[보고서]한반도 화산활동의 유발원인에 대한 암석화학적 연구

최성희

보고서 정보

주관연구기관

충남대학교
Chungnam National University

연구책임자

최성희

보고서유형

최종보고서

발행국가

대한민국

언어

한국어

발행년월

2021-03

과제시작연도

2020

주관부처

기상청
Korea Meteorological Administration(KMA)

연구관리전문기관

한국기상산업기술원
The Korea Meterological Institute

등록번호

TRKO202200010076

과제고유번호

1365003150

사업명

기상·지진See-At기술개발연구(R&D)

DB 구축일자

2022-10-06

키워드

백두산.제주도.울릉도.화산암.Li-Mg-Hf-Sr-Nd- Pb 동위원소.Mt. Baekdu.Jeju Islad.Ulleung Island.Volcanic Rock.Li-Mg-Hf-Sr-Nd- Pb isotope.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.23000/TRKO202200010076

표 Sample locations. KIMY = Kimyeong, ESG = Eoseungsaeng, LAH = Lake Hills, ILK = Ilgwa
표 Na2O+K2Ovs.SiO2 (total alkali versus silica, TAS) diagram after Le Bas et al. (1986) showing well and outcrop samples by geographic location. The line dividing the alkaline and sub-alkaline (or tholeiite) series is from Irvine and Baragar (1971)
표 Al2O3 vs. SiO2 plot of the three Jeju volcanic rocks compared with published data of Hawaii basalts, and EM1- and EM2-type OIB. The empirical line between the high-Al alkali (HAA) and low-Al alkali (LAA) suites is from Baek et al. (2014). Typical EM1 OIB data are from the Pitcairn–Gambier island chain and Walvis Ridge, and EM2-type OIB from the Samoa and Society islands. All comparative data are sourced from GEOROC (http://georoc.mpch-mainz.gwdg.de/georoc)
표 Rare-earth-element patterns normalized to chondrite values (Sun and McDonough, 1989) for basaltic (SiO2 < 52 wt%) samples from Jeju Island. Typical OIB compositions (Sun and McDonough, 1989) are also shown for comparison
표 Trace-element distributions normalized to primitive-mantle values (Sun and McDonough, 1989) for (a) basaltic (SiO2 < 52 wt%) samples from Jeju Island. Data sources: typical OIB (Sun and McDonough, 1989), HIMU-type OIB (St. Helena; Kawabata et al., 2011), the average of global subducting sediment II (GLOSS II; Plank, 2013), and the average upper continental crust (Rudnick and Gao, 2003)
표 SiO2 (wt.%) vs. (a)87Sr/86Sr and (b) 143Nd/144Nd isotopic ratios for Jeju volcanic rocks. Symbols and data sources as in Fig. 3. The errors (2σ) are within the size of the symbols
표 (a) Ce/Pb vs. Ce (ppm), (b) Nb/U vs. Nb (ppm) of Jeju basaltic rocks (SiO2<52wt%). The shaded field represents the range of oceanic basalts (Ce/Pb = 25 ± 5; Nb/U = 47 ± 10; Hofmann et al., 1986). The average value of continental crust (Rudnick and Gao, 2003) is also included for comparison. Symbols and data sources as in Fig. 3
표 Plot of (Sr/Sr*)N vs. (Eu/Eu*)N values for Jeju basaltic rocks (SiO2 < 52 wt%). Sr*N = (PrN + NdN)/2, and Eu*N = (SmN + GdN)/2. Normalization values are from Sun and McDonough (1989). Symbols and data sources as in Fig. 3
표 143Nd/144Nd vs. 7Sr/86Sr isotope compositions for Jeju volcanic rocks. Literature data for volcanic rocks (small symbols) and spinel peridotite xenoliths from Jeju Island are also shown for comparison. Data sources: Jeju volcanic rocks (Baek et al., 2014; Brenna et al., 2010, 2012a, b; Tatsumi et al., 2005), Jeju spinel peridotite xenoliths (Choi et al., 2005), mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB; Chauvel and Blichert-Toft, 2001; Ito et al., 1987; Kempton et al., 2002; Mahoney et al., 1989, 1992), and EM1-type OIB from Pitcairn Islands and EM2-type OIB from Samoan Islands (GEOROC: http://georoc.mpch-mainz.gwdg.de/georoc). The errors (2σ) are within the size of the symbols. Abbreviations: HAA = high-Al alkali; LAA = low-Al alkali; TH = tholeiite; EM1 and EM2 = enriched mantle type-1 and -2, respectively (Zindler and Hart, 1986); BSE = bulk silicate Earth
표 (a) 207Pb/204Pbvs.206Pb/204Pb and (b)208Pb/204Pb vs.206Pb/204Pb isotopic ratios for volcanic rocks from Jeju Island. NHRL is the Northern Hemisphere reference line of Hart (1984). Data sources: Jeju volcanic rocks (Baek et al., 2014; Brenna et al., 2010, 2012a, b; Tatsumi et al., 2005), Jeju spinel peridotite xenoliths (Choi et al., 2005), and MORB basalts (Chauvel and Blichert-Toft, 2001; Debaille et al. 2006; Ito et al., 1987; Kempton et al., 2002; Mahoney et al., 1989, 1992; Salters and White, 1998). Symbols as in Fig. 3. The errors (2σ) are within the size of the symbols. Mantle end-member compositions are from Zindler and Hart (1986). EM1 and EM2 = enriched-mantle type-1 and -2, respectively
표 (a) Dy/Yb vs. Yb (ppm), (b) Zr/Hf vs. La/Yb for Jeju basaltic rocks (SiO2 < 52wt%). Also shown are the melt curves for modal batch melting of eclogites and non-modal batch melting of spinel lherzolite, garnet lherzolite, and spinel–garnet lherzolite in (a) and (b). The partition coefficients used for modeling are from Green (1994), McKenzie and O’Nions (1991), and Pertermann et al. (2004). The average of “enriched” depleted MORB mantle (E-DMM; Workman and Hart, 2005), and N-MORB (Sun and McDonough, 1989) compositions are used for the lherzolite and eclogite modeling, respectively. The phase proportions (by weight) in solid modes are Ol55Opx25Cpx18Sp2 for spinel lherzolite, Ol55Opx20Cpx15Grt10 and Ol55Opx25Cpx10Grt10 for garnet lherzolite, and Ol50Opx25Cpx19Sp3Gnt3 for spinel–garnet lherzolite. The phase proportions (by weight) in melt modes are Ol10Opx20Cpx68Sp2 for spinel lherzolite, Ol5Opx5Cpx45Gnt45 for garnet lherzolite, and Ol7Opx10Cpx50Sp8Gnt25 for spinel–garnet lherzolite. Phase proportions (by weight) for eclogite are noted in the figures. Abbreviations: Ol = olivine; Opx = orthopyroxene; Cpx = clinopyroxene; Sp = spinel; Grt = garnet. Symbols as in Fig. 3
$(a) Magnesium isotope plot for Jeju volcanic rocks. The solid line represents the terrestrial equilibrium mass fractionation line with a slope of 0.521 (Young and Galy, 2004). (b) δ26Mg vs. MgO (wt%) plot for Jeju samples. The grey bar represents the widely accepted δ26Mg value of the normal mantle(−0.25‰ ± 0.04‰; Teng, 2017). Symbols as in Fig. 6. Error bars represent 2σ uncertainties$ 표 (a) Magnesium isotope plot for Jeju volcanic rocks. The solid line represents the terrestrial equilibrium mass fractionation line with a slope of 0.521 (Young and Galy, 2004). (b) δ26Mg vs. MgO (wt%) plot for Jeju samples. The grey bar represents the widely accepted δ26Mg value of the normal mantle(−0.25‰ ± 0.04‰; Teng, 2017). Symbols as in Fig. 6. Error bars represent 2σ uncertainties
표 (a) Simplified geological map showing the major tectonic units of the North China Craton (NCC) and the Central Asia Orogenic Belt (CAOB) and their surrounding areas. (b) Distribution of Cenozoic volcanic rocks in northeastern China and on the Korean Peninsula, after Choi et al. (2017) and Yarmolyuk et al. (2015). (c) Sketch map showing the distribution of late Cenozoic volcanic rocks in the Baekdusan volcanic field (modified from Liu et al., 2015) and sample locations
표 Average major element concentrations (wt%) of olivine phenocrysts from Baekdusan basaltic rocks
표 Magnesium isotopic compositions for Baekdusan basaltic rocks and various standard materials
표 Classification of Baekdusan samples in terms of SiO2 vs. total alkali (Le Maitre et al., 1989). The boundary line dividing alkaline and sub-alkaline series is from Irvine and Baragar (1971). The gray shaded area represents published data for Baekdusan basaltic rocks (Chen et al., 2007; Fan et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2014; Kuritani et al., 2009; Li et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2018; Yun and Koh, 2014; Zhang et al., 2015)
$Fo values vs. (a) the Ca (ppm) and (b) the Ni (ppm) contents of olivine phenocrysts (Fo > 65) in the Baekdusan basaltic rocks. Also shown are olivines from the Hawaiian Koolau basalts (Sobolev et al., 2007) and calculated olivines from partial melts of a fertile peridotite and a stage 2 pyroxenite, after Herzberg (2011). Expected vectors relating to various petrological parameters are from Gavrilenko et al. (2016). Red and blue arrows in (b) are calculated olivine fractionation lines using PRIMELT3 software (Herzberg and Asimow, 2015). See the text for details. Abbreviations: Ol = Olivine, Px = Pyroxene$ 표 Fo values vs. (a) the Ca (ppm) and (b) the Ni (ppm) contents of olivine phenocrysts (Fo > 65) in the Baekdusan basaltic rocks. Also shown are olivines from the Hawaiian Koolau basalts (Sobolev et al., 2007) and calculated olivines from partial melts of a fertile peridotite and a stage 2 pyroxenite, after Herzberg (2011). Expected vectors relating to various petrological parameters are from Gavrilenko et al. (2016). Red and blue arrows in (b) are calculated olivine fractionation lines using PRIMELT3 software (Herzberg and Asimow, 2015). See the text for details. Abbreviations: Ol = Olivine, Px = Pyroxene
표 (a, b) Rare earth element patterns normalized to chondrite values (Sun and McDonough, 1989) and (c, d) extended trace element abundances normalized to the composition of primitive mantle (Sun and McDonough, 1989). Data for a typical oceanic island basalt (OIB; Sun and McDonough, 1989) and Chinese potassic volcanic rocks from Wudalianchi–Erkenshan–Keluo (Wang et al., 2017 and references therein) are also shown for comparison. Solid symbols in (c) represent our most magnesian samples (BD BD-04, BDAC03, and SH-17-05; Mg# = 68.7–71.7; Table 4)
표 (a) 143Nd/144Nd vs. 87Sr/86Sr ratios for the Baekdusan basaltic rocks. Small symbols are data from the literature on the Baekdusan basalts (Kuritani et al., 2009; Guo et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2018). Mantle endmember compositions are from Zindler and Hart (1986); EM1 and EM2 = enriched mantle types 1 and 2, respectively. (b, c) 176Hf/177Hf vs. 143Nd/144Nd ratios for tthe Baekdusan basaltic rocks. The bulk silicate Earth (BSE) 176Hf/177Hf value and the terrestrial array are from Bouvier et al. (2008) and Vervoort et al. (2011), respectively. The zircon-free sediment array (εHf = 0.91εNd + 3.10) and the zircon-bearing sediment array (εHf = 1.80εNd + 2.35) in (c) are from Bayon et al. (2009). The thick orange line represents the calculated binary mixing curve between a depleted MORB mantle (DMM) and a terrigenous sediment that was assumed to be a mixture of 20% zircon-free sediment and 80% zircon-bearing sediment. For the modeling, the Hf and Nd concentrations in DMM were taken from Workman and Hart (2005). The terrigenous sediment compositions were assumed to be: Hf = 4 ppm, Nd = 40 ppm, 176Hf/177Hf=0.282487,and143Nd/144Nd = 0.511869 for zircon-free sediment and Hf = 35 ppm, Nd = 27 ppm, 176Hf/177Hf = 0.282088, and 143Nd/144Nd = 0.511869 for zircon-bearing sediment. Data sources: mid-ocean-ridge basalts (MORB) and oceanic island basalts (OIB) (Choi et al., 2014 and references therein), EM1-type oceanic island basalts from the Pitcairn Islands and EM2-type oceanic island basalts from the Samoan Islands (GEOROC: http://georoc.mpch-mainz.gwdg.de/georoc), spinel peridotite xenoliths in the Baekdusan volcanic rocks (Park et al., 2017), Chinese (ultra)potassic volcanic rocks (Wang et al., 2017 and references therein), and pelagic clays (Bayon et al., 2009; Vervoort et al., 2011 and references therein). Errors (2σ) are within the size of the symbols
표 206Pb/204Pb vs. (a) 207Pb/204Pb and (b) 208Pb/204Pb isotopic ratios for the Baekdusan basaltic rocks. NHRL is the Northern Hemisphere Reference Line of Hart (1984). Mantle end member compositions are from Zindler and Hart (1986): DMM = depleted MORB mantle; EM1 and EM2 = enriched mantle types 1 and 2, respectively. Symbols and data sources are as for Fig. 17
표 Gd/Yb ratios vs. Yb (ppm) for the Baekdusan basaltic rocks. Also shown are the melt curves for modal batch melting of eclogite and non-modal batch melting of spinel peridotite, spinel–garnet peridotite, and garnet peridotite using the partition coefficients from Table S6. Depleted MORB mantle (DMM; Workman and Hart, 2005) and natural eclogite compositions (John et al., 2004) were used for the calculations. Phase proportions (by weight) in the source mode were Ol55Opx25Cpx18Sp2 for spinel peridotite, Ol50Opx5Cpx19Sp3Grt3 for spinel–garnet peridotite, and Ol55Opx25Cpx10Grt10 for garnet peridotite. Phase proportions (by weight) in the melt mode were Ol10Opx20Cpx68Sp2 for spinel peridotite, Ol7Opx10Cpx50Sp8Gr25 for for spinel–garnet peridotite
$(a) Magnesium isotope plot for the Baekdusan basaltic rocks. The solid line represents the terrestrial equilibrium mass fractionation line with a slope of 0.521 (Young and Galy, 2004). (b) δ26Mg vs. MgO (wt%) plot for the Baekdusan samples. Symbols are as for Fig. 17. Small symbols represent literature data for the Baekdusan basalts (Li et al., 2017). The gray bar in (b) represents the widely accepted value of δ26Mg for normal mantle (δ26Mg = −0.25 ± 0.04‰; Teng, 2017). Error bars represent 2σ uncertainties$ 표 (a) Magnesium isotope plot for the Baekdusan basaltic rocks. The solid line represents the terrestrial equilibrium mass fractionation line with a slope of 0.521 (Young and Galy, 2004). (b) δ26Mg vs. MgO (wt%) plot for the Baekdusan samples. Symbols are as for Fig. 17. Small symbols represent literature data for the Baekdusan basalts (Li et al., 2017). The gray bar in (b) represents the widely accepted value of δ26Mg for normal mantle (δ26Mg = −0.25 ± 0.04‰; Teng, 2017). Error bars represent 2σ uncertainties
표 Variations of δ26Mg value vs. (a) 87Sr/86Sr, (b) 143Nd/144Nd, and (c) (Nb/La)N ratios for the Baekdusan basaltic rocks. (Nb/La)N = NbN/LaN, where N denotes normalization to primitive mantle (Sun and McDonough, 1989). Symbols are as for Fig. 17. Error bars represent 2σ uncertainties
표 A schematic illustrating the melting process in the upper mantle beneath Baekdusan
표 Classification of Ulleung volcanic rocks using total alkali vs. SiO2 (Le Maitre et al., 1989). The boundary line dividing the alkaline and subalkaline series is from Irvine and Baragar (1971). Results of the present study are depicted by large symbols. Published data (Brenna et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2018; Choi et al., 2006; Nakamura et al., 1990; Song et al., 1999) for Ulleung volcanic rocks (small symbols) are shown for comparison
표 Photomicrographs of Ulleung volcanic rocks under plane polarized light. Abbreviations: CPX = clinopyroxene; Ti-Mt = titanomagnetite; BT = biotite; SA = sanidine; KAE = kaersutite
표 Major oxide variations for Ulleung volcanic rocks. Small symbols are literature data (Brenna et al., 2014; Choi et al., 2006; Nakamura et al., 1990; Song et al., 1999)
표 Trace-element variations for Ulleung volcanic rocks. Small symbols represent published data (Brenna et al., 2014; Choi et al., 2006; Nakamura et al., 1990; Song et al., 1999)
표 Chondrite-normalized (Sun and McDonough, 1989) rare earth element patterns for Ulleung volcanic rocks. Data for typical oceanic island basalt (OIB; Sun and McDonough, 1989) are also shown for comparison
표 Primitive-mantle-normalized (Sun and McDonough, 1989) extended trace-element abundances for Ulleung volcanic rocks. Data for typical oceanic island basalt (OIB; Sun and McDonough, 1989) and average lower continental crust (Rudnick and Gao, 2014) are also shown for comparison
표 Primary basalt composition estimated by PRIMACAL2
표 Comparison of the estimated primary UD1817-1 melt compositions with those predicted by the OBS1 model. Primary melt compositions were estimated using PRIMACAL2. Values are normalized to primitive-mantle compositions (McDonough and Sun, 1995). See text for details
표 87Sr/86Sr vs. 143Nd/144Nd ratios for Ulleung volcanic rocks. Symbols as in Fig. 26. Small symbols represent literature data (Brenna et al., 2014; Choi et al., 2006). Data sources: EM1-type oceanic island basalt (OIB) from Pitcairn Island and EM2-type OIB from the Samoan Islands (GEOROC: http://georoc.mpchmainz.gwdg.de/georoc). BSE = bulk silicate Earth; EM 1 and 2 = enriched mantle type 1 and 2, respectively.1 and 2, respectively
표 Plot of 207Pb/204Pb vs. 206Pb/204Pb (a) and 208Pb/204Pb vs. 206Pb/204Pb (b) ratios for Ulleung volcanic rocks. NHRL is the Northern Hemisphere reference line (Hart, 1984). Symbols are as in Fig. 26. Data sources: mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) from Choi et al. (2020) and references therein, EM1-type oceanic island basalt (OIB) from Pitcairn Island and EM2-type OIB from the Samoan Islands from GEOROC (http://georoc.mpchmainz.gwdg.de/georoc), and Archean mafic granulites from Huang et al. (1995). EM 1 and 2 = enriched mantle type 1 and 2, respectively
표 (a) Plot of Gd/Yb vs. Yb content for Ulleung basalts. Also shown are the melt curves for modal batch melting of eclogites and non-modal batch melting of spinel peridotite and garnet peridotites using the partition coefficients from Table S4. Depleted MORB mantle (DMM; Workman and Hart, 2005) and natural eclogite compositions (John et al., 2004) were used for the calculations. Phase proportions (by weight) in the source mode were Ol55Opx25Cpx18Sp2 for spinel peridotite, and Ol55Opx25Cpx10Gnt10 for garnet peridotite. Phase proportions (by weight) in the melt mode were Ol10Opx20Cpx68Sp2 for spinel peridotite, and Ol5Opx5Cpx45Gnt45 for garnet peridotite. (b) FeOT/CaO−3MgO/SiO2 (FC3MS) vs. Fe/Mn values for Ulleung basalts. Also shown are fields for experimental peridotite- and pyroxenite-derived melt compositions (Yang and Zhou, 2013; Yang et al., 2016, and references therein). Literature data for Ulleung basalts are from Brenna et al. (2014). Symbols are as in Fig. 26. Abbreviations: Sp = spinel, Cpx = clinopyroxene, Gnt = garnet
$Plot of 87Sr/86Sr vs. Sr content for Ulleung volcanic rocks. Symbols are as in Fig. 26. The modeled curves are constructed using the software package of “AFC” (Ersoy and Helvaci, 2010). The trachyandesite composition (UD1609) was used for the starting magma composition. For similicity, it is assumed that plagioclase was the only fractionated phase, and lower continental crust as the assimilated material. r is the ratio of assimilation and crystallization volumes. The cross marks on the dotted curves represent 10% intervals$ 표 Plot of 87Sr/86Sr vs. Sr content for Ulleung volcanic rocks. Symbols are as in Fig. 26. The modeled curves are constructed using the software package of “AFC” (Ersoy and Helvaci, 2010). The trachyandesite composition (UD1609) was used for the starting magma composition. For similicity, it is assumed that plagioclase was the only fractionated phase, and lower continental crust as the assimilated material. r is the ratio of assimilation and crystallization volumes. The cross marks on the dotted curves represent 10% intervals
표 Plot of δ7Li vs. Li content for Ulleung volcanic rocks. The gray field represents the upper-mantle range of δ7Li values (Jeffcoate et al., 2007; Tomascak et al., 2008). The average Li content and isotopic composition of the lower continental crust (LCC; Li = 8 ppm, δ7Li = +2.5‰; Teng et al., 2008) are plotted for comparison. Symbols are as in Fig. 26
표 Plots of δ7Li vs. SiO2 (a), MgO (b), 87Sr/86Sr (c), and143Nd/144Nd (d) for Ulleung volcanic rocks

과제명(ProjectTitle) :	-
연구책임자(Manager) :	-
과제기간(DetailSeriesProject) :	-
총연구비 (DetailSeriesProject) :	-
키워드(keyword) :	-
과제수행기간(LeadAgency) :	-
연구목표(Goal) :	-
연구내용(Abstract) :	-
기대효과(Effect) :	-

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 제목(한글), 저자명(한글), 발행일자, 전자원문, 초록(한글), 초록(영문) 관리번호, 제목(한글), 제목(영문), 저자명(한글), 저자명(영문), 주관연구기관(한글), 주관연구기관(영문), 발행일자, 총페이지수, 주관부처명, 과제시작일, 보고서번호, 과제종료일, 주제분류, 키워드(한글), 전자원문, 키워드(영문), 입수제어번호, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 목차
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

[국가R&D연구보고서] 한반도 화산활동의 유발원인에 대한 암석화학적 연구 원문보기

초록 ▼

목차 Contents

표/그림 (38)

표/그림 (38)

참고문헌 (25)

연구과제 타임라인

활용도 분석정보

활용도 Top5 보고서

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

이 보고서와 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

[국가R&D연구보고서] 한반도 화산활동의 유발원인에 대한 암석화학적 연구 원문보기

초록 ▼

목차 Contents

표/그림 (38) 모든 표/그림 보기

표/그림 (38) 슬라이드로 보기

참고문헌 (25)

연구과제 타임라인

전체(0) 논문(0) 특허(0) 보고서(0)

전체(0) 논문(0) 특허(0) 보고서(0)

활용도 분석정보

활용도 Top5 보고서 더보기

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

이 보고서와 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

표/그림 (38)

표/그림 (38)

활용도 Top5 보고서