Adaptive handling of operating data based on assets' external conditions
원문보기
IPC분류정보
국가/구분
United States(US) Patent
등록
국제특허분류(IPC7판)
G08B-021/18
G06F-011/26
G01D-003/08
G06F-011/07
G06Q-010/00
G06F-011/263
G06F-011/00
G06Q-010/06
출원번호
US-0257276
(2016-09-06)
등록번호
US-9864665
(2018-01-09)
발명자
/ 주소
McElhinney, Adam
Ciasulli, John
Horrell, Michael
출원인 / 주소
Uptake Technologies, Inc.
대리인 / 주소
Lee Sullivan Shea & Smith, LLP
인용정보
피인용 횟수 :
0인용 특허 :
95
초록▼
Examples of systems, devices, and methods related to assets and asset operating conditions involve determining health metrics that estimate the operating health of an asset or a part thereof, analyzing health metrics to determine variables that are associated with high health metrics, and modifying
Examples of systems, devices, and methods related to assets and asset operating conditions involve determining health metrics that estimate the operating health of an asset or a part thereof, analyzing health metrics to determine variables that are associated with high health metrics, and modifying the handling of operating conditions that normally result in triggering of abnormal-condition indicators, among other examples.
대표청구항▼
1. A computing system comprising: at least one processor;a non-transitory computer-readable medium; andprogram instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that are executable by the at least one processor to cause the computing system to: receive (i) historical response data i
1. A computing system comprising: at least one processor;a non-transitory computer-readable medium; andprogram instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that are executable by the at least one processor to cause the computing system to: receive (i) historical response data indicating a plurality of past responses to instances of a given abnormal-condition indicator for one or more assets, wherein the given abnormal-condition indicator indicates an occurrence of a given abnormal condition at an asset, and (ii) historical conditions data indicating values of at least one given condition impacting asset operation at the time of the respective occurrences of the given abnormal condition at the one or more assets;based on the historical response data and the historical conditions data, identify a relationship between responses to the given abnormal-condition indicator and values of the at least one given condition impacting asset operation;receive, for a given asset, (i) operating data indicating a given occurrence of the given abnormal condition at the given asset, wherein the operating data is associated with a given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator, and (ii) conditions data indicating a value of the at least one given condition at the time of the given occurrence of the given abnormal condition at the given asset; andbased on (i) the received operating data and (ii) the received conditions data, handle the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the determined relationship. 2. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the determined relationship indicates that the given abnormal-condition indicator is ignored or disregarded when a value of the at least one given condition satisfies given criteria. 3. The computing system of claim 2, wherein handling the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the determined relationship comprises causing the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator to be suppressed if the value of the at least one given condition satisfies the given criteria. 4. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the at least one given condition comprises an ambient temperature of an asset. 5. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the at least one given condition comprises a location of an asset. 6. The computing system of claim 5, wherein handling, based on (i) the received operating data and (ii) the received conditions data, the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the determined relationship comprises: based on the received conditions data, determining that the location of the given asset at the time of the given occurrence of the given abnormal condition is within a threshold proximity of one or more locations that have a correlation to a given type of response to instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator; andbased at least on the determination, handling the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the given type of response. 7. The computing system of claim 6, wherein the conditions data is first conditions data, and wherein the program instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium are further executable by the at least one processor to cause the computing system to: after handling the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the determined relationship, determine based on second conditions data that the location of the given asset is no longer within a threshold proximity of the one or more locations; andbased at least on the determination, cease handling the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the given type of response. 8. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the operating data indicating the given occurrence of the given abnormal condition comprises the given instance of the abnormal-condition indicator. 9. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the operating data indicating the given occurrence of the given abnormal condition comprises sensor data that causes the computing system to generate the given instance of the abnormal-condition indicator. 10. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that are executable to cause a computing system to: receive (i) historical response data indicating a plurality of past responses to instances of a given abnormal-condition indicator for one or more assets, wherein the given abnormal-condition indicator indicates an occurrence of a given abnormal condition at an asset, and (ii) historical conditions data indicating values of at least one given condition impacting asset operation at the time of the respective occurrences of the given abnormal condition at the one or more assets;based on the historical response data and the historical conditions data, identify a relationship between responses to the given abnormal-condition indicator and values of the at least one given condition impacting asset operation;receive, for a given asset, (i) operating data indicating a given occurrence of the given abnormal condition at the given asset, wherein the operating data is associated with a given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator, and (ii) conditions data indicating a value of the at least one given condition at the time of the given occurrence of the given abnormal condition at the given asset; andbased on (i) the received operating data and (ii) the received conditions data, handle the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the determined relationship. 11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the determined relationship indicates that the given abnormal-condition indicator is ignored or disregarded when a value of the at least one given condition satisfies given criteria. 12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11, wherein handling the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the determined relationship comprises causing the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator to be suppressed if the value of the at least one given condition satisfies the given criteria. 13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the at least one given condition comprises an ambient temperature of an asset. 14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the at least one given condition comprises a location of an asset. 15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14, wherein handling, based on (i) the received operating data and (ii) the received conditions data, the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the determined relationship comprises: based on the received conditions data, determining that the location of the given asset at the time of the given occurrence of the given abnormal condition is within a threshold proximity of one or more locations that have a correlation to a given type of response to instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator; andbased at least on the determination, handling the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the given type of response. 16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the conditions data is first conditions data, and wherein the instructions are further executable to cause the computing system to: after handling the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the determined relationship, determine based on second conditions data that the location of the given asset is no longer within a threshold proximity of the one or more locations; andbased at least on the determination, cease handling the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the given type of response. 17. A computer-implemented method, the method comprising: receiving (i) historical response data indicating a plurality of past responses to instances of a given abnormal-condition indicator for one or more assets, wherein the given abnormal-condition indicator indicates an occurrence of a given abnormal condition at an asset, and (ii) historical conditions data indicating values of at least one given condition impacting asset operation at the time of the respective occurrences of the given abnormal condition at the one or more assets;based on the historical response data and the historical conditions data, identifying a relationship between responses to the given abnormal-condition indicator and values of the at least one given condition impacting asset operation;receiving, for a given asset, (i) operating data indicating a given occurrence of the given abnormal condition at the given asset, wherein the operating data is associated with a given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator, and (ii) conditions data indicating a value of the at least one given condition at the time of the given occurrence of the given abnormal condition at the given asset; andbased on (i) the received operating data and (ii) the received conditions data, handling the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the determined relationship. 18. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the determined relationship indicates that the given abnormal-condition indicator is ignored or disregarded when a value of the at least one given condition satisfies given criteria, and wherein handling the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the determined relationship comprises causing the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator to be suppressed if the value of the at least one given condition satisfies the given criteria. 19. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the at least one given condition comprises a location of an asset. 20. The computer-implemented method of claim 19, wherein handling, based on (i) the received operating data and (ii) the received conditions data, the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the determined relationship comprises: based on the received conditions data, determining that the location of the given asset at the time of the given occurrence of the given abnormal condition is within a threshold proximity of one or more locations that have a correlation to a given type of response to instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator; andbased at least on the determination, handling the given instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator in accordance with the given type of response.
Jammu, Vinay Bhaskar; Schneider, William Roy; Bliley, Richard Gerald; Varma, Anil; Roddy, Nicholas Edward, Analyzing fault logs and continuous data for diagnostics for a locomotive.
Wegerich, Stephan W.; Wolosewicz, Andre; Xu, Xiao; Herzog, James P.; Pipke, Robert Matthew, Automated model configuration and deployment system for equipment health monitoring.
Meek, Christopher A.; Heckerman, David E.; Rounthwaite, Robert L.; Chickering, David Maxwell; Thiesson, Bo, Bayesian approach for learning regression decision graph models and regression models for time series analysis.
Vipin Kewal Ramani ; Rasiklal Punjalal Shah ; Ramesh Ramachandran ; Piero Patrone Bonissone ; Yu-To Chen ; Phillip Edward Steen ; John Andrew Johnson, Diagnostic system with learning capabilities.
Bankert Raymond J. (Clifton Park NY) Imam Imdad (Schenectady NY) Rajiyah Harindra (Clifton Park NY), Integrated model-based reasoning/expert system diagnosis for rotating machinery.
Wang Hsu-Pin (Tallahassee FL) Huang Hsin-Hao (Kaohsiung TWX) Knapp Gerald M. (Baton Rouge LA) Lin Chang-Ching (Tallahassee FL) Lin Shui-Shun (Tallahassee FL) Spoerre Julie K. (Tallahassee FL), Machine fault diagnostics system and method.
David Richard Gibson ; Nicholas Edward Roddy ; Anil Varma, Method and system for analyzing fault and snapshot operational parameter data for diagnostics of machine malfunctions.
Yanosik, Jr., Edward Michael; Clifford, William Larson; Horejs, Timothy James; Yanosik, Ann Marie, Method and system for assessing adjustment factors in testing or monitoring process.
Subbu, Rajesh V.; Bonissone, Piero P.; Eklund, Neil H.; Iyer, Naresh S.; Shah, Rasiklal P.; Yan, Weizhong; Knodle, Chad E.; Schmid, James J., Method and system for performing model-based multi-objective asset optimization and decision-making.
Fera, Gregory J.; McQuown, Christopher M.; Reichenbach, Bryan S.; Wisniewski, Edward P., Method and system for sorting incident log data from a plurality of machines.
Bliley, Richard G.; Roddy, Nicholas E., Process and system for analyzing fault log data from a machine so as to identify faults predictive of machine failures.
Bonissone, Piero Patrone; Hershey, John Erik; Mitchell, Jr., Robert James; Subbu, Jr., Rajesh Venkat; Taware, Avinash Vinayak; Hu, Xiao, System and method for advanced condition monitoring of an asset system.
Subbu, Rajesh Venkat; Hershey, John Erik; Hu, Xiao; Mitchell, Jr., Robert James; Taware, Avinash Vinayak; Bonissone, Piero Patrone, System and method for advanced condition monitoring of an asset system.
Bonissone, Piero Patrone; Xue, Feng; Varma, Anil; Goebel, Kai Frank; Yan, Weizhong; Eklund, Neil Holger White, System and method for equipment remaining life estimation.
Goebel, Kai Frank; Bonissone, Piero Patrone; Yan, Weizhong; Eklund, Neil Holger White; Xue, Feng, System and method for equipment remaining life estimation.
Rasiklal Punjalal Shah ; Vipin Kewal Ramani ; Susan Teeter Wallenslager ; Christopher James Dailey, System and method for integrating a plurality of diagnostic related information.
Wegerich, Stephan W.; Wilks, Alan D.; Wolosewicz, Andre, System for extraction of representative data for training of adaptive process monitoring equipment.
Kasztenny, Bogdan Z.; Sollecito, Lawrence A.; Mazereeuw, Jeffrey G.; Mao, Zhihong, Systems and methods for predicting maintenance of intelligent electronic devices.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.