acquisition cultivated by maker education: Evidence from Arduino-based educational robotics EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2018 10.29333/ejmste/93483 14 1 

    상세보기

40. Smith, P.L., and Ragan, T.J. (2005). Instructional Design, Wiley. [3rd ed.]. 

41. (2018, October 01). Aviation Rules for Drones. Available online: https://dronesplayer.com/. 

42. 10.4135/9781412995658 Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods, Sage. 

    

43. Stoilescu Gender differences in the use of computers, programming, and peer interactions in computer science classrooms Comput. Sci. Educ. 2015 10.1080/08993408.2010.527691 20 283 

    상세보기

44. 10.1145/100348.100385 Oman, P.W., and Cook, C.R. (1990, January 20-22). A Taxonomy for Programming Style. Proceedings of the ACM Annual Conference on Cooperation, Washington, DC, USA. 

    

45. Reigeluth, C.M. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.