Since "tense conception" was brought into Korean grammer at first time by French missionaries in 1981, theory of tense was developed step by step at the time being past as such tense research were caltivated by JU Si Kyung, Choi Hyun Bai, Lee Hi Seung, Jung In Seung, who were master-degree owners. W...
Since "tense conception" was brought into Korean grammer at first time by French missionaries in 1981, theory of tense was developed step by step at the time being past as such tense research were caltivated by JU Si Kyung, Choi Hyun Bai, Lee Hi Seung, Jung In Seung, who were master-degree owners. When outline of aspect" was brought in 1960, various theories were issued upon the '-tense-' in the many different views once again. But there are not reached to the situation of define theory up to this date. The main purpose of thesis is to describing the final decision of basic details for '-Neun-' '-Aut-' and '-Ket-' among tense appearance. 1) In regarding to '-Neun-', its sound is to meant of present tense as of this date, it were recognized by meaning of function of permanent truth with present progresive tense, present normality and repeat of present. It is my suggestion out of own study that the sound disclosed delicately the aspect of pretend, outlined, planning, uncompleted, maintenance and prograssing. Accordingly, '-Noun-' is not only used for past sentense, but for Non-past. Otherwise, it is my demanding that past and non-past should be divided into two different system depend upon the useing of '-Neun-' for the past, present and future of three different system which were well known as Korean language tense category. 2) '-Aut-' is applying for the past and present perfect tense, but it is my opinion it can be used for the past perfect aspect, past progressive aspect, present perfect aspect, present progressive aspect, future perfect aspect, future confirmational aspect, and etc. Accordingly, '-Aut-' shall be evidential effects to classify the tense. 3) '-Ket-' is a function of future tense but it can be applying for presume and intentional moods. In the event of it used for intentional mood, sentense are equal to subject and speaker. When subject is second person for questionable sentense, it shall be applied by two different way of intentional and presumed mood. When subject is third person or inconstant object, '-Ket-' might be used for presume mood. When subject is first person applied by past tense and when subject is first person and second person as applying of present tense, it shall be used by presume mood excluding subjunctive mood. 4) When '-Ket-' is applied for presumed mood, it shall be used for possitive presume with sensitiveness of subjects mainly. '-1 kusida' shall be applied for objective and intellectual presume. It is all for my opinion upon the '-Neun-; '-Aut-', '-Ket-' as described on hereabove. Tense of Korean is category of sentense. It is not only depend; upon tense suffix but it shall be effected by timely meaning potentially by upper sentence and time adverb. '-Neun-' '-Aut-' and '-Ket-' must be recognized as complex appearance which showed the various kind of aspects and moods as well as the tense.
Since "tense conception" was brought into Korean grammer at first time by French missionaries in 1981, theory of tense was developed step by step at the time being past as such tense research were caltivated by JU Si Kyung, Choi Hyun Bai, Lee Hi Seung, Jung In Seung, who were master-degree owners. When outline of aspect" was brought in 1960, various theories were issued upon the '-tense-' in the many different views once again. But there are not reached to the situation of define theory up to this date. The main purpose of thesis is to describing the final decision of basic details for '-Neun-' '-Aut-' and '-Ket-' among tense appearance. 1) In regarding to '-Neun-', its sound is to meant of present tense as of this date, it were recognized by meaning of function of permanent truth with present progresive tense, present normality and repeat of present. It is my suggestion out of own study that the sound disclosed delicately the aspect of pretend, outlined, planning, uncompleted, maintenance and prograssing. Accordingly, '-Noun-' is not only used for past sentense, but for Non-past. Otherwise, it is my demanding that past and non-past should be divided into two different system depend upon the useing of '-Neun-' for the past, present and future of three different system which were well known as Korean language tense category. 2) '-Aut-' is applying for the past and present perfect tense, but it is my opinion it can be used for the past perfect aspect, past progressive aspect, present perfect aspect, present progressive aspect, future perfect aspect, future confirmational aspect, and etc. Accordingly, '-Aut-' shall be evidential effects to classify the tense. 3) '-Ket-' is a function of future tense but it can be applying for presume and intentional moods. In the event of it used for intentional mood, sentense are equal to subject and speaker. When subject is second person for questionable sentense, it shall be applied by two different way of intentional and presumed mood. When subject is third person or inconstant object, '-Ket-' might be used for presume mood. When subject is first person applied by past tense and when subject is first person and second person as applying of present tense, it shall be used by presume mood excluding subjunctive mood. 4) When '-Ket-' is applied for presumed mood, it shall be used for possitive presume with sensitiveness of subjects mainly. '-1 kusida' shall be applied for objective and intellectual presume. It is all for my opinion upon the '-Neun-; '-Aut-', '-Ket-' as described on hereabove. Tense of Korean is category of sentense. It is not only depend; upon tense suffix but it shall be effected by timely meaning potentially by upper sentence and time adverb. '-Neun-' '-Aut-' and '-Ket-' must be recognized as complex appearance which showed the various kind of aspects and moods as well as the tense.
주제어
#현대국어 시제 시간
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.