IPC분류정보
국가/구분 |
United States(US) Patent
등록
|
국제특허분류(IPC7판) |
|
출원번호 |
US-0146105
(2005-06-07)
|
등록번호 |
US-7382283
(2008-06-03)
|
우선권정보 |
FR-04 06455(2004-06-15) |
발명자
/ 주소 |
- Delaplace,Franck
- Marquier,Sylvie
- Mathieu,G��rard
- Squeglia,Gennaro
|
출원인 / 주소 |
|
대리인 / 주소 |
|
인용정보 |
피인용 횟수 :
5 인용 특허 :
2 |
초록
▼
Detection of the overstepping of design loads of an aircraft tailplane may include determining current bending and twisting moments applied to the aircraft. The determined bending and twisting moments are compared with a safety envelope to determine the risk of developing permanent deformations on t
Detection of the overstepping of design loads of an aircraft tailplane may include determining current bending and twisting moments applied to the aircraft. The determined bending and twisting moments are compared with a safety envelope to determine the risk of developing permanent deformations on the tailplane. A determination is made as to whether a structural inspection of the tailplane should be performed based on the comparison result.
대표청구항
▼
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for detecting an overstepping of design loads of the tailplane of an aircraft, said method comprising: A/ determining, in a preliminary step, a first safety envelope representing a chart formed in a plane on the basis of pairs of values of bending moment and of
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for detecting an overstepping of design loads of the tailplane of an aircraft, said method comprising: A/ determining, in a preliminary step, a first safety envelope representing a chart formed in a plane on the basis of pairs of values of bending moment and of twisting moment of the tailplane and defined so that, for any pair of such values which lies outside said first safety envelope and which is applied to the aircraft, there exists a risk of permanent deformations developing on the tailplane; B/ carrying out, in the course of a flight of the aircraft, the following steps repetitively and automatically: a) estimating the current bending moment; b) estimating the current twisting moment; c) carrying out a first comparison by comparing said current bending moment and said current twisting moment with said first safety envelope; and d) determining whether a structural inspection of said tailplane has to be performed, at least on the basis of the result of said first comparison. 2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step d), an alarm is emitted in the flight control deck of the aircraft, if a structural inspection of said tailplane has to be performed. 3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in preliminary step A/, said first safety envelope is determined with the aid of load models of the aircraft. 4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step B/a), said current bending moment Mx is determined with the aid of the following expression: Mx=��A1��α+��B1��δqd+C1��δ qg+D1��ih+E1��nz��X+F1��nz+G1��q2+H1��dq/dt+I1 in which: A1, B1, C1, D1, E1, F1, G1, H1 and I1 are coefficients; α is the angle of incidence of the aircraft, at the level of the tailplane; δqd and δqg are the angles of swing of elevators, right and left, of the aircraft; ih represents the angle of deflection of the tailplane, defined with respect to the axis of the fuselage of the aircraft; nz is the vertical load factor, measured at the center of gravity of the aircraft; X represents the sum of the mass of the tailplane and of the mass of fuel; q is the pitch rate; dq/dt represents the pitch acceleration corresponding to the derivative with respect to time t of the pitch rate q. 5. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein said coefficients A1, B1, C1, D1, E1, F1, G1, H1 and I1 depend on the dynamic pressure, on the mass distribution, on the Mach number of the aircraft and on longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics of the aircraft. 6. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein said coefficients G1 and H1 are zero. 7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step B/b), said current twisting moment My is determined with the aid of the following expression: My=A2��α+B2��δqd+C2��δ qg+D2��ih+E2��nz��X+F2��nz+G2��q2+H2��dq/dt+I2 in which: A2, B2, C2, D2, E2, F2, G2, H2 and I2 are coefficients; α is the angle of incidence of the aircraft, at the level of the tailplane; δqd and δqg are the angles of swing of elevators, right and left, of the aircraft; ih represents the angle of deflection of the tailplane, defined with respect to the axis of the fuselage of the aircraft; nz is the vertical load factor, measured at the center of gravity of the aircraft; X represents the sum of the mass of the tailplane and of the mass of fuel; q is the pitch rate; dq/dt represents the pitch acceleration corresponding to the derivative with respect to time t of the pitch rate q. 8. The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein said coefficients A2, B2, C2, D2, E2, F2, G2, H2 and I2 depend on the dynamic pressure, on the mass distribution, on the Mach number of the aircraft and on longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics of the aircraft. 9. The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein said coefficients G2 and H2 are zero. 10. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: determining, in preliminary step A/, a second safety envelope representing a chart formed in a plane on the basis of pairs of values of twisting moment and of shearing stress of the tailplane and defined so that, for any pair of such values which lies outside said second safety envelope and which is applied to the aircraft, there exists a risk of permanent deformations developing on the tailplane; and carrying out, in the course of the flight of the aircraft, the following steps automatically: estimating a current shearing stress; carrying out a second comparison by comparing said current twisting moment and said current shearing stress with said second safety envelope; and in step d), determining whether a structural inspection of said tailplane has to be performed, likewise on the basis of the result of said second comparison. 11. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein said current shearing stress Tz is determined with the aid of the following expression: Tz=A3��α+B3��δqd+C3��δ qg+D3��ih+E3��nz��X+F3��nz+G3��q2+H3��dq/dt+I3 in which: A3, B3, C3, D3, E3, F3, G3, H3 and I3 are coefficients; α is the angle of incidence of the aircraft, at the level of the tailplane; δqd and δqg are the angles of swing of elevators, right and left, of the aircraft; ih represents the angle of deflection of the tailplane, defined with respect to the axis of the fuselage of the aircraft; nz is the vertical load factor, measured at the center of gravity of the aircraft; X represents the sum of the mass of the tailplane and of the mass of fuel; q is the pitch rate; dq/dt represents the pitch acceleration corresponding to the derivative with respect to time t of the pitch rate q. 12. A device for detecting an overstepping of design loads of a tailplane of an aircraft, which device comprises: a set of information sources; a first section for determining, with the aid of information emanating from said set of information sources, a current bending moment; a second section for determining, with the aid of information emanating from said set of information sources, a current twisting moment; a third section for carrying out a first comparison, by comparing said current bending moment and said current twisting moment with a first safety envelope representing a chart formed in a plane on the basis of pairs of values of bending moment and of twisting moment of the tailplane and defined so that, for any pair of such values which lies outside said first safety envelope and which is applied to the aircraft, there exists a risk of permanent deformations developing on the tailplane; and a fourth section for determining whether a structural inspection of said tailplane has to be performed, at least on the basis of said first comparison. 13. The device as claimed in claim 12, wherein: said device furthermore comprises: a fifth section for determining, with the aid of information emanating from said set of information sources, a current shearing stress; and a sixth section for carrying out a second comparison, by comparing said current twisting moment and said current shearing stress with a second safety envelope; and said fourth section determines whether a structural inspection of said tailplane has to be performed, likewise on the basis of the result of said second comparison. 14. The device as claimed in claim 12, which furthermore comprises a seventh section intended to indicate to an operator, as appropriate, that an inspection of the tailplane has to be performed.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.