국 문 초 록 1. 취지 박정희와 등소평이 되살아나고 있다. 근래의 논의에서 학자들은 박정희의 경제정책에 관해 부정론을 제시하는가 하면, ‘선성장 후보완’이라는 긍정론을 제시하기도 하였다. 이에 본 논문은 박정희와 등소평의 리더십 스타일과 경제정책을 다음과 같이 비교 하였다. 첫째, 리더십의 개념, 내용, 학자들의 분류 둘째, 의사결정 및 박정희, 등소평의 리더십의 공통점과 차이점 셋째, 박정희 정권, 등소평 국가 정책의 목표 넷째, 박정희 등소평 정권의 리더십 차이점과 정책의 차이점 2. 연구의 내용 연구의 비교를 통해서 첫째, 경제정책의 차이점이 과연 지도자의 리더십 스타일에 따른 것인가의 문제제기와 둘째, 정부의 강력한 개입과 개입 스타일에 있어서 한국과 중국이 다른 형태를 보여주었음에 주목한다. 그것은 최고 지도자의 스타일과 경제정책의 운영에 차이가 있었기 때문이며 이러한 차이점이 두 지도자간의 리더십 차이점에서 비롯된 것인가 하는 문제에 대해서 살펴보았다. 3. 결론 첫째, 박정희와 등소평의 경제정책의 차이점은 두 지도자의 리더십 스타일에 기인한 것이 아니라 르윈의 주장처럼 그가 부딪히고 있는 복합적 상황적 요소 즉 ...
국 문 초 록 1. 취지 박정희와 등소평이 되살아나고 있다. 근래의 논의에서 학자들은 박정희의 경제정책에 관해 부정론을 제시하는가 하면, ‘선성장 후보완’이라는 긍정론을 제시하기도 하였다. 이에 본 논문은 박정희와 등소평의 리더십 스타일과 경제정책을 다음과 같이 비교 하였다. 첫째, 리더십의 개념, 내용, 학자들의 분류 둘째, 의사결정 및 박정희, 등소평의 리더십의 공통점과 차이점 셋째, 박정희 정권, 등소평 국가 정책의 목표 넷째, 박정희 등소평 정권의 리더십 차이점과 정책의 차이점 2. 연구의 내용 연구의 비교를 통해서 첫째, 경제정책의 차이점이 과연 지도자의 리더십 스타일에 따른 것인가의 문제제기와 둘째, 정부의 강력한 개입과 개입 스타일에 있어서 한국과 중국이 다른 형태를 보여주었음에 주목한다. 그것은 최고 지도자의 스타일과 경제정책의 운영에 차이가 있었기 때문이며 이러한 차이점이 두 지도자간의 리더십 차이점에서 비롯된 것인가 하는 문제에 대해서 살펴보았다. 3. 결론 첫째, 박정희와 등소평의 경제정책의 차이점은 두 지도자의 리더십 스타일에 기인한 것이 아니라 르윈의 주장처럼 그가 부딪히고 있는 복합적 상황적 요소 즉 사회적 환경의 변화 및 특수한 정치 환경의 특색 때문인 것이다. 둘째, 정부의 강력한 개입과 개입 스타일에 있어 한국과 중국이 달랐던 것은 최고 지도자의 리더십에 차이가 있었기 때문이며 경제정책의 차이점 또한 두 지도자의 리더십 차이에 기인한다고 결론내릴 수 있다. 셋째, 강력한 리더십으로 국민을 빈곤에서 탈출시켰던 박정희, 등소평의 ‘경제발전’은 지도자에게 무엇보다도 우선시되어야 할 목적이자 목표였던 것이다.
국 문 초 록 1. 취지 박정희와 등소평이 되살아나고 있다. 근래의 논의에서 학자들은 박정희의 경제정책에 관해 부정론을 제시하는가 하면, ‘선성장 후보완’이라는 긍정론을 제시하기도 하였다. 이에 본 논문은 박정희와 등소평의 리더십 스타일과 경제정책을 다음과 같이 비교 하였다. 첫째, 리더십의 개념, 내용, 학자들의 분류 둘째, 의사결정 및 박정희, 등소평의 리더십의 공통점과 차이점 셋째, 박정희 정권, 등소평 국가 정책의 목표 넷째, 박정희 등소평 정권의 리더십 차이점과 정책의 차이점 2. 연구의 내용 연구의 비교를 통해서 첫째, 경제정책의 차이점이 과연 지도자의 리더십 스타일에 따른 것인가의 문제제기와 둘째, 정부의 강력한 개입과 개입 스타일에 있어서 한국과 중국이 다른 형태를 보여주었음에 주목한다. 그것은 최고 지도자의 스타일과 경제정책의 운영에 차이가 있었기 때문이며 이러한 차이점이 두 지도자간의 리더십 차이점에서 비롯된 것인가 하는 문제에 대해서 살펴보았다. 3. 결론 첫째, 박정희와 등소평의 경제정책의 차이점은 두 지도자의 리더십 스타일에 기인한 것이 아니라 르윈의 주장처럼 그가 부딪히고 있는 복합적 상황적 요소 즉 사회적 환경의 변화 및 특수한 정치 환경의 특색 때문인 것이다. 둘째, 정부의 강력한 개입과 개입 스타일에 있어 한국과 중국이 달랐던 것은 최고 지도자의 리더십에 차이가 있었기 때문이며 경제정책의 차이점 또한 두 지도자의 리더십 차이에 기인한다고 결론내릴 수 있다. 셋째, 강력한 리더십으로 국민을 빈곤에서 탈출시켰던 박정희, 등소평의 ‘경제발전’은 지도자에게 무엇보다도 우선시되어야 할 목적이자 목표였던 것이다.
Leadership Styles and Economic Policies : The Cases of Park Jung-hee and Deng Xio Ping - The Purpose and Significance of Study - In recent discussions, amid criticism of Park Jung-hee''s economic policies, some scholars presented their view that Deng Xio Ping''s ''economy-first'' policy was modeled ...
Leadership Styles and Economic Policies : The Cases of Park Jung-hee and Deng Xio Ping - The Purpose and Significance of Study - In recent discussions, amid criticism of Park Jung-hee''s economic policies, some scholars presented their view that Deng Xio Ping''s ''economy-first'' policy was modeled after Park''s economic development pattern; and foreign leaders talked about positive sides of Park Jung-hee and Deng Xio Ping''s leadership. In addition, Kak Choong Kim, CEO and Chairman of Kyungbang Co., LTD, and former chairman of the Federation of Korean Industries said, "Political leaders should now become the CEO of the country." Taking examples from former Korean President Park Jung-hee, French President De Gaulle, and Chinese leader Deng Xio Ping, he emphasized that he was sincerely expecting to see a leader with strong leadership and great statesmanship. Korea was admitted to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development as its 29th member in December 1996. It was expanded from its former body, that was, the Organization for European Economic Cooperation, when the US and Canada became members on September 30, 1961. With the admission, Korea joined the league of industrialized nations. In case of China, as mentioned in Deng''s statement during his visit to the country''s southern region, and in the decision made at the 14th session of China''s Communist Party Congress, the goal was set: to reform the socialist economy. Ever since the successor to GATT (General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade), that is, WTO (World Trade Organization) was inaugurated in 1995, China tried continuously to join it. Eventually China acquired a full membership of WTO on December 11, 2001. China''s economic stature has been strengthened with the acceleration of reform and market liberalization. As Korea was hit hard by the Asian foreign exchange crisis in the late 1990s, various views were presented concerning the negative sides of Park''s government-led economic policies, linking the government-led economic policies with the financial crisis of the nation. Amid such views, however, positive views of Park''s development pattern is resurfacing. Currently, China''s major concern is whether China will be able to maintain its political stability in the future. The expression "Dead Deng Xio Ping is guarding Jiang Zemin" shows the resurrection of Deng at this time when China is faced with economic and social problems, and thus requires the leadership''s crisis management skills under the political system. Few world leaders enjoy such extreme evaluations like Park does. In Deng''s case, he will never be freed from judgment of history. As a captive of Tianenmun Square, he may be hit by two extreme evaluations just like Park. What is common in the resurrection of Park and Deng is that both leaders pulled their country out of extreme poverty through economic reform. This article analyzes the similarities and differences of the two leaders'' leadership; and then compares their economic policies, and the styles of governmental involvement in Korea and China, and proves the influence of their leadership on the nation''s economic policies. - Scope and Focus of Study - Although there are negative views on the way of pursuing development through economic reform, this study focuses on the positive views of the economic policies of Park and Deng, which is the general trend. In addition to different social phenomena, there are differences in their way of practicing economic policies, in the way of the governmental involvement, which derive from the leadership styles at the top. - Composition of the Article - Chapter 1: Purpose and significance of the study on the relationship between the policies and leadership in Korea and China. Chapter 2: Definition of leadership, various theories and types of leadership Chapter 3: Political, economic, and social phenomena and decision making processes of Korea and China Analysis of similarities and differences between the leadership of Park and Deng. Chapter 4: Park''s Economic, foreign, and defense policies Deng''s economic, foreign policy, and political reforms Comparison of Park and Deng in their policies and types of leadership Chapter 5: Conclusion Summary and limits of the study and policy suggestions - The end -
Leadership Styles and Economic Policies : The Cases of Park Jung-hee and Deng Xio Ping - The Purpose and Significance of Study - In recent discussions, amid criticism of Park Jung-hee''s economic policies, some scholars presented their view that Deng Xio Ping''s ''economy-first'' policy was modeled after Park''s economic development pattern; and foreign leaders talked about positive sides of Park Jung-hee and Deng Xio Ping''s leadership. In addition, Kak Choong Kim, CEO and Chairman of Kyungbang Co., LTD, and former chairman of the Federation of Korean Industries said, "Political leaders should now become the CEO of the country." Taking examples from former Korean President Park Jung-hee, French President De Gaulle, and Chinese leader Deng Xio Ping, he emphasized that he was sincerely expecting to see a leader with strong leadership and great statesmanship. Korea was admitted to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development as its 29th member in December 1996. It was expanded from its former body, that was, the Organization for European Economic Cooperation, when the US and Canada became members on September 30, 1961. With the admission, Korea joined the league of industrialized nations. In case of China, as mentioned in Deng''s statement during his visit to the country''s southern region, and in the decision made at the 14th session of China''s Communist Party Congress, the goal was set: to reform the socialist economy. Ever since the successor to GATT (General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade), that is, WTO (World Trade Organization) was inaugurated in 1995, China tried continuously to join it. Eventually China acquired a full membership of WTO on December 11, 2001. China''s economic stature has been strengthened with the acceleration of reform and market liberalization. As Korea was hit hard by the Asian foreign exchange crisis in the late 1990s, various views were presented concerning the negative sides of Park''s government-led economic policies, linking the government-led economic policies with the financial crisis of the nation. Amid such views, however, positive views of Park''s development pattern is resurfacing. Currently, China''s major concern is whether China will be able to maintain its political stability in the future. The expression "Dead Deng Xio Ping is guarding Jiang Zemin" shows the resurrection of Deng at this time when China is faced with economic and social problems, and thus requires the leadership''s crisis management skills under the political system. Few world leaders enjoy such extreme evaluations like Park does. In Deng''s case, he will never be freed from judgment of history. As a captive of Tianenmun Square, he may be hit by two extreme evaluations just like Park. What is common in the resurrection of Park and Deng is that both leaders pulled their country out of extreme poverty through economic reform. This article analyzes the similarities and differences of the two leaders'' leadership; and then compares their economic policies, and the styles of governmental involvement in Korea and China, and proves the influence of their leadership on the nation''s economic policies. - Scope and Focus of Study - Although there are negative views on the way of pursuing development through economic reform, this study focuses on the positive views of the economic policies of Park and Deng, which is the general trend. In addition to different social phenomena, there are differences in their way of practicing economic policies, in the way of the governmental involvement, which derive from the leadership styles at the top. - Composition of the Article - Chapter 1: Purpose and significance of the study on the relationship between the policies and leadership in Korea and China. Chapter 2: Definition of leadership, various theories and types of leadership Chapter 3: Political, economic, and social phenomena and decision making processes of Korea and China Analysis of similarities and differences between the leadership of Park and Deng. Chapter 4: Park''s Economic, foreign, and defense policies Deng''s economic, foreign policy, and political reforms Comparison of Park and Deng in their policies and types of leadership Chapter 5: Conclusion Summary and limits of the study and policy suggestions - The end -
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.