초록 ▼

A method includes accessing a plurality of acceleration values generated by an inertial measurement unit of an optical system. The method includes identifying a maximum acceleration value (the accessed acceleration value having the greatest absolute value), identifying one or more adjacent accelerat

A method includes accessing a plurality of acceleration values generated by an inertial measurement unit of an optical system. The method includes identifying a maximum acceleration value (the accessed acceleration value having the greatest absolute value), identifying one or more adjacent acceleration values (the accessed acceleration value adjacent in time to the maximum acceleration value), and identifying a nearest adjacent acceleration value (the adjacent acceleration value having the value nearest the maximum acceleration value). The method includes determining a corrected peak acceleration. The corrected peak acceleration is the sum of a first value corresponding to an average of the maximum acceleration value and the nearest adjacent acceleration value and a second value corresponding to the product of a correction value and the difference between the maximum acceleration value and the nearest adjacent acceleration value. The method includes determining whether the corrected acceleration value exceeds a predefined threshold acceleration value.

대표청구항 ▼

1. A method comprising accessing acceleration information associated with an optical system, the acceleration information including a plurality of acceleration values generated by an inertial measurement unit (IMU) of the optical system; identifying a maximum acceleration value, the maximum accelera

1. A method comprising accessing acceleration information associated with an optical system, the acceleration information including a plurality of acceleration values generated by an inertial measurement unit (IMU) of the optical system; identifying a maximum acceleration value, the maximum acceleration value being the acceleration value of the plurality of acceleration values having the greatest absolute value;identifying one or more adjacent acceleration values, the one or more adjacent acceleration values being the one or more acceleration values of the plurality of acceleration values that are adjacent m time to the maximum acceleration value;identifying a nearest adjacent acceleration value, the nearest adjacent acceleration value being the acceleration value of the one or more adjacent acceleration value having the value nearest the maximum acceleration value;determining, by one or more processors, a corrected peak acceleration for the optical system, the corrected peak acceleration being the sum of:a first value corresponding to an average of the maximum acceleration value and the nearest adjacent acceleration value; anda second value corresponding to the product of a correction value andthe difference between the maximum acceleration value and the nearest adjacent acceleration value; anddetermining whether the corrected acceleration value exceeds a predefined threshold acceleration value for the optical system. 2. The method of claim 1, comprising initiating, in response to determining that the corrected acceleration value exceeds the predefined threshold acceleration value for the optical system, the communication of a notification to personnel associated with the optical system. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the predefined threshold acceleration value for the optical system corresponds to an acceleration value in response to which realignment of the optical system is deemed appropriate. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the correction value corresponds to the physical reaction of the optical system in response to a shock imparted on the optical system. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the correction value is a value that minimizes the standard deviation between the determined corrected peak acceleration and an actual peak acceleration of the optical system in response to the shock imparted on the optical system. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of acceleration values generated by the IMU correspond to a shock imparted on the optical system. 7. The method of claim 6, wherein: the IMU has an associated IMU sampling rate, the sampling rate being the rate at which the IMU generates the plurality of acceleration values;the shock imparted on the optical system has a shock frequency; andthe IMU sampling rate is less than the shock frequency. 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the optical system is a forward-looking infrared (FLIR) system configured for mounting to a vehicle. 9. The method of claim 8, wherein: the vehicle is a unmanned aerial vehicle (UA V); andthe plurality of acceleration values generated by the IMU correspond to a shock imparted on the FLIR system, the shock resulting from a landing of the UAV. 10. A system, comprising: one or more memory modules operable to store acceleration information associated with an optical system, the acceleration information including a plurality of acceleration values generated by an inertial measurement unit (IMU) of the optical system; andone or more processing modules operable to: access the acceleration information;identify a maximum acceleration value, the maximum acceleration value being the acceleration value of the plurality of acceleration values having the greatest absolute value;identify one or more adjacent acceleration values, the one or more adjacent acceleration values being the one or more acceleration values of the plurality of acceleration values that are adjacent in time to the maximum acceleration value;identify a nearest adjacent acceleration value, the nearest adjacent acceleration value being the acceleration value of the one or more adjacent acceleration value having the value nearest the maximum acceleration value;determine a corrected peak acceleration for the optical system, the corrected peak acceleration being the sum of: a first value corresponding to an average of the maximum acceleration value and the adjacent acceleration value; anda second value corresponding to the product of a correction value and the difference between the maximum acceleration value and the adjacent acceleration value; anddetermine whether the corrected acceleration value exceeds a predefined threshold acceleration value for the optical system. 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the one or more memory modules are operable to initiate, in response to determining that the corrected acceleration value exceeds the predefined threshold acceleration value for the optical system, the communication of a notification to personnel associated with the optical system. 12. The system of claim 10, wherein the predefined threshold acceleration value for the optical system corresponds to an acceleration value in response to which realignment of the optical system is deemed appropriate. 13. The system of claim 10, wherein the correction value corresponds to the physical reaction of the optical system in response to a shock imparted on the optical system. 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the correction value is a value that minimizes the standard deviation between the determined corrected peak acceleration and an actual peak acceleration of the optical system in response to the shock imparted on the optical system. 15. The system of claim 10, wherein the plurality of acceleration values generated by the IMU correspond to a shock imparted on the optical system. 16. The system of claim 15, wherein: the IMU has an associated IMU sampling rate, the sampling rate being the rate at which the IMU generates the plurality of acceleration values;the shock imparted on the optical system has a shock frequency; andthe IMU sampling rate is less than the shock frequency. 17. The system of claim 10, wherein the optical system is a forward-looking infrared (FUR) system configured for mounting to a vehicle. 18. The system of claim 17, wherein: the vehicle is a unmanned aerial vehicle (UA V); andthe plurality of acceleration values generated by the IMU correspond to a shock imparted on the FLIR system, the shock resulting from a landing of the UAV. 19. Software embodied in a non-transitory computer-readable medium, the software operable when executed to perform operations comprising: accessing acceleration information associated with an optical system, the acceleration information including a plurality of acceleration values generated by an inertial measurement unit (IMU) of the optical system;identifying a maximum acceleration value, the maximum acceleration value being the acceleration value of the plurality of acceleration values having the greatest absolute value;identifying one or more adjacent acceleration values, the one or more adjacent acceleration values being the one or more acceleration values of the plurality of acceleration values that are adjacent in time to the maximum acceleration value;identifying a nearest adjacent acceleration value, the nearest adjacent acceleration value being the acceleration value of the one or more adjacent acceleration value having the value nearest the maximum acceleration value;determining a corrected peak acceleration for the optical system, the corrected peak acceleration being the sum of:a first value corresponding to an average of the maximum acceleration value and the nearest adjacent acceleration value; anda second value corresponding to the product of a correction value and the difference between the maximum acceleration value and the nearest adjacent acceleration value; anddetermining whether the corrected acceleration value exceeds a predefined threshold acceleration value for the optical system. 20. The software of claim 19, wherein the software is operable to perform operations comprising initiating, in response to determining that the corrected acceleration value exceeds the predefined threshold acceleration value for the optical system, the communication of a notification to personnel associated with the optical system. 21. The software of claim 19, wherein the predefined threshold acceleration value for the optical system corresponds to an acceleration value m response to which realignment of the optical system is deemed appropriate. 22. The software of claim 19, wherein the correction value corresponds to the physical reaction of the optical system in response to a shock imparted on the optical system. 23. The software of claim 22, wherein the correction value is a value that minimizes the standard deviation between the determined corrected peak acceleration and an actual peak acceleration of the optical system in response to the shock imparted on the optical system. 24. The software of claim 19, wherein the plurality of acceleration values generated by the IMU correspond to a shock imparted on the optical system. 25. The software of claim 24, wherein: the IMU has an associated IMU sampling rate, the sampling rate being the rate at which the IMU generates the plurality of acceleration values;the shock imparted on the optical system has a shock frequency; andthe IMU sampling rate is less than the shock frequency. 26. The software of claim 19, wherein the optical system is a forward-looking infrared (FLIR) system configured for mounting to a vehicle. 27. The software of claim 26, wherein: the vehicle is a unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); andthe plurality of acceleration values generated by the IMU correspond to a shock imparted on the FLIR system, the shock resulting from a landing of the UAV.