표 Fig. 2.1.1. Map of the complete meteorological observation system around Nakdong River.
표 Fig. 2.1.2. Map of Gangjeong Weir meteorological observation system.
표 Fig. 2.1.3. Pictures of meteorological stations added on 2012 at Gangjeong Weir observation system.
표 Fig. 2.1.4. Map of Gumi Weir meteorological observation system.
표 Fig. 2.1.5. Pictures of meteorological stations around Gumi Weir.
표 Fig. 2.1.6. Water temperature observation sites near Gumi Weir.
표 Fig. 2.1.7. Water temperature observation sites near Chilgok Weir.
표 Fig. 2.1.8. Water temperature observation sites near Gangjeong Weir.
표 Fig. 2.1.9. Schematic diagram of the meteorological observation system around Nakdong River.
표 Fig. 2.1.10. Temperature and relative humidity probe, HMP155.
표 Fig. 2.1.11. Temperature and relative humidity probe, HMP45.
표 Fig. 2.1.12. Weather transmitter.
표 Fig. 2.1.13. Wind sensor, 05103.
표 Fig. 2.1.14. Wind sensor, 05106.
표 Fig. 2.1.15. Visibility/ present weather sensor.
표 Fig. 2.1.16. Temperature sensor.
표 Fig. 2.1.17. Water temperature observation system.
표 Fig. 2.1.18. Datalogger, CR800.
표 Fig. 2.1.19. Datalogger, KL400.
표 Fig. 2.2.1. Schematic diagram of director type (a) hydrometerological and observation system and (b) flux tower in Andong area.
표 Fig. 2.2.2. The location of hydrometerological observation site.
표 Fig. 2.2.3. View of hydrometeorological observation site at Pungho-ri.
표 Fig. 2.2.4. View of flux system at Woncheon-ri.
표 Fig. 2.2.5. View of flux system at Ok-dong.
표 Fig. 2.2.6. Main page of the hydrometerological monitoring system.
표 Fig. 2.2.7. Table view of the (a) hydrometerological and (b) flux monitoring system.
표 Fig. 2.2.8. Graph view of the (a) hydrometerological and (b) flux monitoring system.
표 Fig. 2.2.9. Statistic view of the hydrometerological monitoring system.
표 Fig. 2.2.10. Data collection status view of the hydrometerological monitoring system.
표 Fig. 3.1.1. Daily trend of air temperature for Seoul Station, Daegu Station, N3, N7, and C2 in (a) winter, (b) spring, (c) summer, and (d) fall.
표 Fig. 3.1.2. Daily trend of absolute humidity for Seoul Station, Daegu Station, N3, N7, and C2 in (a) winter, (b) spring, (c) summer, and (d) fall.
표 Fig. 3.1.3. Seasonal windrose of 1-minute wind data for N7 from Dec. 1, 2011 to Nov. 30, 2012.
표 Fig. 3.1.4. Air temperature for each season relative to the distance from the river.
표 Fig. 3.1.5. Absolute humidity for each season relative to the distance from the river.
표 Fig. 3.1.6. Wind speed for each season relative to the distance from the river.
표 Fig. 3.1.7. Daily trend of fluxes for (a) N3 and (b) N7 during easterlies (left) and westerlies (right) in winter.
표 Fig. 3.1.8. Daily trend of fluxes for (a) N3 and (b) N7 during easterlies (left) and westerlies (right) in summer.
표 Fig. 3.1.9. Daily averaged (a) Bowen Ratio, (b) H/Rn, and (c) LE/Rn at N3 and N7 from July 20, 2011 to Sept. 5, 2012.
표 Fig. 3.1.10. Energy balance closure at N3 and N7 during July 20, 2011 to Sept. 5, 2012.
표 Fig. 3.1.11. Daily trend of momentum flux at N3 and N7 in winter 2011 (left) and summer 2012 (right).
표 Fig. 3.1.12. Relationship between momentum flux and wind speed at N3 and N7 for (a) winter 2011 and (b) summer 2012.
표 Fig. 3.1.13. Relationship between momentum flux and stability at N3 and N7 for (a) winter 2011 and (b) summer 2012.
표 Fig. 3.1.14. Daily trend of stability at N3 and N7 in winter 2011 (left) and summer 2012 (right).
표 Fig. 3.2.1. Difference of air temperature and absolute humidity measured at C3 and C4 in winter, along with wind direction at C3.
표 Fig. 3.2.2. Difference of air temperature and absolute humidity measured at C3 and C4 in summer, along with wind direction at C3.
표 Fig. 3.3.1. Daily trend of air temperature for G1-G6 (top) and G7-12 (bottom) along with the average of 12 sites.
표 Fig. 3.3.2. Difference of daily trend of air temperature for G1-G6 (top) and G7-12 (bottom) from the average of 12 sites.
표 Fig. 3.3.4. Difference of daily trend of absolute humidity for G1-G6 (top) and G7-12 (bottom) from the average of 12 sites.
표 Fig. 3.3.3. Daily trend of relative humidity for G1-G6 (top) and G7-12 (bottom) along with the average of 12 sites.
표 Fig. 3.4.1. Water temperature measured from Oct. 18 to Oct. 30, 2012 at Gangjeong Weir, Chilgok Weir, and Gumi Weir.
표 Fig. 3.4.2. Water surface temperature and air temperature measured from Oct. 30 to Nov. 1, 2012 at Gangjeong Weir, Chilgok Weir, and Gumi Weir.
표 Fig. 3.4.3. Water temperature measurement at Chilgok Weir during intensive observation period.
표 Fig. 3.4.5. Water temperature at three weirs.
표 Fig. 3.4.4. Water temperature measured at the left side, center, and the right side of each of the weirs.
표 Fig. 3.4.6. Air temperature observation system.
표 Fig. 3.4.7. Vertical temperature distribution from the water surface to Gangjeong Weir.
표 Fig. 4.1.1. Schematic diagram of Noah land surface model in WRF model (from NCAR presentation).
표 Fig. 4.1.2. Varitation of surface temperature and air temperature at 2 m above ground at water and dry land from WRF results with varying the thermal inertia, 0.06 (blue solid line), 0.1 (red dashed line), 0.5 (green dotted line), 10 (purple dashed-dotted line) cal m-2 s-1/2 K-1.
표 Fig. 4.1.3. Anomaly of air temperature at 2 m above ground by extension of the river from WRF model results with and without variation of water surface temperature at each time.
표 Fig. 4.1.4. Anomaly of mixing ratio at 2 m above ground by extension of the river from WRF model results with and without variation of water surface temperature at each time.
표 Fig. 4.1.5. Anomaly of wind speed at 10 m above ground by extension of the river from WRF model results with and without variation of water surface temperature at each time.
표 Fig. 4.1.6. Diurnal averaged effect region assessed by criterion of meteorological factors (air temperature, mixing ratio, wind speed) from WRF model results with and without variation of water surface temperature December 6, 2009.
표 Fig. 5.1.1. Time series of daily precipitation at Docheon-ri, Sang-ri, Nammeon-ri and Gasong-ri.
표 Fig. 5.1.2. Time series of daily mean air temperature at each station.
표 Fig. 5.1.3. Averaged hourly air temperature at each station.
표 Fig. 5.1.4. Time series of daily mean humidity at each station.
표 Fig. 5.1.5. Averaged hourly humidity at each station.
표 Fig. 5.1.6. Windrose of wind direction and speed at each station.
표 Fig. 5.1.7. Time series of daily mean solar radiation at Docheon-ri, Sang-ri, Nammeon-ri and Gasong-ri.
표 Fig. 5.1.8. Averaged hourly solar radiation at Docheon-ri, Sang-ri, Nammeon-ri and Gasong-ri.
표 Fig. 5.1.9. Time series of daily mean soil moisture at Docheon-ri, Sang-ri, Nammeon-ri and Gasong-ri.
표 Fig. 5.1.10. Time series of daily mean soil moisture at Pungho-ri, Woncheon-ri and Ok-dong.
표 Fig. 5.1.11. (a) Time series of daily mean and (b) averaged hour soil temperature at Docheon-ri and Sang-ri.
표 Fig. 5.1.12. (a) Time series of daily mean and (b) averaged hour soil temperature at Nammeon-ri and Gasong-ri.
표 Fig. 5.1.13. Averaged hour soil temperature at the Pungho-ri, Woncheon-ri and Ok-dong.
표 Fig. 5.2.2. Time series of 30 minutes H/Rn, LE/Rn, G/Rn and (H+LE+G)/Rn at the Ok-dong.
표 Fig. 5.2.1. Time series of 30 minutes mean energy budget at the Ok-dong.
표 Fig. 5.2.3. Time series of daily mean bowen ratio at the Ok-dong.
표 Fig. 6.2.1. Schematic diagram of water movement.
표 Fig. 6.3.1. The study area.
표 Fig. 6.3.2. Location of weather stations.
표 Fig. 6.3.3. Goemorphologic data; (a) Land cover, (b) Soil texture, (c) Topographic index and (d) Saturated transmissivity (m2h-1).
표 Fig. 6.4.1. Simulated soil moisture according to warm-up periods.
표 Fig. 6.4.2. Simulated water table depth according to warm-up periods.
표 Fig. 6.4.5. Point based the hourly observed soil moisture at -30 cm and -50 cm and cell based the hourly simulated one in root zoon during 2012 year.
표 Fig. 6.4.3. Point based the hourly observed soil moisture at -30 cm and -50 cm and cell based the hourly simulated one in root zoon during 2010 year.
표 Fig. 6.4.4. Point based the hourly observed soil moisture at -30 cm and -50 cm and cell based the hourly simulated one in root zoon during 2011 year.
표 Fig. 6.4.6. Point based the hourly observed soil moisture at -30 cm and -50 cm for A1 station and cell based the hourly simulated one in root zoon during analysis period.
표 Fig. 6.4.7. Point based the hourly observed soil moisture at -30 cm and -50 cm for A2 station and cell based the hourly simulated one in root zoon during analysis period.
표 Fig. 6.4.8. Point based the hourly observed soil moisture at -30 cm and -50 cm for A3 station and cell based the hourly simulated one in root zoon during analysis period.
표 Fig. 6.4.9. Point based the hourly observed soil moisture at -30 cm and -50 cm for A4 station and cell based the hourly simulated one in root zoon during analysis period.
표 Fig. 6.4.10. Cell based the hourly simulated water table depth in root zoon during analysis period.
표 Fig. 6.4.11. The monthly observed and simulated flow(mm) during the calibration(2003∼82006) and verification(2007∼2009) periods
표 Fig. 6.4.12. The monthly observed and simulated flow(mm) during analysis period.
표 Fig. 6.5.1. Study Area and location of weather stations.
표 Fig. 6.5.2. Scatter diagram of observed precipitation, temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and interpolated precipitation, temperature, relative humidity, wind speed.
표 Fig. 6.5.3. Point based the hourly observed soil moisture at 30 cm and -50 cm for A2 station and cell based the hourly simulated one before and after adding weather stations.
표 Fig. 6.5.4. Point based the hourly observed soil moisture at 30 cm and -50 cm for A3 station and cell based the hourly simulated one before and after adding weather stations.
표 Fig. 6.5.5. Point based the hourly observed soil moisture at 30 cm and -50 cm for A4 station and cell based the hourly simulated one before and after adding weather stations.
표 Fig. 6.6.1. Schematic diagram of real time hydro-meteorologic information display system.
표 Fig. 6.6.2. Real time hydro-meteorological information display system on the Nakdong river basin.
표 Fig. 7.2.1. Elevation map with the basin number of 117 mid-watersheds specified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime affairs.
표 Fig. 7.2.2. Thiessen's polygon in 117 mid-watersheds for 642 AWS rain stations.
표 Fig. 7.2.3. Comparison of qualitative skill scores of forecast models between 2010 and 2011 summer
표 Fig. 7.2.3. Comparison of qualitative skill scores of forecast models between 2010 and 2011 summer
표 Fig. 7.2.4. Comparison of quantitative skill scores of forecast models between 2010 and 2011 summer
표 Fig. 7.3.1. Expected skill trends for radar nowcasting and NWP forecast.
표 Fig. 7.3.2. Schematic diagram of the blending system.
표 Fig. 7.3.3. Verification skill scores of forecast models and blending precipitation in the summer of 2011
표 Fig. 7.3.4. The evolution of MAPLE, KLAPS, AWS and blending precipitation started from 09 LST 9 July 2011.
표 Fig. 7.3.5. Spatial distribution of Critical Success Index (CSI) for 117 mid-watersheds in the summer of 2011
표 Fig. 7.3.5. Spatial distribution of Critical Success Index (CSI) for 117 mid-watersheds in the summer of 2011
표 Fig. 8.2.1. Locations of the rain gauges (black square) and radars (red triangle) in south Korea. The red dashed line denotes the coverage (≤200 km) of the each radar.
표 Fig. 8.2.2. Flow chart for accumulated rainfall calculation.
표 Fig. 8.2.3. Distribution of weighting function with weight parameter (σ).
표 Fig. 8.3.1. The web pages of time-series (upper), data table (middle), and statistics (lower) of rainfall map.
표 Fig. 8.3.2. Distributions of spatial correction factor (F) with weight factor (σ0) on Jul. 9, 2009.
표 Fig. 8.3.3. Scatter diagram of daily rainfall observed rain gauges versus daily rainfall using spatial correction (*) and M-P relationship (+) on Jul. 9, 2009.
표 Fig. 8.3.4. The differences between two rainfall fields (Rσ=15km - Rσ=σi) on Jul. 9, 2009.
표 Fig. 8.3.5. RMSEs with weight factor (σ) of rain gauge and spatial corrected radar daily rainfall on Jul. 9, 2009
표 Fig. 8.3.6. Distributions of (a) rain gauges daily rainfall and radar daily rainfall applied by (b) one weight factor (σ=10 km), and (c) total five weight factor with basins on Jul. 9, 2009.
표 Fig. 8.3.7. Distributions of spatial correction factor (F) with weight factor (σ) on Jul. 11, 2009.
표 Fig. 8.3.8. Scatter diagram of daily rainfall observed rain gauges versus daily rainfall using spatial correction (*) and M-P relationship (+) on Jul. 11, 2009.
표 Fig. 8.3.9. The differences between two rainfall fields (Rσ=15km - Rσ=σi) on Jul. 11, 2009.
표 Fig. 8.3.10. RMSEs with weight factor (σ) of rain gauge and spatial corrected radar daily rainfall on Jul. 11, 2009.
표 Fig. 8.3.11. Distributions of (a) rain gauges daily rainfall and radar daily rainfall applied by (b) one weight factor (σ=15 km), and (c) total five weight factor with basins on Jul. 11, 2009.

과제명(ProjectTitle) :	-
연구책임자(Manager) :	-
과제기간(DetailSeriesProject) :	-
총연구비 (DetailSeriesProject) :	-
키워드(keyword) :	-
과제수행기간(LeadAgency) :	-
연구목표(Goal) :	-
연구내용(Abstract) :	-
기대효과(Effect) :	-

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 제목(한글), 저자명(한글), 발행일자, 전자원문, 초록(한글), 초록(영문) 관리번호, 제목(한글), 제목(영문), 저자명(한글), 저자명(영문), 주관연구기관(한글), 주관연구기관(영문), 발행일자, 총페이지수, 주관부처명, 과제시작일, 보고서번호, 과제종료일, 주제분류, 키워드(한글), 전자원문, 키워드(영문), 입수제어번호, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 목차
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

초록

표/그림 (126)

표/그림 (126)

연구자의 다른 보고서 :

참고문헌 (25)

연구과제 타임라인

활용도 분석정보

활용도 Top5 보고서

관련 콘텐츠

이 보고서와 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

초록

표/그림 (126) 모든 표/그림 보기

표/그림 (126) 슬라이드로 보기

연구자의 다른 보고서 :

참고문헌 (25)

연구과제 타임라인

전체(0) 논문(0) 특허(0) 보고서(0)

전체(0) 논문(0) 특허(0) 보고서(0)

활용도 분석정보

활용도 Top5 보고서 더보기

관련 콘텐츠

이 보고서와 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

표/그림 (126)

표/그림 (126)

활용도 Top5 보고서