최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
DataON 바로가기다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
Edison 바로가기다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
Kafe 바로가기국가/구분 | United States(US) Patent 등록 |
---|---|
국제특허분류(IPC7판) |
|
출원번호 | US-0212590 (2016-07-18) |
등록번호 | US-10091702 (2018-10-02) |
발명자 / 주소 |
|
출원인 / 주소 |
|
대리인 / 주소 |
|
인용정보 | 피인용 횟수 : 0 인용 특허 : 3 |
A wireless relay device may receive a request indicating that a wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network. The wireless relay device may send a response message to the wireless device indicative of an estimated time to network contact. The wireless relay de
A wireless relay device may receive a request indicating that a wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network. The wireless relay device may send a response message to the wireless device indicative of an estimated time to network contact. The wireless relay device then receives and caches the delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded. The wireless relay device may forward at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages.
1. A method for wireless communication, comprising: receiving, at a first wireless relay device, a request indicating that a wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network;sending a response message to the wireless device indicative of an estimated time to netwo
1. A method for wireless communication, comprising: receiving, at a first wireless relay device, a request indicating that a wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network;sending a response message to the wireless device indicative of an estimated time to network contact;receiving and caching the one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded; andforwarding at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages. 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving a message from a second wireless relay device indicating at least an estimated time to network contact for the second wireless relay device; andforwarding the at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages to the second wireless relay device. 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising: receiving a cost metric from the second wireless relay device, wherein forwarding the at least one of the one or more delay tolerant messages is based at least in part on the received cost metric. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein sending the response message to the wireless device comprises: including the estimated time to network contact in the response message. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the request comprises a delay tolerance or a deadline for when the one or more delay-tolerant messages are to be sent to the network. 6. The method of claim 5, wherein sending the response message to the wireless device comprises: comparing the estimated time to network contact with the delay tolerance or deadline; andthe method further comprising sending the response message to the wireless device based on the comparing. 7. The method of claim 5, further comprising: deleting one or more of the delay-tolerant messages based at least in part on the one or more of the delay-tolerant messages not being forwarded within the delay tolerance or within the deadline. 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining, by the first wireless relay device, the estimated time to network contact indicating a next time the first wireless relay device is expected to make network contact for at least one radio access technology (RAT) using a history of contact with the network via the at least one RAT. 9. The method of claim 8, further comprising: maintaining the determined estimated time to network contact for each respective RAT that the first wireless relay device is capable of using. 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising: calculating a cost metric for at least one radio access technology (RAT), wherein the cost metric is based on at least one of: monetary costs, wireless relay device resource usage, channel quality, or an existing connection the first wireless relay device has with the network; andtransmitting the calculated cost metric to the wireless device. 11. The method of claim 10, wherein at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages remains cached based at least in part on the calculated cost metric. 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the estimated time to network contact is based on at least one of: supported access networks, mobility patterns, application traffic dynamics, or combinations thereof. 13. The method of claim 1, further comprising: broadcasting a message indicating an estimated time to network contact. 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages is forwarded to the network. 15. A method for wireless communication, comprising: sending, from a wireless device, a request indicating that the wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network;receiving one or more response messages from a corresponding one or more wireless relay devices, the one or more response messages each indicative of an estimated time to network contact for corresponding wireless relay devices;evaluating the one or more response messages to determine at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices to which the one or more delay-tolerant messages may be sent in order to be forwarded to the network; andtransmitting the one or more delay-tolerant messages to the at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices. 16. The method of claim 15, wherein sending the request comprises: including in the request a delay tolerance or a deadline for when the one or more delay-tolerant messages are to be forwarded to the network. 17. The method of claim 15, wherein the one or more response messages further comprise a cost metric, wherein the cost metric is based on at least one of: monetary costs, wireless relay device resource usage, channel quality, or an existing connection a wireless relay device has with the network. 18. The method of claim 15, wherein the estimated time to network contact is based on at least one of: supported access networks, mobility patterns, application traffic dynamics, or combinations thereof. 19. The method of claim 15, wherein the one or more response messages comprise one or more broadcast messages received from the one or more wireless relay devices. 20. The method of claim 15, wherein evaluating the one or more response messages further comprises: determining a probability that the one or more delay-tolerant messages will be forwarded to the network within a delay tolerance or before a deadline. 21. The method of claim 15, wherein sending the request comprises using a transmission protocol that is one of: Bluetooth low energy (BLE), WiFi Aware, Long Term Evolution (LTE) Direct, or LTE Proximity Services. 22. A method for wireless communication, comprising: sending, from a wireless device, a request indicating that the wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network, and the request including a delay tolerance or a deadline for when the one or more delay-tolerant messages are to be forwarded to the network;receiving one or more response messages from a corresponding one or more wireless relay devices; andtransmitting the one or more delay-tolerant messages to the at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices. 23. The method of claim 22, further comprising: evaluating the one or more response messages to determine at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices to which the one or more delay tolerant messages may be sent in order to be forwarded to the network, wherein the one or more response messages include one or more evaluation parameters. 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the one or more evaluation parameters include a cost metric, wherein the cost metric is based on at least one of: monetary costs, wireless relay device resource usage, channel quality, or an existing connection a wireless relay device has with the network. 25. The method of claim 23, wherein the one or more evaluation parameters include an estimated time to network contact for the corresponding wireless relay device, wherein the estimated time to network contact is based on at least one of: supported access networks, mobility patterns, application traffic dynamics, or combinations thereof. 26. The method of claim 23, wherein evaluating the one or more response messages further comprises: determining a probability that the one or more delay-tolerant messages will be forwarded to the network within the delay tolerance or before the deadline. 27. The method of claim 22, wherein sending the request comprises using a transmission protocol that is one of: Bluetooth low energy (BLE), WiFi Aware, Long Term Evolution (LTE) Direct, or LTE Proximity Services. 28. An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising: means for receiving, at a first wireless relay device, a request indicating that a wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network;means for sending a response message to the wireless device indicative of an estimated time to network contact;means for receiving and caching the one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded; andmeans for forwarding at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages. 29. The apparatus of claim 28, further comprising: means for receiving a message from a second wireless relay device indicating at least an estimated time to network contact for the second wireless relay device; andmeans for forwarding the at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages to the second wireless relay device. 30. The apparatus of claim 29, further comprising: means for receiving a cost metric from the second wireless relay device, wherein forwarding the at least one of the one or more delay tolerant messages is based at least in part on the received cost metric. 31. The apparatus of claim 28, wherein the means for sending the response message to the wireless device comprises: means for including the estimated time to network contact in the response message. 32. The apparatus of claim 28, wherein the request comprises a delay tolerance or a deadline for when the one or more delay-tolerant messages are to be sent to the network. 33. The apparatus of claim 32, wherein the means for sending the response message to the wireless device comprises: means for comparing the estimated time to network contact with the delay tolerance or deadline; andthe apparatus further comprising means for sending the response message to the wireless device based on the comparing. 34. The apparatus of claim 32, further comprising: means for deleting one or more of the delay-tolerant messages based at least in part on the one or more of the delay-tolerant messages not being forwarded within the delay tolerance or within the deadline. 35. The apparatus of claim 28, further comprising: means for determining, by the first wireless relay device, the estimated time to network contact indicating a next time the first wireless relay device is expected to make network contact for at least one radio access technology (RAT) using a history of contact with the network via the at least one RAT. 36. The apparatus of claim 35, further comprising: means for maintaining the determined estimated time to network contact for each respective RAT that the first wireless relay device is capable of using. 37. The apparatus of claim 28, further comprising: means for calculating a cost metric for at least one radio access technology (RAT), wherein the cost metric is based on at least one of: monetary costs, wireless relay device resource usage, channel quality, or an existing connection the first wireless relay device has with the network; andmeans for transmitting the calculated cost metric to the wireless device. 38. The apparatus of claim 37, wherein at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages remains cached based at least in part on the calculated cost metric. 39. The apparatus of claim 28, wherein the estimated time to network contact is based on at least one of: supported access networks, mobility patterns, application traffic dynamics, or combinations thereof. 40. The apparatus of claim 28, further comprising: means for broadcasting a message indicating an estimated time to network contact. 41. The apparatus of claim 28, wherein the at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages is forwarded to the network. 42. An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising: means for sending, from a wireless device, a request indicating that the wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network;means for receiving one or more response messages from a corresponding one or more wireless relay devices, the one or more response messages each indicative of an estimated time to network contact for corresponding wireless relay devices;means for evaluating the one or more response messages to determine at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices to which the one or more delay-tolerant messages may be sent in order to be forwarded to the network; andmeans for transmitting the one or more delay-tolerant messages to the at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices. 43. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein the means for sending the request comprises: means for including in the request a delay tolerance or a deadline for when the one or more delay-tolerant messages are to be forwarded to the network. 44. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein the one or more response messages further comprise a cost metric, wherein the cost metric is based on at least one of: monetary costs, wireless relay device resource usage, channel quality, or an existing connection a wireless relay device has with the network. 45. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein the estimated time to network contact is based on at least one of: supported access networks, mobility patterns, application traffic dynamics, or combinations thereof. 46. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein the one or more response messages comprise one or more broadcast messages received from the one or more wireless relay devices. 47. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein the means for evaluating the one or more response messages further comprises: means for determining a probability that the one or more delay-tolerant messages will be forwarded to the network within a delay tolerance or before a deadline. 48. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein the means for sending the request comprises means for using a transmission protocol that is one of: Bluetooth low energy (BLE), WiFi Aware, Long Term Evolution (LTE) Direct, or LTE Proximity Services. 49. An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising: means for sending, from a wireless device, a request indicating that the wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network, and the request including a delay tolerance or a deadline for when the one or more delay-tolerant messages are to be forwarded to the network;means for receiving one or more response messages from a corresponding one or more wireless relay devices; andmeans for transmitting the one or more delay-tolerant messages to the at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices. 50. The apparatus of claim 49, further comprising: means for evaluating the one or more response messages to determine at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices to which the one or more delay tolerant messages may be sent in order to be forwarded to the network, wherein the one or more response messages include one or more evaluation parameters. 51. The apparatus of claim 50, wherein the one or more evaluation parameters include a cost metric, wherein the cost metric is based on at least one of: monetary costs, wireless relay device resource usage, channel quality, or an existing connection a wireless relay device has with the network. 52. The apparatus of claim 50, wherein the one or more evaluation parameters include an estimated time to network contact for the corresponding wireless relay device, wherein the estimated time to network contact is based on at least one of: supported access networks, mobility patterns, application traffic dynamics, or combinations thereof. 53. The apparatus of claim 50, wherein the means for evaluating the one or more response messages further comprises: means for determining a probability that the one or more delay-tolerant messages will be forwarded to the network within the delay tolerance or before the deadline. 54. The apparatus of claim 49, wherein the means for sending the request comprises means for using a transmission protocol that is one of: Bluetooth low energy (BLE), WiFi Aware, Long Term Evolution (LTE) Direct, or LTE Proximity Services. 55. An apparatus for wireless communication, in a system comprising: a processor;memory in electronic communication with the processor; andinstructions stored in the memory and operable, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:receive, at a first wireless relay device, a request indicating that a wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network;send a response message to the wireless device indicative of an estimated time to network contact;receive and caching the one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded; andforward at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages. 56. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: receive a message from a second wireless relay device indicating at least an estimated time to network contact for the second wireless relay device; andforward the at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages to the second wireless relay device. 57. The apparatus of claim 56, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: receive a cost metric from the second wireless relay device, wherein forwarding the at least one of the one or more delay tolerant messages is based at least in part on the received cost metric. 58. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: include the estimated time to network contact in the response message. 59. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the request comprises a delay tolerance or a deadline for when the one or more delay-tolerant messages are to be sent to the network. 60. The apparatus of claim 59, wherein the instructions executable to cause the apparatus to perform the sending of the response message to the wireless device comprise instructions executable to cause the apparatus to: compare the estimated time to network contact with the delay tolerance or deadline; andsend the response message to the wireless device based on the comparing. 61. The apparatus of claim 59, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: delete one or more of the delay-tolerant messages based at least in part on the one or more of the delay-tolerant messages not being forwarded within the delay tolerance or within the deadline. 62. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: determine, by the first wireless relay device, the estimated time to network contact indicating a next time the first wireless relay device is expected to make network contact for at least one radio access technology (RAT) using a history of contact with the network via the at least one RAT. 63. The apparatus of claim 62, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: maintain the determined estimated time to network contact for each respective RAT that the first wireless relay device is capable of using. 64. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: calculate a cost metric for at least one radio access technology (RAT), wherein the cost metric is based on at least one of: monetary costs, wireless relay device resource usage, channel quality, or an existing connection the first wireless relay device has with the network; andtransmit the calculated cost metric to the wireless device. 65. The apparatus of claim 64, wherein at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages remains cached based at least in part on the calculated cost metric. 66. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the estimated time to network contact is based on at least one of: supported access networks, mobility patterns, application traffic dynamics, or combinations thereof. 67. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: broadcast a message indicating an estimated time to network contact. 68. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages is forwarded to the network. 69. An apparatus for wireless communication, in a system comprising: a processor;memory in electronic communication with the processor; andinstructions stored in the memory and operable, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:send, from a wireless device, a request indicating that the wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network;receive one or more response messages from a corresponding one or more wireless relay devices, the one or more response messages each indicative of an estimated time to network contact for corresponding wireless relay devices;evaluate the one or more response messages to determine at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices to which the one or more delay-tolerant messages may be sent in order to be forwarded to the network; andtransmit the one or more delay-tolerant messages to the at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices. 70. The apparatus of claim 69, wherein the instructions executable to cause the apparatus to send the request comprise instructions executable to cause the apparatus to: include in the request a delay tolerance or a deadline for when the one or more delay-tolerant messages are to be forwarded to the network. 71. The apparatus of claim 69, wherein the one or more response messages further comprise a cost metric, wherein the cost metric is based on at least one of: monetary costs, wireless relay device resource usage, channel quality, or an existing connection a wireless relay device has with the network. 72. The apparatus of claim 69, wherein the estimated time to network contact is based on at least one of: supported access networks, mobility patterns, application traffic dynamics, or combinations thereof. 73. The apparatus of claim 69, wherein the one or more response messages comprise one or more broadcast messages received from the one or more wireless relay devices. 74. The apparatus of claim 69, wherein the instructions executable to cause the apparatus to evaluate the one or more response messages comprise instructions executable to cause the apparatus to: determine a probability that the one or more delay-tolerant messages will be forwarded to the network within a delay tolerance or before a deadline. 75. The apparatus of claim 69, wherein the instructions executable to cause the apparatus to send the request comprise instructions executable to cause the apparatus to: use a transmission protocol that is one of: Bluetooth low energy (BLE), WiFi Aware, Long Term Evolution (LTE) Direct, or LTE Proximity Services. 76. An apparatus for wireless communication, in a system comprising: a processor;memory in electronic communication with the processor; andinstructions stored in the memory and operable, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:send, from a wireless device, a request indicating that the wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network, and the request including a delay tolerance or a deadline for when the one or more delay-tolerant messages are to be forwarded to the network;receive one or more response messages from a corresponding one or more wireless relay devices; andtransmit the one or more delay-tolerant messages to the at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices. 77. The apparatus of claim 76, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: evaluate the one or more response messages to determine at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices to which the one or more delay tolerant messages may be sent in order to be forwarded to the network, wherein the one or more response messages include one or more evaluation parameters. 78. The apparatus of claim 77, wherein the one or more evaluation parameters include a cost metric, wherein the cost metric is based on at least one of: monetary costs, wireless relay device resource usage, channel quality, or an existing connection a wireless relay device has with the network. 79. The apparatus of claim 77, wherein the one or more evaluation parameters include an estimated time to network contact for the corresponding wireless relay device, wherein the estimated time to network contact is based on at least one of: supported access networks, mobility patterns, application traffic dynamics, or combinations thereof. 80. The apparatus of claim 77, wherein the instructions executable to cause the apparatus to evaluate the one or more response messages comprise instructions executable to cause the apparatus to: determine a probability that the one or more delay-tolerant messages will be forwarded to the network within the delay tolerance or before the deadline. 81. The apparatus of claim 76, wherein the instructions executable to cause the apparatus to send the request comprise instructions executable to cause the apparatus to: use a transmission protocol that is one of: Bluetooth low energy (BLE), WiFi Aware, Long Term Evolution (LTE) Direct, or LTE Proximity Services. 82. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing code for wireless communication, the code comprising instructions executable by a processor to: receive, at a first wireless relay device, a request indicating that a wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network;send a response message to the wireless device indicative of an estimated time to network contact;receive and caching the one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded; andforward at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages. 83. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 82, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: receive a message from a second wireless relay device indicating at least an estimated time to network contact for the second wireless relay device; andforward the at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages to the second wireless relay device. 84. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 83, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: receive a cost metric from the second wireless relay device, wherein forwarding the at least one of the one or more delay tolerant messages is based at least in part on the received cost metric. 85. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 82, wherein the instructions executable to send the response message to the wireless device comprise instructions executable to: include the estimated time to network contact in the response message. 86. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 82, wherein the request comprises a delay tolerance or a deadline for when the one or more delay-tolerant messages are to be sent to the network. 87. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 86, wherein the instructions executable to send the response message to the wireless device comprise instructions executable to: compare the estimated time to network contact with the delay tolerance or deadline; andsend the response message to the wireless device based on the comparing. 88. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 86, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: delete one or more of the delay-tolerant messages based at least in part on the one or more of the delay-tolerant messages not being forwarded within the delay tolerance or within the deadline. 89. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 82, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: determine, by the first wireless relay device, the estimated time to network contact indicating a next time the first wireless relay device is expected to make network contact for at least one radio access technology (RAT) using a history of contact with the network via the at least one RAT. 90. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 89, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: maintain the determined estimated time to network contact for each respective RAT that the first wireless relay device is capable of using. 91. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 82, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: calculate a cost metric for at least one radio access technology (RAT), wherein the cost metric is based on at least one of: monetary costs, wireless relay device resource usage, channel quality, or an existing connection the first wireless relay device has with the network; andtransmit the calculated cost metric to the wireless device. 92. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 91, wherein at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages remains cached based at least in part on the calculated cost metric. 93. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 82, wherein the estimated time to network contact is based on at least one of: supported access networks, mobility patterns, application traffic dynamics, or combinations thereof. 94. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 82, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: broadcast a message indicating an estimated time to network contact. 95. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 82, wherein the at least one of the one or more delay-tolerant messages is forwarded to the network. 96. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing code for wireless communication, the code comprising instructions executable by a processor to: send, from a wireless device, a request indicating that the wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network;receive one or more response messages from a corresponding one or more wireless relay devices, the one or more response messages each indicative of an estimated time to network contact for corresponding wireless relay devices;evaluate the one or more response messages to determine at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices to which the one or more delay-tolerant messages may be sent in order to be forwarded to the network; andtransmit the one or more delay-tolerant messages to the at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices. 97. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 96, wherein the instructions executable to send the request comprise instructions executable to: include in the request a delay tolerance or a deadline for when the one or more delay-tolerant messages are to be forwarded to the network. 98. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 96, wherein the one or more response messages further comprise a cost metric, wherein the cost metric is based on at least one of: monetary costs, wireless relay device resource usage, channel quality, or an existing connection a wireless relay device has with the network. 99. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 96, wherein the estimated time to network contact is based on at least one of: supported access networks, mobility patterns, application traffic dynamics, or combinations thereof. 100. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 96, wherein the one or more response messages comprise one or more broadcast messages received from the one or more wireless relay devices. 101. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 96, wherein the instructions executable to evaluate the one or more response messages comprise instructions executable to: determine a probability that the one or more delay-tolerant messages will be forwarded to the network within a delay tolerance or before a deadline. 102. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 96, wherein the instructions executable to send the request comprise instructions executable to: use a transmission protocol that is one of: Bluetooth low energy (BLE), WiFi Aware, Long Term Evolution (LTE) Direct, or LTE Proximity Services. 103. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing code for wireless communication, the code comprising instructions executable by a processor to: send, from a wireless device, a request indicating that the wireless device has one or more delay-tolerant messages to be forwarded to a network, and the request including a delay tolerance or a deadline for when the one or more delay-tolerant messages are to be forwarded to the network;receive one or more response messages from a corresponding one or more wireless relay devices; andtransmit the one or more delay-tolerant messages to the at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices. 104. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 103, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to: evaluate the one or more response messages to determine at least one of the one or more wireless relay devices to which the one or more delay tolerant messages may be sent in order to be forwarded to the network, wherein the one or more response messages include one or more evaluation parameters. 105. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 104, wherein the one or more evaluation parameters include a cost metric, wherein the cost metric is based on at least one of: monetary costs, wireless relay device resource usage, channel quality, or an existing connection a wireless relay device has with the network. 106. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 104, wherein the one or more evaluation parameters include an estimated time to network contact for the corresponding wireless relay device, wherein the estimated time to network contact is based on at least one of: supported access networks, mobility patterns, application traffic dynamics, or combinations thereof. 107. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 104, wherein the instructions executable to evaluate the one or more response messages comprise instructions executable to: determine a probability that the one or more delay-tolerant messages will be forwarded to the network within the delay tolerance or before the deadline. 108. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 103, wherein the instructions executable to send the request comprise instructions executable to: use a transmission protocol that is one of: Bluetooth low energy (BLE), WiFi Aware, Long Term Evolution (LTE) Direct, or LTE Proximity Services.
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.