초록 ▼

A method of controlling an elevator of an aircraft may include identifying a current stabilizer angle of incidence of a stabilizer of the aircraft. The stabilizer may include an elevator pivotably coupled to the stabilizer. The method may further include comparing the current stabilizer angle of inc

A method of controlling an elevator of an aircraft may include identifying a current stabilizer angle of incidence of a stabilizer of the aircraft. The stabilizer may include an elevator pivotably coupled to the stabilizer. The method may further include comparing the current stabilizer angle of incidence with a threshold stabilizer angle of incidence, and selecting an elevator position limit that is more restrictive if the current stabilizer angle of incidence is greater than or equal to the threshold stabilizer angle of incidence. The method may additionally include moving the elevator to a commanded elevator position that is no greater than the elevator position limit.

대표청구항 ▼

1. A method of controlling an elevator of an aircraft, comprising: identifying a current stabilizer angle of incidence of an aircraft, the aircraft including a stabilizer and an elevator pivotably coupled to the stabilizer;comparing the current stabilizer angle of incidence with a threshold stabiliz

1. A method of controlling an elevator of an aircraft, comprising: identifying a current stabilizer angle of incidence of an aircraft, the aircraft including a stabilizer and an elevator pivotably coupled to the stabilizer;comparing the current stabilizer angle of incidence with a threshold stabilizer angle of incidence;selecting an elevator position limit that is more restrictive if the current stabilizer angle of incidence is greater than or equal to the threshold stabilizer angle of incidence; andreducing the elevator position limit upon at least one of: deployment of speed brakes;activation of a wing maneuvering-load-alleviation system for varying wing camber along a spanwise direction. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the selecting of the elevator position limit includes: selecting an elevator position limit from a first table of a first pair of lookup tables if the current stabilizer angle of incidence is greater than or equal to the threshold stabilizer angle of incidence; andselecting the elevator position limit from a second table of the first pair of lookup tables if the current stabilizer angle of incidence is below the threshold stabilizer angle of incidence. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the elevator position limit is an upper elevator position limit associated with a given airspeed and Mach number, and wherein the selecting of an elevator position limit further includes: selecting a lower elevator position limit from a second pair of lookup tables, the lower elevator position limit associated with the given airspeed and Mach number and having a magnitude different from a magnitude of the upper elevator position limit. 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the elevator position limit is an upper elevator position limit associated with a given airspeed and Mach number, and wherein the selecting of the elevator position limit further includes: selecting a lower elevator position limit from a second pair of lookup tables, the lower elevator position limit associated with the given airspeed and Mach number; andwherein a magnitude of the lower elevator position limit is greater than a magnitude of the upper elevator position limit if the current stabilizer angle of incidence is negative, and the magnitude of the lower elevator position is less than a magnitude of the upper elevator position limit if the current stabilizer angle of incidence is positive. 5. The method of claim 2, further comprising: generating a plurality of lookup tables including a first pair of lookup tables comprising values for an upper elevator position limit and a second pair of lookup tables comprising values for a lower elevator position limit; andwherein the selecting of the elevator position limit includes selecting a value for the upper elevator position limit from one of the first pair of lookup tables if the current stabilizer angle of incidence is greater than or equal to the threshold stabilizer angle of incidence, and selecting a value for the upper elevator position limit from another one of the first pair of lookup tables if the current stabilizer angle of incidence is below the threshold stabilizer angle of incidence. 6. The method of claim 3, wherein the selecting of the elevator position limit further includes: selecting a value for the lower elevator position limit from one of the second pair of lookup tables if the current stabilizer angle of incidence is greater than or equal to the threshold stabilizer angle of incidence; andselecting a value for the lower elevator position limit from another one of the second pair of lookup tables if the current stabilizer angle of incidence is below the threshold stabilizer angle of incidence. 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the threshold stabilizer angle of incidence corresponds to a value below which speed brakes of the aircraft are retracted. 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: computing the elevator position limit as a function of at least one of Mach number, airspeed, dynamic pressure, and altitude, and based on a threshold stabilizer angle of incidence. 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the elevator position limit is a first elevator position limit, the method further comprising: selecting a second elevator position limit that is less restrictive than the first elevator position limit in response to a determination of a hydraulic system failure. 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising: moving the elevator to an elevator position that is no greater than the elevator position limit. 11. The method of claim 10, wherein moving the elevator comprises: moving the elevator to the elevator position in response to an elevator command initiated by a pilot or by an autopilot. 12. The method of claim 10, wherein moving the elevator comprises: moving the elevator using one or more elevator actuators. 13. The method of claim 12, wherein: at least one of the one or more elevator actuators is one of a hydraulic actuator and an electromechanical actuator. 14. The method of claim 1, wherein: the elevator position limit is an electronic position limit computed by a flight control processor. 15. The method of claim 1, wherein: the wing maneuvering-load-alleviation system includes at least one of speed brakes, wing leading edge devices, and wing trailing edge devices. 16. The method of claim 1, wherein: the aircraft is a tube-and-wing aircraft.