참고문헌 (46)

1. Wang A review on recent advancements of substructures for offshore wind turbines Energy Convers. Manag. 2018 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.061 158 103 

   상세보기

2. Ahmed The challenges and possible solutions of horizontal axis wind turbines as a clean energy solution for the future Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014 10.1016/j.rser.2014.06.004 38 439 

   상세보기

3. Esteban Why offshore wind energy? Renew. Energy 2011 10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.009 36 444 

   상세보기

4. Luca A procedure for deriving wind turbine noise limits by taking into account annoyance Sci. Total Environ. 2019 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.107 648 728 

   상세보기

5. Fredianelli Analytical assessment of wind turbine noise impact at receiver by means of residual noise determination without the wind farm shutdown Noise Control Eng. J. 2017 10.3397/1/376558 65 417 

   상세보기

6. Michaud Exposure to wind turbine noise: Perceptual responses and reported health effects J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2016 10.1121/1.4942391 139 1443 

   상세보기

7. Snyder A comparison of offshore wind power development in europe and the U.S.: Patterns and drivers of development Appl. Energy 2009 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.02.013 86 1845 

   상세보기

8. Michalak Wind energy development in the world, Europe and Poland from 1995 to 2009; current status and future perspectives Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.008 15 2330 

   상세보기

9. Hong Offshore wind energy potential in China: Under technical, spatial and economic constraints Energy 2011 10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.071 36 4482 

   상세보기

10. 10.3390/app9020231 Piasecka, I., Tomporowski, A., Flizikowski, J., Kruszelnicka, W., Kasner, R., and Mroziński, A. (2019). Life Cycle Analysis of Ecological Impacts of an Offshore and a Land-Based Wind Power Plant. Appl. Sci., 9. 

    

11. 10.3390/app9020278 Seyr, H., and Muskulus, M. (2019). Decision Support Models for Operations and Maintenance for Offshore Wind Farms: A Review. Appl. Sci., 9. 

    

12. International Electrotechnical Commission (2005). Wind turbines-Part 1: Design requirements, IEC 61400-1, IEC. 

13. DNVGL (2016). DNVGL-ST-0126: Support Structures for Wind Turbines, DNV GL. 

14. CCS (2012). Specification for Offshore Wind Turbine Certification, CCS. 

15. Mo, E. (2008). Nonlinear Stochastic Dynamics and Chaos by Numerical Path Integration. [Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology]. 

16. Narayanan Numerical solutions of Fokker-Planck equation of nonlinear systems subjected to random and harmonic excitations Probabilist. Eng. Mech. 2012 10.1016/j.probengmech.2011.05.006 27 35 

    

17. Sun Numerical solution of high dimensional stationary Fokker-Planck equations via tensor decomposition and Chebyshev spectral differentiation Comput. Math. Appl. 2014 10.1016/j.camwa.2014.04.017 67 1960 

    

18. Crandall Perturbation techniques for stochastic vibration of nonlinear systems J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1963 10.1121/1.1918792 35 1700 

    

19. Khasminskii A limit theorem for the solutions of differential equations with random right-hand sides Theor. Probab. Appl. 1966 10.1137/1111038 11 390 

    

20. Alevras GPU computing for accelerating the numerical Path Integration approach Comput. Struct. 2016 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.05.002 171 46 

    

21. Spencer On the numerical solution of the Fokker-Planck equation for nonlinear stochastic systems Nonlinear Dynam. 1993 10.1007/BF00120671 4 357 

    

22. Wojtkiewicz Response of stochastic dynamical systems driven by additive Gaussian and Poisson white noise: Solution of a forward generalized Kolmogorov equation by a spectral finite difference method Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Eng. 1999 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00098-X 168 73 

    

23. Chai Filter models for prediction of stochastic ship roll response Probabilist. Eng. Mech. 2015 10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.06.002 41 104 

    

24. Yurchenko Stochastic Dynamics of a Parametrically base Excited Rotating Pendulum Procedia Iutam 2013 10.1016/j.piutam.2013.01.018 6 160 

    

25. Yurchenko Control and dynamics of a SDOF system with piecewise linear stiffness and combined external excitations Probabilist. Eng. Mech. 2014 10.1016/j.probengmech.2013.09.007 35 118 

    

26. Iourtchenko Response probability density functions of strongly non-linear systems by the path integration method Int. J. Non-Lin. Mech. 2006 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2006.04.002 41 693 

    

27. Naess Response statistics of nonlinear, compliant offshore structures by the path integral solution method Probabilist. Eng. Mech. 1993 10.1016/0266-8920(93)90003-E 8 91 

    

28. Zhu Probabilistic solution of non-linear random ship roll motion by path integration Int. J. Non-Lin. Mech. 2016 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2016.03.010 83 1 

    

29. Mo, E., and Naess, A. (August, January 31). Efficient path integration by FFT. Presented at the 10th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP10), Tokyo, Japan. 

30. Beylkin Algorithms for Numerical Analysis in High Dimensions SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2005 10.1137/040604959 26 2133 

    

31. Lombardi Dynamic soil-structure interaction of monopile supported wind turbines in cohesive soil Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2013 10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.015 49 165 

    

32. Bisoi Dynamic analysis of offshore wind turbine in clay considering soil-monopile-tower interaction Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2014 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.03.006 63 19 

    

33. Nam Evolution of the dynamic response and its effects on the serviceability of offshore wind turbines with stochastic loads and soil degradation Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2019 10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.017 184 151 

    

34. Bisoi Design of monopile supported offshore wind turbine in clay considering dynamic soil-structure-interaction Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2015 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.02.017 73 103 

    

35. Damgaard Dynamic response sensitivity of an offshore wind turbine for varying subsoil conditions Ocean Eng. 2015 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.039 101 227 

    

36. Feyzollahzadeh Wind load response of offshore wind turbine towers with fixed monopile platform J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerdodyn. 2016 10.1016/j.jweia.2016.09.007 158 122 

    

37. Arany Design of monopiles for offshore wind turbines in 10 steps Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2017 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.024 92 126 

    

38. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.038 Kaynia, A.M. (2018). Seismic considerations in design of offshore wind turbines. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 

    

39. Jalbi Dynamic design considerations for offshore wind turbine jackets supported on multiple foundations Mar. Struc. 2019 10.1016/j.marstruc.2019.05.009 67 102631 

    

40. Chengxi Numerical Investigation of a Hybrid Wave Absorption Method in 3D Numerical Wave Tank CMES Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2015 107 125 

41. Yeter Fatigue damage assessment of fixed offshore wind turbine tripod support structures Eng. Struct. 2015 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.038 101 518 

    

42. Vestas (2019, January 10). V80-2MW OptiSpeedTM Offshore Wind Turbine. Available online: http://www.vestas.dk/. 

43. Dostal Probabilistic approach to large amplitude ship rolling in random seas Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2011 10.1177/0954406211414523 225 2464 

    

44. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (2006). Code for Design of High-Rising Structures. 

45. 10.1049/etr.2014.0041 Bhattacharya, S. (2014). Challenges in Design of Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines. Eng. Tech. Ref. 

    

46. DNV (2014). Offshore Standard DNV-OS-J101 Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Structures, DNV.