[보고서]원자력 수소 플랜트 등의 응용을 위한 수소환경 재료거동 예측 핵심기술 개발

윤기봉

보고서 정보

주관연구기관

중앙대학교
Chung Ang University

연구책임자

윤기봉

참여연구자

김윤재 , 마영화 , 김성찬 , 이관주 , 원두일 , 우승균 , 이호준 , Nguyen Tuan Son , 박지혜 , 이주영 , 정성용 , Pham Van Duyet , 안중혁 , 이국희 , 김낙현 , 제진호 , 정하주

보고서유형

2단계보고서

발행국가

대한민국

언어

한국어

발행년월

2012-11

과제시작연도

2011

주관부처

교육과학기술부
Ministry of Education and Science Technology(MEST)

등록번호

TRKO202100005380

과제고유번호

1345158236

사업명

원자력기술개발

DB 구축일자

2021-07-10

키워드

수소취화.수소확산.수소손상.원자력수소.손상해석.균열진전.연성파괴.유한요소해석.수소유기파손.결함건전성평가.Hydrogen embrittlement.Hydrogen diffusion.Hydrogen damage.Nuclear hydrogen.Damage analysis.Crack growth.Ductile failure.Finite element analysis.Hydrogen induced failure.Defect assessment.

표 Equipment used in Sandia National Lab. [Brain Somerday etc. ´Technical reference on hydrogen compatibility of materials : Austenitic stainless steels type 304 & 304L´, 2005] (a) case to protect the pressure vessel (b) the pressure vessel equipped with specimen (c) specimen inside the pressure vessel
표 Tensile testing system for measuring mechanical properties of materials under high pressure hydrogen gas environment in AIST [Seiji Fukuyama etc. ´Hydrogen embrittlement of metals in 70Mpa hydrogen at room temperaure´, 2005
$Various high-pressure hydrogen fatigue testing machines and vessels, high-resolution microscopes and precise meaurement instruments in Kyushu University (a)100MPa Hydrogen Fatigue Testing Machine (b)100MPa Hydrogen Gas Vessel (c)Blister Testing Machine for Rubber (d)Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (e)Thermal Desorption Spectrometry (TDS) (f)Thermal Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope with Electron Backscatter Diffraction Analyzer$ 표 Various high-pressure hydrogen fatigue testing machines and vessels, high-resolution microscopes and precise meaurement instruments in Kyushu University (a)100MPa Hydrogen Fatigue Testing Machine (b)100MPa Hydrogen Gas Vessel (c)Blister Testing Machine for Rubber (d)Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (e)Thermal Desorption Spectrometry (TDS) (f)Thermal Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope with Electron Backscatter Diffraction Analyzer
표 Establishment of mechanical property measurement system under 120 MPa hydrogen gas
표 Comparison between methods of assessing hydrogen damage
표 Current status of the data possessed by foreign major research institutes
표 Electro-chemical charging method
표 Electro-chemical Hydrogen Charging system
표 Small Punch test (MTS 810, Zig)
표 Zig for SP Test (D=10mm, t=0.5mm, a=4mm, d=2.38mm)
표 ELTRA OH-900 (Left : Furnace / Right : Graphite crucible)
표 ELTRA OH-900 flow diagram
표 Composition of experimental system for high temperature hydrogen damage assessment
표 Structural drawing of experimental system for high temperature hydrogen damage assessment
표 Photo of fume hood
표 Photo of high temperature circulation bath
표 Photo of potentiastat V3 MC equipment with double slots
표 Chemical composition of Inconel Alloy 617
표 Shape of specimen
표 Conditions of hydrogen charging for Inconel alloy 617
표 Results of the small punch load-displacement curve according to hydrogen charging time
표 Variation of maximum punch load according to charging time
$Variation of fracture displacement according to charging time$ 표 Variation of fracture displacement according to charging time
표 Results of hydrogen concentration analysis
표 Variation of hydrogen concentration according to charging time
$SEM images of specimen surface and its fracture surface after the small punch test for the as-received material (a) 82X (b) 217X (c) 883X (d) 1680X$ 표 SEM images of specimen surface and its fracture surface after the small punch test for the as-received material (a) 82X (b) 217X (c) 883X (d) 1680X
$SEM images of specimen surface and its fracture surface after the small punch test for the hydrogen charged specimen (25 hours) (a) 66 (b) 145X (c) 508X (d) 949X$ 표 SEM images of specimen surface and its fracture surface after the small punch test for the hydrogen charged specimen (25 hours) (a) 66 (b) 145X (c) 508X (d) 949X
$SEM images of specimen surface and its fracture surface after the small punch test for the hydrogen charged specimen (48 hours) (a) 61X (b) 169X (c) 208X (d) 541X (e) 920X (f) 1340X$ 표 SEM images of specimen surface and its fracture surface after the small punch test for the hydrogen charged specimen (48 hours) (a) 61X (b) 169X (c) 208X (d) 541X (e) 920X (f) 1340X
$SEM images of specimen surface and its fracture surface after the small punch test for the hydrogen charged specimen (96 hours) (a) 58X (b) 164X (c) 1200X (d) 2860X$ 표 SEM images of specimen surface and its fracture surface after the small punch test for the hydrogen charged specimen (96 hours) (a) 58X (b) 164X (c) 1200X (d) 2860X
표 파괴인성 측정 결과
표 Chemical composition of Hastelloy C-276
표 Change of Max. Load and Max. deformation (1단계)
표 Change of Max. Load and Max. deformation (2단계)
표 Change of Max. Load and Max. Deformation according to temperature; (a) Max. Load, (b) Max. Deformation
표 Hydrogen concentration analysis results
표 Hydrogen concentration analysis results
표 Hydrogen concentration analysis results according to temperature
표 SEM Micrograph of charged specimen surface (at Room temp.)
표 SEM Micrograph of charged specimen surface (at 40℃)
표 SEM Micrograph of charged specimen surface (at 50℃)
표 SEM Micrograph of charged specimen surface (at 70℃)
표 SEM Micrograph of charged specimen surface (at 80℃)
표 SEM Micrograph of charged specimen surface (at 90℃)
표 인장시편 형상
표 유도가열방식의 온도제어
표 Hastelloy C-276의 인장시험결과 (a) Room Temperature (b) 80℃
표 Chemical composition of 34CrMo4 steel used in this study (w.t. %)
표 Values of mechanical strength in metal liner before and after heat treatment
표 Punch load vs. displacement curves measured from small punch test for hydrogen charged specimens at several stages
표 Punch load vs. displacement curve measured from small punch test in typical ductile material
표 Comparison of hydrogen concentration change with charging time for specimens before and after heat treatment
$SEM image of fracture surface after small punch testing for the specimen before heat treatment (Charging time: 10 hours)$ 표 SEM image of fracture surface after small punch testing for the specimen before heat treatment (Charging time: 10 hours)
$SEM image of fracture surface after small punch testing for the specimen after heat treatment (Charging time: 10 hours)$ 표 SEM image of fracture surface after small punch testing for the specimen after heat treatment (Charging time: 10 hours)
표 Investigation of cross-section after 10 hrs hydrogen charging for the specimen before heat treatment
표 Chemical composition of Hastelloy C-276
표 Change of Max. Load and Max. deformation
표 Change of Max. Load and Max. Deformation according to temperature; (a) Max. Load, (b) Max. Deformation
표 Hydrogen concentration analysis results
표 Hydrogen concentration analysis results according to temperature
표 SEM Micrograph of charged specimen surface (Room Temp.)
표 SEM Micrograph of charged specimen surface (50℃.)
표 SEM Micrograph of charged specimen surface (80℃.)
표 SUS316L의 인장시험결과 (a) Room Temperature (b) 80℃
표 압력상승부에서 이상기체모델과 실제기체모델의 온도장 해석결과
표 기체모델에 따른 배관부 온도비교
표 격자해상지수에 따른 유동특성비교
표 HI 분해반응에 적용된 상수
표 요드화수소 분해과정의 온도에 따른 반응상수 영향
표 요드화 수소반응을 위한 plug flow reactor
표 온도에 따른 plug flow reactor 내의 요오드화 수소 농도분포
표 온도에 따른 plug flow reactor내의 수소농도 분포
표 온도변화에 따른 요드화수소의 변환정도비교
표 유동-구조 해석방식의 비교
표 유동격자와 구조격자의 연결
표 90도 곡관경계면에서의 압력분포와 구조해석 결과의 변위량
표 일방향 해석과 양방향 해석에 따른 최대 최소 응력값 비교
표 복합열전달을 여부에 따른 고체내부의 열응력해석결과
표 복합열전달 고려여부에 따른 경계에서의 온도 및 압력의 최대 및 최소 값 비교
표 복합열전달 고려여부에 따른 구조물의 응력 분포비교
표 경계값의 추출방법에 따른 구조해석결과의 응력값 비교
표 배관내 길이방향으로의 표면균열의 치수
표 손상부 유동-구조해석을 위한 격자
표 국부손상부에서의 유동특성
표 유체고체 경계에서 국부 손상부 온도 및 압력분포
표 국부손상부에서의 온도분포
표 배관 손상부에서의 응력분포와 변형율 분포
표 부력항의 고려에 따른 Tee 입출구에서의 속도분포 비교(XH2O,in=10%)
표 부력항의 고려에 따른 Tee 입출구에서의 수소농도 비교(XH2O,in=10%)
표 부력항을 무시한 경우의 속도장와 수소혼합물의 농도장 (XH2O,in = 10%)
표 부력항이 고려된 경우의 속도장과 수소혼합물의 농도장 (XH2O,in =10%)
표 유입속도에 따른 Tee 입출구에서의 속도분포 비교 (XH2O,in=10%)
표 부력항을 무시한 경우의 속도장와 수소혼합물의 농도장 (XH2O,in = 10%, Vin=5 m/s)
표 부력항을 고려한 경우의 속도장와 수소혼합물의 농도장 (XH2O,in = 10%, Vin=5 m/s)
표 입구속도에 따른 수소질량유량의 비율
표 유체-고체 경계면에서의 수소농도
표 외부 벽면의 열적조건에 따른 수소내부 열유동장 분포
표 벽면 경계조건에 따른 곡관부 통과 이후의 관내 수소농도분포
표 곡관부 통과이후 단면에서의 유동형태
표 Analogy of variables between the heat transfer analysis within ABAQUS and the hydrogen diffusion analysis
표 Flowchart of hydrogen diffusion implemented to ABAQUS
표 Boundary layer specimen: (a) schematic illustration and (b) FE mesh
표 Values of variables used in hydrogen diffusion analysis
표 Present FE results of the boundary layer specimen with low strength steel properties: (a) constant and (b) zero flux hydrogen concentration boundary conditions
표 FE results of the trapping site concentrations and plastic straining at the end of loading
표 FE results of hydrogen induced dilatation strain and mechanical dilatation strain at steady state
표 Present FE results of the boundary layer specimen with high strength steel properties: (a) constant and (b) zero flux hydrogen concentration boundary conditions
표 Comparison of reference and present results for hydrostatic stress distribution of the boundary layer specimen with high strength steel properties
표 FE mesh of four point bending specimen
표 Various loading conditions
표 Present FE results of the four point bending specimen with low strength steel properties: (a) constant and (b) zero flux hydrogen concentration boundary conditions
표 Present FE results of the four point bending specimen at the trapping sites
표 Comparision between coupled and de-coupled analysis of the boundary layer specimen with low strength steel properties: (a) constant and (b) zero flux hydrogen concentration boundary conditions
표 Present FE results of the boundary layer specimen with ignore plastic strain term (a) constant and (b) zero flux hydrogen concentration boundary conditions
표 The effect of hydrostatic stress on hydrogen transport simulation for the boundary layer specimen with (a) low strength and (b) high strength steel properties
표 Schematic illustration of phenomenological damage concept
표 FE meshes for tensile specimens
표 Fracture strain determination
표 Schematic illustrations of (a) standard round bar and (b) notched bar tensile specimens (nuits: mm)
표 Chemical compositions and mechanical tensile properties at room temperature of the API X65 steel, used in the present work
표 (a) Engineering stress-strain curves from smooth and notched round bar tests, and (b) true stress-strain data
표 Schematic illustrations of (a) SENB and (b) SENT specimens (unit : mm)
표 (a) Experimental load-CMOD curves for SENB speciments, and (b) experimental load-displacement curves for SENT specimens
표 FE meshes for notched tensile bars: (a) notch=1.5R and (b) notch=3R. (a→R)
표 Comparison of experimental engineering stress-strain data for (a) smooth and (b) notched (radius=3mm) tensile bars with FE results
표 (a) Stress triaxiality distributions and (b) equivalent strain distributions for smooth and notched tensile bars at the failure initiation point, determined from the FE analyses
$(a) Variations of the stress triaxiality with the equivalent strain for smooth and notched bar tensile tests, and (b) fracture strain as a function of the stress triaxiality$ 표 (a) Variations of the stress triaxiality with the equivalent strain for smooth and notched bar tensile tests, and (b) fracture strain as a function of the stress triaxiality
표 FE meshes for the SENB specimen with a/w=0.46: (a) 2-D mesh and (b) 3-D mesh
표 Schematic illustrations of (a) standard round bar and (b) notched bar tensile specimens (nuits: mm)
표 Chemical compositions and mechanical tensile properties at room temperature of the Inconel 617, used in the present work
표 (a) Engineering stress-strain curves from smooth and notched round bar tests, and (b) true stress-strain data
표 Schematic illustrations of C(T) specimens (unit : mm)
표 (a) Experimental load-CMOD curves for SENB speciments, and (b) experimental load-displacement curves for SENT specimens
표 Schematic illustrations of small punch test
표 Experimental load-load line displacement curves for small punch test
표 FE meshes for notched tensile bars: (a) notch=5mm and (b) notch=10mm
표 Comparison of experimental engineering stress-strain data for (a) smooth and (b) notched (radius=10mm) tensile bars with FE results
$(a) Variations of the stress triaxiality with the equivalent strain for smooth and notched bar tensile tests, and (b) fracture strain as a function of the stress triaxiality$ 표 (a) Variations of the stress triaxiality with the equivalent strain for smooth and notched bar tensile tests, and (b) fracture strain as a function of the stress triaxiality
표 FE meshes for the C(T) specimen
표 Comparison of C(T) test results of load-load line displacement curve with simulated one
표 FE meshes for the small punch simulation
표 Comparison of small punch test results of load-load line displacement curve with simulated one
표 Damage simulation
표 Hydrogen diffusion damage simulation
표 Chemical composion of FeE 690T (%)
표 Stress-strain curve for FeE 690T material
표 Schematic illustrations of C(T) specimen
표 Experimental results under various loading condition
표 Diffusion properties of FeE 690T
표 FE mesh of C(T) specimen
표 Comparison of FE results using various mesh size with test results
표 Hydrogen diffusion type (a) 1 dimensional, (b) 2 dimensional
표 Comparison of FE results under various condition with test results
표 2 step of parameter determination
표 Flow chart of Inverse method
표 Comparison of FE results with experimental results
표 Effect of hardening parameter (a)N, (b)k
표 Final result of inverse method
표 Comparison of material properties based on smooth tensile test and small punch test
표 Comparison of FE results with experimental results
표 The procedure of existing damage simulation technique
표 The procedure of advanced damage simulation technique
표 Material property and chemical composition for API X65
표 True stress-true strain curve for API X65
표 Failure criterion for API X65
표 Schematic illustrations of (a) SE(B) and (b) SE(T) specimens (units: mm)
표 FE mesh for (a)L=0.15mm and (b)L=0.5mm
표 True stress-true strain curve for API X70
표 Failure criterion for API X70
표 Schematic illustrations of SE(T)
표 FE mesh for (a)L=0.15mm and (b)L=0.5mm
표 Comparison of cracked bar test results with simulated ones
표 Tensile test data for Alloy 617
표 Failure criterion for Alloy 617
표 Schematic illustrations of C(T)
표 FE mesh for (a)L=0.15mm and (b)L=0.5mm
표 Comparison of C(T) test results with simulated ones
$Assumed stress-modified fracture strain models$ 표 Assumed stress-modified fracture strain models
표 Chemical compositions and mechanical tensile properties at 288℃ of the SA333 Gr. 6 Carbon steel, used in the present work
표 Schematic of (a) a smooth tensile bar and (b) engineering and true stress-strain curves
표 (a) Schematic of the C(T) specimen and (b) experimental load-load line displacement curve for the C(T) specimen
표 (a) Experimental LLD-average crack growth curve and (b) J -resistance curve
표 (a) FE mesh for the smooth tensile bar and (b) Comparison of experimental smooth bar tensile test with simulated FE result
$(a) Variations of the stress triaxiality with equivalent strain in tensile test and (b) assumed stress-modified fracture strain models$ 표 (a) Variations of the stress triaxiality with equivalent strain in tensile test and (b) assumed stress-modified fracture strain models
표 FE meshes for the C(T) specimen
표 Comparison of load-LLD curve with experimental C(T) test results using the element size of 0.3mm
표 Comparison of load-LLD curve with experimental C(T) test results: (a) using the element size of 0.5mm and (b) using the element size of 0.8mm
표 Comparison of LLD-crack growth curve with experimental C(T) test results: (a) using the element size of 0.5mm and (b) using the element size of 0.8mm
표 Comparison of J-resistance curve of the element size of 0.5mm with experimental C(T) test results: (a) using the criterion 1 and (b) using the criterion 2
표 Comparison of J -resistance curve of the element size of 0.8mm with experimental C(T) test results: (a) using the criterion 1 and (b) using the criterion 2
표 Chemical compositions and mechanical tensile properties at at 288℃ of the A106 Gr. B Carbon steel, used in the present work
표 Schematic of (a) smooth tensile bar and (b) engineering and true stress-strain curves
표 (a) Schematic of the C(T) specimen and (b) experimental load-load line displacement curve for the C(T) specimen
표 (a) Experimental LLD-average crack growth curve and (b) J -resistance curve
표 (a) FE mesh for the smooth tensile bar and (b) Comparison of experimental smooth bar tensile test with simulated FE result
$(a) Variations of the stress triaxiality with equivalent strain in the tensile test and (b) assumed stress-modified fracture strain models$ 표 (a) Variations of the stress triaxiality with equivalent strain in the tensile test and (b) assumed stress-modified fracture strain models
표 FE meshes for the C(T) specimen
표 Comparison of load-LLD curves with experimental C(T) test results using the element size of 0.25mm
표 Comparison of load-LLD curves with experimental C(T) test results: (a) using the element size of 0.5mm and (b) using the element size of 0.8mm
표 Comparison of LLD-crack growth curve with experimental C(T) test results: (a) using the element size of 0.5mm and (b) using the element size of 0.8mm
표 Comparison of J -resistance curves with experimental C(T) test results: (a) using the element size of 0.5mm and (b) using the element size of 0.8mm
표 Schematic illustrations of small punch test
표 Experimental load-load line displacement curves for small punch test
표 Experimental load-load line displacement curves for small punch test (a) Room temperature; (b) 80°C temperature
표 Flow chart of Inverse method
표 2 step of parameter determination
표 Comparison of FE results with experimental results
표 Effect of hardening parameter (a)N, (b)k
표 Final result of inverse method
표 Comparison of material properties based on smooth tensile test and small punch test
표 Comparison of experimental engineering load-displacement data for small punch with FE results(without damage)
표 hydrogen embrittlement material properties based on small punch test
표 2 step of parameter determination
표 Effect of hardening parameter (a)N, (b)k
표 Final result of inverse method
표 material properties based on sand small punch test
표 Comparison of experimental engineering load-displacement data for small punch with FE results(without damage) (a) room temperatur (b) 80°C
표 hydrogen embrittlement material properties based on small punch test (a) room temperature (b) 80°C
표 FE meshes for notched tensile bars: (a) notch=5mm and (b) notch=10mm
표 Comparison of experimental engineering stress-strain data for (a) smooth and (b) notched (radius=10mm) tensile bars with FE results
$(a) Variations of the stress triaxiality with the equivalent strain for smooth and notched bar tensile tests, and (b) fracture strain as a function of the stress triaxiality$ 표 (a) Variations of the stress triaxiality with the equivalent strain for smooth and notched bar tensile tests, and (b) fracture strain as a function of the stress triaxiality
표 Comparison of experimental engineering load-displacement data for small punch with FE results(with damage)
표 (a) FE mesh for the smooth tensile bar and (b) FE result of smooth bar tensile test at hydrogen condition
표 FE result of reduction in area at hydrogen charging time
$(a) Variations of the stress triaxiality with the equivalent strain for small punch test, and (b) fracture strain as a function of the stress triaxiality at air condition$ 표 (a) Variations of the stress triaxiality with the equivalent strain for small punch test, and (b) fracture strain as a function of the stress triaxiality at air condition
$fracture strain as a function of the stress triaxiality at hydrogen condition$ 표 fracture strain as a function of the stress triaxiality at hydrogen condition
표 damage criteria factor-hydrogen charging time cureve for Room temperature and 80°C condition
표 Comparison of experimental engineering load-displacement data for small punch with FE results(with damage) (a) room temperature (b) 80°C
표 FE result of smooth bar tensile test at hydrogen condition (a) room temperature (b) 80°C
$FE result of fracture strain at hydrogen charging time$ 표 FE result of fracture strain at hydrogen charging time
표 Schematic illustrations of C(T)
표 FE mesh for C(T) test
표 Comparison of J-resistance curves with experimental C(T) test results
표 Schematic illustrations of (a) gouge (b) Axial surface crack

과제명(ProjectTitle) :	-
연구책임자(Manager) :	-
과제기간(DetailSeriesProject) :	-
총연구비 (DetailSeriesProject) :	-
키워드(keyword) :	-
과제수행기간(LeadAgency) :	-
연구목표(Goal) :	-
연구내용(Abstract) :	-
기대효과(Effect) :	-

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 제목(한글), 저자명(한글), 발행일자, 전자원문, 초록(한글), 초록(영문) 관리번호, 제목(한글), 제목(영문), 저자명(한글), 저자명(영문), 주관연구기관(한글), 주관연구기관(영문), 발행일자, 총페이지수, 주관부처명, 과제시작일, 보고서번호, 과제종료일, 주제분류, 키워드(한글), 전자원문, 키워드(영문), 입수제어번호, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 목차
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

원자력 수소 플랜트 등의 응용을 위한 수소환경 재료거동 예측 핵심기술 개발
Development of Mechanical Behavior Prediction Technology under Hydrogen Environment for Application to Nuclear Hydrogen Plant etc 원문보기

초록 ▼

Abstract ▼

목차 Contents

표/그림 (233)

표/그림 (233)

연구자의 다른 보고서 :

참고문헌 (25)

연구과제 타임라인

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

이 보고서와 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

원자력 수소 플랜트 등의 응용을 위한 수소환경 재료거동 예측 핵심기술 개발 Development of Mechanical Behavior Prediction Technology under Hydrogen Environment for Application to Nuclear Hydrogen Plant etc 원문보기

초록 ▼

Abstract ▼

목차 Contents

표/그림 (233) 모든 표/그림 보기

표/그림 (233) 슬라이드로 보기

연구자의 다른 보고서 :

윤기봉 (40) 마영화 (5) 이관주 (4) 원두일 (5) 우승균 (4) 이호준 (4) 박지혜 (3) 이주영 (2)

참고문헌 (25)

연구과제 타임라인

전체(0) 논문(0) 특허(0) 보고서(0)

전체(0) 논문(0) 특허(0) 보고서(0)

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

이 보고서와 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

원자력 수소 플랜트 등의 응용을 위한 수소환경 재료거동 예측 핵심기술 개발
Development of Mechanical Behavior Prediction Technology under Hydrogen Environment for Application to Nuclear Hydrogen Plant etc 원문보기

표/그림 (233)

표/그림 (233)