This study is the case study that applies the task-centered model to high risk youth. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate whether self-control and self-efficacy is increased by effort that reduce the risk and by apply the task-centered model to high risk youth and to suggest the basic data w...
This study is the case study that applies the task-centered model to high risk youth. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate whether self-control and self-efficacy is increased by effort that reduce the risk and by apply the task-centered model to high risk youth and to suggest the basic data which is qualitative research and study for reducing high risk youth. The object of this study are 3 female students, in 2 middle school, whom teacher of K middle school in Seoul requests. They had misbehavior such like violence, smoking, leaving home, despoilment in their school. The case study period of study is form April 14, 2003 to May 29, 2003. We assign 50 minute to each person for a session and it is total 10 sessions which are composed of session 1 with the pre-test and pre-research and session 9. Also, the pro-test is held on May 29. We used the Self-control rating scale(SCRS) which is re-composed by Song Won Young(1998) as self-report form with total 21 sections and Sentence completion test(SCT) which is used by Cho Hae Yeon(002) and which is for understanding the problem and the scale of self-efficacy of student as measurement tools. Analyzing method used the pre and pro-analyzing to know changed tendency of self-control and self-efficacy and case analyze to record and report the case which is applied task-centered method to misbehavior of youth. The results are summarized as below: (1) K's case K's concrete task are set up as ① I recite 5 English word a day ② I study 4 pages of English text book a day ③ I stop the smoking ④ I clench my fist and put my hand in my pocket when I want to bit my nail. K got the good result for task ① and ②. This result is relate with K's confidence and is important chance to change her attitude. In case of task ③, even though the result didn't show statistical meaning change, K's smoking is reduced a third after applying the task-centered method. Task ④ is well accomplished. According to result of task ④, we estimated that K had a recognition and effort to stop bit the nail about the problem which is recognized. K's efforts brought her to improved definite result about self-control and self-efficacy after applies the task-centered method to her. (2) J's case J's concrete task are set up as ① I will return to home until 10 o'clock at least ② I will study 5 pages of English text book a day ③ I will smoke a cigarette per a couple of day and will stop the smoking. In case of ① and ②, it wasn't well done. There are two reasons. First, the researcher didn't exactly estimate J's basic studying capacity. Second, K's stress situation is an obstacle to K's positive change for carry out the task-centered method. Task ③ is well carried out. According to pre and pro-test, there is no change about self-control and self-efficacy is reduced. We can estimate the reason that is experience of discouragement and loss of will to do task-centered method by circumstantial factor and is lack of recognition and insight about her problem in the first stage and she was difficult to reveal herself before making a relationship with researcher in pre-testing. (3) Y's case Y's concrete task are set up as ① I will return to home until 10 o'clock at least ② I will study 6 pages of mathematic text book a day ③ I will smoke a cigarette per a couple of day and will stop the smoking. Task ① wasn't carried out. For task ② case, even though statistical change is little, there is certainly positive in task check table and task ③ is well carried out. Even though Y's result is generally bad, the self-control and self-efficacy is improved on the other hand. This result show that the meaning of red change is different from meaning of statistical change. Actually, Y is conscious of positive change about the estimation of result of task-centered method and is very satisfied with the result of task-centered. In conclusion, the application of task-centered model for high risk youth is demonstrated to have a numerical and practical effect through analysing the result, even though the task-centered result of student didn't get a high value.
This study is the case study that applies the task-centered model to high risk youth. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate whether self-control and self-efficacy is increased by effort that reduce the risk and by apply the task-centered model to high risk youth and to suggest the basic data which is qualitative research and study for reducing high risk youth. The object of this study are 3 female students, in 2 middle school, whom teacher of K middle school in Seoul requests. They had misbehavior such like violence, smoking, leaving home, despoilment in their school. The case study period of study is form April 14, 2003 to May 29, 2003. We assign 50 minute to each person for a session and it is total 10 sessions which are composed of session 1 with the pre-test and pre-research and session 9. Also, the pro-test is held on May 29. We used the Self-control rating scale(SCRS) which is re-composed by Song Won Young(1998) as self-report form with total 21 sections and Sentence completion test(SCT) which is used by Cho Hae Yeon(002) and which is for understanding the problem and the scale of self-efficacy of student as measurement tools. Analyzing method used the pre and pro-analyzing to know changed tendency of self-control and self-efficacy and case analyze to record and report the case which is applied task-centered method to misbehavior of youth. The results are summarized as below: (1) K's case K's concrete task are set up as ① I recite 5 English word a day ② I study 4 pages of English text book a day ③ I stop the smoking ④ I clench my fist and put my hand in my pocket when I want to bit my nail. K got the good result for task ① and ②. This result is relate with K's confidence and is important chance to change her attitude. In case of task ③, even though the result didn't show statistical meaning change, K's smoking is reduced a third after applying the task-centered method. Task ④ is well accomplished. According to result of task ④, we estimated that K had a recognition and effort to stop bit the nail about the problem which is recognized. K's efforts brought her to improved definite result about self-control and self-efficacy after applies the task-centered method to her. (2) J's case J's concrete task are set up as ① I will return to home until 10 o'clock at least ② I will study 5 pages of English text book a day ③ I will smoke a cigarette per a couple of day and will stop the smoking. In case of ① and ②, it wasn't well done. There are two reasons. First, the researcher didn't exactly estimate J's basic studying capacity. Second, K's stress situation is an obstacle to K's positive change for carry out the task-centered method. Task ③ is well carried out. According to pre and pro-test, there is no change about self-control and self-efficacy is reduced. We can estimate the reason that is experience of discouragement and loss of will to do task-centered method by circumstantial factor and is lack of recognition and insight about her problem in the first stage and she was difficult to reveal herself before making a relationship with researcher in pre-testing. (3) Y's case Y's concrete task are set up as ① I will return to home until 10 o'clock at least ② I will study 6 pages of mathematic text book a day ③ I will smoke a cigarette per a couple of day and will stop the smoking. Task ① wasn't carried out. For task ② case, even though statistical change is little, there is certainly positive in task check table and task ③ is well carried out. Even though Y's result is generally bad, the self-control and self-efficacy is improved on the other hand. This result show that the meaning of red change is different from meaning of statistical change. Actually, Y is conscious of positive change about the estimation of result of task-centered method and is very satisfied with the result of task-centered. In conclusion, the application of task-centered model for high risk youth is demonstrated to have a numerical and practical effect through analysing the result, even though the task-centered result of student didn't get a high value.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.