Reader-Response Criticism does not desginate any one critical theory, but a focuses on the process of reading a literary text that is shared by many of the critical modes. Reader-Response critics turn from the traditional conception of a work as an achieved structure of meanings to the ongoing menta...
Reader-Response Criticism does not desginate any one critical theory, but a focuses on the process of reading a literary text that is shared by many of the critical modes. Reader-Response critics turn from the traditional conception of a work as an achieved structure of meanings to the ongoing mental responses of readers as their eyes follow a text on the page before them. By this shift of perspective a literary work is converted into an activity on the part of the reader. Reader-Response critics agree that, at least to some considerable degree, the meanings of a text are the "production" or "creation" of the individual reader. Wolfgang lser develops the phenomenological analysis of the reading process. In his view the literary text, as a product of the writer's intentional acts, in part controls the reader' responses, but always contains a number of "gap" or "interminate elements." These the reader must fill in by a creative participation in what is given in the text before bin The experience of reading is an evolving process of anticipation, frustration, retrospection, and reconstruction. Stanley Fish is the Proponent of what he calls affective stylistics. In his earlier writings, Fish represented the activity of reading as one which converts the spatial sequence of printed words on a page into a temporal flow of experience in an "informed" reader. In following the printed text with his eyes, "there is a point at which the reader has taken in only the first word, and then the second, and then the third, and so on." At each point at which the reader stops, he makes sense of what he has so far read by anticipating what is still to come. Fish's early claim was that he was describing a universal process of the competent reading of literary texts. In later publications, however, he introduced the concept of interpretive communities, each of which is composed of members who share a particular reading "strategy". Norman Holland accounts for the psychoanalytic responses of a reader to a text. The subject matter of a work of literature is a projection of the fantasies engendered by the interplay of unconscious needs and defenses that constitute the particular "identity" of its author. The individual reader's "subjective" response to a text is a "transactive" encounter between the fantasies projected by its author and the particular defenses, expectations, and wish-fulfilling fantasies that makeup the reader's own identity. In this transactive process the reader transforms the fantasy content into a unity which constitutes the reader's particular interpretation of the text.
Reader-Response Criticism does not desginate any one critical theory, but a focuses on the process of reading a literary text that is shared by many of the critical modes. Reader-Response critics turn from the traditional conception of a work as an achieved structure of meanings to the ongoing mental responses of readers as their eyes follow a text on the page before them. By this shift of perspective a literary work is converted into an activity on the part of the reader. Reader-Response critics agree that, at least to some considerable degree, the meanings of a text are the "production" or "creation" of the individual reader. Wolfgang lser develops the phenomenological analysis of the reading process. In his view the literary text, as a product of the writer's intentional acts, in part controls the reader' responses, but always contains a number of "gap" or "interminate elements." These the reader must fill in by a creative participation in what is given in the text before bin The experience of reading is an evolving process of anticipation, frustration, retrospection, and reconstruction. Stanley Fish is the Proponent of what he calls affective stylistics. In his earlier writings, Fish represented the activity of reading as one which converts the spatial sequence of printed words on a page into a temporal flow of experience in an "informed" reader. In following the printed text with his eyes, "there is a point at which the reader has taken in only the first word, and then the second, and then the third, and so on." At each point at which the reader stops, he makes sense of what he has so far read by anticipating what is still to come. Fish's early claim was that he was describing a universal process of the competent reading of literary texts. In later publications, however, he introduced the concept of interpretive communities, each of which is composed of members who share a particular reading "strategy". Norman Holland accounts for the psychoanalytic responses of a reader to a text. The subject matter of a work of literature is a projection of the fantasies engendered by the interplay of unconscious needs and defenses that constitute the particular "identity" of its author. The individual reader's "subjective" response to a text is a "transactive" encounter between the fantasies projected by its author and the particular defenses, expectations, and wish-fulfilling fantasies that makeup the reader's own identity. In this transactive process the reader transforms the fantasy content into a unity which constitutes the reader's particular interpretation of the text.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.