$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Factor Structure of the Conflict Tactics Scale 1 원문보기

International journal of community based nursing and midwifery, v.5 no.3, 2017년, pp.239 - 247  

Baba PhD, Kaori (Kitamura Institute of Mental Health Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan) ,  Takauma RN, Fumie (Department of Nursing, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan) ,  Tada PhD, Katsuhiko (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization, Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan) ,  Tanaka RN, Tomoko (Department of Health, Welfare, and Environment, Aso Health Center, Aso, Japan) ,  Sakanashi MS, Kyoko (Department of Women’s Health) ,  Kataoka PhD, Yaeko (College of Nursing, St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo, Japan) ,  Kitamura PhD, Toshinori (Kitamura Institute of Mental Health Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

ABSTRACTBackground: The Conflict Tactics Scale 1 (CTS1) is a widely used self-report measure of abusive attitudes of parents towards children. The factor structure of the CTS1 still remains to be clarified. The aim of this study was to examine the factor structure of the Japanese version of the CTS1...

주제어

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 1 Murphy S Orkow B Nicola RM Prenatal prediction of child abuse and neglect: a prospective study Child Abuse & Neglect 1985 9 225 35 4005663 

  2. 2 Milner JS Gold RG Wimberley RC Prediction and explanation of child abuse: cross-validation of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1986 54 865 6 3794036 

  3. 3 Straus MA Hamby SL Finkelhor D Identification of child maltreatment with the parent-child conflict tactics scales: development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents Child Abuse & Neglect 1998 22 249 70 9589178 

  4. 4 Kaufman Kantor G Jasinski Jana L Out of the Darkness, Contemporary Perspectives on Family Violence 1997 US Sage 119 35 

  5. 5 Bugental DB Schwartz A A cognitive approach to child mistreatment prevention among medically at-risk infants Developmental Psychology 2009 45 284 8 19210009 

  6. 6 Dubowitz H Feigelman S Lane W Kim J Pediatric primary care to help prevent chid maltreatment: the safe environment for every kid (SEEK) model Pediatrics 2009 123 858 64 19255014 

  7. 7 Duggan A Caldera D Rodriguez K Impact of a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse Child Abuse & Neglect 2007 31 801 27 17822764 

  8. 8 Duggan A McFarlane E Fuddy L Randomized trial of a statewide home visiting program: impact in preventing child abuse and neglect Child Abuse & Neglect 2004 28 597 622 15193851 

  9. 9 DuMont K Mitchell-Herzfeld S Greene R Healthy families New York (HFNY) randomized trial: effects on early child abuse and neglect Child Abuse & Neglect 2008 32 295 315 18377991 

  10. 10 Fergusson DM Grant H Horwood LJ Ridder EM Randomized trial of the early start program of home visitation Pediatrics 2005 116 e803 9 16322138 

  11. 11 Ohashi Y Kitamura T Sakanashi K Tanaka T Mother-to-infant bonding disorder, but not depression, 5 days after delivery is a risk factor for neonate emotional abuse: A study in Japanese mothers of 1-month olds The Open Family Studies Journal 2016 8 27 36 

  12. 12 Kitamura T Takauma F Tada K Postnatal depression, social support, and child abuse World Psychiatry 2004 3 100 1 16633468 

  13. 13 Ohashi Y Kitamura T Sakanashi K Tanaka T Postpartum Bonding Disorder: Factor Structure, Validity, Reliability and Model Comparison of the Postnatal Bonding Questionnaire in Japanese Mothers of Infants Healthcare 2016 4 3 piiE50 

  14. 14 Straus MA Hamby SL Warren WL The Conflict Tactics Scale Handbook 2003 Los Angeles Western Psychological Services 

  15. 15 Bentler PM Comparative fit indexes in structural models Psychological Bulletin 1990 107 238 46 2320703 

  16. 16 Browne MW Cudeck R Alternative ways of assessing model fit Sociological methods and research 1992 21 230 58 

  17. 17 Schermelleh-Engell K Moosbrugger H Müller H Engell K Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures Methods of Psychological Research Online 2003 8 23 74 

  18. 18 Akaike H Factor analysis and AIC Psychometrika 1987 52 317 32 

  19. 19 Kline RB Principles and practice of structural equation modelling 2004 2nd ed New York The Guilford Press 

  20. 20 IBM Corporation IBM SPSS Statistics 21 Brief Guide. USA: IBM Corporation; 2012. [cited 16 Nov 2016] Available from: [ http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/pdfs/SPSS_Brief_Guide_21.pdf ] 

  21. 21 Arbuckle JL IBM SPSS Amos 21 User’s Guide. US: Amos Development Corporation; 2012. [cited 16 Nov 2016]. Available from: [ ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/amos/21.0/en/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Amos_Users_Guide.pdf ] 

  22. 22 Hornung CA McCullough BC Sugimoto T Status relationhips in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse Journal of Marriage and Family 1981 43 675 92 

  23. 23 Barling J O’Leary KD Jouriles EN Factor similarity of the Conflict Tactc Scales across samples, spouses, and sites: Ussues and implications Journal of Family Violence 1987 2 37 54 

  24. 24 Caulfield MB Riggs DS The assessment of dating aggression: Empirical evaluation of the Conflict Tactics Scale Journal of Interpersonal Violence 1992 7 549 58 

  25. 25 Pan HS Neidig PH O’Leary KD Male-female and aggressor-victim differences in the factor structure of the modified Conflict Tactics Scale Journal of Interpersonal Violence 1994 9 366 82 

  26. 26 Newton RR Connelly CD Landsverk JA An examination of measurement characteristics and factorial validity of the revised Conflic Tactocs Scale Educational and Psychological Measurement 2001 51 317 35 

  27. 27 Lucente SW Fals-Stewart W Richards HJ Goscha J Factor structure and reliability of the revised Conflict Tactics Scales for incarcerated female substance abusers Journal of Family Violence 2001 16 437 50 

관련 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로