System and method for inhibiting transponder replies
원문보기
IPC분류정보
국가/구분
United States(US) Patent
등록
국제특허분류(IPC7판)
G06F-017/00
B60T-008/00
출원번호
US-0177919
(2002-06-21)
발명자
/ 주소
Ybarra, Kathryn W.
Stone, Cyro A.
출원인 / 주소
Aviation Communication & Surveillance Systems LLC
대리인 / 주소
Bachand William R.
인용정보
피인용 횟수 :
2인용 특허 :
6
초록▼
A traffic collision avoidance system has a transponder with an interrogation monitoring engine for receiving interrogations and an interrogation response engine for inhibiting responses to the interrogations if the interrogations are air traffic control interrogations and the transponder is in a qui
A traffic collision avoidance system has a transponder with an interrogation monitoring engine for receiving interrogations and an interrogation response engine for inhibiting responses to the interrogations if the interrogations are air traffic control interrogations and the transponder is in a quiet mode. Typically the transponder enters quiet mode during military formation flight if the aircraft in which the transponder is installed is not a tail or lead member of the formation.
대표청구항▼
1. A method performed by a collision avoidance system aboard a host aircraft, the method for limiting transmitting from a transponder of the system, the method comprising:a step for determining whether the host aircraft is flying in a formation;a step for performing a collision avoidance function, i
1. A method performed by a collision avoidance system aboard a host aircraft, the method for limiting transmitting from a transponder of the system, the method comprising:a step for determining whether the host aircraft is flying in a formation;a step for performing a collision avoidance function, in a mode of operation of a set of modes comprising a normal mode wherein a message having a first message format is transmitted by the transponder in response to at least one of lapse of a period of time and receipt of an interrogation having a second message format, and a quiet mode wherein a message is not transmitted that would have been transmitted if in a normal mode; anda step for determining the mode of operation in response to whether the host aircraft is flying in the formation. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the interrogation comprises at least one of an altitude interrogation and an identifier interrogation. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the system further comprises computer; and the method further comprises a step for operating the transponder in the quiet mode in accordance with a command received by the transponder from the computer. 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the command is received by the transponder in an ARINC 429 data transmission. 5. The method of claim 1 wherein:the step for determining whether the host aircraft is flying in the formation further comprises a step for determining that the host aircraft is not a lead member of the formation, and is not a tail member of the formation; andthe step for determining the mode of operation further comprises a step for determining the mode of operation as quiet mode in further accordance with whether the host aircraft is not a lead member of the formation, and is not a tail member of the formation. 6. The method of claim 1 wherein a message having a third message format different from the first message format is transmitted by the transponder operating in the quiet mode and in response to at least one of lapse of time associated with the third message format and receipt of an interrogation having a message format different from the second message format. 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the collision avoidance function comprises at least one of a traffic colission avoidance function, a terrain avoidance function, a windshear avoidance function, and a military threat avoidance function. 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the second message format comprises at least one of an ATCRBS Mode A, an ATCRBS Mode C, a Mode S UF=4, a Mode S UF=5, a Mode S UF=11, a Mode S UF=20, and a Mode S UF=21. 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the first message format comprises at least one of a Mode S DF=17 and a Mode S DF=19. 10. A computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions for performing the method of claim 1. 11. A system for collision avoidance in a host aircraft, the system comprising:means for determining whether the host aircraft is flying in a formation;means for performing a collision avoidance function, in a mode of operation of a set of modes comprising a normal mode wherein a message having a first message format is transmitted by the transponder in response to at least one of lapse of a period of time and receipt of an interrogation having a second message format, and a quiet mode wherein a message is not transmitted that would have been transmitted if in a normal mode; andmeans for determining the mode of operation in response to whether the host aircraft is flying in the formation. 12. The system of claim 11 wherein the interrogation comprises at least one of an altitude interrogation and an identifier interrogation. 13. The system of claim 11 wherein the means for performing comprises a transponder coupled to a computer; wherein the the transponder operates in the quiet mode in accordance with a command received by the transponder from the computer. 14. The system of claim 13 wherein the command is received in an ARINC 429 data transmission. 15. The syst em of claim 11 wherein:the means for determining whether the host aircraft is flying in the formation further comprises means for determining that the host aircraft is not a lead member of the formation, and is not a tail member of the formation; andthe means for determining the mode of operation further comprises means for determining the mode of operation as quiet mode in further accordance with whether the host aircraft is not a lead member of the formation, and is not a tail member of the formation. 16. The system of claim 11 wherein a message having a third message format different from the first message format is transmitted by the transponder operating in the quiet mode and in response to at least one of lapse of time associated with the third message format and receipt of an interrogation having a message format different from the second message format. 17. The system of claim 11 wherein the collision avoidance function comprises at least one of a traffic collision avoidance function, a terrain avoidance function, a windshear avoidance function, and a military threat avoidance function. 18. The system of claim 11 wherein the second message format comprises at least one of an ATCRBS Mode A, an ATCRBS Mode C, a Mode S UF=4, a Mode S UF=5, a Mode S UF=11, a Mode S UF=20, and a Mode S UF=21. 19. The system of claim 11 wherein the first message format comprises at least one of a Mode S UF=17 and a Mode S UF=19. 20. A method performed by a collision avoidance system aboard a host aircraft, the method for limiting transmitting from a transponder of the system, the method comprising:determining whether the host aircraft is flying in a formation;performing a collision avoidance function, in a mode of operation of a set of modes comprising a normal mode wherein a message having a first message format is transmitted by the transponder in response to at least one of lapse of a period of time and receipt of an interrogation having a second message format, and a quiet mode wherein a message is not transmitted that would have been transmitted if in a normal mode; anddetermining the mode of operation in response to whether the host aircraft is flying in the formation. 21. The method of claim 20 wherein the interrogation comprises at least one of an altitude interrogation and an identifier interrogation. 22. The method of claim 20 wherein the system further comprises a computer; and the method further comprises a step for operating the transponder in the quiet mode in accordance with a command received by the transponder from the computer. 23. The method of claim 22 wherein the command is received by the transponder in an ARINC 429 data transmission. 24. The method of claim 20 wherein:the step for determining whether the host aircraft is flying in the formation further comprises a step for determining that the host aircraft is not a lead member of the formation, and is not a tail member of the formation; andthe step for determining the mode of operation further comprises a step for determining the mode of operation as quiet mode in further accordance with whether the host aircraft is not a lead member of the formation, and is not a tail member of the formation. 25. The method of claim 20 wherein a message having a third message format different from the first message format is transmitted by the transponder operating in the quiet mode and in response to at least one of lapse of time associated with the third message format and receipt of an interrogation having a message format different from the second message format. 26. The method of claim 25 wherein the collision avoidance function comprises at least one of a traffic collision avoidance function, a terrain avoidance function, a windshear avoidance function, and a military threat avoidance function. 27. The system of claim 20 wherein the second message format comprises at least one of an ATCRBS Mode A, an ATCRBS Mode C, a Mode S UF=4, a Mode S UF=5, a Mode S UF=11, a Mode S UF=20, a nd a Mode S UF=21. 28. The method of claim 20 wherein the first message format comprises at least one of a Mode S DF=17 and a Mode S DF=19. 29. A computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions for performing the method of claim 20. 30. A system for collision avoidance in a host aircraft, the system comprising:a computer that determines whether the host aircraft is flying in a formation;a transponder that cooperates with the computer to perform a collision avoidance function, in a mode of operation of a set of modes comprising a normal mode wherein a message having a first message format is transmitted in response to at least one of lapse of a period of time and receipt of an interrogation having a second message format, and a quiet mode wherein a message is not transmitted that would have been transmitted if in a normal mode; whereinthe computer further determines the mode of operation in response to whether the host aircraft is flying in the formation. 31. The system of claim 30 wherein the interrogation comprises at least one of an altitude interrogation and an identifier interrogation. 32. The system of claim 31 wherein the transponder operates in the quiet mode in accordance with a command received by the transponder from the computer. 33. The system of claim 32 wherein the command is received in an ARINC 429 data transmission. 34. The system of claim 30 wherein:the computer determines whether the host aircraft is flying in the formation in accordance with determining that the host aircraft is not a lead member of the formation, and is not a tail member of the formation; andthe computer determines the mode of operation in accordance with determining the mode of operation as quiet mode in further accordance with whether the host aircraft is not a lead member of the formation, and is not a tail member of the formation. 35. The system of claim 30 wherein a message having a third message format different from the first message format is transmitted by the transponder operating in the quiet mode and in response to at least one of lapse of time associated with the third message format and receipt of an interrogation having a message format different from the second message format. 36. The system of claim 30 wherein the collision avoidance function comprises at least one of a traffic collision avoidance function, a terrain avoidance function, a windshear avoidance function, and a military threat avoidance function. 37. The system of claim 30 wherein the second message format comprises at least one of an ATCRBS Mode A, an ATCRBS Mode C, a Mode S UF=4, a Mode S UF=5, a Mode S UF=11, a Mode S UF=20, and a Mode S UF=21. 38. The system of claim 30 wherein the first message format comprises at least one of a Mode S UF=17 and a Mode S UF=19.
연구과제 타임라인
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
이 특허에 인용된 특허 (6)
Burdoin Robert B. (Salt Lake City UT) Moolenijzer Nicolaas J. (Sandia Park NM) Strohacker Fred M. (Albuquerque NM), Airborne drone formation control system.
David Oey ; Ruy C. Brandao ; LuAn Vanness ; Larry D. King, Method for reducing transmit power for traffic alert and collision avoidance systems and airborne collision avoidance systems.
Rich Richard S. (2670 Mineral Point Rd. Friday Harbor WA 98250) Anderson Michael W. (P.O. Box 4175 McCall ID 83638), Traffic alert and collision avoidance coding system.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.