[논문]The role of the gut microbiota on animal model reproducibility

Turner, Patricia V.

doi:10.1002/ame2.12022

[해외논문] The role of the gut microbiota on animal model reproducibility 원문보기

Animal models and experimental medicine, v.1 no.2, 2018년, pp.109 - 115

Turner, Patricia V. (Charles River Laboratories Wilmington MA USA)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

AbstractThe gut microbiota is composed of approximately 1010‐1014 cells, including fungi, bacteria, archaea, protozoa, viruses, and bacteriophages; their genes and their various metabolites were found throughout the gastrointestinal tract. It has co‐evolved with each species to assist with day to day bodily functions, such as digestion, metabolism of xenobiotics, development of mucosal immunity and immunomodulation, and protection against invading pathogens. Because of the significant beneficial impact that gut microbiota may have, there is interest in learning more about it and translating these findings into clinical therapies. Results from recent studies characterizing the gut microbiota of various species have demonstrated the range of influences that may affect gut microbiota diversity, including animal strain, obesity, types of enrichment used, bedding and housing methods, treatment with antimicrobials, vendor source, specific animal housing, diet, and intercurrent disease. Relatively little is known about the functional consequences of alterations of the gut microbiota and exactly how changes in richness and diversity of the microbiota translate into changes in health and susceptibility to disease. Furthermore, questions have been raised as to whether germ‐free or even ultraclean, barrier‐raised mice are relevant models of human disease, given their significantly reduced gut microbiota diversity and complexity compared with conventionally housed mice. In addition, evidence suggests that the specific anatomical location selected for assessing the gut microbiota has a highly significant effect on study outcomes, in that bacterial phyla change significantly along the gastrointestinal tract. This paper will explore animal model reproducibility in light of this information about the gut microbiota.

참고문헌 (67)

1 Jandhyala SM , Talukdar R , Subramanyam C , Vuyyuru H , Sasikala M , Reddy DN . Role of the normal gut microbiota . World J Gastroenterol . 2015 ; 21 : 8787 ‐ 8803 . 26269668
2 Laukens D , Brinkman BM , Raes J , De Vos M , Vandenabeele P . Heterogeneity of the gut microbiome in mice: guidelines for optimizing experimental design . FEMS Microbiol Rev . 2016 ; 40 : 117 ‐ 132 . 26323480

상세보기
3 Spor A , Koren O , Ley R . Unravelling the effects of the environment and host genotype on the gut microbiome . Nat Rev Microbiol . 2011 ; 9 : 279 ‐ 290 . 21407244

상세보기
4 MacFabe DF . Enteric short chain fatty acids: microbial messengers of metabolism, mitochondria, and mind: implications in autism spectrum disorders . Microbiol Ecol Health Dis . 2015 ; 26 : 28177 .
5 Morgan XC , Huttenhower C . Chapter 12: human microbiome analysis . PLoS Comput Biol . 2012 ; 8 : e1002808 . 23300406

상세보기
6 Clarke G , Stilling RM , Kennedy PJ , Stanton C , Cryan JF , Dinan TG . Gut microbiota: the neglected endocrine organ . Mol Endocrinol . 2014 ; 28 : 1221 ‐ 1238 . 24892638
7 Van de Wiele T , Van Praet JT , Marzorati M , Drennan MB , Elewaut D . How the microbiota shapes rheumatic diseases . Nat Rev Rheumatol . 2016 ; 12 : 398 ‐ 411 . 27305853

상세보기
8 Berg RD . The indigenous gastrointestinal microflora . Trends Microbiol . 2014 ; 4 : 430 ‐ 435 .
9 Honda K , Littman DR . The microbiome in infectious disease and inflammation . Annu Rev Immunol . 2012 ; 30 : 759 ‐ 795 . 22224764

상세보기
10 Sekirov I , Russell SL , Antunes LC , Finlay BB . Gut microbiota in health and disease . Physiol Rev . 2010 ; 90 : 859 ‐ 904 . 20664075

상세보기
11 Kamada N , Chen GY , Inohara N , Nunez G . Control of pathogens and pathobionts by the gut microbiota . Nat Immunol . 2013 ; 14 : 685 ‐ 690 . 23778796

상세보기
12 Tung YC , Chang WT , Li S , et al. Citrus peel extracts attenuated obesity and modulated gut microbiota in mice with high‐fat diet‐induced obesity . Food Funct . 2018 https://10.1039/c7fo02066j
13 Laserna‐Mendieta EJ , Clooney AG , Carretero‐Gomez JF , et al. Determinants of Reduced genetic capacity for butyrate synthesis by the gut microbiome in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis . J Crohns Colit . 2018 ; 12 : 204 ‐ 216 .
14 Zheng X , Zhou K , Zhang Y , et al. Food withdrawal alters the gut microbiota and metabolome in mice . FASEB J . 2018 ; fj201700614R .
15 Ma C , Han M , Heinrich B , et al. Gut microbiome‐mediated bile acid metabolism regulates liver cancer via NKT cells . Science . 2018 ; 360 .
16 DeFilipp Z , Peled JU , Li S , et al. Third‐party fecal microbiota transplantation following allo‐HCT reconstitutes microbiome diversity . Blood Adv . 2018 ; 2 : 745 ‐ 753 . 29592876
17 Schroeder BO , Backhed F . Signals from the gut microbiota to distant organs in physiology and disease . Nat Med . 2016 ; 22 : 1079 ‐ 1089 . 27711063

상세보기
18 Yang B , Wang Y , Qian P‐Y . Sensitivity and correlation of hypervariable regions in 16S rRNA genes in phylogenetic analysis . BMC Bioinformatics . 2016 ; 17 : 135 . 27000765

상세보기
19 Knight R , Vrbanac A , Taylor BC , et al. Best practices for analysing microbiomes . Nat Rev Microbiol . 2018 . doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0029-9

상세보기
20 Aroniadis OC , Brandt LJ . Intestinal microbiota and the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in gastrointestinal disease . Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2014 ; 10 : 230 ‐ 237 .
21 Mattner J , Schmidt F , Siegmund B . Faecal microbiota transplantation ‐ A clinical view . Int J Med Microbiol . 2016 ; 306 : 310 ‐ 315 . 26924753
22 Gianotti RJ , Moss AC . Fecal microbiota transplantation: from Clostridium difficile to inflammatory bowel disease . Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2017 ; 13 : 209 ‐ 213 .
23 Nguyen TL , Vieira‐Silva S , Liston A , Raes J . How informative is the mouse for human gut microbiota research? Dis Model Mech . 2015 ; 8 : 1 ‐ 16 . 25561744
24 Flemer B , Gaci N , Borrel G , et al. Fecal microbiota variation across the lifespan of the healthy laboratory rat . Gut Microbes . 2017 ; 8 : 428 ‐ 439 . 28586297

상세보기
25 Li D , Chen H , Mao B , et al. Microbial biogeography and core microbiota of the rat digestive tract . Sci Report . 2017 ; 7 : 45840 .
26 Wos‐Oxley ML , Bleich A , Oxley APA , et al. Comparative evaluation of establishing a human gut microbial community within rodent models . Gut Microbes . 2012 ; 3 : 234 ‐ 249 . 22572831

상세보기
27 Hildebrand F , Ebersbach T , Nielsen HB , et al. A comparative analysis of the intestinal metagenomes present in guinea pigs ( Cavia porcellus ) and humans ( Homo sapiens ) . BMC Genom . 2012 ; 13 : 514 .
28 Lamendella R , Domingo JW , Ghosh S , Martinson J , Oerther DB . Comparative fecal metagenomics unveils unique functional capacity of the swine gut . BMC Microbiol . 2011 ; 11 : 103 . 21575148

상세보기
29 Pedersen R , Ingerslev HC , Sturek M , et al. Characterisation of gut microbiota in Ossabaw and Göttingen minipigs as models of obesity and metabolic syndrome . PLoS ONE . 2013 ; 8 : e56612 . 23437186

상세보기
30 Xiao L , Estellé J , Kiilerich P , et al. A reference gene catalogue of the pig gut microbiome . Nat Microbiol . 2016 ; 1 : 16161 .

상세보기
31 Rodrigues Hoffmann A , Proctor LM , Surette MG , Suchodolski JS . The microbiome: the trillions of microorganisms that maintain health and cause disease in humans and companion animals . Vet Pathol . 2016 ; 53 : 10 ‐ 21 . 26220947

상세보기
32 Handl S , Dowd SE , Garcia‐Mazcorro JF , Steiner JM , Suchodolski JS . Massive parallel 16s rRNA gene pyrosequencing reveals highly diverse fecal bacterial and fungal communities in healthy dogs and cats . FEMS Microbol Ecol . 2011 ; 76 : 301 ‐ 310 .
33 Middelbos IS , Vester Boler BM , Qu A , White BA , Swanson KS , Fahey GC . Phylogenetic characterization of fecal microbial communities of dogs fed diets with or without dietary fiber using 454 pyrosequencing . PLoS ONE . 2010 ; 5 : e9768 . 20339542
34 Swanson KS , Dowd SE , Suchodolski JS , et al. Phylogenetic and gene‐centric metagenomics of the canine intestinal microbiome reveals similarities with humans and mice . ISME J . 2011 ; 5 : 639 ‐ 649 . 20962874

상세보기
35 Garcia‐Mazcorro JF , Lanerie DJ , Dowd SE , et al. Effect of multispecies symbiotic formulation on fecal bacterial microbiota of healthy cats and dogs as evaluated by pyrosequencing . FEMS Microbiol Ecol . 2011 ; 78 : 542 ‐ 554 . 22067056
36 McKenna P , Hoffmann C , Minkah N , et al. The macaque gut microbiome in health, lentiviral infection, and chronic enterocolitis . PLoS Pathog . 2008 Feb 8; 4 : e20 . 18248093

상세보기
37 Yildirim S , Yeoman CJ , Sipos M , et al. Characterization of the fecal microbiome from non‐human wild primates reveals species specific microbial communities . PLoS ONE . 2010 ; 5 : e13963 . 21103066

상세보기
38 Amato KR , Yeoman CJ , Cerda G , et al. Variable responses of human and non‐human primate gut microbiomes to a Western diet . Microbiome . 2015 ; 3 : 53 . 26568112

상세보기
39 Krych L , Hansen CH , Hansen AK , van den Berg FW , Nielsen DS . Quantitatively different, yet qualitatively alike: a meta‐analysis of the mouse core gut microbiome with a view towards the human gut microbiome . PLoS ONE . 2013 ; 8 : e62578 . 23658749

상세보기
40 Round JL , Mazmanian SK . The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease . Nat Rev Immunol . 2009 ; 9 : 313 ‐ 323 . 19343057

상세보기
41 Al‐Asmakh M , Zadjali F . Use of germ‐free animal models in microbiota‐related research . J Microbiol Biotechnol . 2015 ; 25 : 1583 ‐ 1588 . 26032361

원문보기 상세보기
42 Begley CG , Buchan AM , Dirnagl U . Robust research: institutions must do their part for reproducibility . Nature . 2015 ; 525 : 25 ‐ 27 . 26333454
43 Baker M . 1500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility . Nature . 2016 ; 533 : 452 ‐ 454 . 27225100
44 Fisher CK , Mora T , Walczak AM . Variable habitat conditions drive species covariation in the human microbiota . PLoS Comput Biol . 2017 ; 13 : e1005435 . 28448493

상세보기
45 Lozupone CA , Stombaugh JI , Gordon JI , Jansson JK , Knight R . Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota . Nature . 2012 ; 489 : 220 ‐ 230 . 22972295

상세보기
46 Rogers GB , Kozlowska J , Keeble J , et al. Functional divergence in gastrointestinal microbiota in physically‐separated genetically identical mice . Sci Rep . 2014 ; 4 : 5437 . 24961643

상세보기
47 Clavel T , Lagkouvardos I , Blaut M , Stecher B . The mouse gut microbiome revisited: from complex diversity to model ecosystems . Int J Med Microbiol . 2016 ; 306 : 316 ‐ 327 . 26995267
48 Arrieta MC , Walter J , Finlay BB . Human microbiota‐associated mice: a model with challenges . Cell Host Microbe . 2016 ; 19 : 575 ‐ 578 . 27173924

상세보기
49 Ericsson AC , Franklin CL . Manipulating the gut microbiota: methods and challenges . ILAR J . 2015 ; 56 : 205 ‐ 217 . 26323630
50 Hugenholtz F , de Vos WM . Mouse models for human intestinal microbiota research: a critical evaluation . Cell Mol Life Sci . 2018 ; 75 : 149 ‐ 160 . 29124307

상세보기
51 Ericsson AC , Davis JW , Spollen W , et al. Effects of vendor and genetic background on the composition of the fecal microbiota of inbred mice . PLoS ONE . 2015 ; 10 : e0116704 . 25675094

상세보기
52 Antunes LCM , Han J , Ferreira RBR , Lolić P , Borchers CH , Finlay BB . Effect of antibiotic treatment on the intestinal metabolome . Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2011 ; 55 : 1494 ‐ 1503 . 21282433

상세보기
53 De La Cochetière MF , Durand T , Lepage P , Bourreille A , Galmiche JP , Doré J . Resilience of the dominant human fecal microbiota upon short‐course antibiotic challenge . J Clin Microbiol . 2005 ; 43 : 5588 ‐ 5592 . 16272491

상세보기
54 Odamaki T , Kato K , Sugahara H , et al. Age‐related changes in gut microbiota composition from newborn to centenarian: a cross‐sectional study . BMC Microbiol . 2016 ; 16 : 90 . 27220822

상세보기
55 Saraswati S , Sitaraman R . Aging and the human gut microbiota‐from correlation to causality . Front Microbiol . 2015 ; 5 : 764 . 25628610
56 Langille MG , Meehan CJ , Koenig JE , et al. Microbial shifts in the aging mouse gut . Microbiome . 2014 ; 2 : 50 . 25520805

상세보기
57 Hoy YE , Bik EM , Lawley TD , et al. Variation in taxonomic composition of the fecal microbiota in an inbred mouse strain across individuals and time . PLoS ONE . 2015 ; 10 : e0142825 . 26565698

상세보기
58 Tropini C , Earle KA , Huang KC , Sonnenburg JL . The gut microbiome: connecting spatial organization to function . Cell Host Microbe . 2017 ; 21 : 433 ‐ 442 . 28407481

상세보기
59 Hillman ET , Lu H , Yao T , Nakatsu CH . Microbial ecology along the gastrointestinal tract . Microbes Environ . 2017 ; 32 : 300 ‐ 313 . 29129876
60 Suzuki TA , Nachman MW . Spatial heterogeneity of gut microbial composition along the gastrointestinal tract in natural populations of house mice . PLoS ONE . 2016 ; 11 : e0163720 . 27669007

상세보기
61 Zoetendal EG , Raes J , van den Bogert B , et al. The human small intestinal microbiota is driven by rapid uptake and conversion of simple carbohydrates . ISME J . 2012 ; 6 : 1415 ‐ 1426 . 22258098

상세보기
62 Thomas V , Clark J , Doré J . Fecal microbiota analysis: an overview of sample collection methods and sequencing strategies . Future Microbiol . 2015 ; 10 : 1485 ‐ 1504 . 26347019

상세보기
63 Rintala A , Pietilä S , Munukka E , et al. Gut microbiota analysis results are highly dependent on the 16S rRNA gene target region, whereas the impact of DNA extraction is minor . Biomol Tech . 2017 ; 28 : 19 ‐ 30 .
64 Smith AJ , Clutton RE , Lilley E , Hansen KEA , Brattelid T . PREPARE: guidelines for planning animal research and testing . Lab Anim . 2018 ; 52 : 135 ‐ 141 . 28771074
65 Kilkenny C , Browne WJ , Cuthill IC , Emerson M , Altman DG . Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research . PLoS Biol . 2010 ; 8 : e1000412 . 20613859

상세보기
66 Drucker DJ . Never waste a good crisis: confronting reproducibility in translational research . Cell Metab . 2016 ; 24 : 348 ‐ 360 . 27626191
67 Groves T , Godlee F . Open science and reproducible research . Brit Med J . 2012 ; 344 : e4383 . 22736475

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

[해외논문] The role of the gut microbiota on animal model reproducibility 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

참고문헌 (67)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트