In 1998, Korea and Japan made a conclusion of new fishery agreement between the two nations. Along the process of the negotiation, Japan approached with more aggressive and powerful strategy than what had been done previously and Korea seemed to be dragged by it. Korean Government was having difficu...
In 1998, Korea and Japan made a conclusion of new fishery agreement between the two nations. Along the process of the negotiation, Japan approached with more aggressive and powerful strategy than what had been done previously and Korea seemed to be dragged by it. Korean Government was having difficulties to deal with it rationally due to the economic crisis that Korea faced to, the complecated domestic political situation, and the public opinion which tended to deny on Governmental policies and also tended to be conservative, originated by the particularity of Korea-Japan relation. Japanese Government showed extreme attitudes such as abrogation of the fishery agreement having been helped by strong voices of domestic beneficiary parties and lobbying activities done by the politicians who had their bases on the parties. In November, 1998, the both nations in this difficult situation however, ended up making a conclusion of the new Korea-Japan fishery agreement that did not seem to be concluded. But, during the negotiation of actual affairs that took place even after the ratification of the both nations, within Korea, strong opposition forces to demand cancelation of the new Korea-Japan fishery agreement occurred due to the omission of pair trawl work and so on. Korean domestic interest group, the press, and nongovernmental parties urged renegotiation and Japan accepted it. It leads to a question why Japan accepted such an unreasonable demand of Korean Government, that also violates diplomatic norms. In another words, the purpose of this study is to clarify the factors that cause the occurrence of the renegotiation. In this study, analysis of the factors is divided into domestic and international factors in Korea. First, Korean Government failed in having a redefinition of issue. Due to the particularity of Korea-Japan relation and issues regarding Tok-do, it failed to persuade ratifiers as it converted the same issue into the another issue. Secondly, the interest group, as well as nongovernment party had threatened Government in order to have a better position on indemnification and political interest for themselves. Thirdly, the press and public opinion also showed lack of faith in governmental issue during the process of the negotiation resulted in understanding it as a territorial dispute regarding on issues around Tok-to and Korea-Japan relation, and gave pressure on Government. Lastly, the counterpart, Japanese Government interpreted the governmental circumstances in Korea mentioned above as a critical situation. Japanese Government acted under having a complexed thoughts of finding the side-payment through a renegotiation while having restrained Korean Government from involuntary defection. In conclusion, factors affected feasibility of renegotiation could be found when domestic condition that strongly denies governmental issues and the counter party to a negotiation who regards it as external threat coexist.
In 1998, Korea and Japan made a conclusion of new fishery agreement between the two nations. Along the process of the negotiation, Japan approached with more aggressive and powerful strategy than what had been done previously and Korea seemed to be dragged by it. Korean Government was having difficulties to deal with it rationally due to the economic crisis that Korea faced to, the complecated domestic political situation, and the public opinion which tended to deny on Governmental policies and also tended to be conservative, originated by the particularity of Korea-Japan relation. Japanese Government showed extreme attitudes such as abrogation of the fishery agreement having been helped by strong voices of domestic beneficiary parties and lobbying activities done by the politicians who had their bases on the parties. In November, 1998, the both nations in this difficult situation however, ended up making a conclusion of the new Korea-Japan fishery agreement that did not seem to be concluded. But, during the negotiation of actual affairs that took place even after the ratification of the both nations, within Korea, strong opposition forces to demand cancelation of the new Korea-Japan fishery agreement occurred due to the omission of pair trawl work and so on. Korean domestic interest group, the press, and nongovernmental parties urged renegotiation and Japan accepted it. It leads to a question why Japan accepted such an unreasonable demand of Korean Government, that also violates diplomatic norms. In another words, the purpose of this study is to clarify the factors that cause the occurrence of the renegotiation. In this study, analysis of the factors is divided into domestic and international factors in Korea. First, Korean Government failed in having a redefinition of issue. Due to the particularity of Korea-Japan relation and issues regarding Tok-do, it failed to persuade ratifiers as it converted the same issue into the another issue. Secondly, the interest group, as well as nongovernment party had threatened Government in order to have a better position on indemnification and political interest for themselves. Thirdly, the press and public opinion also showed lack of faith in governmental issue during the process of the negotiation resulted in understanding it as a territorial dispute regarding on issues around Tok-to and Korea-Japan relation, and gave pressure on Government. Lastly, the counterpart, Japanese Government interpreted the governmental circumstances in Korea mentioned above as a critical situation. Japanese Government acted under having a complexed thoughts of finding the side-payment through a renegotiation while having restrained Korean Government from involuntary defection. In conclusion, factors affected feasibility of renegotiation could be found when domestic condition that strongly denies governmental issues and the counter party to a negotiation who regards it as external threat coexist.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.