Adaptive handling of abnormal-condition indicator criteria
원문보기
IPC분류정보
국가/구분
United States(US) Patent
등록
국제특허분류(IPC7판)
G08B-021/18
G06F-011/26
G06F-011/07
G06Q-010/00
G06F-011/263
G06F-011/00
G06Q-010/06
출원번호
US-0257258
(2016-09-06)
등록번호
US-9910751
(2018-03-06)
발명자
/ 주소
McElhinney, Adam
Ciasulli, John
Horrell, Michael
출원인 / 주소
Uptake Technologies, Inc.
대리인 / 주소
Lee Sullivan Shea & Smith, LLP
인용정보
피인용 횟수 :
1인용 특허 :
94
초록▼
Disclosed herein are systems, devices, and methods related to assets and asset operating conditions. In particular, examples involve determining health metrics that estimate the operating health of an asset or a part thereof, analyzing health metrics to determine variables that are associated with h
Disclosed herein are systems, devices, and methods related to assets and asset operating conditions. In particular, examples involve determining health metrics that estimate the operating health of an asset or a part thereof, analyzing health metrics to determine variables that are associated with high health metrics, and modifying the handling of operating conditions that normally result in triggering of abnormal-condition indicators, among other examples.
대표청구항▼
1. A computing system comprising: at least one processor;a non-transitory computer-readable medium; andprogram instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that are executable by the at least one processor to cause the computing system to: maintain criteria that governs whether
1. A computing system comprising: at least one processor;a non-transitory computer-readable medium; andprogram instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that are executable by the at least one processor to cause the computing system to: maintain criteria that governs whether a given abnormal-condition indicator is generated, wherein the given abnormal-condition indicator indicates an occurrence of a given abnormal-condition at an asset;receive historical response data indicating a plurality of past responses to displayed instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator;based on the historical response data, modify the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator is generated; andtransmit the modified criteria to at least one asset for use in monitoring asset operation. 2. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator is generated comprises a sensor identifier and a first sensor value criteria, and wherein the modified criteria comprises the sensor identifier and a second sensor value criteria that differs from the first sensor value criteria. 3. The computing system of claim 2, wherein the first sensor value criteria comprises a first sensor value threshold, and wherein the second sensor value criteria comprises a second sensor value threshold that is greater than the first sensor value threshold. 4. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator is generated comprises a first set of sensor identifiers, and wherein the modified criteria comprises a second set of sensor identifiers that differs from the first set of sensor identifiers by at least one sensor identifier. 5. The computing system of claim 1, wherein modifying the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator is generated comprises: based on the historical response data, determining that an extent of past responses comprising a decision to disregard a displayed instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator has reached a threshold extent; andin response to the determination, modifying the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator is generated. 6. The computing system of claim 5, wherein the program instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium are further executable by the at least one processor to cause the computing system to: before modifying the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator is generated, define the threshold extent based on one or more characteristics of the given abnormal-condition indicator. 7. The computing system of claim 6, wherein the one or more characteristics of the given abnormal-condition indicator comprises one or more of (i) a severity level of the given abnormal condition indicated by the given abnormal-condition indicator or (ii) an asset subsystem associated with the given abnormal-condition indicator. 8. The computing system of claim 5, wherein the program instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium are further executable by the at least one processor to cause the computing system to: before receiving the historical response data indicating a plurality of past responses to displayed instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator, (i) receive instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator from the at least one asset, and (ii) cause one or more output systems to display the received instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator. 9. The computing system of claim 1, wherein the program instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium are further executable by the at least one processor to cause the computing system to: before maintaining the criteria that governs whether a given abnormal-condition indicator is generated, define the criteria that governs whether a given abnormal-condition indicator is generated. 10. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that are executable to cause a computing system to: maintain criteria that governs whether a given abnormal-condition indicator is generated, wherein the given abnormal-condition indicator indicates an occurrence of a given abnormal condition at an asset;receive historical response data indicating a plurality of past responses to displayed instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator;based on the historical response data, modify the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator is generated; andtransmit the modified criteria to at least one asset for use in monitoring asset operation. 11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein modifying the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator is generated comprises: based on the historical response data, determining that an extent of past responses comprising a decision to disregard a displayed instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator has reached a threshold extent; andin response to the determination, modifying the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator. 12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11, wherein the instructions are further executable to cause the computing system to: before modifying the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator is generated, define the threshold extent based on one or more characteristics of the given abnormal-condition indicator. 13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12, wherein the one or more characteristics of the given abnormal-condition indicator comprises one or more of (i) a severity level of the given abnormal-condition indicated by the given abnormal-condition indicator or (ii) an asset subsystem associated with the given abnormal-condition indicator. 14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the instructions are further executable to cause the computing system to: before receiving the historical response data indicating a plurality of past responses to displayed instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator, (i) receive instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator from the at least one asset, and (ii) cause one or more output systems to display the received instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator. 15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10, wherein the instructions are further executable to cause the computing system to: before maintaining the criteria that governs whether a given abnormal-condition indicator is generated, define the criteria that governs whether a given abnormal-condition indicator is generated. 16. A computer-implemented method, the method comprising: maintaining criteria that governs whether a given abnormal-condition indicator is generated, wherein the given abnormal-condition indicator indicates an occurrence of a given abnormal condition at an asset;receiving historical response data indicating a plurality of past responses to displayed instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator;based on the historical response data, modifying the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator is generated; andtransmitting the modified criteria to at least one asset for use in monitoring asset operation. 17. The computer-implemented method of claim 16, wherein modifying the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator is generated comprises: based on the historical response data, determining that an extent of past responses comprising a decision to disregard a displayed instance of the given abnormal-condition indicator has reached a threshold extent; andin response to the determination, modifying the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator. 18. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, the method further comprising: before modifying the criteria that governs whether the given abnormal-condition indicator is generated, defining the threshold extent based on one or more characteristics of the given abnormal-condition indicator. 19. The computer-implemented method of claim 18, wherein the one or more characteristics of the given abnormal-condition indicator comprises one or more of (i) a severity level of the given abnormal-condition indicated by the given abnormal-condition indicator or (ii) an asset subsystem associated with the given abnormal-condition indicator. 20. The computer-implemented method of claim 16, the method further comprising: before receiving the historical response data indicating a plurality of past responses to displayed instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator, (i) receive instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator from the at least one asset, and (ii) cause one or more output systems to display the received instances of the given abnormal-condition indicator.
연구과제 타임라인
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
LOADING...
이 특허에 인용된 특허 (94)
Wegerich,Stephan W.; Bell,David R.; Xu,Xiao, Adaptive modeling of changed states in predictive condition monitoring.
Jammu, Vinay Bhaskar; Schneider, William Roy; Bliley, Richard Gerald; Varma, Anil; Roddy, Nicholas Edward, Analyzing fault logs and continuous data for diagnostics for a locomotive.
Wegerich, Stephan W.; Wolosewicz, Andre; Xu, Xiao; Herzog, James P.; Pipke, Robert Matthew, Automated model configuration and deployment system for equipment health monitoring.
Meek, Christopher A.; Heckerman, David E.; Rounthwaite, Robert L.; Chickering, David Maxwell; Thiesson, Bo, Bayesian approach for learning regression decision graph models and regression models for time series analysis.
Vipin Kewal Ramani ; Rasiklal Punjalal Shah ; Ramesh Ramachandran ; Piero Patrone Bonissone ; Yu-To Chen ; Phillip Edward Steen ; John Andrew Johnson, Diagnostic system with learning capabilities.
Bankert Raymond J. (Clifton Park NY) Imam Imdad (Schenectady NY) Rajiyah Harindra (Clifton Park NY), Integrated model-based reasoning/expert system diagnosis for rotating machinery.
Wang Hsu-Pin (Tallahassee FL) Huang Hsin-Hao (Kaohsiung TWX) Knapp Gerald M. (Baton Rouge LA) Lin Chang-Ching (Tallahassee FL) Lin Shui-Shun (Tallahassee FL) Spoerre Julie K. (Tallahassee FL), Machine fault diagnostics system and method.
David Richard Gibson ; Nicholas Edward Roddy ; Anil Varma, Method and system for analyzing fault and snapshot operational parameter data for diagnostics of machine malfunctions.
Yanosik, Jr., Edward Michael; Clifford, William Larson; Horejs, Timothy James; Yanosik, Ann Marie, Method and system for assessing adjustment factors in testing or monitoring process.
Subbu, Rajesh V.; Bonissone, Piero P.; Eklund, Neil H.; Iyer, Naresh S.; Shah, Rasiklal P.; Yan, Weizhong; Knodle, Chad E.; Schmid, James J., Method and system for performing model-based multi-objective asset optimization and decision-making.
Fera, Gregory J.; McQuown, Christopher M.; Reichenbach, Bryan S.; Wisniewski, Edward P., Method and system for sorting incident log data from a plurality of machines.
Bliley, Richard G.; Roddy, Nicholas E., Process and system for analyzing fault log data from a machine so as to identify faults predictive of machine failures.
Bonissone, Piero Patrone; Hershey, John Erik; Mitchell, Jr., Robert James; Subbu, Jr., Rajesh Venkat; Taware, Avinash Vinayak; Hu, Xiao, System and method for advanced condition monitoring of an asset system.
Subbu, Rajesh Venkat; Hershey, John Erik; Hu, Xiao; Mitchell, Jr., Robert James; Taware, Avinash Vinayak; Bonissone, Piero Patrone, System and method for advanced condition monitoring of an asset system.
Bonissone, Piero Patrone; Xue, Feng; Varma, Anil; Goebel, Kai Frank; Yan, Weizhong; Eklund, Neil Holger White, System and method for equipment remaining life estimation.
Goebel, Kai Frank; Bonissone, Piero Patrone; Yan, Weizhong; Eklund, Neil Holger White; Xue, Feng, System and method for equipment remaining life estimation.
Rasiklal Punjalal Shah ; Vipin Kewal Ramani ; Susan Teeter Wallenslager ; Christopher James Dailey, System and method for integrating a plurality of diagnostic related information.
Wegerich, Stephan W.; Wilks, Alan D.; Wolosewicz, Andre, System for extraction of representative data for training of adaptive process monitoring equipment.
Kasztenny, Bogdan Z.; Sollecito, Lawrence A.; Mazereeuw, Jeffrey G.; Mao, Zhihong, Systems and methods for predicting maintenance of intelligent electronic devices.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.