초록 ▼

o ICRP 103 이를 반영하여 개정된 IAEA GSR part 3(BSS 2014)가 요구하는 방사선방호 체계에 견주어 국내 규제관리 체계의 보완 필요 항목 도출

o 국내 방사선방호체계에서 취약점으로 드러난 중심관청의 부재 문제를 해소하기 위해 여러 법률에 분산되어 있는 방사선방호 규정을 통합한 ‘방사선방호법 및 하부규정’ 시안을 개발함
- 현행 체계와 중요한 차이는 국가 방사선방호 중심관청 설정, 방사선방호 정책계획 수립추진, 방사선 관리 역량을 기준으로 포괄 관리선원 소유허가제 도입, 방사선 취급면허 개념

o ICRP 103 이를 반영하여 개정된 IAEA GSR part 3(BSS 2014)가 요구하는 방사선방호 체계에 견주어 국내 규제관리 체계의 보완 필요 항목 도출

o 국내 방사선방호체계에서 취약점으로 드러난 중심관청의 부재 문제를 해소하기 위해 여러 법률에 분산되어 있는 방사선방호 규정을 통합한 ‘방사선방호법 및 하부규정’ 시안을 개발함
- 현행 체계와 중요한 차이는 국가 방사선방호 중심관청 설정, 방사선방호 정책계획 수립추진, 방사선 관리 역량을 기준으로 포괄 관리선원 소유허가제 도입, 방사선 취급면허 개념 폐지, 피폭자 분류체계 합리화, 선량한도 부분 개정 및 선량제약치 도입, 의료방사선 관리에 대한 합리적 책임분담, 방사선량 계측체계 명료화, 직장 라돈피폭 관리, 방사선안전통합정보체계를 활용한 행정절차 간소화, 방사선재난 대응체계 개선 등임

- 현행 법규 우선 보완 필요한 항목에 대한 법규 개정안 제안
o 제안된 규제변경에 대해 입법 과정에서 정당화를 위한 규제영향분석에 대해 기술현황보고서를 작성하고 정량적 비용편익분석에 사용할 산출도구를 개발하여 시범적 규제영향분석에 활용함
o 방사선방호 분야 국제동향의 파급을 위해 주요 근간 ICRP 간행물 10편 및 방사선방호 국제표준(IAEA BSS 2014 및 EU BSS 2014) 번역판을 편집, 보급
o N-STAR 보고서 3편 및 규제정책제안서 16편 제출

(출처 : 보고서 요약서 5p)

Abstract ▼

IV. Results
o Most part of the current domestic RP laws and regulations are in accordance with the international recommendations and guidance. Some gaps identified and to be considered in revision include:
- use of old dosimetric data
- less emphasis on protection against medical exposure a

IV. Results
o Most part of the current domestic RP laws and regulations are in accordance with the international recommendations and guidance. Some gaps identified and to be considered in revision include:
- use of old dosimetric data
- less emphasis on protection against medical exposure and exposure to natural radiation
- no provisions for application of dose constraints
- over-regulation of occupational workers being less exposed(category B workers)
- inefficient or questionable system to respond a radiological emergency.

o More fundamental weak points revealed is that there is no leading agency in RP and responsibility is split to some agencies with no principles. This makes the national RP policy and strategy unclear to result weak infrastructure for RP. As a remedy, we proposed promulgation of integrated 'Acts for Radiation Protection' and made a draft.

o Compared with the current legislations, the proposed RP act directs:
- to form an integrated act encompassing all radiation sources, all exposure situations and all exposed persons
- to assign the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission(NSSC) as the leading agency in RP and establish an Inter-agency Committee for RP Policy to coordinate national RP policy and to facilitate cooperation among agencies
- to fully adopt the international recommendations and guidance, except for the exposure situation based approaches because of some conceptual deficiency in the latter
- to transform the control concept from permit by source-basis to comprehensive possession permit based on protection capacity of applicants and account of sources to be kept by a registration system
- to abandon the concept allowing radiation work only for license holders and to recognize those existing license holders, together with qualified experts coming with the new system, as qualified RP experts who are eligible for an RP advisor
- to make those possessing no radiation sources but providing radiation work service registrate as radiation practitioners to put under regulatory control
- to minimize directive provisions to lead the regulatory requirements objective oriented as much
- to introduce concept of informed exposure and missionary exposure and to categorize occupational workers into A and B group to apply graded approaches in worker management(i.e. less requirements for individuals in category B who are expected not to exceed 2 mSv of effective dose in a year)
- to adopt the new equivalent dose limit to the lens of eyes for occupational exposure and to implement dose constraint system for practices
- to clarify the definition of public for the purpose of RP as 'individual exposed with no informed consent'
- to set a monitoring requirement for operators of industry potential of concentrating NORM and to apply type approval for consumer product requiring labeling
- to clarify responsibility of government to establish national radon policy and to control of occupational exposure in workplaces exceeding radon exemption level
- to designate the Ministry of Health and Welfare(MOHW) as the competent authority to oversight medical exposure, whereas NSSC oversights all the occupational exposures, public exposures and environmental protection
- to move the key responsibility of planning, preparedness and response to radiological disaster to the line of the Ministry of Interior and Safety(MOIS) and Governors of Province while NSSC provides technical support and advice on radiological and technical matters
- to make and distribute retailed formal report on accidents/incidents with lessons learned to contribute preventing from recurrences
- to rationalize penalties and
- to emphasize responsibility of the government(and responsible agencies) to strengthen infrastructure for RP.
o An open forum was held to accommodate opions of different parties.
o Three N-STAR reports covering control of contaminated foodstuff, rationalized categorization of exposure situations and protection against radon at work and home were published.
o Since a regulatory impact analysis is required for major changes in regulations, a state-of-the art report on regulatory impact analysis addressing RP is prepared and a computational tool for cost-benefit analysis is developed.
o With the tool, illustrative analysis were conducted for some of the proposed changes.
o Since promulgation of a new act takes time in the National Assembly, some items for which early changes are desirable are selected and proposed amendments are suggested.
o Finally for further reference, 10 ICRP publcations supporting the ICRP system of RP have been translated in Korean with kind permission of ICRP and posted at both KARP and ICRP web sites.

(출처 : SUMMARY 11p)

목차 Contents

• 표지 ... 1
• 제 출 문 ... 3
• 보고서 요약서 ... 5
• 요 약 문 ... 7
• SUMMARY ... 11
• 목차 ... 15
• 표목차 ... 17
• 그림목차 ... 18
• 제1장 연구개발과제의 개요 ... 19
• 1. 연구 배경 및 필요성 ... 19
• 2. 연구개발 목표 및 범위 ... 20
• 제2장 국내외 현황 ... 21
• 1. 국내 현황 ... 21
• 2. 국외 현황 ... 22
• 제3장 연구개발수행 내용 및 결과 ... 25
• 제1절 동향 요약 ... 25
• 1. 국외 동향 ... 25
• 2. 국내 동향 ... 52
• 3. 우리 방사선방호 법규 개선 방향 ... 77
• 제2절 방사선방호법 및 하부 규정(안) ... 86
• 1. 방사선방호법 초안 ... 86
• 2. 방사선방호법 시행령 초안 ... 136
• 3. 위원회 규칙 초안 ... 149
• 4. 방사선량 계측에 관한 지침 ... 176
• 제3절 규제영향분석 ... 177
• 1. 기술현황보고서 ... 177
• 2. 방사선안전규제 변경에 대한 규제영향분석 예시 ... 177
• 제4절 국제방사선방호위원회 간행물 번역 보급 ... 226
• 1. 국제방사선방호위원회(ICRP) 간행물 ... 226
• 2. ICRP 간행물 번역 입장과 의의 ... 226
• 3. 이 연구에서 수행한 ICRP 간행물 번역 ... 227
• 제4장 목표달성도 및 관련분야에의 기여도 ... 229
• 1. 목표 ... 229
• 2. 목표 달성여부 ... 229
• 3. 관련 분야 기여도 ... 232
• 제5장 연구개발결과의 활용계획 ... 233
• 1. 제안의 법제화 ... 233
• 2. 기술지침 준비 ... 233
• 3. 조기 개선이 필요한 항목 ... 233
• 4. 방사선방호 주요 자료 번역사업 ... 259
• 제6장 연구개발과정에서 수집한 해외과학기술정보 ... 261
• 제7장 참고문헌 ... 263
• 부록 I 진단용 방사선 발생장치의 안전관리에 관한 규칙 ... 267
• 부록 II 산업안전보건기준에 관한 규칙 ... 277
• 부록 III 방사선량과 계측에 관한 지침 ... 281
• 부록 IV 방사선방호 규제관리 제도 개선방향 토론회 ... 423
• 부록 V 별책부록 목록 ... 429
• 끝페이지 ... 432