초록 ▼

In rotorcraft having rotors on multiple masts, a controller causes opposing roll mast moments to be applied to the different rotors. In preferred embodiments, the opposing roll moment is the result of increasing the lift on the advancing blade and reducing the lift on the retreating blade on the sec

In rotorcraft having rotors on multiple masts, a controller causes opposing roll mast moments to be applied to the different rotors. In preferred embodiments, the opposing roll moment is the result of increasing the lift on the advancing blade and reducing the lift on the retreating blade on the second rotor. This can be accomplished in any suitable manner, such as by applying differential cyclic roll control to the two rotors by tilting the two Swashplates of the two rotors or by using Individual Blade Control (IBC).

대표청구항 ▼

1. A rotorcraft, comprising: first and second hingeless rotors on first and second masts; and a controller that:determines desired roll mast moments out of the rotor plane of rotation as a function of the rotorcraft's forward speed during edgewise flight andcommands a first roll mast moment on a fir

1. A rotorcraft, comprising: first and second hingeless rotors on first and second masts; and a controller that:determines desired roll mast moments out of the rotor plane of rotation as a function of the rotorcraft's forward speed during edgewise flight andcommands a first roll mast moment on a first rotors out of the rotor plane of rotation using cyclic rotor pitch control; andcommands a second roll mast moment out of the rotor plane of rotation on a second rotor using cyclic rotor pitch control, such that the second mast moment opposes the first mast moment in direction and magnitude. 2. The rotorcraft of claim 1, wherein the controller determines desired roll mast moments out of the rotor plane of rotation as a function of rotor rpm. 3. The rotorcraft of claim 1, wherein the controller determines desired roll mast moments out of the rotor plane of rotation as a function of rotor advance ratio. 4. The rotorcraft of claim 1, wherein the controller commands the opposing first roll mast moment and second roll mast moments in a fully automatic fashion. 5. The rotorcraft of claim 1, wherein the controller commands the opposing first roll mast moment and second roll mast moment under at least partially manual control. 6. The rotorcraft of claim 1, wherein the controller is non-linear. 7. The rotorcraft of claim 4, wherein the controller is at least partially electronic. 8. The rotorcraft of claim 1, wherein the controller commands opposing roll mast moments on the multiple masts using a swashplate. 9. The rotorcraft of claim 1, wherein the controller commands opposing roll mast moments on the multiple masts using individual blade control (IBC). 10. The rotorcraft of claim 1, wherein the multiple masts are in a tandem configuration. 11. The rotorcraft of claim 1, wherein the multiple masts are in a side-by-side configuration. 12. The rotorcraft of claim 1, wherein the multiple masts are in a tilt rotor configuration.