Since the Fukushima accident in 2011, nuclear safety has emerged as a very important political and social issue. Under this circumstance, the importance of configuration management (CM) is emphasized in order to ensure the reliability and safety of facility. However, configuration management (CM) is...
Since the Fukushima accident in 2011, nuclear safety has emerged as a very important political and social issue. Under this circumstance, the importance of configuration management (CM) is emphasized in order to ensure the reliability and safety of facility. However, configuration management (CM) is still in its conceptual stage in the nuclear industry due to the ambiguity of CM definitions, insufficiency of CM procedures, paucity of computerized systems and lack of CM professionals. In an attempt to address this issue, a previous study proposed a comprehensive CM framework for nuclear power plants (NPPs) by comparing CM concepts in seven different industries where the CM is actively utilized. In order to facilitate the practical implementation of the conceptual framework, this paper proposes an assessment methodology for prioritizing the importance of CM application areas based on the physical subjects of NPP structures, systems, components (SSCs). The proposed methodology is composed of an ‘extended CM framework’ with further details and ‘evaluation criteria’ based on CM functions. This study developed an SSCs list by analyzing Design Control Document (DCD) of Westinghouse AP1000 and also identified evaluation criteria through an extensive literature review. The concept of CM in this study encompasses the entire NPP project life-cycle in order to promote the practical CM application. The results of case-study performed in this paper would provide the SSCs priorities and guidelines for practical configuration management (CM) for sustainable NPP facilities.
Since the Fukushima accident in 2011, nuclear safety has emerged as a very important political and social issue. Under this circumstance, the importance of configuration management (CM) is emphasized in order to ensure the reliability and safety of facility. However, configuration management (CM) is still in its conceptual stage in the nuclear industry due to the ambiguity of CM definitions, insufficiency of CM procedures, paucity of computerized systems and lack of CM professionals. In an attempt to address this issue, a previous study proposed a comprehensive CM framework for nuclear power plants (NPPs) by comparing CM concepts in seven different industries where the CM is actively utilized. In order to facilitate the practical implementation of the conceptual framework, this paper proposes an assessment methodology for prioritizing the importance of CM application areas based on the physical subjects of NPP structures, systems, components (SSCs). The proposed methodology is composed of an ‘extended CM framework’ with further details and ‘evaluation criteria’ based on CM functions. This study developed an SSCs list by analyzing Design Control Document (DCD) of Westinghouse AP1000 and also identified evaluation criteria through an extensive literature review. The concept of CM in this study encompasses the entire NPP project life-cycle in order to promote the practical CM application. The results of case-study performed in this paper would provide the SSCs priorities and guidelines for practical configuration management (CM) for sustainable NPP facilities.
참고문헌 (22)
KINS (2013). Study on Establishment of Regulation Policy for the Reinforcement of Configuration Management and Application in Nuclear Power Plants.
DoD (2001). Configuration Management Guidance.
IAEA (2003). Configuration Management in Nuclear Power Plants, IAEA.
INPO (2005). Configuration Management Process Description, Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO). AP-929 Revision 1.
IAEA (2010). Information Technology for Nuclear Power Plant Configuration Management, IAEA.
EPRI (2011). Elements of Pre-Operational and Operational Configuration Management for a New Nuclear Facility, EPRI. 1022684.
Kang Framework & Functions of Configuration Management (CM) in Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) Korean J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2015 10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.3.101 16 101
Jung Flexible Work Breakdown Structure for Integrated Cost and Schedule Control J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2004 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:5(616) 130 616
10.1155/2015/190925 Jung, Y., Moon, B.-S., Kim, Y.-M., and Kim, W. (2015). Integrated Cost and Schedule Control Systems (EVMS) for Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Construction. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install., 2015.
10.3390/su9030469 Kim, M., Lee, I., and Jung, Y. (2017). International Project Risk Management for Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Construction: Featuring Comparative Analysis with Fossil and Gas Power Plants. Sustainability, 9.
IAEA (2001). Managing Change in Nuclear Utilities, IAEA.
IAEA (1996). Management of Procurement Activities in a Nuclear Installation, IAEA.
IAEA (2006). Maintenance, Periodic Testing and Inspection of Research Reactors, IAEA.
IAEA (2008). Commissioning for Nuclear Power Plants: Training and Human Resource Considerations, IAEA.
IAEA (2012). Project Management in Nuclear Power Plant Construction: Guidelines and Experience, IAEA.
IAEA (2012). Safety of Nuclear Power Plant: Design, IAEA.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2011). Part 50: Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities-50.2 Definition, Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
EPRI (2016). Advanced Nuclear Technology: New Nuclear Power Plant Information Handover Guide, EPRI. 1019221.
Kim, Y.M., Bae, Y.K., and Yang, M.D. (2012). A Study on Engineering/Construction Impact and Improvement against the Delay of BOP Vender Design Data in Nuclear Plant Project of Korea, KEPCO E&C.
IAEA (2014). Commissioning for Nuclear Power Plants, IAEA.
Kim Application of Linear Scheduling Method (LSM) for Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Construction Nucl. Eng. Des. 2014 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.12.053 270 65
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.