초록 ▼

A volume measurement system uses volume element counting in determining the amount of a liquid such as fuel in an irregularly-shaped container such as a fuel tank which can have changing orientation. The container is conceptually divided up into a plurality of volume elements. An orientation sensor

A volume measurement system uses volume element counting in determining the amount of a liquid such as fuel in an irregularly-shaped container such as a fuel tank which can have changing orientation. The container is conceptually divided up into a plurality of volume elements. An orientation sensor determines the orientation of the container or of the liquid surface, which is approximated as a plane. A computational or optical processor uses orientation data to project vectors representing the volume elements onto a direction normal to the liquid interface plane. These projected distances are then arithmetically or optically compared to the location of the liquid interface plane.

대표청구항 ▼

A volume measurement system uses volume element counting in determining the amount of a liquid such as fuel in an irregularly-shaped container such as a fuel tank which can have changing orientation. The container is conceptually divided up into a plurality of volume elements. An orientation sensor

A volume measurement system uses volume element counting in determining the amount of a liquid such as fuel in an irregularly-shaped container such as a fuel tank which can have changing orientation. The container is conceptually divided up into a plurality of volume elements. An orientation sensor determines the orientation of the container or of the liquid surface, which is approximated as a plane. A computational or optical processor uses orientation data to project vectors representing the volume elements onto a direction normal to the liquid interface plane. These projected distances are then arithmetically or optically compared to the location of the liquid interface plane. said dimple head is moved forwardly toward said third reference displacement value and, upon detection of a predetermined drop in pressure, determining that a gross failure of the metal part has occurred. 4. The method according to claim 2, comprising the further step of: comparing the calculated maximum deformation with a predetermined maximum deformation value to determine whether said metal part is weak at said test point. 5. The method of claim 1, comprising the further step of: comparing the calculated permanent deformation value with a predetermined permanent deformation value to determine whether said metal part is weak at said test point. 6. A method for sequentially testing a plurality of locations on a metal part for deformation, comprising the steps of: a) establishing a grid of said test points to be tested; b) positioning a dimple head adjacent one of said plurality of test points on said metal part; c) moving the dimple head forwardly toward the test point; d) determining when said dimple head encounters resistance to movement; e) measuring displacement of said dimple head when resistance to movement is encountered to establish a first reference displacement value; f) moving said dimple head forwardly into said metal part until a predetermined force is detected; g) measuring displacement of said dimple head when said predetermined force is detected to establish a second reference displacement value; h) calculating a maximum deformation of said metal part at said test point by subtracting said first reference displacement value from said second reference displacement value; i) after said predetermined force is detected, moving said dimple head rearwardly; j) measuring displacement of said dimple head as said dimple head is moved rearwardly and, when said displacement is less than or equal to said first reference displacement value, moving said dimple head forwardly; k) determining when said dimple head encounters resistance to movement; l) measuring displacement of said dimple head when resistance to movement is encountered to establish a third reference displacement value; m) calculating permanent deformation of said metal part at said test point by subtracting said first reference displacement value from said third reference displacement value; n) moving said dimple head into a position adjacent a subsequent one of said plurality of test points; and, o) repeating steps c-n until each of said plurality of test points has been tested. 7. The method according to claim 6, comprising the further steps of: for each test point, comparing the calculated maximum deformation with a predetermined maximum deformation value to determine whether said metal part is weak at said test point. 8. The method of claim 7, comprising the further step of: for each test point, comparing the calculated permanent deformation value with a predetermined permanent deformation value to determine whether said metal part is weak at said test point. 9. The method according to claim 6, comprising the further steps of: for each test point, monitoring forces as said dimple head is moved forwardly toward said second reference displacement value and, upon detection of a predetermined drop in pressure, determining that a gross failure of the metal part has occurred. Jones et al.; US-5753013, 19980500, Dingfelder; US-5843209, 19981200, Ray et al.; US-6042634, 20000300, Van Tassel et al.