초록 ▼

A guided projectile may include a projectile body. An inertial measurement unit may be disposed within the projectile body, the inertial measurement unit including sensors to measure motion parameters relative to first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes. Each of the first, second, and third

A guided projectile may include a projectile body. An inertial measurement unit may be disposed within the projectile body, the inertial measurement unit including sensors to measure motion parameters relative to first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes. Each of the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes may form an oblique angle with a longitudinal axis of the projectile body. A controller may be configured to control a trajectory of the guided projectile in response, at least in part, to measurement data received from the inertial measurement unit.

대표청구항 ▼

1. A guided projectile, comprising: a projectile bodyan inertial measurement unit disposed within the projectile body, the inertial measurement unit including sensors to measure motion parameters relative to first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes, wherein each of the first, second, and th

1. A guided projectile, comprising: a projectile bodyan inertial measurement unit disposed within the projectile body, the inertial measurement unit including sensors to measure motion parameters relative to first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes, wherein each of the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes forms a different oblique angle with a longitudinal axis of the projectile bodya controller configured to control a trajectory of the guided projectile in response, at least in part, to measurement data received from the inertial measurement unit. 2. The guided projectile of claim 1, wherein the controller is further configured to compare measurement data relative to the first, second, and third, mutually orthogonal axes to determine if the inertial measurement unit is functioning within predetermined tolerances, andinhibit operation of the guided projectile if a determination is made that the inertial measurement unit is not functioning within predetermined tolerances. 3. The projectile of claim 2, wherein the guided projectile may be programmed to operate in one of a test mode and a tactical modewherein the predetermined tolerances for the test mode are different from the predetermined tolerances for the tactical mode. 4. The guided projectile of claim 2, wherein after launch, the inertial measurement unit measures a component of an initial deceleration of the guided projectile on each of the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes, andthe controller is configured to compare initial deceleration measurement data from the first, second, and third, mutually orthogonal axes to determine if the inertial measurement unit is functioning within predetermined tolerances. 5. The guided projectile of claim 2, wherein after launch, the inertial measurement unit measures a component of an initial roll of the guided projectile on each of the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes, andthe controller is configured to compare initial roll measurement data from the first, second, and third, mutually orthogonal axes to determine if the inertial measurement unit is functioning within predetermined tolerances. 6. The guided projectile of claim 2, wherein the guided projectile further comprises a warhead, andthe controller is configured to inhibit operation of the guided projectile by inhibiting arming of the warhead. 7. The guided projectile of claim 2, wherein the guided projectile further comprises a plurality of control surfaces stowed within the projectile body before and during launch, andthe controller is configured to inhibit operation of the guided projectile by inhibiting extension of the plurality of control surfaces from the projectile body. 8. The guided projectile of claim 2, wherein the guided projectile further comprises a self-destruct mechanism, andthe controller is configured to inhibit operation of the guided projectile by initiating self-destruction. 9. The guided projectile of claim 1, wherein the inertial measurement unit comprises first, second, and third accelerometers disposed to measures acceleration along each of the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes, respectively. 10. The projectile of claim 1, wherein the inertial measurement unit comprises respective first, second, and third gyroscopes disposed to measure rotation rate about each of the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes, respectively. 11. The projectile of claim 1, further comprising: a GPS receiverwherein the controller is configured to control the trajectory of the guided projectile in response, at least in part, to positional data provided by the GPS receiver. 12. The projectile of claim 1, wherein the angles formed by each of the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes and the longitudinal axis of the projectile body are of equal magnitude. 13. A method for operating a guided projectile, comprising: launching the guided projectilemeasuring motion parameters relative to first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes with an inertial measurement unit, wherein each of the first, second and third mutually orthogonal axes forms a different oblique angle with a longitudinal axis of the guided projectilecontrolling a trajectory of the guided projectile in response, at least in part, to the measured motion parameters. 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising: comparing measurement data relative to the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes to determine if the inertial measurement unit is functioning within predetermined tolerancesinhibiting operation of the guided projectile if a determination is made that the inertial measurement unit is not functioning within predetermined tolerances. 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising: programming the guided projectile to operate in one of a test mode and a tactical modewherein the predetermined tolerances for the test mode are different from the predetermined tolerances for the tactical mode. 16. The method of claim 14, further comprising: after launch, measuring a component of an initial deceleration of the guided projectile on each of the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axescomparing initial deceleration measurement data from the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes to determine if the inertial measurement unit is functioning within predetermined tolerances. 17. The method of claim 14, further comprising: after launch, measuring a component of an initial roll of the guided projectile on each of the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axescomparing initial roll measurement data from the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes to determine if the inertial measurement unit is functioning within predetermined tolerances is performed after launching the projectile. 18. The method of claim 14, wherein the guided projectile comprises a warhead, andthe method further comprising inhibiting operation of the guided projectile by inhibiting arming of the warhead. 19. The method of claim 14, wherein the guided projectile comprises a plurality of control surfaces stowed within a projectile body before and during launch, andthe method further comprises inhibiting operation of the guided projectile by inhibiting extension of the plurality of control surfaces from the projectile body. 20. The method of claim 14, wherein the guided projectile comprises a self-destruct mechanism, andthe method further comprises inhibiting operation of the guided projectile by initiating self-destruction. 21. The method of claim 13, wherein the inertial measurement unit comprises first, second, and third accelerometers disposed to measures acceleration along each of the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes, respectively. 22. The method of claim 13, wherein the inertial measurement unit comprises respective first, second, and third gyroscopes disposed to measure rotation rate about each of the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes, respectively. 23. The method of claim 13, wherein the guided projectile comprises a GPS receiverthe method further comprising controlling the trajectory of the guided projectile in response, at least in part, to positional data provided by the GPS receiver. 24. The method of claim 13, wherein the angles formed by each of the first, second, and third mutually orthogonal axes and the longitudinal axis of the guided projectile are of equal magnitude.